![]() |
Need ideas for possible (new-to-me) used car
Hey guys. As much as I want the FR-S, I need to get real with myself and realize that my gigantic student debt isn't going anywhere. Therefore, buying a brand new car is probably not the most sound financial decision to make right now, knowing how much debt I have and how much I actually make at my job. So, it looks like I may be in the market for a used car and I'm looking for some help on some models I should be looking at. I have the following requirements-
1. Lower mileage -
5. Good MPG - I'm shooting for 30mpg highway. 6. Price - Under $15k, preferably closer to $10k as I only plan to keep it a few years. 7. Must be manual transmission - I'm freakin' sick of auto. 8. Something decent in snow would be nice, but I plan to keep the elantra for winter driving. 9. I prefer honda, toyota, and nissan and their subsidiaries, but will consider others. I will not buy Hyundai, Subaru, or pretty much any American car, period. So far, the cars I've been looking at consist of-
|
Have you considered a 2ZZ-GE like the final generation Celica GT-S or the first gen XRS models (Corolla and Matrix)?
|
1st gen Audi TT?
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Perhaps this S2000?
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/2006-...#ht_735wt_1182 or this? http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/2003-...#ht_500wt_1182 or even this? http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/2004-...#ht_879wt_1182 |
WRX, TL type S, CL type S, Integra Type R, E36 M3
Those would be my top choices. My two good friends drive drive both the WRX and TL, both very quick and fun. |
Reliable to me means assembled in Japan, 2WD, naturally aspirated, piston engine. That cuts down the choices by a lot. Here's a few I'd add to your list:
Acura TSX Honda Fit Honda Prelude Infiniti G20 Infiniti G35 Lexus IS300 (hard to find manuals) Lexus SC300 (hard to find manuals) Mazda MX-5 and Miata Mazda Protege and Mazda3 Scion tC Toyota Celica GT and GT-S Toyota MR-2 Spyder |
Quote:
...along with a Laguna Seca Blue E46 M3 :drool: |
Quote:
and WRB>LSB :bonk: |
Quote:
Sorry for thread jacking Suprachica...:scared0016: |
Quote:
But yeah... I think S2000's fit the bill perfectly and the ones I posted are pretty damn affordable with pretty low miles! |
Miata.
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Thanks everyone for the ideas! |
And I'm coming to realize the s2000 doesn't have great gas mileage either...
|
I'd say I was in the same predicament 2 years ago. Things changed since then, but I was considering a used Subaru STI or an Honda S2000 at that point.
The 2dr. or even the 4dr. Honda Accord is worth the money and easy to maintain. I'm not much of a fan of the 8th gen. accord 4drs and up. I would say go for a Subaru cause of the awd for winter, but you already made your mind up on that. And my friend love's her altima coupe. She let me get behind the wheel and I thought it was a little fun car for an auto so it maybe equally as fun or better in a manual transmission. |
The s2000 has much better gas mileage than a WRX, but I wouldn't want to drive it 150 miles a day. Honestly, it seems like it would be in your best interest to get a comfortable, efficient, reliable car, and save money towards getting something faster later. I know that isn't really want anyone wants to hear, but, as the saying goes, patience is a virtue.
Why can't you get a decently equipped accord coupe and a track-rat, first gen miata on the side? |
With the S2000, I think you could get 26 mpg, if you were careful. And the fun factor would be to die for. Where you would make sacrifices is with lack of room to carry stuff. Also, the s2k is very reliable and super easy to work on.
If you get a Fit, don't get 2007-08 models. Good luck. It will be interesting to see which way you go. :happy0180: |
Apparently someone got 32mpg pulse and gliding the S2000 with engine on http://ecomodder.com/forum/em-fuel-l...vehicleid=3551
Seeing that even pulse and glide couldn't even get respectable (it's 2.2L, most cars with an engine like that do 30 easy) fuel economy out of an s2000, a 150 mile commute might hurt the wallet a lot. |
Quote:
Edit oops you are in CT. Near new York? Lucky to have it 6 months then :) |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
I am from Providence, RI. And let me tell you a Type R would be lucky to last 15 minutes here. I had a friend who bought a EP3 and it was literally stolen within a week of him purchasing it! |
I would buy a used civic hybrid, or used prius.
At 150 miles per day, you would spend $255 a month on gas with a prius, vs $480 a month at 26 mpg. On top of that, they have retardedly cheap maintenance. With that $230 a month you saved, you could get quite a few nice used sports cars for leisure use, and not worry about gas mileage. You could sell your hyundai, and put that as down payment on another < 10K sports car. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Would you consider a hatch? I'm driving now a Honda Fit and I freaking love it to death. It gets me about 31 mpg combined, its lightweight, and if you put a little bit of work into it, it can be fun to drive. Not to mention its very reliable and pretty damn cheep.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
oh, and add to the list? Nissan Maxima (2003 and earlier assembled in Japan) |
Quote:
|
Mazdas aren't very good on gas though are they?
A 2ZZ powered car sounds right for the job IMO...although the gearing is very short. You might want to pull the 6th gear from a Matrix XRS or something and swap it in, that could save you several hundred dollars a year in gas as it cuts your rpms down 12.5%. I wonder if you can pull the 5th gear from one of Toyota's 5 speed manuals. Probably not. Actually, probably not even worthwhile. Or, an MR-S which has a low cruising gear would do the trick too. |
1. stick to FWD, less things to break
2. stick to a FWD car that uses a solid rear beam in the back, contributes to less things to break (and if you ever happen to bend it, used ones are cheap in the rip-and-pulls 3. get a 4 door to pay less insurance (although not always the case) so i would suggest a VW Citi (or City?) Golf/Jetta or toyota yaris, the ford fiesta also fits. these cars will cost you very little up front, and little in long term care, they are comfortable and more than adequate for all of a persons daily car driving needs. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Considering what you have said, I would probably steer clear of an S2000. I owned a 2004 S2000 (AP2) for close to 2 years. I loved the car and it was a lot of fun. I also had the OEM hardtop on it which was nice. Here is why I would probably steer clear of it considering your situation.
First, I drove 70 miles round trip to get to work. It was all highway miles and the best I ever got was 25mpg and that was being "easy" on the throttle. Second, you go through rear tires at the cyclic rate. Be prepared to change rear tires every 20K miles. Third, road noise (and it gets worse as the rear tires wear). At 150 miles round trip every day, you might have a headache every day you get home. Fourth, if you don't have the hard top they are easy to break into and car thieves love to steal them (I was military so my car was either on base or in my garage so fortunately I didn't have to worry about this as much). Fifth, I see you are in CT? Driving a RWD sports car in inclement weather conditions is not always the best idea (especially if you are driving 150 miles round trip). Last but not least, good luck finding a low mileage one that doesn't have any issues for around 10K (yes, they occasionally show up but you have to be in the right place at the right time). They are fun and reliable though and someday I will own another one. A used 350Z may be a good compromise, but once again don't expect stellar MPG and be prepared to replace rear tires just like the S. I had a 2003 and I think I averaged around the same as the S with the exact same drive. You do pay more for insurance too so that has to be taken into account and the Z is probably just as limited on room as the S when you take into account the rear strut bar. Now, I would highly recommend looking into an Accord coupe. I've owned 2, a 1999 EX with the 4 cylinder and a 2003 LX with the 6 cylinder. Both were fun, got great mpg, reliable, comfortable and the insurance was cheap. The 4 cylinder was "only" around 150bhp but it was still "peppy". Remember, the money you save on gas and insurance can go towards either a) paying down your college debt quickly so you can get that "fun" car you really want or b) put into savings that can later be used to buy that "fun" car as a 2nd weekend warrior type car. Just a thought. |
Quote:
|
How is it possible? Well for one thing, Subaru engines got complete crap mpg despite being only 2L. When you throw a turbo on, you end up invariably losing a little bit of energy through the turbo when it attempts to produce boost when you don't need it. Turbo engines are also lower compression, which hurts low load economy a lot.
But the most important factor for mpg is gearing. The maximum efficiency level is obtained at somewhere between 70-100% load at any given rpm, you increase the rpm, you decrease the load. Oh may I add, the efficiency usually falls slowly until around 30% load, and then drops off very fast. On an S2000 for example, the highway rpm is so high that the engine is operating in abysmal conditions for efficiency. I reckon if they took that stupid 0.82 or whatever 6th gear and dropped it to 0.6, the car would be doing 35 mpg easily. Now as for why it can't get say 45-50mpg, it has horrible aerodynamics and since the engine revs to 9000 there were probably a lot of low end efficiency tradeoffs. For Mazda, I think the situation was similar to Subaru, their engines were just not very good in the efficiency department (otherwise Skyactiv wouldn't be claiming huge friction reduction numbers just to match the fuel economy of competitors like Hyundai and Honda), and I believe the MX-5 has short gears. And since it's a convertible, it has shit aerodynamics. The 2ZZ is pretty remarkable in that it doesn't get total crap mpg despite short gears and high revs :) Thanks to toughening EPA standards, in a few years time we'll stop seeing these nonsensical cruising gears, and 6 speeds will become the bare minimum in a transmission. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Geo Metro 1.0L, manual, hatch. Gets same real-world economy as a Prius (C&D test). It's fantastically cheap. And it could probably last long enough until you can buy a FR-S/BRZ. Problem solved. ;)
|
Early S2000. Within budget, dead reliable, 30 highway mpg, best freaking mass produced sports car on the market since the 240Z.
Totally disagree with the notion that FWD implies "less things to break". I've only ever owned rwd, and I've NEVER had a driveshaft, diff, or halfshaft failure. On any reasonably designed rwd car, these components will last an ETERNITY. In a way, fwd is more complicated! And it sucks. If not S2000, Miata. Life is short, don't dd an fwd car. |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:37 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.