![]() |
Any thoughts on DSPs? are they worth the $?
Hey guys,
As some of you know (or might remember), I got a kenwood radio, (Here's the review ). and I'm not too pleased with it. Considering this car is not my daily driver I think I can live up with the kenwood's faults in terms of usability. But one thing I absolutely HATE about the radio is the EQ, only 3 band. Not too far from the stock radio EQ we get around these parts. I listen to classical music, 80-90's music. I'm not a death metal enthusiast or a bass junkie. But I do like a good bass kick. So I've been thinking on getting an amp, and a few speakers for the car. Amp: is currently undecided, but a 5 channel one. My speaker choices are: Front: Kappa Perfect 6.1 Link to inifity website or the Kappa 60.9cs Link to website Back: JBL GTO428 Link to JBL Site or the JBL GTO328 Link to JBL Site (not sure which size fits in the back) Subwoofer: JL Audio CS110TG-TW3 Crutchfield website link Some people have suggested I go for 3 way components up front and forget about the sub at the back. This is also something I'm taking in consideration. The audio store guys were telling me to get a sound processor like the JBL MS-8 JBL Site, or a JBL MS-A1004 Link to JBL site or get a product from the Audiocontrol Brand. The thing is, I don't see many people putting DSPs on their cars, but reviews on those items make them seem like they really do improve the experience. Any thoughts? Thanks! |
A dsp is the best money spent on car audio. That then deadner.
|
Quote:
|
DSP can do a lot for how an audio system sounds. i used to install corporate board room AV systems and DSP programming for the more advanced multi-mic array systems can be daunting, but can make or break the entire system. If you are going to keep your head unit, DSP is the only way to make a genuine improvement. I have not used standalone car audio DSP, but I have used home receivers and car audio head units that employ the most important DSP processing elements, which are time alignment, self baseline EQ via calibrated microphone, user EQ, and user crossovers for each driver. Unless you're going with a high end audiophile head unit that has these features built-in, a standalone DSP should get it done.
|
Quote:
inifinty has BS tweeters, Id get these http://www.jbl.com/estore/jbl/us/pro...larProductOnly best speakers under 600$ in my opinion. I wont give input on the rear as dont think they should be used. |
Ms8 sucks... if I were to run a dsp it would be a rf360.3 or a arc audio ps8 or a mosconi 6to8, zapco also has a nice DSP.
Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2 |
Or sell the Kenwood and buy a pioneer p99rs
Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2 |
The 99 is one hell of a head unit; unfortunately it was a bit out of my budget,. The 80prs was more affordable and had a few features I could definitely use that the 99 lacked (bluetooth, more USB, etc).
OP, if you're willing to drop the touch screen, the 80prs or p99rs would negate the need for a separate DSP as the head unit will do everything and sound fantastic. |
As mentioned, best money spent is on a DSP, takes all the hassle out of tuning.
MS-8 are awful, had 2 die on me, never could get the tuning right. Go for an Alpine PXA H800 with RUX controller or Audison Bit one |
Another vote for the Audison BitOne or it's baby brother the Bit10. It really depends on how many channels you're trying to push actively.
|
Just looked up the Bit processors. There is a Bit10D. So does anyone know of a decent, more or less affordable H/U with a digital output?
|
The Alpine pxe-h660 is a "cheap" solution that works very good if you can learn it and spend the time tweaking it.
I have no issues with the quality I've gotten out of it with a PDX-V9. It's not close to as configurable as the others listed in this thread, but it's more than most folks would need, and you can't beat the cost! |
Quote:
|
Not anymore unfortunately. TOS/LINK never seemed to really catch on in car audio for reasons I've never quite understood. The Bit10D is really intended to be used with Audison's line of Voce amps. It has a digital output via RJ-45 into a special module for their amps, the Bit10 is basically the same device minus this functionality and with the controller module an optional accessory.
Knowing your budget and goals would be very helpful. The big players in the DPS field right now are Audison, Rockford Fosgate, JBL, JL Audio, and to a very lesser extent Alpine. I've heard the Audison in person and it's a phenominal unit. I've also heard good things about the new generation of Rockfords 3sixty line. The JL Audio CleanSweep seems to very VERY hit or miss. |
Mosconi 6to8 looks good too.
|
Quote:
It doesn't have anywhere near the power of a good processor, it's more like a deluxe output converter. |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2 |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
get this for the sub box instead. http://www.jlaudio.com/product/54216....1050512.0/BRZ
|
Quote:
|
JBL MS-8 works perfectly for me. If you use it properly with the right equipment, it will give you audiophile quality sound a hell of a lot quicker than a BitOne, 6to8, PS8 etc. I think a lot of amateurs just like having a myriad of bells and whistles to tool around with until it sounds good to them.
Also, the MS-8's method of post-set up EQ'ing is a hell of a lot more sophisticated than the 'nuts and bolts' DSPs and means that you're more likely to improve the sound by tweaking rather than constantly messing it up. Of course, if you're a professional audio engineer with 20 years experience and very expensive test equipment, it's possible you can do a better job than the MS-8. Also, somebody that lives and breathes car audio and spends several hours per day tuning systems could possibly beat the MS-8....maybe. |
Quote:
I usually recommend it to someone with a factory center who is swapping radios, have them run that over the oem amp and it cleans stuff up nicely. |
If you are contemplating setting up a processor, you might want to visit DIYMA and read this how-to thread. It sounds interesting.
http://www.diymobileaudio.com/forum/...your-ears.html |
Quote:
|
Guys whose services are made obsolete by a product don't like that product? Shocking.
|
I have installed and tuned over 300 dsps..25 or so were ms8s. There r advantages and disadvantages of it versus a more traditional unit. I will try to elaborate more when im back from vacation.
But two things for sure. 1. Ms8 never did or will. Replace an experienced tuner in a car. It was never meant to be that. 2. Experience still counts a lot when setting up the ms8. I would not call it a dsp for someone with zero knowledge. Rather someone with good and solid fundamentals in audio can achieve decent results in as little as 10 to 15 mins. B Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I317 using Tapatalk 2 |
I have an MS-8 as well. I haven't installed it yet in my FRS but had it in my previous car. A tC. It made a noticeable difference for my 3-way comps. For reference I've been tinkering with car audio for 25+ years; not professionally but have been in several competitions and worked closely with shops over the years. I'm considering opening my own shop when I finally retire from the AF.
|
Quote:
BTW... I love your avatar choice. Big GiTS fan! |
If you want to go old school I have a Rockford Symmetry EPX2 with the 28 band eq and the D-Card sitting in my closet.
:party0030: |
DSPs...
Bit Ten or if you can afford it Bit ONE, nothing touches em really for the money IMO. |
I'm surprised that no one has mentioned the Arc Audio PS-8.
|
Quote:
I wanna see what they come up w version 2s to compete with the newer products that have more tuning ability. Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I317 using Tapatalk 2 |
Quote:
I'm gonna come off like as ass but, its typical that people the "really like" the 6to8 dislike the bitone..... I think its bias honestly. Do you have any legitimate reason to not like the bitone? |
Quote:
I have installed quite a few bitones and helped tune many more...so my preference is based on those experiences. as for the 6to8, i do like the unit, but it is not pefect either, there are quite a few elements that i like more that comes on the bitone than the 6to8, but my final conclusion is that overall for system tuning and install, i prefer units other than the bit processors. as to my exact reasons, i dont think its my place to list those things publically on the forum, if you want i can PM you the full details. but i will say the central point is that for me, i prefer to tune with a full parametric eq with infinitely adjustable center frequencies and fully adjustable Qs. I feel that have a lot more flexility with this set up than a graphic eq and can achieve my desired results a lot faster. That is why i prefer processors with this feature over the ones with graphic EQs :) Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I317 using Tapatalk 2 |
Wow, I never expected to have so many options in the market, perhaps I'll have to import one, since in Peru we seem to only get JBL stuff.
Any advice in "easy-ness" to setup and change config? the audio store will do the initial work, but I'm more concerned if I want to tweak it down the line. |
Quote:
Fair enough reasons and I understand, I think it is what we become most familiar with plays a role in what we prefer as well for sure. |
I have an ms-8 plugged into the stock head unit and speakers. Sounds great. Easy to set up.
|
I'd love to hear the 6to8 but there's no dealers in the STL who carry their products.
|
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:33 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.