![]() |
Suspension UPGRADE - Shock/Spring Pkg vs. Coilover System - Which to choose?
I want to upgrade my suspension so that I can run my car as a somewhat comfortable daily driver, but also be able to take it to track days every month or two and have it perform well. I think many of you would agree, keeping stock shocks and doing an upgrade like this: http://www.ft86speedfactory.com/ft-8...-kit-1152.html won't cut it for track at least. I have a few options in mind (see below) and I would really appreciate some constructive responses.
*I understand that yes it is non-adjustable vs. adjustable. Keeping that in mind I really have no idea how often I would actually adjust ride height realistically. If there is a better option than the ones I have listed below please offer the suggestion so I can take it into account. Thank you. Would really like to hear from @Racecomp Engineering @CSG David @CSG Mike and @FT-86 SpeedFactory 1) Bilstein B8 Package(RCE Yellow) - http://www.ft86speedfactory.com/bils...llow-1421.html 2) Bilstein B8 Package(RCE Tarmac) - http://www.ft86speedfactory.com/bils...rmac-1422.html 3) Bilstein B8 Package(Pro-Kit) - http://www.ft86speedfactory.com/bils...-kit-1424.html 4) Bilstein B8 Package(Sportline) - http://www.ft86speedfactory.com/bils...line-1423.html 5) Bilstein B14 PSS Coilovers - http://www.ft86speedfactory.com/bils...vers-1216.html 6) Skunk2 Pro-C Coilovers - http://www.ft86speedfactory.com/skun...vers-1725.html 7) KW V1 Coilovers - http://www.ft86speedfactory.com/kw-v...vers-1001.html 8) Fortune Auto V5 500 Series- http://www.ft86speedfactory.com/fort...lover-206.html What should I go with? |
What is your budget?
|
$1,400-1,500
|
I'll be ordering these in a week or so...
http://www.ft86speedfactory.com/rce-...s-brz-797.html http://www.rallysportdirect.com/Race...djustable-19mm Then again, I have a slightly different outlook on performance goals, more of an OEM+ |
I'd point you towards the Bilsteins B8 + RCE Tarmacs. You'll reduce the amount of roll, squat, and drive... without compromising much ride quality and durability.
20mm drop will reduce wheel gap, and the spring rate will increase significantly (which it needs to, with the reduced articulation). From all indications, the B8 should have adequate range of damping to match a 5 kg/mm spring. This guy provides an honest review of the setup, addressing most of my thoughts/concerns: Link to thread |
Quote:
If you've got really sticky tires, that's one thing. But those bars are overkill for street. |
Quote:
Quote:
|
I have two recommendations; that really come down to what you want.
Bilstein B8 with Tein S-Tech springs maintain good comfort, keep (if not slightly enhance) the cars stock willingness to rotate, and close the wheel gap up - as I suspect that is a motivator here. If you aren't worried about the wheel gap, I would recommend Bilstein B14. |
You may want to consider the Bilstein B6 as well. Apparently they have similar rates to the B8 but with a standard length body (B8 has shorter body). If that's true, then the benefit in using B6 over B8 is that you'll get a little more droop...providing you use a spring that is captive on stock damper length of course. Plus the B6 is cheaper than the B8.
|
Quote:
Also, what do you mean a little more droop? and "providing you use a spring that is captive on stock damper length of course"? If you could clarify in detail because I am not following due to my ignorance haha. |
On Bilsteins site there is also this,
"What difference is there between BILSTEIN B6 Sport and BILSTEIN B8 Sprint shock absorbers? The BILSTEIN B6 Sport is a mono-tube gas pressure shock absorber designed to dampen wide-ranging vibrations very precisely. Where an oil shock absorber produces an oily foam and creates a spongy driving feeling after a very short distance, the BILSTEIN B6 Sport remains constant, precise and stable. The BILSTEIN B8 Sprint is a mono-tube gas pressure shock absorber specifically designed to be used with lowered vehicles with shorter stroke. It also offers the same advantages as the BILSTEIN B6 Sport shock absorber." On another site.... B6 or B8 Sprint? B6 - Ideal upgrade for standard dampers, all the benefits of B8, but standard length designed to work with standard ride height and lowering springs up to approx 30mm lowering (please note only a guide the key criteria is to ensure location of spring on droop) B8 - Specially designed for lowered sport vehicles. It's a must when sports springs are used with lowering of 30-40 mm or more. Shortened unit ensures spring is correcly located and gives less droop and more predictable control of over/undesteer and sharper responses. (In some cases only B6 will be listed.) I am learning - perhaps you could explain? So RCE Tarmacs would work perfectly fine with the B6's but Eibach Sportlines would work better on the B8's? |
Quote:
Don't be that guy. I've always been a fan of letting springs control body motion. Sway bars do an excellent job of leveling the car during roll, but in other situations, they can prevent each wheel from acting independently. Keep sizes reasonable, unless you're in an SCCA class that benefits from that loophole. Regarding spring choice, you have alot of good options. Pick the ones that give you the amount of comfort you'll need for your driving habits. |
B6 and B8 have similar valving, the differences are:
1. B8 (probably) have a shorter bumpstop up front to allow a little more bump travel. I can't 100% confirm this is true but I believe that it is. 2. B8 have a shorter overall extended length. This means less droop travel (extension) which isn't really a good thing. For our RCE springs you can go either way, and with the B6s being cheaper it makes them a little more appealing. BUT if the B8s do have a shorter internal front bumpstop that is very helpful. There's a couple people running the B8/RCE Tarmac combo with some reviews posted here. It's firm but very well controlled. It will be a very solid "set it and forget it" package that will last a long time. Even for me non-adjustable is kind of appealing. Eibach Sportlines are IMO too low. More of a style spring whereas we focused on function first and even Eibach Pro-kit would be preferable from that standpoint. Bilstein PSS coilovers are a solid option but use progressive springs which I don't prefer. Good quality set-up though. Another option would be RCE T0 coilovers. Based on KW V1 but a little firmer and sport/track oriented. Same nice stainless finish and lifetime warranty. - Andy |
Quote:
|
Quote:
- Andy |
Quote:
I did some more researching with some 86ers who like to track, and from their feedback we concluded that the stock shocks are actually quite capable when paired with the appropriate spring, specifically, your rce yellows, swift and eibach pro kit. Right now I have actually done a bit of a 180 for the time being and have decided to choose between these: http://www.ft86speedfactory.com/ft-8...-rce-1082.html http://www.ft86speedfactory.com/ft-8...rmac-1414.html http://www.ft86speedfactory.com/ft-8...wift-1357.html In the future, say next year, THEN I may want to upgrade the shocks. What do you suggest if I go this route? I can be very analytically so i want to make sure I make the appropriate decision before purchasing. |
Quote:
RCE Yellows are very good springs and we've had a lot of happy track guys with that kit on stock and aftermarket shocks. Ain't nothing wrong with running those springs on stock shocks and upgrading shocks later. :thumbup: - Andy |
I have RCE Yellows on B8s, Raceseng CasCam, SPC rear LCAs, and Eibach bars set to stiff on the front soft on the rear. I really like the car as is, I am dialed in with 0 toe and -3 degrees of camber all around and 255 square setup. The car does well at auto x, and I have had a couple of co-drivers who feel it is set up decently, and it loves to hunt down Porsches in the corners on lapping days. I find it harsh to drive everyday around town but our roads are crap up here.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I run your #2 option. I use my car as a daily driver and for autocross. It is much tighter all around and more evenly balanced than stock. The 3/4" drop still allows me to navigate the city and manage pot holes. I highly recommend it. It is comparable in quality to a 3-4k coilovers system.
|
Bilstein B14 + HVT camber plates
$1400 Done! |
Quote:
If it were me, I'd keep the stock suspension, and get rear LCAs, front camber plates, a good alignment, and run it that way. Cheap coilovers will NOT improve performance (no matter what people tell you); they're strictly useful for dropping the car. Springs on stock dampers, while not a bad medium, will not increase performance as much as getting a proper alignment. Bonus: Camber plates and rear LCAs will not be outgrown, even if you go to top shelf dampers, you will be re-using these parts. :thumbsup: If you insist on spending more money, then I'd get RaceSeng CasCam plates, SPL Rear LCAs, and Swift Spec-R springs on stock dampers. We can package all this together for you, and is actually the exact setup that is on our car at the moment. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
For springs on stock dampers - why Swift Spec-R vs. RCE Yellow or Swift Sport FRS/BRZ ? Do you prefer progressive + it's spring rates? |
Quote:
You'll probably want to cut your bumpstops too. |
I wouldn't use Swift Spec R on stock dampers. They're even stiffer than our Tarmac springs in the rear and IMO that's too much.
Also, cut bumpstops generally aren't preferable compared to a full replacement shorter bumpstop. EDIT: I do agree that camber plates (HVT and Raceseng are good options) and quality rear LCAs are a good thing to think about adding to any track set-up, whether it's with stock springs, lowering springs, or coilovers. - Andy |
While cut bumpstops are not ideal, someone purchasing springs is looking for the most cost effective solution, not the ideal solution.
I absolutely agree that replacing the bumpstops is better than cutting the stock ones. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
There are a few places you can spec out custom ones, but the bumpstops included with our RCE springs (and Eibach + TRD) are the only ones made specifically with the BRZ/FRS in mind. We are not able to sell them separately unfortunately. - Andy |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
How much would it cost for this combination? Is it worth it? |
Quote:
I don't see why you would need to swap the springs as the B14 allows for: Spring Rates (adjustable) Front: 2.5-4.5kg progressive Rear: 3.0-7.0kg progressive Swift Spec R (fixed) Spring Rate (Front): 4.4-kg/mm (245-lb/in) Drop (Front): -28 mm (-1.1 in) Spring Rate (Rear): 5.3-kg/mm (296-lb/in) Drop (Rear): -25 mm (-1.0 in) http://www.ft86speedfactory.com/bils...vers-1216.html http://counterspacegarage.com/produc...scion-frs.html |
Quote:
Or would the ride customization only really come in with the 2 or 3 way adjustable coilovers? IE: KW V3's? Is there a more affordable setup that could smooth out sucky roads from the DD, that can be tweak for the track/autoX when (rarely) needed? |
Quote:
A performance increase is a performance increase. If improves performance on the street, it'll naturally improve track performance. Likewise, track performance means street performance. The two goals for increasing performance are, literally, the same goal. Tracks are not a perfectly smooth surface. They're full of bumps, dips, undulations, and things that upset cars. |
Quote:
It's something I'd be interested in doing, but it adds quite a bit of cost to the kit. - Andy |
Quote:
TEIN's weren't in his initial list. I know you guys love your SRC's. What about the rest of the TEIN lineup, specifically the Mono Sport and Street Flex? It seems the KW's and RCE's get a lot more attention for the $2000 price range. Is there really nothing between just springs and $2000 coilvers that would ride nicely on the street but be an improvement, however minor, on the track? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
What's you and Mike's take on: ST or B14's (or TEIN's)? |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:05 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.