Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB

Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/index.php)
-   Other Vehicles & General Automotive Discussions (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=6)
-   -   Nissan's DeltaWing! (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=4179)

RRnold 03-13-2012 08:17 PM

Nissan's DeltaWing!
 
Holy Batman!!

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/motoring/...?frame=2166566

ZetaVI 03-13-2012 08:21 PM

I didn't know Batman wanted to break land-speed records.

blur 03-13-2012 08:24 PM

Land speed records? I thought this was the new class for Le Mans?

edit:

Quote:

Marino Franchitti has been involved with testing the DeltaWing and will race the vehicle at Le Mans on June 16-17
yep.

Only has 300hp lol.

tranzformer 03-13-2012 08:29 PM

Cool. I kinda like it.

serialk11r 03-13-2012 08:31 PM

Is that narrow front track going to cause problems? I like the aero.

Dimman 03-13-2012 08:42 PM

Nissan had nothing to do with the development of that car. They are just supplying the motor. It will be running in the exhibition class at LeMans, and was actually developed from an Indycar replacement proposal.

http://www.racecar-engineering.com/n...-mans-project/

http://www.racetechmag.com/news/news.php?id=208

OrbitalEllipses 03-13-2012 08:47 PM

It's a Juke motor, more or less.

Dimman 03-13-2012 08:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by serialk11r (Post 155322)
Is that narrow front track going to cause problems? I like the aero.

It's apparently going to rely on some fancy torque-vectoring on the back for stability and turn-in.

old greg 03-13-2012 08:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by serialk11r (Post 155322)
Is that narrow front track going to cause problems?

Not necessarily. There's not a whole lot of weight on the front axle, since the wheels are so far forward, so there won't be much weight transfer / roll moment for the front tires to deal with.

Draco-REX 03-13-2012 10:14 PM

The deltawing takes some really interesting approaches at car handling dynamics.

Personally, I think it's going to be an unstable mess. We'll see how it does on the back sections of LeMans. But since most of that course is straight, its flaws won't be too apparent, unfortunately. I'd like to see it on an ALMS course.

The thing is, the DeltaWing was designed by coming up with the looks first, and then engineering a solution that would allow it to work. Which, in my opinion, is how you design a production car, but bass-ackwards when designing a racecar.

tranzformer 03-13-2012 10:55 PM

Would like to see it on a track with other cars around it, but it looks fairly stable in this video.

[u2b]3wlQAvEfmeI[/u2b]

Snoopyalien24 03-13-2012 11:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OrbitalEllipses (Post 155332)
It's a Juke motor, more or less.

We need that for the S16

tranzformer 03-13-2012 11:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Snoopyalien24 (Post 155420)
We need that for the S16

:word: Could easily tune that for over 300hp. :)

M-17 03-14-2012 02:52 AM

I want one.

ichitaka05 03-14-2012 04:19 AM

Crazy looking... I wonder how well it'll do on Le Mans

Levi 03-14-2012 07:54 AM

Please, bring a new Silvia weighing 1150 kg with this 1.6l I4 making 300 PS!

old greg 03-14-2012 09:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Draco-REX (Post 155392)
The thing is, the DeltaWing was designed by coming up with the looks first, and then engineering a solution that would allow it to work. Which, in my opinion, is how you design a production car, but bass-ackwards when designing a racecar.

Do you have any idea who Ben Bowlby is?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ben Bowlby
Looking radical was never the objective – the Delta Wing shape is simply the outcome of addressing performance targets... What we have proposed for the car is not a styling exercise. Form has followed function.

Source

7thgear 03-14-2012 10:45 AM

reminds me of this

only not as funny :D

[u2b]QQh56geU0X8[/u2b]

Snoopyalien24 03-14-2012 11:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Levi (Post 155643)
Please, bring a new Silvia weighing 1150 kg with this 1.6l I4 making 300 PS!

They have the engine, all they need is a crazy well balanced, light, rigid chassis and suspension like the BRZ/86 has.

Car of the century

tranzformer 03-14-2012 03:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Snoopyalien24 (Post 155715)
They have the engine, all they need is a crazy well balanced, light, rigid chassis and suspension like the BRZ/86 has.


I agree. It would be epic if Nissan got into the game. I just don't have a feeling they will anytime soon.

Draco-REX 03-14-2012 03:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by old greg (Post 155664)
Do you have any idea who Ben Bowlby is?


Source

Part of the Future IndyCar initiative was to design a car that would LOOK unique and give IndyCar an identity among all the other formula series. I'm sure Bowlby had some of the DeltaWing's dynamics already in mind, and this gave him an opportunity to create the car. But you can be sure that looks played a significant part in the car's design.

A three legged chair isn't as stable as a 4 legged chair regardless of how you build it. And those front wheels are narrow enough to effectively be a single "leg" of the platform. I said before that I find some of his ideas interesting. The shifting of almost all weight over the rear axle to compensate for the narrow front track has merit. In theory. But a lot can happen between theory and the reality of a race in the real world with other cars.

I foresee a blow-over in the DeltaWing's future. Going down the Mulsanne straight at nearly 200mph in the dirty air behind another car seems dangerous in a car that depends so much on under-car aero and body-generated downforce.

But we'll see. I'm not hoping it will fail. I'm just very skeptical that it will succeed beyond a moderate level.

tranzformer 03-14-2012 03:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Draco-REX (Post 155919)
Part of the Future IndyCar initiative was to design a car that would LOOK unique and give IndyCar an identity among all the other formula series. I'm sure Bowlby had some of the DeltaWing's dynamics already in mind, and this gave him an opportunity to create the car. But you can be sure that looks played a significant part in the car's design.

A three legged chair isn't as stable as a 4 legged chair regardless of how you build it. And those front wheels are narrow enough to effectively be a single "leg" of the platform. I said before that I find some of his ideas interesting. The shifting of almost all weight over the rear axle to compensate for the narrow front track has merit. In theory. But a lot can happen between theory and the reality of a race in the real world with other cars.

I foresee a blow-over in the DeltaWing's future. Going down the Mulsanne straight at nearly 200mph in the dirty air behind another car seems dangerous in a car that depends so much on under-car aero and body-generated downforce.

But we'll see. I'm not hoping it will fail. I'm just very skeptical that it will succeed beyond a moderate level.



Don't you think they would have already thought of that and tested that in their models and the wind tunnel? This isn't a high school project build.

Dimman 03-14-2012 04:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tranzformer (Post 155927)
Don't you think they would have already thought of that and tested that in their models and the wind tunnel? This isn't a high school project build.

It's a controversial design even among professional designers. Aero-wise until recently it was just CFD stuff.

The main concerns among the traditional designers are more to do with mechanical grip/stability in cornering and braking. Apparently it is quite dependent on a computerized torque-vectoring differential, as this is basically a 2 wheeled vehicle in terms of braking, cornering and accelerating.

One major one is how it will perform under wet braking, some feel it will be more likely to for the rear to hydroplane, because it doesn't have the clearing effect of normal front tires, plus it depends on all of its braking force from the rear tires. Could lead to a very unstable condition.

We will see. It's an experiment.

7thgear 03-14-2012 04:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Draco-REX (Post 155919)

A three legged chair isn't as stable as a 4 legged chair regardless of how you build it.

yes but a chair is not a car

at the end of the day what we're after is propelling a tire through space, on pavement. Then there is junk that's attached to the tire that has to be taken into account.. and other tires.

i'm very curious how this will turn out.

old greg 03-14-2012 04:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Draco-REX (Post 155919)
I'm sure Bowlby had some of the DeltaWing's dynamics already in mind, and this gave him an opportunity to create the car. But you can be sure that looks played a significant part in the car's design.

I'm obviously not going to be able to change your mind on this point. Suffice it to say that I disagree.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Draco-REX (Post 155919)
I foresee a blow-over in the DeltaWing's future. Going down the Mulsanne straight at nearly 200mph in the dirty air behind another car seems dangerous in a car that depends so much on under-car aero and body-generated downforce.

Blow-overs aren't caused by turbulence. They are caused by the pitch-sensitivity of the large flat underbodies that are required by sanctioning bodies. They occur when the underbody presents a positive angle of attack to the air flow and creates lift. By virtue of the fact that the Deltawing has significantly less underbody surface area in the nose of the car, I would argue that it will be much less likely to suffer such a fate than a more traditional car.

You do realize of course that all LMP cars generate the majority of their downforce with the underbody, right?


Quote:

Originally Posted by Draco-REX (Post 155919)
But we'll see. I'm not hoping it will fail. I'm just very skeptical that it will succeed beyond a moderate level.

Few race cars ever do.

RRnold 03-14-2012 04:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tranzformer (Post 155407)
Would like to see it on a track with other cars around it, but it looks fairly stable in this video.

[u2b]3wlQAvEfmeI[/u2b]

I didn't know they were testing at Buttonwillow! That's one of my favorite tracks besides being tore up. Too bad they didn't go over Phill Hill b/c I would have liked to see how it would handle an off camber dropoff.

http://www.buttonwillowraceway.com/i..._15_config.gif

Draco-REX 03-14-2012 05:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tranzformer (Post 155927)
Don't you think they would have already thought of that and tested that in their models and the wind tunnel? This isn't a high school project build.

Neither were these cars:
http://youtu.be/rQbgSe9S54I
http://youtu.be/g8XxQkXCmsU

Quote:

Originally Posted by old greg (Post 155968)
I'm obviously not going to be able to change your mind on this point. Suffice it to say that I disagree.

Perfectly ok.

Quote:

Blow-overs aren't caused by turbulence. They are caused by the pitch-sensitivity of the large flat underbodies that are required by sanctioning bodies. They occur when the underbody presents a positive angle of attack to the air flow and creates lift. By virtue of the fact that the Deltawing has significantly less underbody surface area in the nose of the car, I would argue that it will be much less likely to suffer such a fate than a more traditional car.
But don't forget that with the significantly smaller underbody area, is an equally significant reduction in weight on the front. Additionally there is even less downforce being generated at the nose, which seems to be designed to actually gather air under the car:
http://dsc.discovery.com/pdi/files/2...Delta-Wing.jpg
I see that long nose as an effective lever to expose the wider rear to more air as well.

Quote:

You do realize of course that all LMP cars generate the majority of their downforce with the underbody, right?
While keeping a large aerodynamic device up in cleaner air. And without encouraging lift at a lightweight nose.

Quote:

Few race cars ever do.
And if so, the DeltaWing will be known as another flop that was only notable for its looks.

http://i217.photobucket.com/albums/c...A-1/6wheel.jpg

SkullWorks 03-14-2012 05:43 PM

i don't recall the ELF car shown being a flop so much as outlawed...my recollection could be off but....

Remember the Chapparel? they had to come up with new rules to write it out of eligibility because they were using jet engines to create under car suction that allowed ridiculous cornering speeds...

Lots of stuff happens and isn't well accepted by sanctioning bodies and other teams, but calling something short lived a flop is usually wrong, if it didn't work well it would usually evolve for a bit before disappearing, most single showing cars are outlawed, often only because of the potential, before they even work well enough to be advantageous.

7thgear 03-14-2012 06:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SkullWorks (Post 156030)
i don't recall the ELF car shown being a flop so much as outlawed...my recollection could be off but.....



the fan car was outlawed, the Tyrell couldn't get tires made fast/cheap enough! (what a silly thing to have stopped it's progress)

Draco-REX 03-14-2012 07:04 PM

The Tyrrell won 1 race in 40 tries. Not the greatest record. But it continues as a car known for its looks rather than performance. If the performance had been that much better than the conventional layout, we'd be seeing 6 wheeled F1 cars today, or it would have been outright banned. But the complexity and weight of the front suspension and the issue of tire availability were issues that were too big to surmount.

old greg 03-14-2012 08:34 PM

1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by Draco-REX (Post 156104)
If the performance had been that much better than the conventional layout, we'd be seeing 6 wheeled F1 cars today, or it would have been outright banned. But the complexity and weight of the front suspension and the issue of tire availability were issues that were too big to surmount.

They were banned. It was in 1982 in response to the Williams FW07D. It used 4 comparatively small rear tires primarily to reduce aero drag, with four wheel drive to offset the loss of traction.

Quote:

Originally Posted by F1 Technical Regulations
12.2 Number of wheels :
The number of wheels is fixed at four.

Attachment 5510

Draco-REX 03-14-2012 11:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by old greg (Post 156157)
They were banned. It was in 1982 in response to the Williams FW07D. It used 4 comparatively small rear tires primarily to reduce aero drag, with four wheel drive to offset the loss of traction.



Attachment 5510

Very interesting.

Well, we will see at Le Mans.

tranzformer 03-14-2012 11:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Draco-REX (Post 156018)


Still not sure what your point is. A lot has been learned since then.

Draco-REX 03-14-2012 11:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tranzformer (Post 156233)
Still not sure what your point is. A lot has been learned since then.

That even big teams can overlook things.

Again, we will see how it behaves at LeMans. But I personally feel that while it's a great exercise in out-of-the-box thinking, it's too full of compromises to work effectively.

tranzformer 03-15-2012 12:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Draco-REX (Post 156240)
That even big teams can overlook things.

Again, we will see how it behaves at LeMans. But I personally feel that while it's a great exercise in out-of-the-box thinking, it's too full of compromises to work effectively.


Gotcha. I agree. We won't know until it is used in the real world.

Dimman 03-15-2012 11:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Draco-REX (Post 156240)
That even big teams can overlook things.

Again, we will see how it behaves at LeMans. But I personally feel that while it's a great exercise in out-of-the-box thinking, it's too full of compromises to work effectively.

Which is the only reason it is in LeMans in the first place. Their special entry position for innovation. Basically an exhibition class.

tranzformer 03-15-2012 05:35 PM

Cool overview video by Nissan Europe regarding the DeltaWing:

[u2b]DlLZ3d-X8aY[/u2b]

tranzformer 03-20-2012 02:21 PM

"Acceleration like a rocket"


[u2b]zs_wnHNbVCA[/u2b]


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:09 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.


Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.