Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB

Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/index.php)
-   Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Premium gas, or? (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=6184)

NotlocTRD 05-13-2012 09:08 PM

Premium gas, or?
 
Hi folks,

Does the FR-S/BRZ HAVE to run on premium gas, or could it run on regular/mid and still function efficiently? Would it hurt the engine to run mid grade or regular? Would Scion advertise Premium as getting the most performance or would it run the risk of damaging something if anything else is used?

Thanks!

fistpoint 05-13-2012 09:14 PM

Says use premium.

In all those cases I do believe it is safe to use the lesser gas, but it results in less power and possibly less efficiency which both offset the savings. So you'd wind up spending the same amount overall, but with less power.

Lonewolf 05-13-2012 09:15 PM

Premium gas is required. In an emergency you can fill it up with less, and the car will pull timing, but the car will run like crap.

Premium gas is only 20 cents more per gallon than regular. Is it really worth potentially harming your engine in car that you just paid nearly 30G's for to save twenty cents a gallon?

Plus this car has very high compression, you are risking knock and pinging by running less than premium, and that is bad, mmkay?

Mari0 05-13-2012 09:16 PM

Many threads on this one :search:

It still never seizes to amaze me how people are ready to pay $25k+ for a car and are willing to be cheap on gas.

Not an expert on engines and fuels but I am guessing if it's optimized to run on premium, anything else would give you shitty results and might hurt your engine.

They win nothing by advertising it as premium as they don't get $ from you whether you use premium or regular. If anything, they might lose some potential customers by saying you need premium. Point is, if they are saying you need it, you do. It will run on regular but do you want to put your car through that?

This was a long way of saying, if you are gonna buy a brand new car for over $25k, don't be a cheap a** when it comes to filling it up. :bonk:

Smitty_89 05-13-2012 09:16 PM

I may be wrong but I think cars nowadays have technology to detect the use of lesser gas and the engine performs accordingly, so yes you get lesser performance but I do not believe you can damage or hurt you engine if you went with lesser gas for a few weeks or something. I would of course never do that and would always buy what the manufacturers suggests but its not the end of the world if you accidentally fill up on lesser gas once or twice.

Edit: I was wrong, so ignore everything I said. lol

Alias 05-13-2012 09:21 PM

If you can't afford the 20 cents extra you shouldn't even dream of buying this car.

You're talking about 2 bucks or so whenever you fill up, does that REALLY matter?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Smitty_89 (Post 210545)
Please correct me if Im wrong

You're wrong, it actually can damage your engine.

Genomaxter 05-13-2012 09:24 PM

You can indeed damage your engine if you run regular. Due to the high compression, it needs the 91 (minimum) octane to operate normally. If you put regular and then go into a heavy load situation, your engine will start to knock. It will pull timing but at the same time is also trying to meet the required torque demand (pedal position) and will start a nasty cycle of retard and advancing. Knock destroys engines if it happens far too often over a period of time or too much at once. You want to be cheap? Start by not paying 25k + on a car like this.

In short, dont buy this car if you want to run regular. Your wasting money.

Xdragonxb0i 05-13-2012 09:31 PM

if you calculate the cost of premium, it is an aprox an extra $5 dollars, that is a value meal

NotlocTRD 05-13-2012 09:31 PM

Just to clear things up, I have no objection to buying premium gas for the FR-S. A buddy asked me if I knew anything about it and if it was designed to utilize the lesser but perform the best with the high test, but I had no idea so I thought you guys might know more about it.

YukiHachiRoku 05-13-2012 09:35 PM

don't cheap out!

Pekingduck 05-13-2012 10:05 PM

I think out would be okay at lower rpm, but at higher rpm you might cause detonation. With the frs why would you stay at low rpm?

DeeezNuuuts83 05-13-2012 10:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Smitty_89 (Post 210545)
I may be wrong but I think cars nowadays have technology to detect the use of lesser gas and the engine performs accordingly, so yes you get lesser performance but I do not believe you can damage or hurt you engine if you went with lesser gas for a few weeks or something. I would of course never do that and would always buy what the manufacturers suggests but its not the end of the world if you accidentally fill up on lesser gas once or twice.

Edit: I was wrong, so ignore everything I said. lol

Even though you've already been corrected, there are indeed safeguards built into the car, but it's not meant to be an option to use regularly or even sparingly. The ECU will detect it once the engine starts acting up due to the lower octane fuel, and to prevent any further knocking or stuff like that, it will retard timing, which will allow the engine to run without any huge problems (though of course you will lose some power), but it's meant for the event of premium fuel not being available, as opposed to refusing to use it from that point onward.

Some people do tune their cars to utilize lower octane fuel in a safe manner, but again, it's useless to go through that hassle to save 20 cents per gallon at the cost of a certain amount of performance. But some cars nowadays will adjust as intended by the manufacturer. I know one of the Hyundais adjusts its hp and torque depending on the octane used, but in those cases, the "normal" octane to use is 87 while getting more out of a higher octane when used, not the other way around.

russv 05-13-2012 11:11 PM

12.5 compression ratio. Enough said.

Turbowned 05-13-2012 11:30 PM

http://i167.photobucket.com/albums/u...ter/catsez.jpg

michaelahess 05-13-2012 11:48 PM

Just a note, higher elevations generally have lower octane levels, around where I live, 91 is the highest, some places only carry 89. This is not an issue as detonation becomes less of a concern the higher the altitude due to less dense air (so I'm told).

At sea level, I'd always use 93. Up here I'm stuck with 91, and unless I can't get it out of town somewhere, 89 will never be used. My Hemi asks for 91, and there is a noticeable difference in performance with 89 or 87 octane, though I do run 87 from time to time with no adverse effects.

When I used to travel a lot, my '01 Celica was noticeably more peppy with a lower grade of gas at sea level, it's always good to know those cross country trips will usually end in a better performing car for a week or two. ;)

Symbiont 05-14-2012 12:01 AM

Unfortunately, you can't really buy 93 in California easily. Time for Torco?

86design 05-14-2012 02:42 AM

you want to put 91 on your FRS/BRZ....I know gas prices are tough at the moment...but don't harm the engine with lesser gas...91!! if you don't want a sports car get a hybrid or something that has 40 mpg...just my 2 cents..

dookie11 05-14-2012 03:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 86design (Post 210838)
you want to put 91 on your FRS/BRZ....I know gas prices are tough at the moment...but don't harm the engine with lesser gas...91!! if you don't want a sports car get a hybrid or something that has 40 mpg...just my 2 cents..

I use 91 on my dinosaur, so why should you on your brand new car? Don't be a cheapo ;)

MRZ415 05-14-2012 04:45 AM

As of tonight I saw prices near me as
$4.49 for 87
$4.59 for 89
$4.69 for 91...

and $4.29 for Diesel #2 (w00t for my tdi at least for now )

WhiteGDB 05-14-2012 05:14 AM

13.2 gal tank. Avg fill up, 11-12 gal. 12 x $0.20 = $2.40 or $7.20/month if you fill up three times a month. I suggest you skip a lunch each month if you can't afford that.

ngabdala 05-14-2012 08:48 AM

Too much risk with unleaded and you are going to have to use more gas just to get your car to move.

StuttterButtter 05-14-2012 09:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WhiteGDB (Post 210916)
13.2 gal tank. Avg fill up, 11-12 gal. 12 x $0.20 = $2.40 or $7.20/month if you fill up three times a month. I suggest you skip a lunch each month if you can't afford that.

I'm fine with skipping lunch to drive this car. 7.20= fast food around hear so and its bad for you anyways.

91 in my area is about 3.79$ a gallon and reg is about 3.49

Turbowned 05-14-2012 09:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MRZ415 (Post 210911)
As of tonight I saw prices near me as
$4.49 for 87
$4.59 for 89
$4.69 for 91...

and $4.29 for Diesel #2 (w00t for my tdi at least for now )

$4.05 for 93 in the People's Republic of Massachusetts. Man, you guys really get f****d living in Cali!

terrypm 05-14-2012 10:46 AM

I wonder what the owners manual states about using 100% gas or the blended gas with 10% ethanol? I know the ethanol blended gas has less energy than 100% gas so you get worse gas mileage with it.

Gas prices near me:

10% ethanol
87- $3.28
89- 3.38
91- 3.52

100% gas
87- 3.54
89- 3.79
91- 3.90

Turbowned 05-14-2012 12:00 PM

We don't have that option here... Stuck with 10% ethanol blend. Ethanol has more energy, but burns faster as a result.

SpeedR 05-14-2012 12:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Turbowned (Post 211143)
We don't have that option here... Stuck with 10% ethanol blend. Ethanol has more energy, but burns faster as a result.


E85 contains roughly 1/3 less energy than gasoline per gallon.


But when you add the 1/3 more fuel needed to make things equal you get other benefits that make a big difference if you are running a turbo car.

Turbowned 05-14-2012 01:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SpeedR (Post 211164)
E85 contains roughly 1/3 less energy than gasoline per gallon.


But when you add the 1/3 more fuel needed to make things equal you get other benefits that make a big difference if you are running a turbo car.

Ahh, my bad. I knew it was something like that, just got it mixed up.

DeeezNuuuts83 05-14-2012 01:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Symbiont (Post 210708)
Unfortunately, you can't really buy 93 in California easily. Time for Torco?

That doesn't really matter much, since cars today sold in the U.S. are tuned from the factory to run on 91 octane, not that higher octane is a bad thing.

Quote:

Originally Posted by MRZ415 (Post 210911)
As of tonight I saw prices near me as
$4.49 for 87
$4.59 for 89
$4.69 for 91...

and $4.29 for Diesel #2 (w00t for my tdi at least for now )

That sucks. I guess I shouldn't complain about paying $4.41/gallon for 91 octane this morning in Orange County (though I was expecting it to come back down a bit after this past weekend).

terrypm 05-14-2012 03:50 PM

from Wikipedia:

Ethanol contains approx. 34% less energy per unit volume than gasoline, and therefore in theory, burning pure ethanol in a vehicle will result in a 34% reduction in miles per US gallon, given the same fuel economy, compared to burning pure gasoline. Since ethanol has a higher octane rating, the engine can be made more efficient by raising its compression ratio. In fact using a variable turbocharger, the compression ratio can be optimized for the fuel being used, making fuel economy almost constant for any blend.[25][26] For E10 (10% ethanol and 90% gasoline), the effect is small (~3%) when compared to conventional gasoline,[55] and even smaller (1-2%) when compared to oxygenated and reformulated blends.[56] For E85 (85% ethanol), the effect becomes significant. E85 will produce lower mileage than gasoline, and will require more frequent refueling. Actual performance may vary depending on the vehicle. Based on EPA tests for all 2006 E85 models, the average fuel economy for E85 vehicles resulted 25.56% lower than unleaded gasoline.[57] The EPA-rated mileage of current USA flex-fuel vehicles[58] should be considered when making price comparisons, but E85 is a high performance fuel, with an octane rating of about 94-96, and should be compared to premium.[59

WolfpackS2k 05-14-2012 04:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MRZ415 (Post 210911)
As of tonight I saw prices near me as
$4.49 for 87
$4.59 for 89
$4.69 for 91...

and $4.29 for Diesel #2 (w00t for my tdi at least for now )

yeah have fun with that over in the land of [s]crazy people[/s] California.

Here in Raleigh, NC premium 93 is around $3.89 most places :clap:

thill 05-14-2012 04:04 PM

Premium at Costco and Sams is $3.68 right now outside of Minneapolis.

Allch Chcar 05-14-2012 07:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ngabdala (Post 210977)
Too much risk with unleaded and you are going to have to use more gas just to get your car to move.

It's perfectly fine to run regular, knock sensors are standard now. But since the FA20 is designed for Premium it's going to run less efficient on regular making the end cost the same or negligible.

OP, run the highest grade unleaded 93 AKI octane if you can, you won't regret it.

Quote:

Originally Posted by terrypm (Post 211072)
I wonder what the owners manual states about using 100% gas or the blended gas with 10% ethanol? I know the ethanol blended gas has less energy than 100% gas so you get worse gas mileage with it.

Gas prices near me:

10% ethanol
87- $3.28
89- 3.38
91- 3.52

100% gas
87- 3.54
89- 3.79
91- 3.90

In some states, only premium grades can be Ethanol free. The Twins' manual(it's like page 272 or something) says 10% Ethanol is perfectly fine, it's even tuned specifically for it, but it says to not run anything beyond that. Disappointing if, like me, you want to run E85 but that's normal for all sporty cars. :iono:

Quote:

Originally Posted by terrypm (Post 211505)
from Wikipedia:

Ethanol contains approx. 34% less energy per unit volume than gasoline, and therefore in theory, burning pure ethanol in a vehicle will result in a 34% reduction in miles per US gallon, given the same fuel economy, compared to burning pure gasoline. Since ethanol has a higher octane rating, the engine can be made more efficient by raising its compression ratio. In fact using a variable turbocharger, the compression ratio can be optimized for the fuel being used, making fuel economy almost constant for any blend.[25][26] For E10 (10% ethanol and 90% gasoline), the effect is small (~3%) when compared to conventional gasoline,[55] and even smaller (1-2%) when compared to oxygenated and reformulated blends.[56] For E85 (85% ethanol), the effect becomes significant. E85 will produce lower mileage than gasoline, and will require more frequent refueling. Actual performance may vary depending on the vehicle. Based on EPA tests for all 2006 E85 models, the average fuel economy for E85 vehicles resulted 25.56% lower than unleaded gasoline.[57] The EPA-rated mileage of current USA flex-fuel vehicles[58] should be considered when making price comparisons, but E85 is a high performance fuel, with an octane rating of about 94-96, and should be compared to premium.[59

Ethanol has less energy per gallon, so it's more expensive than you would think, but it makes more power. E85 is the bees' knees for hotrods.

BTW, the EPA does not test MPG on any Ethanol content. They calculate the MPG for all cars based on BTU content.

Subie 05-14-2012 07:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Allch Chcar (Post 211856)
It's perfectly fine to run regular, knock sensors are standard now. But since the FA20 is designed for Premium it's going to run less efficient on regular making the end cost the same or negligible.

I'm sorry but that's not true. Yes, it does have knock sensors, and it WILL pull timing, but that can only do so much. The engine may still knock under certain driving conditions which will damage it over time. The FA20/4U-GSE requires premium fuel. It's exactly what it sounds like.

Allch Chcar 05-14-2012 08:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Subie (Post 211862)
I'm sorry but that's not true. Yes, it does have knock sensors, and it WILL pull timing, but that can only do so much. The engine may still knock under certain driving conditions which will damage it over time. The FA20/4U-GSE requires premium fuel. It's exactly what it sounds like.

I must ask you to prove it then. Nothing that I've seen or read says that a factory ECU cannot compensate enough for regular grade. I have even seen people run regular on "premium only" engines for many years without a problem.

Edit: Since it's common knowledge and you are refuting it. I did make the initial statement so I will add that you can do a quick search for "can you run regular in a premium engine" and find this.
Why use premium gas when regular will do?

Quote:

The main advantage of premium-grade gas is that it allows automakers to advertise a few more horsepower by designing and tuning engines to take advantage of premium's anti-knock properties. But auto engineers generally agree that if you use regular in a premium engine, the power loss is so slight, most drivers can't tell.
Quote:

The only modern engines that should really need premium are those with superchargers, which force-feed fuel into the cylinders. "You're driving along and just tramp the gas and the knock sensor cannot sense the knock fast enough in some cases," because the supercharger boosts pressure so fast, says Bob Furey, chemist and fuels specialist at General Motors.

Burning regular when the owner's manual specifies premium won't void the warranty, nor damage the engine, even the most finicky automakers say. "You're giving up perhaps just a little bit of performance that a customer wouldn't really even notice, it's so slight," says Furey.
I still say run the highest grade available. It's not like it's expensive. :iono:

Subie 05-14-2012 08:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Allch Chcar (Post 211944)
I must ask you to prove it then. Nothing that I've seen or read says that a factory ECU cannot compensate enough for regular grade. I have even seen people run regular on "premium only" engines for many years without a problem.

I can't personally prove it, but reading an article such as this one will provide insight into the difference between "premium recommended" and "premium required."

DeeezNuuuts83 05-14-2012 08:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Allch Chcar (Post 211944)
I have even seen people run regular on "premium only" engines for many years without a problem.

But on what kinds of cars? Some can deal with it better, especially if they are not highly tuned with pretty high compression ratios or boosted.

A friend of mine who used to work at Enterprise Rent-A-Car said that they never put anything over 87 octane in their cars, but again, it's not as if they have sports cars in their regular inventory. This came up in discussion when he and I rented a Mercedes E350 for a trip. And again, the E350 isn't a slouch, but it doesn't have the most technologically advanced engine on the market.

Allch Chcar 05-14-2012 09:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Subie (Post 211953)
I can't personally prove it, but reading an article such as this one will provide insight into the difference between "premium recommended" and "premium required."

That list doesn't include the Twins. I'm going to check the manual again since I know it covered this.

Subie 05-14-2012 09:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Allch Chcar (Post 211965)
That list doesn't include the Twins. I'm going to check the manual again since I know it covered this.

Please report back when you've done so.

iDriveFast 05-14-2012 09:06 PM

They made the car to run on premium so use premium. Its not like the genesis coupe where they actually tell you that you can use regular or premium.

Allch Chcar 05-14-2012 09:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Subie (Post 211968)
Please report back when you've done so.

This is all I could find in the BRZ manual.

Quote:

Fuel types

Unleaded gasoline (93 AKI [Research Octane Number 98] or higher)

If unleaded gasoline with an octane rating of 93 AKI (98 RON) is not avail-
able, unleaded gasoline with an octane rating of 91 AKI (95 RON) may be
used with no detriment to engine durability or driveability.
I don't have a copy of the FRS manual ATM.:bonk:

Edit: Looks like premium is required, I couldn't find the FRS manual but I did find one of the press releases saying premium was required. Sorry guys, I thought after reading the entry on fuel 6 times I wouldn't get confused on which grade was required. :(


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:37 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.


Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.