FA20CLUB Power Pack #1 Tested
 

We've been working on an affordable package to bump up the power and not break the bank. We finally got a chance to get it on a local Dynojet for apples/apples comparisons.

Power Pack Components:
FA20Club Front Over Pipe
FA20Club Front Pipe Catless
aFe Dry Intake System

Tested numbers with the combined tune were 183.84HP 144.85TQ not bad for a total of only about $1600.00 invest with a tune. Thats what we call bang for the buck. And these numbers were in Florida heat/humidity index.

http://i1051.photobucket.com/albums/...psa3b20d86.jpg

Get to 200hp NA, you will have all my money !
I still have to run the stage 2 you sent me, it's just do damn cold outside 😢

Are you going to be offering the front pipe and over pipe separately? I already have the AFE/Greddy intake.

ONLY 1600?!

I'm assuming that comes with a tune. There's no way an I/E on a stock tune is making 185 whp LOL.

Where are you guys located? I'd be really interested in an in house tune. I'm up in Tampa.

DDPR hit 190whp STOCK with just a tune. I think it's funny for $1600, you can get 185whp with mods. :lol:

DDPR also hit "177whp" before tuning. So a gain of 13 is within the realm of possibility :)

Yeah, it's about the before/after.... Dynos are apples to apples.
Gains over stock is apples to apples.

What a stupid post, fitting username. Yeah 13whp... You are making them look bad.

Great job FA20.

E85 or 93? if 93 then I def wanna see with E85!

@Drift-Office did better on mine with a tune and AVO's intake. Hell of a lot cheaper than $1600.

http://i22.photobucket.com/albums/b3...ps685543fc.jpg

What a stupid post? You mad bro? I'm just showing what potential this car has stock with a little tuning. I'm not meaning for them to look bad, sorry if I did.

And 13 whp is a lot when your comparing stock ---> mods.

Different cars, different dynos, different dyno conditions play a HUGE role in the hp numbers achieved. Crimony, you have to look at the numbers over stock with the same car, on the same dyno, in the same conditions...:bonk:

Comparing different dynos and cars is pretty dumb. Might as well compare track times from different tracks.

Seems like a nice package.

LOL not bad considering it was 69 degrees. That car would never make that in florida its like comparing a dyno run in high elevation to ours its not the same situation. Most cars even with a tune one isnt making that in our weather. Infact even there base run was on a different date with 80 degrees and low humidity. Our stage 2 tune makes about 7-8whp more power in other areas of the country due to geographic location alone.

e85 is next

they have been available for a while now on our site for sale

Need a baseline dyno.

Was this with your stage2 tune? Sorry, not sure if I saw it mentioned.

car baselined on another local dynojet a couple weeks prior at 160hp without tune or mods. it wasnt on this dyno

OK. Just looking for a way to figure out what the actual gains were on the same dyno.

most dynojet numbers are comparable but you have to remember that geographic location plays allot in end results. this car be it was not dyno'd prior on the same dyno the baseline is still valid since we are located in the same general area

I know i have asked this and it's probably been answered, but any dyno numbers with just your intake system and does the intake system require a tune?

my car will be going back to stock later on this week to get our intake as well as another one tested with and without a tune

Awesome. Keep us posted! If a tune is required then Im going to have to hold off for more $$$ since I just purhased a Perrin carback.

already stated in the intake thread no tune needed our intake doesnt bog or cause flat spots

Okay thanks for reminding me. Im in my iphone in between meetings and it's sloooow going trying to open different pages.

Saw myself tagged in here.

Why the quotes? We have plenty of pulls from back at 300 miles showing 165 or less to the tire on my dyno - AND I have pulls showing 150s,168,170,172/173 on the stock tune before reset and on the base ECUTEK map (supposedly stock) with the IAM set at 0.7.

I could have posted any of that as the before for the tune - But instead we waited till the car was totally stable HP wise after break in and gave the best possible conditions for the before pull. (Warm oil, cold coolant, fresh reset)

Look - my second run versus my most recent run (both in SAE) we made like 30 HP Yo!!!!!
http://www.ddperformanceresearch.com..._and_after.jpg

Seriously - that *IS* my car's second pull ever in SAE vs the most recent in SAE. Both runs are stock and the only difference is the tune and a few (10,000) miles. But while it would make a cool marketing tool, its not REALLY representative is it?


This however - is totally apples to apples WITH a 1.0 IAM on the before pull to boot (despite the claims that stock is actually a 0.7 IAM). The car wasn't even removed from the dyno between the 2 pulls - it was strapped down exactly the same for days while Jason (Illusive) worked on the tune.
http://www.ddperformanceresearch.com...tek%20tune.jpg


Compare that to some people (not the ones in this thread - I really don't know anything about them) who install a bunch of parts and THEN do an ECU reset for the "after" dyno.... (we have been able to make 5-6 HP repeatedly simply from just the ECU reset BTW - and we have posted that result too)


So... yeah - that was all over the place. But - the car made what it made dude.

And if you think my dyno reads high - check this FJ cruiser dyno out: :D

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ayYA...e_gdata_player


http://www.ddperformanceresearch.com.../FJ%20dyno.jpg

In retrospect - I should have just said "Don't drag me into this" - would have been a much shorter post :D

The quotes weren't meant in a bad way, but with everyone questioning dyno's locations/calibrations/whatever... I figured I'd be politically correct. I got called a troll for taking another dyno at face value in a vortech thread. Nothing against you, Boosted.

I totally understand - Its all good.