Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB

Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/index.php)
-   Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Insideline: FR-S vs. '85 Corolla GTS (AE86) (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=5091)

poormans_LFA 04-18-2012 02:38 AM

Insideline: FR-S vs. '85 Corolla GTS (AE86)
 
http://www.ft86club.com/forums/third/car2.png
FT86CLUB Homepage Featured Story


http://media.il.edmunds-media.com/sc...411127_717.jpg

Quote:

That Toyota's 1985-'87 Corolla GT-S is a cultural icon and a destination car for an entire generation of enthusiasts appears, on its surface at least, to be a mere accident.

It is not.

Nor will it be for the 2013 Scion FR-S. Mechanically, the two cars share nothing. Spiritually, however, their similarities run deep.

There are powerful reasons the humble Toyota Corolla GT-S — or AE86 as it's known by enthusiasts — remains a highly coveted machine nearly 30 years after entering production. Those reasons have nothing to do with the car's speed, its amenities or its complexity. Rather, it's the 86's fundamentally sound design, low cost and massive potential that give it profound desirability as its third decade approaches.

It's these simple, potent core values on which Scion and Subaru intend to capitalize with the Scion FR-S/Subaru BRZ twins. Here, then, is a look at how Toyota got the simple sports car right the first time and how it intends to get it right again.
more here:
http://www.insideline.com/scion/fr-s...olla-gt-s.html

Fussy08X 04-18-2012 04:20 AM

thanks for sharing, was a great read. I never got to experience the apparent fun that comes from owning an ae86. Hopefully i will b able to experience it with this modern day 86 wen it comes out.

Future 04-18-2012 08:30 AM

The review I was waiting for :) As much as I was uncertain of buying a car I never drove, this is pretty much what I wanted to hear/read about the car I've been waiting for.

The best part:
"Yet we find the modern Toyota (Scion) to be among the most engaging driver's cars available at any price. There's no greater marker of success in automotive design than making a slow car fun. That's precisely what the AE86 did in the '80s and what the FR-S does today."

mandm177 04-18-2012 08:48 AM

great article. i hope to compare the FRS/BRZ to my AE86 one day

Turbowned 04-18-2012 09:19 AM

I've always wanted an AE86, but never quite made it. I looked at 2 or 3 for sale that were all clapped out, and finally bought one late last year, that also turned out to be clapped out once I got into it. I've pretty much resigned myself to knowing I'll never own a proper AE86, so the BRZ will be it's worthy substitute. I think it looks a lot sexier, anyways ;)

Very cool article. Anyone remember when Josh Jacquot used to write for Sport Compact Car? Those were the days! That magazine got me into Japanese compacts and fueled my passion like nothing else!

brillo 04-18-2012 09:32 AM

I wish someone would instrument test the FR-S. I'm curious to see how it compares to the BRZ.

pastuch 04-18-2012 09:58 AM

Terrific article...

"considering the FR-S's double-wishbone rear suspension. MacPherson struts — good enough for every Porsche 911 ever built — remain in the front."

Exhaust 04-18-2012 09:59 AM

That was a fantastic review:clap:

Sport-Tech 04-18-2012 09:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by brillo (Post 186010)
I wish someone would instrument test the FR-S. I'm curious to see how it compares to the BRZ.

I'm sure someone will. Maybe C&D is doing that already - I find it intriguing that of the major car rags they are the only one who has not released a review of the production BRZ.

There has to be an embargo on full road tests of the GT86/FR-S because there have been none published to date. Should be lifting soon, they won't want the BRZ getting all the accolades.

ZetaVI 04-18-2012 10:28 AM

Awesome article. Glad it finally happened. Thanks alot.

Boxer 86 04-18-2012 11:07 AM

I have driven a friend of mine's (now in the Army) '85 GT-S and man what an awesome and lively car. Apart from the handling, the sound was one of the greatest factors.

Rampage 04-18-2012 11:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scion FR-S (Post 186025)
I'm sure someone will. Maybe C&D is doing that already - I find it intriguing that of the major car rags they are the only one who has not released a review of the production BRZ.

There has to be an embargo on full road tests of the GT86/FR-S because there have been none published to date. Should be lifting soon, they won't want the BRZ getting all the accolades.


Car and Driver, Road and Track and Motor Trend will be waiting for production versions of the car before performing instrument test and evaluations. Up to now everyhing in the US has been pre-production models and all three of the magazines reported on driving those in Japan or Europe. As soon as the real thing hit our shores the test will come. I would think that they would be timed to come with the actual availability of cars at dealerships so most likely the June or July issue of the mags.

Ryephile 04-18-2012 11:38 AM

Great read, and it's refreshing to hear about the feel of the car below the limit.

Sport-Tech 04-18-2012 11:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rampage (Post 186085)
Car and Driver, Road and Track and Motor Trend will be waiting for production versions of the car before performing instrument test and evaluations. Up to now everyhing in the US has been pre-production models and all three of the magazines reported on driving those in Japan or Europe. As soon as the real thing hit our shores the test will come. I would think that they would be timed to come with the actual availability of cars at dealerships so most likely the June or July issue of the mags.

I'd be surprised if they didn't already have their hands on production versions, or have been at least taken to locations to drive them, much as Subaru took reviewers to Spain. Why would a production version of the BRZ be available to press many weeks before an FR-S?

StuttterButtter 04-18-2012 12:04 PM

Great read i love these kinda articles. i wish more people understood what this car is about.

Turbowned 04-18-2012 12:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Boxer 86 (Post 186072)
I have driven a friend of mine's (now in the Army) '85 GT-S and man what an awesome and lively car. Apart from the handling, the sound was one of the greatest factors.

Mmmhm! The 4AGE may not make much power but it has a great sound. Stock cars sound awesome above 4k rpm when the T-VIS (Toyota Variable Induction System) kicks in, and the newer 20v engines with VVT have a phenomenal induction sound thanks to the factory ITB's.

demby123 04-18-2012 01:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Turbowned (Post 186125)
Mmmhm! The 4AGE may not make much power but it has a great sound. Stock cars sound awesome above 4k rpm when the T-VIS (Toyota Variable Induction System) kicks in, and the newer 20v engines with VVT have a phenomenal induction sound thanks to the factory ITB's.

Dangit, of only they'd continue the RWD corolla into the 90s... the possibilities.

tripjammer 04-18-2012 02:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scion FR-S (Post 186106)
I'd be surprised if they didn't already have their hands on production versions, or have been at least taken to locations to drive them, much as Subaru took reviewers to Spain. Why would a production version of the BRZ be available to press many weeks before an FR-S?

That was not a production version. It was pre-production. No production BRZ have been delivered in Europe yet?

Tugboat 04-18-2012 02:48 PM

I have been waiting for a review like this... I have been lucky enough to enjoy the original and now I am looking to forward to driving the updated version.

PERRIN_Chris 04-18-2012 02:50 PM

I liked this article too. I had an AE86 almost 10 years ago, and have been waiting for a RWD spiritual successor like this for a long time.

blofeld42 04-18-2012 03:39 PM

"Sure, you're not going to easily stuff a bicycle in the back of a 2013 Scion FR-S"

Has anyone tried it? I'd really, really like to fit a bike back there and not have to use a bike rack. I'd be kinda surprised you can fit four wheels in back but not a bike.

86design 04-18-2012 03:45 PM

that was an awesome article

Dadhawk 04-18-2012 03:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blofeld42 (Post 186287)
"Sure, you're not going to easily stuff a bicycle in the back of a 2013 Scion FR-S"

Has anyone tried it? I'd really, really like to fit a bike back there and not have to use a bike rack. I'd be kinda surprised you can fit four wheels in back but not a bike.

I didn't measure it, but I don't think you could fit a standard adult bike in the trunk without some dismantling. I'm not sure its even tall enough to handle a regular set of handlebars.

Draco-REX 04-18-2012 04:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blofeld42 (Post 186287)
"Sure, you're not going to easily stuff a bicycle in the back of a 2013 Scion FR-S"

Has anyone tried it? I'd really, really like to fit a bike back there and not have to use a bike rack. I'd be kinda surprised you can fit four wheels in back but not a bike.

I'm pretty sure a bike will fit if you fold the seats and remove the front wheel. I've fit them into some pretty small cars in the past.

86'd 04-18-2012 06:02 PM

A track bike fit into our Mini with the front wheel removed (barely) and I think the FRS has more space than a Mini...so...

Bristecom 04-18-2012 06:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pastuch (Post 186023)
Terrific article...

"considering the FR-S's double-wishbone rear suspension. MacPherson struts — good enough for every Porsche 911 ever built — remain in the front."

Meh, I definitely prefer double wishbones. Porsche 911's benefit from MacPherson strut's understeering tendencies since so much of the weight is in the rear. But for most cars, MacPherson strut is still inferior to double wishbones. Sure, some BMW, Porsche, and Audi's still use them and they have their cost/weight/size/stroke advantages but even the best of them can't overcome their inherent disadvantages. At least I can always tell the difference. Double wishbones just tend to seem more planted and linear and grippier at the limit. But it's obviously not a deal-breaker for me and I'm aware that it would have been very difficult, if not impossible for them to fit proper double wishbones with that wide boxer engine up front.

Bristecom 04-18-2012 06:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blofeld42 (Post 186287)
"Sure, you're not going to easily stuff a bicycle in the back of a 2013 Scion FR-S"

Has anyone tried it? I'd really, really like to fit a bike back there and not have to use a bike rack. I'd be kinda surprised you can fit four wheels in back but not a bike.

If I take the front wheel off and knock down the rear seats in my little Eclipse coupe, my mountain bike will just barely fit. So... it probably could fit.

naticedog04 04-18-2012 07:38 PM

nice article and thank you for sharring... it's great to hear the author experience the joys of driving each car. I hope they produce this car for at least four years or so. :happy0180:

Matador 04-18-2012 09:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bristecom (Post 186445)
Meh, I definitely prefer double wishbones. Porsche 911's benefit from MacPherson strut's understeering tendencies since so much of the weight is in the rear. But for most cars, MacPherson strut is still inferior to double wishbones. Sure, some BMW, Porsche, and Audi's still use them and they have their cost/weight/size/stroke advantages but even the best of them can't overcome their inherent disadvantages. At least I can always tell the difference. Double wishbones just tend to seem more planted and linear and grippier at the limit. But it's obviously not a deal-breaker for me and I'm aware that it would have been very difficult, if not impossible for them to fit proper double wishbones with that wide boxer engine up front.

Nobody is trying to give the impression that it's better than double wishbone. The point is, it works well enough for some of the best handling cars in the world and it does here too. Period.

fatoni 04-18-2012 09:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bristecom (Post 186445)
Meh, I definitely prefer double wishbones. Porsche 911's benefit from MacPherson strut's understeering tendencies since so much of the weight is in the rear. But for most cars, MacPherson strut is still inferior to double wishbones. Sure, some BMW, Porsche, and Audi's still use them and they have their cost/weight/size/stroke advantages but even the best of them can't overcome their inherent disadvantages. At least I can always tell the difference. Double wishbones just tend to seem more planted and linear and grippier at the limit. But it's obviously not a deal-breaker for me and I'm aware that it would have been very difficult, if not impossible for them to fit proper double wishbones with that wide boxer engine up front.

thats total bull. there is no way you can tell from just driving a car.

the ae86 was kind of a turd. while i liked it alot, the car didnt do anything special. its also a little funny that you end up seeing many of the same people knocking the mustang gt for its solid axle and praising the ae86 for its handling.

Dimman 04-18-2012 10:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fatoni (Post 186581)
thats total bull. there is no way you can tell from just driving a car.

the ae86 was kind of a turd. while i liked it alot, the car didnt do anything special. its also a little funny that you end up seeing many of the same people knocking the mustang gt for its solid axle and praising the ae86 for its handling.

Back in the pre-initial d days I was looking for my first sports/y car. Rwd Corolla GT-S looked cool, like a baby Mk3 Supra. Then I found out the power they make (none) and that they had a stick axle. So I just bought a turbo Supra.

Stick axle was the real deal-killer. Still is actually.

MF_DEUCE 04-19-2012 12:18 AM

hey thanks for posting! PM_LFA, doesnt the driver of the FRS look like the guy who was at the FRS meet in Arcadia? That same guy told me they were at GMR before that meet so it could've been that same day. :)

blofeld42 04-19-2012 12:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Draco-REX (Post 186309)
I'm pretty sure a bike will fit if you fold the seats and remove the front wheel. I've fit them into some pretty small cars in the past.

I'm fine with removing both wheels--it's not like it's hard--but I do want to be able to leave it in the car so I can walk away and get dinner instead of leaving it on top out in the street.

Bristecom 04-19-2012 12:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fatoni (Post 186581)
thats total bull. there is no way you can tell from just driving a car.

Test me. Let me drive a few cars (I don't already know) hard with the different types of suspension and see if I'm right. :D

SoCal_86 04-19-2012 01:00 AM

Very nice review. I want full size pictures of that hatch!

PERRIN_Chris 04-19-2012 11:03 AM

Hey socal_AE86, I remember your hatch from club4AG! The pictures from the article can actually be expanded, there's a little link with an arrow on the corner of the picture that makes the picture huge.

mandm177 04-19-2012 11:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by demby123 (Post 186180)
Dangit, of only they'd continue the RWD corolla into the 90s... the possibilities.

you mean this? :D

AE111 20v Blacktop in my AE86 Coupe
http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b1...331_130409.jpg

jdrxb9 04-19-2012 11:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blofeld42 (Post 186287)
"Sure, you're not going to easily stuff a bicycle in the back of a 2013 Scion FR-S"

Has anyone tried it? I'd really, really like to fit a bike back there and not have to use a bike rack. I'd be kinda surprised you can fit four wheels in back but not a bike.

link - also link - also link

Using the measurements I took, I actually mocked up the space with some pvc I had laying around. I'm sure both my road and mtb will fit (one at at time, of course) with front wheels removed. YMMV with seating position, bike size, etc.

Draco-REX 04-19-2012 01:06 PM

ITBs are teh secks.

demby123 04-19-2012 09:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mandm177 (Post 187005)
you mean this? :D

AE111 20v Blacktop in my AE86 Coupe
http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b1...331_130409.jpg

Why don't I ever see or hear 20v swapped ae86's driving around dallas lol


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:39 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.


Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.