Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB

Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/index.php)
-   FR-S / BRZ vs.... (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=25)
-   -   vs 2013 Dodge Dart (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=2930)

Snoopyalien24 12-16-2011 07:15 PM

vs 2013 Dodge Dart
 
Most of you are probably like what Dodge Dart? Isn't that a classic muscle car?

Well yeah it used to be. Turns out that Dodge is making a Dart once again, and introducing it at the NAIAS as a sport compact.

Here is the link for more info on the Dart - http://www.dodge.com/en/dart/

Now, the reason I chose this car to compare because they claim this:

Quote:

GROUNDBREAKING COMPACT CAR.
THE ULTIMATE BLEND.

Dodge redefines performance in the compact car segment with an all-new, state-of-the-art four-door sedan delivering class-leading aerodynamics. The all-new 2013 Dodge Dart is a thoroughly modern vehicle that's fuel-efficient, beautifully designed and crafted, agile and brings fun back to driving in the segment.

ALFA ROMEO DNA

The all-new Dodge Dart blends Alfa Romeo DNA & Dodge's passion for performance. Dodge Dart is adapted from the award-winning Alfa Romeo Giulietta. The Giulietta is renowned for satisfying the most demanding customers in terms of road-holding, agility and safety, with exceptional driving dynamics. The Dart leverages all of these attributes within a lengthened and widened platform delivering segment-leading levels of interior roominess.

UNMISTAKABLE TECHNOLOGY AND STYLE.

The all-new 2013 Dart delivers unmistakable Dodge design that builds upon its performance heritage while evoking emotion, efficiency and fluidity of movement. Eye-catching exterior proportions are set off from every angle by dynamic lines and curves, along with advanced technology, to deliver class-leading aerodynamic performance.

SOPHISTICATED,
POWERFUL FUEL-EFFICIENT ENGINES.

The 2013 Dodge Dart will be powered by three fuel-efficient, powerful, state-of-the-art four-cylinder engines that add to Dart's fun-to-drive quotient and provide the most diverse powertrain lineup in its class. Choose from a new Tigershark 16-valve 2.0-liter, a 16-valve 1.4-liter MultiAir® Intercooled Turbo, and a new Tigershark 16-valve 2.4-liter MultiAir® four-cylinder engine.
So what do you guys think? A competitor, even if it may be FWD?

Edit: Sounds like they are taking straight jabs at the AS1

Quote:

-The Dart's "driver-centric" layout is designed to put all controls within easy reach of the driver.
-Mopar will also offer hundreds of customization options and themed packages specifically developed for the Dart.
-To deliver class-leading aerodynamic performance.
-Beautifully designed and crafted, agile and brings fun back to driving in the segment.
http://www.dodge.com/en/dart/images/panel_1.png

http://www.dodge.com/en/dart/images/panel_2.png

http://www.dodge.com/en/dart/images/panel_3.png

http://www.dodge.com/en/dart/images/panel_4.png


Keatonus 12-16-2011 07:35 PM

I'm not sure about a direct competitor. But I will say that it fits into the same general mantra of "smaller and sportier".

A few things kill the Dart for me. FWD and Dodge are the predominant ones, the turbo sounds like it might be the enthusiast option, but at only 1.4L who knows how tuneable it will be.

I'd prefer the GT86 over it of course, but if it were RWD, the choice might be a little harder to make.

ryude 12-16-2011 07:36 PM

It's aiming at the Cruze and Fiesta. The Cruze Eco with Trifecta tune and intake makes close to 200 crank horsepower, not too shabby for a 1.4L that gets almost 50MPG (in the real world).

http://www.trifectaperformance.com/D...uzeLUJDyno.jpg

Trifecta tune 93 octane, no other mods.

carbonBLUE 12-16-2011 07:45 PM

yeah and that 9 speed auto... lol really?

Snoopyalien24 12-16-2011 07:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Keatonus (Post 99465)
I'm not sure about a direct competitor. But I will say that it fits into the same general mantra of "smaller and sportier".

A few things kill the Dart for me. FWD and Dodge are the predominant ones, the turbo sounds like it might be the enthusiast option, but at only 1.4L who knows how tuneable it will be.

I'd prefer the GT86 over it of course, but if it were RWD, the choice might be a little harder to make.

There is a 2.0 NA and a 2.4... well not sure if also NA or Turbocharged

But, they do have 3 engines to choose from and different interior trims. Thing is, I best it will weigh a lot. Prolly 3000lbs+, also having 4 doors.

But if it were to be RWD - it would be pretty good direct competitor.

Levi 12-16-2011 07:50 PM

What a joke comparing this to a GT86. Here in EU we have this car for quite some time. It is called Alfa Romeo Giulietta. In terms of driving experience it is worse than my Alfa 147. Quality is not any better, it is still far from any german. An price is high, 32.000 € for an Alfa Romeo Giulietta Quadrifoglio Verde with a +200 PS Turbo 1.7l I4.

Snoopyalien24 12-16-2011 08:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Levi (Post 99471)
What a joke comparing this to a GT86. Here in EU we have this car for quite some time. It is called Alfa Romeo Giulietta. In terms of driving experience it is worse than my Alfa 147. Quality is not any better, it is still far from any german. An price is high, 32.000 € for an Alfa Romeo Giulietta Quadrifoglio Verde with a +200 PS Turbo 1.7l I4.

You saying this thread is a joke or are you saying what they said is a joke?

BTW you telling us that what Dodge says are lies about the Alfa Romeo Giulietta receiving "many awards"? /sarcasm :bellyroll:

ahausheer 12-16-2011 08:37 PM

Dodge by definition: To avoid (someone or something).

Why would you buy a car whose name literally means to avoid??????

fatoni 12-16-2011 09:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ahausheer (Post 99500)
Dodge by definition: Avoid (someone or something) by a sudden quick movement. Why would you buy a car whose name literally means to avoid??????

why would you want to avoid something whose very name implies its agile?

Giccin 12-16-2011 09:30 PM

Why is there no picture of the Dodge Dart. >:l

Dimman 12-16-2011 09:35 PM

No personal experience with Alfas, but the Brit car mags sure rip on all the utilitarian Fiat family cars for crap quality. They make it sound like Chrysler was saved by the Euro Chrysler.

Any insight from people with experience?

(Yes I know, the Brit car writers can be rather biased and nationalistic...)

Snoopyalien24 12-16-2011 09:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Giccin (Post 99541)
Why is there no picture of the Dodge Dart. >:l

Their is, just hit exterior when you scroll down a bit. Bottom left

But, here they are anyways

http://www.dodge.com/en/dart/images/panel_1.png

http://www.dodge.com/en/dart/images/panel_2.png

http://www.dodge.com/en/dart/images/panel_3.png

http://www.dodge.com/en/dart/images/panel_4.png
(too big for me to put in post)

RYU 12-16-2011 09:37 PM

i've owned many Chryslers over the years and have family members with them (SRT-4, 300C Hemi, 96 Viper GT, numerous Caravans). They make for great company cars (lol) but they are horribly built and you definitely get what you pay for... actually some would argue you get less than what you pay for.

So many buzzwords in that press release made me scoff... Advanced Technology, Groundbreaking style???

I feel bad for saying all this since I really want our American car companies to do better.

mines13 12-16-2011 09:49 PM

I am not so sure about this one.

v12 12-16-2011 09:51 PM

and this one is 4 doors, by looking to the picture

Keatonus 12-16-2011 09:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RYU (Post 99548)
i've owned many Chryslers over the years and have family members with them (SRT-4, 300C Hemi, 96 Viper GT, numerous Caravans). They make for great company cars (lol) but they are horribly built and you definitely get what you pay for... actually some would argue you get less than what you pay for.

So many buzzwords in that press release made me scoff... Advanced Technology, Groundbreaking style???

I feel bad for saying all this since I really want our American car companies to do better.

So do I. Only one I'd support is Ford, even then though I've been hearing negative things.

Snoopyalien24 12-16-2011 09:53 PM

I added pics to the first post

ahausheer 12-16-2011 09:55 PM

You do get less than what you pay for, that is why you can't lease a Chrysler or at least you couldn't a few years ago, perhaps it has changed (dealers couldn't make money due to poor resale value). I have seen a few pics of the Dart and it looks good but I say, even shit can shine.

Snoopyalien24 01-09-2012 02:36 PM

Okay so price is in. It is wrong wheel drive - yes. But, it is priced at $15,995

http://www.autoblog.com/2012/01/09/2...eo-for-15-995/

n2oinferno 01-09-2012 02:38 PM

I don't think it'll be a real competitor. Not until they bring out the SRT4 version, that is. I do think it looks good though.

Snoopyalien24 01-09-2012 02:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by n2oinferno (Post 109928)
I don't think it'll be a real competitor. Not until they bring out the SRT4 version, that is. I do think it looks good though.

Someone wanting a "sports" car would look at this and say:

"Hmm 4 doors, nice interior, doesn't look bad, turbo, and only $16k"

vs. FR-S

"Hmm 2 doors, no real rear seats, so far okay interior, no turbo, but $20k+?"

I think this is more of a major competitor to the Scion tC

HitTheGas 02-28-2012 03:32 PM

Just read that they're going to be releasing a SRT version of the dart.

http://www.motortrend.com/future/fut...dge_dart_srt4/

Quote:

The base Dart borrows heavily from the Alfa Romeo Giulietta platform, so expect an upgraded version of the Giulietta Cloverleaf's dual-clutch, six-speed transmission to find its way into the Dart SRT4.

The all-aluminum, direct-injection, 300-hp four-cylinder engine that should arrive in the long-awaited Alfa Romeo 4C could be a perfect, though expensive, fit. A turbocharged and intercooled larger displacement version of the Dart's Tigershark 2.0-liter might be a better option.

Price? With a turbo Tigershark, figure close to Focus ST pricing; at 300 hp, it should price well north of that, but just below the AWD VW Golf R and Subaru WRX STI at just over $30,000.
http://image.motortrend.com/f/353498...e-quarters.jpg
http://image.motortrend.com/f/353499...e-quarters.jpg

Interesting. another cheap (edit maybe probably not AWD) 300+ hp turbo lightweight sedan is always welcome.

I prefer the looks of the FR-S & BRZ though. Much sexier lines.

But this is at least a huge leap in appearance from the old dodge neon SRT-4.

Snoopyalien24 02-28-2012 03:38 PM

Whoa whoa whoa... AWD? Holy guacamole!

I still prefer the new upcoming impreza :D

GenkiElite 02-28-2012 05:00 PM

Oh look, they re-named the Neon...."Hi"

Snoopyalien24 02-28-2012 05:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GenkiElite (Post 144307)
Oh look, they re-named the Neon...."Hi"

Well it is a pretty big difference between AWD and FWD.

HitTheGas 02-28-2012 05:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Snoopyalien24 (Post 144310)
Well it is a pretty big difference between AWD and FWD.

the neon offered an AWD model too. (edit no it didn't i was thinking of talon)

this really isn't the neon though. it's the same segment in their lineup as the neon. but it's an entirely different car based on an Alfa Romeo.

Chrysler/Dodge is owned by Fiat now.

SLeRoux92 02-28-2012 05:11 PM

Cobalt + Charger = new dart.


talk about one confusing love child

cassidy0998 02-28-2012 07:24 PM

Looks better than the old neon SRT-4.

I like it. Looks like it may really have the performance to back it up this time too.

GenkiElite 02-28-2012 07:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HitTheGas (Post 144314)
the neon offered an AWD model too.

this really isn't the neon though. it's the same segment in their lineup as the neon. but it's an entirely different car based on an Alfa Romeo.

Chrysler/Dodge is owned by Fiat now.

AWD Neon? No, I dont think so. Details?

tranzformer 02-28-2012 07:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Snoopyalien24 (Post 144252)
Whoa whoa whoa... AWD? Holy guacamole!

I still prefer the new upcoming impreza :D

Yeah I'm not sure how good the AWD system will be in this car. It sure is welcomed to have another competitor on the block, but I would risk the assumption that Subaru's AWD > this system's setup.

OrbitalEllipses 02-28-2012 07:58 PM

I was pretty sure the Dart was FWD... I was pretty sure I wasn't smoking crack that day either, so what gives?

tranzformer 02-28-2012 08:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OrbitalEllipses (Post 144459)
I was pretty sure the Dart was FWD... I was pretty sure I wasn't smoking crack that day either, so what gives?

Yeah the Dart is FWD. That is why I am confused/curious as well. I don't see any mention of AWD in the MT article. It was just HitTheGas who mentioned it. But I don't see any confirmation of that. Doubt Dodge would do this.

HitTheGas 02-28-2012 08:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GenkiElite (Post 144437)
AWD Neon? No, I dont think so. Details?

bah my bad. i was thinking of the talon. which isn't even a dodge.
waaaay off

Quote:

Originally Posted by OrbitalEllipses (Post 144459)
I was pretty sure the Dart was FWD... I was pretty sure I wasn't smoking crack that day either, so what gives?

i just got there somehow. probably it was the 22 hours w/ no sleep + them talking about it competing w/ the STi & Golf R which are AWD.

for that price i would think it would have to be. Because you can get a charger which is bigger, roomier, & has way more hp for that price.

Exage 02-28-2012 09:37 PM

I would wait a couple years on this one. I'm not one "keener" to test new European platforms transferring over to the North American market. I find there is above average quirks with said models, which will have to be sorted out in time. It will be better then the Caliber for obvious reasons (; it's not hard to beat). The SRT I'm not going to bench race yet because it's just speculated figures.

Snoopyalien24 02-28-2012 11:28 PM

So no AWD? Yeah no competition lol

SVTSHC 02-29-2012 11:06 AM

This thing won't be AWD. The regular dart is FWD and this is supposed to fill the gap the neon SRT-4 left behind. As far as thing thing being a force to be reckoned with... I wouldn't doubt it. Like it or not the neon SRT-4 was running with Vette's with some reasonable modification.

cassidy0998 02-29-2012 11:17 AM

Time will tell guys.

Nobody expected the new Charger to have an AWD option, and it does.

Snoopyalien24 02-29-2012 11:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cassidy0998 (Post 144922)
Time will tell guys.

Nobody expected the new Charger to have an AWD option, and it does.

Why doesn't anyone do the normal thing and make them RWD?

brufleth 02-29-2012 11:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Levi (Post 99471)
What a joke comparing this to a GT86. Here in EU we have this car for quite some time. It is called Alfa Romeo Giulietta. In terms of driving experience it is worse than my Alfa 147. Quality is not any better, it is still far from any german. An price is high, 32.000 € for an Alfa Romeo Giulietta Quadrifoglio Verde with a +200 PS Turbo 1.7l I4.

Oh that's what this is? Then I drove one on a business trip to Italy last year. The one I drove had a little diesel in it. It was alright. Not what I would really consider sporty but then it was a rental and different engine than this thing will come with.

It definitely was sort of bloated to be considered a competitor for the FRS/BRZ. It had a good sized back seat and trunk. We fit three people and their luggage for a week in it (it was packed very tight). I would say it is more a competitor for the Impreza, Civic, etc. Even sported up I think comparing it to the BRZ is sort of apples and oranges.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:18 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.


Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.