Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB

Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/index.php)
-   BRZ First-Gen (2012+) — General Topics (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=23)
-   -   Vorschlag/AST/Moton Hands On BRZ (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=3901)

oneday 02-25-2012 08:36 PM

Vorschlag/AST/Moton Hands On BRZ
 
12 Attachment(s)
Lots of awesome info here!

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vorschlag

Today Matt and I from Vorshlag and Brian from AST/Moton were able to preview a real live production 2013 Subaru BRZ Limited. This is the Subaru version of the joint Subaru/Toyota "FT86" chassis. I like Subaru a lot mor than Scion, so that's what we wanted to see. The 40+ "pre-release pictures" were taken by Vorshlag on Feb 25, 2012 start here. The BRZs go on sale in a week and should start arriving in early May.

Attachment 5091 Attachment 5092

The folks at Subaru of Plano only had the car for a day, and I had hoped to weigh this thing and get a "real number" on this car. Weight is key to everything for performance, to me. I've read these will be anything from 2600 to 2800 pounds. Big range there. We were also hoping to be able to pull off the front and rear wheels and measure strut and shock lengths as well as look at a few things like that up close. The guy in charge (some random car dealer there) said "no dice". We couldn't drive it, start it, move it, jack it up, but we could open the hood and trunk, and people were allowed to sit inside. Matt and I were the first ones at the dealership to see the car at 9 am today, and Brian Hanchey rolled up shortly after, followed by Sean Goodpasture and some other local folks that heard about this car being on display today.

Attachment 5093 Attachment 5094

We measured all sorts of things and Brian figured out what shocks and strut its going to take (a unique front strut, but not all THAT new), what camber plate it needs (Vorshlag already makes one that works perfectly - but it wasn't what I thought! I brought several we make and quickly figured out which Subaru chassis they stole the front suspension from), and verified some of the published numbers - like wheelbase (101"), total length (167"), etc. I also measured "outer track width" (from outer sidewall to sidewall, not center of tire) and it was over 68" wide, even with the skinny ass 215/45/17 tires! That's a good bit wider than an E36 BMW.

Attachment 5095 Attachment 5096

Take all of the "driving preview" impressions and throw them out the window, because they are meaningless - the factory tires coming on US models SUCK. These pathetic, skinny things are the same tires that come on a Toyota Prius... not kidding. As in "the opposite of performance tires". So it probably spins the rear tires easily and slides around like mad, but its likely making 0.7g lateral on these all weather, super-low-rolling-resistance microtires. Anyone that drives one of these on the factory rubber needs to know that it will make NO GRIP in bone stock form, but with a proper wheel and tire upgrade it should be considerably better. After crawling around and under it for 2 hours I know what its going to take to fit 17x9" wheels front and rear - it won't be super easy, but we'll make it happen, even if it means having a run of wheels custom made.

Attachment 5097 Attachment 5098

The car is begging for negative front camber, needs to be lowered at least 2", and is going to lose a considerable amount of weight with typical track/autocross prep. The rear muffler is a massive suitcase sized box, easily 50 pounds, and there's another resonator upstream (where a proper race muffler will easily fit). The exhaust routing is FUNKY - typical Subaru turbo car routing, with the driver's side manifold routed across the front of the motor (where a turbo would normally go) and into the passenger side, then routed back. Yuck! There will be a market for custom headers and full exhaust systems for NA cars, which should lose 60-80 pounds or more (in STX legal trim) in the exhaust alone.

Attachment 5099 Attachment 5100

Left: The BRZ engine is almost entirely behind front axle centerline. Right: AWD Impreza engine is almost entire in front of front axle centerline

What else... oh, the motor placement really is pretty much perfect, and this chassis was NEVER meant to be an AWD car. Engine is supposed to be 9" further back than a typical AWD Subaru boxer 4, and it looks more like 2 feet further back. The front axle centerline is almost lined up with the front of the motor, unlike most Imprezas and the like (see comparison above).

Attachment 5101 Attachment 5102

The strut tower bracing is simple yet super effective, with stand-offs welded to the strut towers and rods going to the firewall (no wacky top-mounted intercooler in the way); it would be easy to make a 3-point brace using the stock bolt holes. Engine bay is plenty long and wide - you could put an LS1 under the hood if you wanted to, but the oil pan would need surgery and the front of the V8 engine would sit pretty far forward. The battery is huge and begging for a lightweight replacement (-20 pounds). There's tons of room for a FMIC when they make a turbo version (maybe in a year or so). Front end cosmetics are good and the lighting is well done.

...see part 2 below...

After reading Part 2, jump to Post 66 for details about AST's BRZ/FR-S suspension offerings!

oneday 02-25-2012 08:37 PM

10 Attachment(s)
Part 2 continued
Quote:

Originally Posted by Vorschlag
...part 2 continued from above...

Interior... wow, they really did this right. Best looking interior for a 25 grand car I've ever seen. The plastics have nice tactile feel (more rubber like than plastic), and the Alcantara/leather seats in this "Limited" model were very nice. Shifter is in the right spot, the steering wheel can adjust for tilt and telescope, plenty of head room, plenty of interior width (not knocking shoulders with your passenger, like in an NA/NB Miata or Elise), and the materials are great.

Attachment 5103 Attachment 5104

The stock seats are awesome, and almost as good as the ones in the EVO X MR. Like the EVO seats, they won't work at all for fat guys (hey, calling it like it is - sorry) but you won't be tempted to swap them out for race seats unless it becomes a full-on caged race car. The height adjustment of the all-manual (thank you!) seats has a large range, and both Matt (vertically challenged) and I could each fit in the car with a race helmet on. The center stack on this Limited model had automatic climate control, and if it works like on other Subarus (as in: not well), I'd skip the Limited package and get the "base" model for $2K or so less. The auto climate control, heated seats, rear wing, and leather inserts on the seat edges are all that goes into this pricier Limited model... I'd pass, but its not a big deal either way (supposedly only a 16 pound difference between the US packages).

Attachment 5105 Attachment 5106

The total height of the roof was super short (comes up to the bottom of my rib cage), and shorter than any Subaru I've ever seen by a foot or more. The rear wing from the Limited package does sort of make the rear lines look "right", so it might be worth the extra bucks of this Limited package just to get that. Or add your own later.

Attachment 5107 Attachment 5108

The rear seat is... very limited. Small children or child seats, maybe. With me sitting fairly upright in my normal driving position, at 6'3" tall, the front seat back was 2-3" from touching the rear seat bottom (almost zero rear seat leg room). The front seat could slide back that extra few inches, to where the seats touch (zero rear leg room), and I had to really reach for the controls... so I suspect up to a 6'7" driver would fit - there is a lot of head room. With a slimmer seat bottom (custom floor bracket) even these tall folks could race the car with a helmet on. Surprisingly roomy up front... but not so much in the back seat. The rear seats fold flat and you can fit a set of wheels and tires there, though.

Attachment 5109 Attachment 5110

Not to mention, there's a full sized spare wheel and tire, and a scissor jack and tire iron back there. So figure on losing another 45 lbs when the "trunk junk" is removed. Whatever the actual weights end up being (if you take the middle of the range of weights I've seen published that might be ~2700 lbs?), figure you could take out another 100-175 pounds from exhaust, battery and trunk junk in STX autocross trim. And that's the only logical ST class it should go into - its close to the RX8's 2800 lb weight and 200 horsepower (and low torque), but has less tire room (245/40/17 should fit but 255/40/17 might be a tick too tall to clear up front and full lock).

Attachment 5111 Attachment 5112

This blue exterior color looked HAWT in the sunlight as it rolled in, super quietly

Should be fun tinkering with this thing, regardless. Matt has a deposit on one already, but not at Subaru of Plano - those jokers were taking $1000 non-nonrefundable deposits on a car they didn't know the prices of. And marking them up $900 over MSRP for "paint protection" dealer add-on crap, that you couldn't opt out of. Sleazeballs. "We're only getting 15 for the year!" I suspect the low production numbers predictions are total BS, but who knows. Its a $25K car - its not going to be super exclusive, you know? Once they start cranking these out, I think they will be made in "Miata like" numbers.

Again, all 40+ pictures I took are avilable here. I will post info and pics as soon as we get our hands on one - within the first hour of one arriving here at the Vorshlag shop it will be corner weighed, measured, disassembled, and the rest of the car will be dissected and weighed further. We have several new FT86 specific products in mind - some will be developed before it arrives, the rest soon after. I will share them during development, too.

Cheers,

You can now skip to post 66 for details about AST's BRZ/FR-S suspension solutions!

MannyO 02-25-2012 08:49 PM

Nice find oneday! Thanks for sharing with us. One member here (Guff) was also at that dealership earlier today. Maybe this information can be moved to that thread?

http://www.ft86club.com/forums/showt...=34#post142461

NumbersGuy 02-25-2012 09:30 PM

Wow, that is a lot of freaking leg room. I am 6'2-6'3 and I was worried about legroom, but it seems I have no need to worry. I am really surprised this car has so much legroom, more than coupes bigger than it! :)

dsgerbc 02-25-2012 09:54 PM

Sticky tires, 17x9, 2" lowering, STX ... bleh. Completely missing the point of the car. I'm keeping stock rubber. It's not UHP Summer tire, but it's not a total crap .7 skidpad tire either. Even '11 Jetta pulled .8 on those, I expect BRZ to do better.

Pat1usmc 02-25-2012 09:58 PM

The Product Guide I posted says the tires will be 215/45WR17 87W summer performance tires. I wonder why this car had different tires.

merlin2111 02-25-2012 10:03 PM

All great news. Can we just get a price already!

dsgerbc 02-25-2012 10:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pat1usmc (Post 142486)
The Product Guide I posted says the tires will be 215/45WR17 87W summer performance tires. I wonder why this car had different tires.

It didn't. Michelin Primacy HP are exactly that.

Future 02-26-2012 12:00 AM

Finally the last questions I had in my head.. (except price)... Head room (with helmet), wheel vs fender distance and WOW look at where the engine is compared to the wrx.. w00t

Guff 02-26-2012 12:05 AM

Dang, your lighting was a lot better than mine... But awesome nonetheless! Nice to see you guys measure everything up! The dealer guys were nice, albeit not very knowledgeable...

Xlr8 02-26-2012 05:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dsgerbc (Post 142484)
Sticky tires, 17x9, 2" lowering, STX ... bleh. Completely missing the point of the car. I'm keeping stock rubber. It's not UHP Summer tire, but it's not a total crap .7 skidpad tire either. Even '11 Jetta pulled .8 on those, I expect BRZ to do better.

I think from the way their article was written that they are thinking about autocross only. Someone worried about pulling the spare out, changing to a lighter battery and changing exhaust from the headers back is not thinking about this car as a daily driver. This car with a weight drop like they are suggesting, with track set up suspension and wide sticky tires will be sweet. Autocrossers are not interested in drifting the tail out all the time.
Just my observation. :burnrubber:

Xlr8 02-26-2012 05:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NumbersGuy (Post 142475)
Wow, that is a lot of freaking leg room. I am 6'2-6'3 and I was worried about legroom, but it seems I have no need to worry. I am really surprised this car has so much legroom, more than coupes bigger than it! :)

This was my concern as well. Also great news to hear the wheel is tilt and telescope. So with a small diameter steering wheel, plenty of legroom and tilt and telescope wheel there should be plenty of adjustment to find a comfortable position. :happyanim:

pithy_logorrhea 02-26-2012 10:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Xlr8 (Post 142648)
I think from the way their article was written that they are thinking about autocross only. Someone worried about pulling the spare out, changing to a lighter battery and changing exhaust from the headers back is not thinking about this car as a daily driver. This car with a weight drop like they are suggesting, with track set up suspension and wide sticky tires will be sweet. Autocrossers are not interested in drifting the tail out all the time.
Just my observation. :burnrubber:

Exactly! Autocrossers/trackers are interested in going faster. That does not necessarily mean you can't have fun doing so. I hope the BRZ is a twitchy car to drive on the limit like an STR prepped s2k is!

robo_robb 02-26-2012 10:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oneday (Post 142460)
http://vorshlag.smugmug.com/Cars/Sub.../DSC7999-S.jpg
...Not to mention, there's a full sized spare wheel and tire...

Hmm, did you per chance mean to say donut? This doesn't look like a full size spare.

MannyO 02-26-2012 12:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by robo_robb (Post 142716)
Hmm, did you per chance mean to say donut? This doesn't look like a full size spare.

It's full size as far as height goes, just a lot skinnier than the others on the car.

dsgerbc 02-26-2012 12:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Xlr8 (Post 142648)
I think from the way their article was written that they are thinking about autocross only. Someone worried about pulling the spare out, changing to a lighter battery and changing exhaust from the headers back is not thinking about this car as a daily driver. This car with a weight drop like they are suggesting, with track set up suspension and wide sticky tires will be sweet. Autocrossers are not interested in drifting the tail out all the time.
Just my observation. :burnrubber:

No, these guys are talking to a small subset of autocrossers - those who delude themselves about becoming 'nationally competitive'. Disproportionate share of autox-ers show up to have fun in their car.

Plenty of rx8 owners spent crapload on 'stx' mods only to make their cars slower, lol.

And notice that they are not talking about stock class either, cause those guys won't buy much from them, hence little sense to start priming them early.

ZetaVI 02-26-2012 12:36 PM

Awesome that you guys were able to measure everything.

iLuveKetchup 02-26-2012 02:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dsgerbc (Post 142768)
No, these guys are talking to a small subset of autocrossers - those who delude themselves about becoming 'nationally competitive'. Disproportionate share of autox-ers show up to have fun in their car.

Plenty of rx8 owners spent crapload on 'stx' mods only to make their cars slower, lol.

And notice that they are not talking about stock class either, cause those guys won't buy much from them, hence little sense to start priming them early.

Huh??!? Stock class is allowed to change their shocks (not springs). So Moton's target demo include stock class as well. And the shocks is the most expensive part of the suspension. STX is slower than what? Slower than their respective stock class (RX8 - CStock). I really would hope that a CStock running Hoosiers would be faster than a STX car running Hankooks.

On another note, I'm really glad Moton or AST (same company now) are developing options for the FR-S/BRZ. I really hope the FR-S/BRZ will be classed in STX.

dsgerbc 02-26-2012 03:42 PM

^Slower on PAX. Some are also slower on street tires, after switching from a local street-tire stock class to STX. Stock class guys will spend a fraction of what those prepping for STX will spend.

Anyway, comments by people who only have random set of rules for some competition in mind should be disregarded by 99% of potential buyers of this car.

Dark 02-26-2012 04:07 PM

The stock tire is summer tire. It performs really good, and the only down side is, it costs almost the same as much stickier tires.

Silverpike 02-26-2012 10:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dsgerbc (Post 142768)
No, these guys are talking to a small subset of autocrossers - those who delude themselves about becoming 'nationally competitive'. Disproportionate share of autox-ers show up to have fun in their car.

Plenty of rx8 owners spent crapload on 'stx' mods only to make their cars slower, lol.

And notice that they are not talking about stock class either, cause those guys won't buy much from them, hence little sense to start priming them early.

Delude themselves huh? Do you know who Vorschlag is? Probably not.

They have provided very valuable insight by measuring this car. All their praise and criticisms are dead on, and are highly relevant to both auto-x people and track people. Estimating removable weight strategies is useful, and the observations about suspension geometry is also very relevant for mild suspension mods. I just wish they would have told us which Subaru model shares the front struts.

What pisses me off about this forum is the number of "drifting is rad yo!" people here. Anyone who thinks keeping Prius tires on the car is a good idea is straight up retarded. I am astounded that Subaru is pulling this "pseudo luxury" attitude and putting such crappy tires on the car. I suppose it's not much different from when the original WRX came with RE-92s (sigh), but Prius tires are insulting. Anyone who knows anything about cars should know that tires are the single most important part on the car which improves car performance. Braking, acceleration, and cornering all depend on high quality tires. The first thing I'm going to do is pull these absurd piles of crap and put some high quality street tires on.:mad0260:

oneday 02-26-2012 10:20 PM

Fyi, I did not write those posts nor do I have any affiliation with Vorschlag, AST, or Moton.

And even though Vorshlag's target customer will be autocrossers and trackday enthusiasts there will be plenty of regular folks that will buy parts built by these manufacturers. I know I am excited to see what they come up with.

oneday 02-26-2012 10:28 PM

Silverpike, the tire choice is supposed to allow drivers to reach the chassis limits at slower speeds while still being controllable.That said Continental DW or Hankook RS3 will be the first mods I get mor my FRS.

LeftFootBrake 02-26-2012 10:29 PM

Part of the design work that went into this car is enabling it to adapt to the demands of different demographics. Tetsuya Tada has made it clear that in stock form the goal is not to be fastest around a track. Fortunately, he's also designed a car with an expectation that it will be modified for different outcomes, including lap times. If you haven't had a chance already, I highly recommend the following article to understand the philosophy better: http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/201...hief-engineer/
I, for one, am looking forward to both the stock experience and the opportunities of modification in the fullness of time.

dsgerbc 02-26-2012 11:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Silverpike (Post 143061)
Delude themselves huh?

Yeap. Been there, went to nationals, thankfully only once. And his impressions are useless to me now, other than helmet clearance. I am still gonna take the car to autox (probably test-n-tune events only though) and track. But I'm not gonna burn money buying tires/shocks/whatever to gain X mph in a corner.

Like I said, even on a Jetta this tire did .80g. Given that a lowered/stiffened WRX on RE92 could better its skippad by .05, I reasonably expect the BRZ to be capable of .90g on the skidpad with these tires, which would be adequate for most people. I wouldn't be surprised it could do more, given that the objective was 1.0g.

And honestly, anyone who brings up 'Prius' tires is probably trolling.

iLuveKetchup 02-26-2012 11:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Silverpike (Post 143061)
What pisses me off about this forum is the number of "drifting is rad yo!" people here. Anyone who thinks keeping Prius tires on the car is a good idea is straight up retarded.

Funniest thing I've read here. :bellyroll:

86design 02-26-2012 11:38 PM

nice good post.....I love when people take measurements :)

serialk11r 02-27-2012 01:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dsgerbc (Post 143077)
Like I said, even on a Jetta this tire did .80g. Given that a lowered/stiffened WRX on RE92 could better its skippad by .05, I reasonably expect the BRZ to be capable of .90g on the skidpad with these tires, which would be adequate for most people. I wouldn't be surprised it could do more, given that the objective was 1.0g.

And honestly, anyone who brings up 'Prius' tires is probably trolling.

Yea!
And honestly, considering that most cars come with all-seasons, it's pretty nice that these have summer tires at least, even if they're touring rather than performance. Slightly crappier grip for a quiet and comfortable ride on the road might not be such a bad thing.

bestwheelbase 02-27-2012 02:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Silverpike (Post 143061)
Delude themselves huh? Do you know who Vorschlag is? Probably not.

*snip*

What pisses me off about this forum is the number of "drifting is rad yo!" people here. Anyone who thinks keeping Prius tires on the car is a good idea is straight up retarded. I am astounded that Subaru is pulling this "pseudo luxury" attitude and putting such crappy tires on the car.

*snip*

The first thing I'm going to do is pull these absurd piles of crap and put some high quality street tires on.:mad0260:

Clearly the OEM tire choice has struck a chord with you. But please let's do without the name calling. It merely detracts from the point you are making and squashes open dialogue.

It comes down to this... these are cars that some people will want to modify. Others will want to keep them stock. Is one approach better or worse?

No.

We will all be supportive of folks who ditch their tires the minute they get home. I, for one, encourage you to discard your worthless horrible no good very bad Prius tires to a loving enthusiast who wishes to use them. We can make a list. (I'm at the top! Free tires are fun tires!)

Let's try to be open minded and realize that however each of us chooses to enjoy his/her FRS/BRZ/86 -- it beats the alternative. : )

Deslock 02-27-2012 06:36 AM

For anyone interested, the original post is at http://www.vorshlag.com/forums/showp...00&postcount=1

It's a great write-up, with a couple exceptions:

Quote:

the factory tires coming on US models SUCK. These pathetic, skinny things are the same tires that come on a Toyota Prius... not kidding. As in "the opposite of performance tires". So it probably spins the rear tires easily and slides around like mad, but its likely making 0.7g lateral on these all weather, super-low-rolling-resistance microtires. Anyone that drives one of these on the factory rubber needs to know that it will make NO GRIP in bone stock form
While they're not the grippiest, statements like "0.7g lateral" and "NO GRIP" and "all weather" range from being exaggerations to outright false.
  1. They're Sumer tires.
  2. According to this post at NASIOC, these do not come on any US Prius (they're available on the JDM performance package) and they're used by Audi and BMW.
  3. They get respectable reviews.
As long as steering feel/feedback is good, using a low rolling resistance, moderately sticky tire makes sense for OEM and for a daily driver. Many who are serious about competing get dedicated tires anyway.


Quote:

there's a full sized spare wheel and tire
According to motortrend, the BRZ comes with a T135/80D16, which (if I did the math correctly) has a diameter of 24.5" and a width of 5.3" (vs 24.6" and 8.5" for a 215/45R17).

That's not full size (but to be fair, it's not a donut either).

pithy_logorrhea 02-27-2012 09:29 AM

They are glorified all-seasons, not proper summer tires. Treadwear of 240? pff

oneday 02-27-2012 09:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pithy_logorrhea (Post 143226)
They are glorified all-seasons, not proper summer tires. Treadwear of 240? pff

Treadwear means nothing. The Continental Extreme Contact DW is a UTQG of 340 and out performs many higher performance summer tires. The fact remains that the Primacy HP is not a "performance" tire, but rather chosen because they offer decent feedback and allow some slipping for lower speed limits--they were certainly not selected because they are a common tire or because they are inexpensive (TR has the 225/45-17 at $224/tire, vs $129 for the same size ECDW).

Draco-REX 02-27-2012 09:54 AM

The point of the Primacy HP tires is twofold.

1. It gives the car a lower limit so in stock trim it can be flung around corners sideways. Yes, this is not the fastest way around a track. But it is one of the more FUN ways to do so. Check out this vid where Chris Harris takes an AMG C63 for a spin on 4 space-saver spares.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HPh90yNX-mY

2. The tires have a very low rolling resistance. This gives the car a better fuel economy in the EPA tests. Manufacturers need to meet minimum average mileage ratings So anything they can do to get their average up will be done. Be prepared to see more and more cars coming with low rolling resistance tires in the future.

You don't have to be Nationally competitive in AutoX to want to tune the car to your class. Regional and Divisional levels can still be plenty reason to want to shed weight and improve the handling. So it's good to know that they're keeping an eye towards AutoX and other venues where this car should excel when they come up with new products. It's better, in my opinion, than just making mods for the sake of making new stuff to sell.

Back OT: Good review. Considering some of the comments I've seen in reviews about the interior, I think most of the reviewers don't know that the seats are height adjustable and the steering wheel is telescopic. It's good to see that they made sure this small car will fit a wide range of driver sizes. However I think the comment about a 6'7" driver might be overboard unless they recline the seat which isn't my preferred driving position.

I'm VERY interested in an exhaust that has weight savings in mind. One with a centrally mounted muffler would be great. I'm looking forward to it.

pithy_logorrhea 02-27-2012 10:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oneday (Post 143229)
Treadwear means nothing. The Continental Extreme Contact DW is a UTQG of 340 and out performs many higher performance summer tires.

Can you cite source(s) for this?

Draco-REX, I see you are in Ohio. What autox region are you with?

Draco-REX 02-27-2012 10:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pithy_logorrhea (Post 143232)
Can you cite source(s) for this?

In general treadwear doesn't mean a lot since there is no standard. I had a set on my spec.B and they're very good tires for the price. No RE-01Rs or Z1*s, but they're nice tires.

Quote:

Draco-REX, I see you are in Ohio. What autox region are you with?
OVR. I compete in RallyX, but I AutoX now and then for fun. The BRZ will be a good opportunity to work on my lines. The STI is a great platform but the AWD and power can cover for a lot of mistakes.

(for the record, the BRZ will replace the spec.B as my daily, not the STI)

Rabble 02-27-2012 11:14 AM

Normal people (like me) who just want the car for a daily driver will probably change out the tires after 40k miles or whatever with some cheap all seasons.

If you want high performance shit go buy it yourself, I'd rather have msrp be that much lower.

brufleth 02-27-2012 11:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rabble (Post 143240)
Normal people (like me) who just want the car for a daily driver will probably change out the tires after 40k miles or whatever with some cheap all seasons.

If you want high performance shit go buy it yourself, I'd rather have msrp be that much lower.

This. I'll probably want snow tires too pretty much as soon as it gets cold up here. If anything I'm a little surprised they didn't go with a cheaper tire. My guess is that they wanted lots of tire squealing videos and the best MPG ratings and felt these were the best readily available option.

Laika 02-27-2012 11:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by brufleth (Post 143242)
This. I'll probably want snow tires too pretty much as soon as it gets cold up here. If anything I'm a little surprised they didn't go with a cheaper tire. My guess is that they wanted lots of tire squealing videos and the best MPG ratings and felt these were the best readily available option.

:word:

I'm gonna be blasting around in primacy's all summer/fall. Then I'm gonna throw on blizzak's or equivalent. I'll probably save up for a proper set of summer tires, maybe star specs, during the winter so I can slap them on late february/march. Phew...3 sets of tires in under a year


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:14 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.


Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.