Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB

Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/index.php)
-   Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   UNDERPOWERED? THE REAL DEAL!!! (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=67255)

FRSpappa 06-03-2014 03:33 PM

UNDERPOWERED? THE REAL DEAL!!!
 
Seems like a lot of people are complaining about how under powered these cars are, so thought I would do a little fact finding myself.

Did a HP to weight ratio comparison to some of what I would consider comparable cars from the years. Cars included were: Datsun 240z, Mazda RX7, VW GTI, Miata MX5 and CRX Si.

Guess which car came out on top??? If you said FRS/BRZ you were right!!! The only car even close was the 240z that has a 6 cylinder motor, enough said...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

N1rve 06-03-2014 03:41 PM

I think @humfrz calculated this before.

nyfries 06-03-2014 03:41 PM

Sadly most of the cars you have been comparing have also receive complain from being underpower over the year :p

trogdor007 06-03-2014 03:57 PM

You got some stats or data we can see instead of simply stating the conclusion? It makes it easier to visualize.

Rampage 06-03-2014 04:13 PM

While I 100% agree with your findings and your opinion that the twins are not underpowered, you and I are both living in the past. The "kids" today are spoiled by mundane family sedans, SUVs and mini-Vans that come from the factory with 260-295HP. These people movers are quick in a straight line which comes in handy when merging with traffic on a 70MPH (80MPH actual) interstate. They cannot fathom a sports car than cannot outrun these everyday cars from a stoplight or blow past them easily during a passing attempt even if said soccer mom driven appliance does not wished to be passed.

What they forget is that those vehicles would roll over or plow off the road, front end first, if they attempted to chase a twin through a slalom or a set of switch backs up in the hills.

They also ignore the fact that the twins are fast. They can reach a top speed of 145MPH which is something most of those family haulers cannot do because they have the aerodynamics of a brick. That type of top speed is also something that the sporty cars of the past you listed could not match.

You will never convince the ones that want more power that they do not need it and will seldom use it if they do pay the big bucks to get it. It will take years of experience and thousands of dollars wasted before they will come to that conclusion on their own.

MokSpeed 06-03-2014 04:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rampage (Post 1775940)
While I 100% agree with your findings and your opinion that the twins are not underpowered, you and I are both living in the past. The "kids" today are spoiled by mundane family sedans, SUVs and mini-Vans that come from the factory with 260-295HP. These people movers are quick in a straight line which comes in handy when merging with traffic on a 70MPH (80MPH actual) interstate. They cannot fathom a sports car than cannot outrun these everyday cars from a stoplight or blow past them easily during a passing attempt even if said soccer mom driven appliance does not wished to be passed.

What they forget is that those vehicles would roll over or plow off the road, front end first, if they attempted to chase a twin through a slalom or a set of switch backs up in the hills.

They also ignore the fact that the twins are fast. They can reach a top speed of 145MPH which is something most of those family haulers cannot do because they have the aerodynamics of a brick. That type of top speed is also something that the sporty cars of the past you listed could not match.

You will never convince the ones that want more power that they do not need it and will seldom use it if they do pay the big bucks to get it. It will take years of experience and thousands of dollars wasted before they will come to that conclusion on their own.

Don't forget to include the fact that the average consumer now expects to be spoon fed information. The most research some will do is look at the brochure and that's being optimistic. Many people fail to look at the car as a whole in terms of what they're buying. It's like they see that HP/Torque specs in bold and bright red lettering and treat everything else as Egyptian.

blackhawkdown 06-03-2014 04:43 PM

back in the day, i thought my Acura Integra LS 140hp & 127 lbs of torque was fast!

MokSpeed 06-03-2014 04:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackhawkdown (Post 1776014)
back in the day, i thought my Acura Integra LS 140hp & 127 lbs of torque was fast!

My GS-R was a beast! :burnrubber:

NWFRS 06-03-2014 05:00 PM

These modern cars with high redlines take some getting used to as well. A lot of us are missing that low-end torque that our previous cars had. Our Twins perform better in almost every measurable way. Power delivery just feels different. My Old first-gen Celicas basically had truck motors, same with my MR2.

ichitaka05 06-03-2014 05:15 PM

If you can't drive 200hp car fast, extra 20~100hp ain't gonna help ya

Nevermore 06-03-2014 05:22 PM

My Mazda 626 felt pretty fast... And this car has like 70 more hp and weighs a lot less. I think it's fast. *Shrugs*

Gearbanger 06-03-2014 05:34 PM

When its slower then a new v6 camry its slow.

ichitaka05 06-03-2014 05:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gearbanger (Post 1776144)
When its slower then a new v6 camry its slow.

At the track or autox, that's what they say... til my car make em run for their money.

So in the end, slow car isn't slow because of car. Slow car is slow, cuz of the driver.

Dezoris 06-03-2014 05:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ichitaka05 (Post 1776154)
At the track or autox, that's what they say... til my car make em run for their money.

So in the end, slow car isn't slow because of car. Slow car is slow, cuz of the driver.

My first review video where we track tested the stock FRS at Gingerman, I wanted to do a smart ass segment where Turbowski brought his V6 Accord Sedan on track.

We filmed it and the Accord just blew past on the mile straight but almost did not stop in the corner, after that Accord did not make it one lap before the brakes were absolutely faded out and parked so we never used the footage.

There is truth to the to the track/autox bit but of course 95% of the time these cars roll on the street, where they cant get out of their own way.

Old debate that will never die.

jack43 06-03-2014 05:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by trogdor007 (Post 1775900)
You got some stats or data we can see instead of simply stating the conclusion? It makes it easier to visualize.

http://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=42085

ichitaka05 06-03-2014 05:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dezoris (Post 1776178)
My first review video where we track tested the stock FRS at Gingerman, I wanted to do a smart ass segment where Turbowski brought his V6 Accord Sedan on track.

We filmed it and the Accord just blew past on the mile straight but almost did not stop in the corner, after that Accord did not make it one lap before the brakes were absolutely faded out and parked so we never used the footage.

There is truth to the to the track/autox bit but of course 95% of the time these cars roll on the street, where they cant get out of their own way.

Old debate that will never die.

On the stress I just ignore em. They don't have balls to track it to prove it. All show no go.

Davey 06-03-2014 06:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gearbanger (Post 1776144)
When its slower then a new v6 camry its slow.

Yeah, imagine the excitement as you mash the gas and hold the wheel straight in that Camry. Oh boy, now we're racing... So much more enjoyable than a BRZ/FR-S because it's .6 seconds faster to 60 I bet. And that quarter mile time, wow, 7/10 faster. I bet that Camry is a real barn burning neck snapping hot rod, isn't it.

continuecrushing 06-03-2014 06:04 PM

aaaaaaaannnnnnnndddddddd...........we're still slow

Dezoris 06-03-2014 06:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ichitaka05 (Post 1776191)
On the stress I just ignore em. They don't have balls to track it to prove it. All show no go.


I hear you on that.

Masago88 06-03-2014 06:36 PM

Oh man what am I going to tell Vin Diesel and Tommy Rice Rocket the next time the whole gang from Fast & Furious 15 want to go Tokyo Duriiifto? A car in and of itself is a waste of money. Power junkies advocate for spending even more of your hard earned dollars to use more power even less of the time because....everybody is some street racer in their mind. People don't have lives outside of their cars, real careers, other bills to pay or heaven forbid other hobbies to enjoy that don't revolve around pea-cocking your car theoretical figures in a parking lot with other like-minded tools.

bedabi 06-03-2014 06:38 PM

My 9 y.o. son was riding shotgun in my BRZ while we were behind my wife in her 2.0T Sonata at a red light. When the light turned green, my wife took off pretty quickly and I had to work a bit to keep up, nearly redlining before shifting. My son noticed and said, "Wow, mom's car is pretty fast." I agreed.

Then he said, "But your car feels a lot faster!"

At 9, he gets what magazine racers don't. :iono:

chas3wba0 06-03-2014 06:39 PM

So you're telling me (for the 274th time)... that my car is slower to 60 than a V6 Camry?

https://i.chzbgr.com/maxW500/5165239040/h5032EE05/

airjonny 06-03-2014 06:50 PM

Those cars are older than many of us on this forum. It's 2014. If I'm a spoiled brat to think that a sports car should be faster than a grocery getter, oh well.

mav1178 06-03-2014 07:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ichitaka05 (Post 1776154)
At the track or autox, that's what they say... til my car make em run for their money.

So in the end, slow car isn't slow because of car. Slow car is slow, cuz of the driver.

It's why my license plate is the way it is... if I pass you at the track, you're doing something wrong.

http://i.imgur.com/Z8t4Oh6.jpg

-alex

Rampage 06-03-2014 07:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mav1178 (Post 1776309)
It's why my license plate is the way it is... if I pass you at the track, you're doing something wrong.

Or you might be in the wrong car. For example; something like a V6 Camry.

mav1178 06-03-2014 07:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rampage (Post 1776404)
Or you might be in the wrong car. For example; something like a V6 Camry.

Nah, 4-cylinder 2005 Camry here.

-alex

tahdizzle 06-03-2014 07:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mav1178 (Post 1776408)
Nah, 4-cylinder 2005 Camry here.

-alex

A scion tC?

Tromatic 06-03-2014 08:05 PM

Whiners gonna whine. Maybe they got lemons, 'cuz my little FR-S is awesome.

fatoni 06-03-2014 09:02 PM

in these threads nobody is even speaking to the same points. the cars are slow. it does other things well but its slow. yes, a camry or even a mustang wont feel as fun or inspiring. that doesnt make the frs any faster though.

Davey 06-03-2014 09:07 PM

It makes it faster at winning my heart. :wub:

Rampage 06-03-2014 09:37 PM

I guess some of us have different definitions of what is "fast", what is "quick" and what is "slow". Maybe it takes being over 40 and having the experience of driving many cars to really appreciate the FR-S/BRZ for what the are.

I just hate seeing every new person that comes to this forum being constantly bombarded with the rhetoric about how slow this car is. Then they think that the only way to make this car decent is to spend a ton of money supercharging or turbocharging it. At the same time, many of the early adopters who used to preach that gospel and have gone the FI route have already dumped their mistakes on someone else, gone back to stock to recoup what money they can and sold the car or blown up an engine or two.

civdaddy 06-03-2014 09:48 PM

Anybody ever on niccoclub.com or any other 240sx forum when they first came out? I wonder if people bitched as much about their power as well??

Hot Lava 06-03-2014 09:50 PM

It's fast where it counts. Shredding corners on my stock donuts in my stock FR-S is many times the thrill I experienced lighting up tires in my sick built to the balls 3/4 race old gold Chevy. Hell, bet very few of the current crowd has even heard of or knows what a 3/4 race is. 800hp street cars were common in my day. It's been done so lets move along kiddies.

AVodka14 06-03-2014 09:57 PM

Of course it's slow. Was that a surprise? If so, research was not performed by the buyer. That would be disappointing. I knew the car was going to be slow below 4k rpm. It's a high revving motor high performance motor. That's my favorite stuff. Plenty of room to play around with it. It was built to be modified per owner's taste.

italy7 06-03-2014 10:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Davey (Post 1776200)
Yeah, imagine the excitement as you mash the gas and hold the wheel straight in that Camry. Oh boy, now we're racing... So much more enjoyable than a BRZ/FR-S because it's .6 seconds faster to 60 I bet. And that quarter mile time, wow, 7/10 faster. I bet that Camry is a real barn burning neck snapping hot rod, isn't it.

This man speaketh the truth :laughabove: I own a v6 camry and it really isn't fun to drive. Good car, just not fun to drive and no stick shift in the v6 :lol:

Tromatic 06-03-2014 10:07 PM

I'm starting to suspect that the people who complain about the power have no interest in the other aspects of the car. Sucks to be them.

Marco_86 06-03-2014 10:18 PM

don't bash me as this is a serious question.. what rwd 2.0 n/a car that costs less than 27k is faster than the frs??

Muaddib 06-03-2014 10:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marco_86 (Post 1776719)
don't bash me as this is a serious question.. what rwd 2.0 n/a car that costs less than 27k is faster than the frs??

The S2000.

Marco_86 06-03-2014 10:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Muaddib (Post 1776727)
The S2000.

lol I said for 27k the s2000 was around 10k more than that new..

Turbo95eg6 06-03-2014 10:29 PM

Surprised of all the underpowered threads people still keep posting up.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:26 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.


Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.