Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB

Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/index.php)
-   Engine, Exhaust, Transmission (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=8)
-   -   GFB 3-Piece lightweight aluminum pulley kit (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=24081)

Touge Factory 12-11-2012 07:28 PM

GFB 3-Piece lightweight aluminum pulley kit
 
GFB (Go Fast Bits) has just released their 3 piece lightweight aluminum pulley kit for the FR-S / BRZ FA20 motor.

The pulleys are made out of 6061 T6 billet aluminum. Design is slightly different then AGP and Perrin.
With GFB kit, you get crank pulley, alternator pulley, and water pump pulley.
One of the main reasons why you would install a lightweight pulley on your car is to reduce rotational inertia. Reduction in rotating inertia allows the engine to accelerate throughout the rev range much more efficiently. This allows you to get up into the power band much faster.

Install was a nothing out of the ordinary. The Alternator and water pump pulley came off easily. The crank pulley will require the use of a breaker bar.
Since the pulleys are not underdriven, the stock belts can be re-used.

With the pulleys installed we started the car and went for a test drive.
We immediately noticed the difference in acceleration in the 2nd and 3rd gear. Once it gets up to around 3500 rpm range revs really come on fast. Rev matching is much easier, and car feels more responsive to your throttle inputs as well.

Overall we are very pleased with the quality of the pulleys, and best of all we like the overall improvement on the drive-ability.

http://cdn2.bigcommerce.com/server28...48.600.400.jpg

Crank Pulley: 4.15 pounds difference!!!!
http://cdn2.bigcommerce.com/server28...42.600.400.jpg

A/C pulley: 50% less weight!
http://cdn2.bigcommerce.com/server28...45.600.400.jpg

Holding these two in your hands... pretty shocking to feel the difference.
http://cdn2.bigcommerce.com/server28...46.600.400.jpg

Installed...looking pretty
http://cdn2.bigcommerce.com/server28...47.600.400.jpg

For Pricing please CLICK HERE

Turdinator 12-11-2012 07:32 PM

Are they under driven as well?

Touge Factory 12-11-2012 07:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Turdinator (Post 603277)
Are they under driven as well?

They are not.

Turdinator 12-11-2012 07:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Touge Factory (Post 603278)
They are not.

Perfect! Thank you for the quick reply :thumbup:

ill86 12-11-2012 11:28 PM

You might have some more of my $...

ahaghshenas 12-12-2012 03:55 AM

Is that not the water pump pulley not the A/C?????

86_ZN6 12-12-2012 04:24 AM

does it cone in any other color?

ill86 12-12-2012 05:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 86_ZN6 (Post 603941)
does it cone in any other color?

GFB pulley kits are typically black.

_F-R-S_ 12-12-2012 06:29 AM

Any long term effects to the engine?/ alternator

Touge Factory 12-12-2012 02:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ahaghshenas (Post 603925)
Is that not the water pump pulley not the A/C?????


You are correct. A/C pulleys are "clutched" cannot replace that.
The lower pulley is the WATER pump pulley.

Sorry about that.

gmookher 12-12-2012 03:09 PM

Please PM me price to 86351 thanks

Touge Factory 12-12-2012 03:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by _F-R-S_ (Post 603983)
Any long term effects to the engine?/ alternator

Here is what Go Fast Bits wrote:

A better name for a harmonic balancer would be "torsional dampener" since its main task is to absorb the rotational pulses inflicted on the crankshaft by the pistons. Most often it is incorporated into the crank pulley by attaching the outer belt drive ring to the inner by means of vulcanized rubber. At the right RPM, it is possible for a resonant frequency to be set up torsionally on the crankshaft. Resonant frequency occurs when the pulses of the engine correspond with the natural frequency of the crankshaft and it ancillary components. However, since factory pulleys are often comparatively heavy (reasons for this are described later) it is actually the large mass (and therefore inertia) of the factory harmonic balancer and flywheel that will help to excite this natural frequency. So by dramatically reducing the weight and inertia of the crank pulley, the natural frequency of the crankshaft is shifted and its ability to self-excite is greatly reduced. So in fact it is the harmonic balancer's own weight that necessitates the dampening, and since the weight of a GFB crank pulley is typically about 20% of the factory component it cannot supply an exciting force significant enough to damage the crankshaft.

An opinion often expressed is "if the manufacturer put it there, it must be there for a reason". However, if you look at it from the car manufacturer's point of view, casting pulleys from steel is very cheap and easy, because they can be produced in large numbers and there is no waste (as opposed to machining them from billet). But because the resulting pulley weighs significantly more than one made from aluminium alloy, it requires dampening.

Manufacturers will always build cars (even high performance cars) to suit the widest possible selection of driving scenarios and drivers, which means there are always compromises. The weight of the flywheel and pulley also affect how fast the revs drop between gear shifts, and a production car is designed to only allow the revs to drop fast enough for average shifts. If you hurry the shift the revs will be too high for the next gear, resulting in a sharp jerk as the momentum of the engine transmits through the drivetrain. Reducing the engines' inertia with a lightweight pulley kit allows faster and smoother shifting.

When looking at high performance engines such as those found in Honda VTEC equipped cars and the S2000, it is obvious that manufacturers do understand the benefits of reducing engine inertia, and have utilized lightweight pulleys to help the power output and responsiveness without the use of a harmonic balancer.

However, this is not the case for all engines, many of them do require the use of the harmonic balancer to prevent failure. Skylines with the RB20, 25 and 26 are a good example of this, which is why we don't make a pulley kit for them. The pulley kits we do make are for engines that do not rely on the balancer to any significant degree.

Craig 12-12-2012 04:47 PM

Would this be beneficial on an AT? I've been waiting to see what other options come out and considering swapping out most of the pulleys to reduce weight.

_F-R-S_ 12-12-2012 05:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Touge Factory (Post 604793)
Here is what Go Fast Bits wrote:

A better name for a harmonic balancer would be "torsional dampener" since its main task is to absorb the rotational pulses inflicted on the crankshaft by the pistons. Most often it is incorporated into the crank pulley by attaching the outer belt drive ring to the inner by means of vulcanized rubber. At the right RPM, it is possible for a resonant frequency to be set up torsionally on the crankshaft. Resonant frequency occurs when the pulses of the engine correspond with the natural frequency of the crankshaft and it ancillary components. However, since factory pulleys are often comparatively heavy (reasons for this are described later) it is actually the large mass (and therefore inertia) of the factory harmonic balancer and flywheel that will help to excite this natural frequency. So by dramatically reducing the weight and inertia of the crank pulley, the natural frequency of the crankshaft is shifted and its ability to self-excite is greatly reduced. So in fact it is the harmonic balancer's own weight that necessitates the dampening, and since the weight of a GFB crank pulley is typically about 20% of the factory component it cannot supply an exciting force significant enough to damage the crankshaft.

An opinion often expressed is "if the manufacturer put it there, it must be there for a reason". However, if you look at it from the car manufacturer's point of view, casting pulleys from steel is very cheap and easy, because they can be produced in large numbers and there is no waste (as opposed to machining them from billet). But because the resulting pulley weighs significantly more than one made from aluminium alloy, it requires dampening.

Manufacturers will always build cars (even high performance cars) to suit the widest possible selection of driving scenarios and drivers, which means there are always compromises. The weight of the flywheel and pulley also affect how fast the revs drop between gear shifts, and a production car is designed to only allow the revs to drop fast enough for average shifts. If you hurry the shift the revs will be too high for the next gear, resulting in a sharp jerk as the momentum of the engine transmits through the drivetrain. Reducing the engines' inertia with a lightweight pulley kit allows faster and smoother shifting.

When looking at high performance engines such as those found in Honda VTEC equipped cars and the S2000, it is obvious that manufacturers do understand the benefits of reducing engine inertia, and have utilized lightweight pulleys to help the power output and responsiveness without the use of a harmonic balancer.

However, this is not the case for all engines, many of them do require the use of the harmonic balancer to prevent failure. Skylines with the RB20, 25 and 26 are a good example of this, which is why we don't make a pulley kit for them. The pulley kits we do make are for engines that do not rely on the balancer to any significant degree.

Just for that writeup send me an invoice and ill buy it..

LIKEABOSS 12-12-2012 07:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by _F-R-S_ (Post 604992)
Just for that writeup send me an invoice and ill buy it..

When you get them on let me know how you like them. I might be in for a set as well.

bgibbsunc 12-12-2012 07:53 PM

Price sent to 78148

Andrew360 12-12-2012 08:30 PM

Price shipped to 11372.

Ingen 12-12-2012 08:54 PM

As a curiosity, why does nobody do any of the other pulleys? I mean, the idlers have mass as well, and since they are not transmitting any torque could be unbelievably light.

Why does nobody do it? Cost / benefit, or some other reason?

kask2_6.0 12-12-2012 09:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ingen (Post 605399)
As a curiosity, why does nobody do any of the other pulleys? I mean, the idlers have mass as well, and since they are not transmitting any torque could be unbelievably light.

Why does nobody do it? Cost / benefit, or some other reason?

I haven't checked on this car so don't hold me to it, but most cars have plastic idlers. Won't save very much weight there if any at all.

PrDarkKnight 12-12-2012 09:17 PM

PM me the prices! BTW I second the AT question on how does it benefit

Captain Insano 12-12-2012 10:31 PM

Awesome writeup!!

For those asking if this benefits AT - of course it does. Anything that drops rotational weight is beneficial for quicker revs and acceleration the more weight you drop... and less driveline weight the engine needs to directly move/spin. You wont notice from a shift "feel" perspective like a MT though since that is all "automated" on the AT cars.

number1Tango 12-12-2012 10:54 PM

this won't throw CELs for being so light? don't quote me on this but, I remember reading on here someone talking about the wrx's and what not having CELs because the system was so light the car thought it was misfiring.. anyone have any incite? Perrin said something that that's why they kept theirs at a moderate weight and they HAD the option of going lower in weight but didn't. maybe that's just a thing of the past..

zex 12-13-2012 12:21 AM

price shipped to L4S1W8 Canada. Thanks

Norkoastal 12-13-2012 12:46 AM

Interested but would like to see a couple reviews from folks talking about any possible compromises with these installed..

MattQ-WP 12-13-2012 03:50 AM

Agreed. I would love to get some but the salesperson would be the last person to slate their own product.. I remember their being a very anti-low weight pulleys post from one of the other tuners somewhere on these forums so would be keen to re-visit that opinion vs this one

Celica00 12-13-2012 04:23 AM

could you get the water pump and alternator pulleys alone as i've already purchased a crank pulley.

Kodename47 12-13-2012 05:51 AM

Looks good. Any ideas of cost delivered to the UK?

Touge Factory 12-13-2012 02:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by number1Tango (Post 605597)
this won't throw CELs for being so light? don't quote me on this but, I remember reading on here someone talking about the wrx's and what not having CELs because the system was so light the car thought it was misfiring.. anyone have any incite? Perrin said something that that's why they kept theirs at a moderate weight and they HAD the option of going lower in weight but didn't. maybe that's just a thing of the past..

We will let you know if any CEL's come up, but having driven this car for about a week now... everything is good so far.

WolfsFang 12-13-2012 03:21 PM

Is it possible to get 2 piece? I already have a lightweight pulley

gmookher 12-13-2012 05:03 PM

nice kit

Darryljr11 12-13-2012 05:26 PM

Interested but I wanna see how it performs for others. Won't be putting any parts on the FR-S till May anyways.

OrbitalEllipses 12-13-2012 07:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Captain Insano (Post 605558)
Awesome writeup!!

For those asking if this benefits AT - of course it does. Anything that drops rotational weight is beneficial for quicker revs and acceleration the more weight you drop... and less driveline weight the engine needs to directly move/spin. You wont notice from a shift "feel" perspective like a MT though since that is all "automated" on the AT cars.

The problem with the AT will be the torque converter. You can drop all the rotational mass you want, but that torque converter will always have the most drag (fluid).

Captain Insano 12-13-2012 07:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OrbitalEllipses (Post 607440)
The problem with the AT will be the torque converter. You can drop all the rotational mass you want, but that torque converter will always have the most drag (fluid).

Ummm... Even if you think the torque converter is a huge loss in power (in reality it's not) dropping rotational mass is still only going to help. If you have to fight the fluid in torque converter and 100 lbs of mass to spin, and you change the equation so you have to fight the fluid in the torque converter and only have to fight say 90 or 80 or 70 lbs of mass... Does it help to have dropped that mass? Rhetorical question.

OrbitalEllipses 12-13-2012 07:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Captain Insano (Post 607449)
Ummm... Even if you think the torque converter is a huge loss in power (in reality it's not) dropping rotational mass is still only going to help. If you have to fight the fluid in torque converter and 100 lbs of mass to spin, and you change the equation so you have to fight the fluid in the torque converter and only have to fight say 90 or 80 or 70 lbs of mass... Does it help to have dropped that mass? Rhetorical question.

The point was that incremental drops in rotating mass won't help as much as you're making it seem like they do. You can't defeat physics at the end of the day.

And I never said power.

Captain Insano 12-13-2012 07:39 PM

The same could be said on an MT or AT.
The point was that incremental drops in rotating mass won't help as much as you're making it seem like they do.

And the tiny fraction of a difference the torque converter makes compared to the MT, you could again say the same thing you said...
The point was that incremental drops in rotating mass won't help as much as you're making it seem like they do.

I guess my opinion is - if you are contending these pulleys make no difference or minimal difference on an AT or MT, maybe that is true, I haven't run them. But I would say I'm a very firm believer in dropping weight, especially rotational weight. If you are trying to say these pulleys make a bigger difference on an MT versus an AT, maybe, but I woudl think it would be so imperceptible that the diff would not be noticeable.

I'm done, I'm not going to fight about AT versus MT. It has been beaten to death.

The pulleys look great.

OrbitalEllipses 12-13-2012 07:43 PM

Heavy fluid filled torque converter vs. flywheel that you can replace for a lightweight piece; that's where the most difference in feel will be had from dropping rotating mass.

Enjoy your delusions. /out

Captain Insano 12-13-2012 07:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OrbitalEllipses (Post 607494)
Heavy fluid filled torque converter vs. flywheel that you can replace for a lightweight piece; that's where the most difference in feel will be had from dropping rotating mass.

Enjoy your delusions. /out

OK, I will enjoy my delusional state that a torque converter somehow renders dropping rotation weight as a pointless exercise. I guess lightweight wheels, lighter drive shafts, lighter pulleys are all pointless modifications on a car with a torque converter. Thanks for all your wisdom on this topic I do appreciate it. /out

soros151 12-14-2012 10:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Touge Factory (Post 604793)
Here is what Go Fast Bits wrote:

A better name for a harmonic balancer would be "torsional dampener" since its main task is to absorb the rotational pulses inflicted on the crankshaft by the pistons. Most often it is incorporated into the crank pulley by attaching the outer belt drive ring to the inner by means of vulcanized rubber. At the right RPM, it is possible for a resonant frequency to be set up torsionally on the crankshaft. Resonant frequency occurs when the pulses of the engine correspond with the natural frequency of the crankshaft and it ancillary components. However, since factory pulleys are often comparatively heavy (reasons for this are described later) it is actually the large mass (and therefore inertia) of the factory harmonic balancer and flywheel that will help to excite this natural frequency. So by dramatically reducing the weight and inertia of the crank pulley, the natural frequency of the crankshaft is shifted and its ability to self-excite is greatly reduced. So in fact it is the harmonic balancer's own weight that necessitates the dampening, and since the weight of a GFB crank pulley is typically about 20% of the factory component it cannot supply an exciting force significant enough to damage the crankshaft.

An opinion often expressed is "if the manufacturer put it there, it must be there for a reason". However, if you look at it from the car manufacturer's point of view, casting pulleys from steel is very cheap and easy, because they can be produced in large numbers and there is no waste (as opposed to machining them from billet). But because the resulting pulley weighs significantly more than one made from aluminium alloy, it requires dampening.

Manufacturers will always build cars (even high performance cars) to suit the widest possible selection of driving scenarios and drivers, which means there are always compromises. The weight of the flywheel and pulley also affect how fast the revs drop between gear shifts, and a production car is designed to only allow the revs to drop fast enough for average shifts. If you hurry the shift the revs will be too high for the next gear, resulting in a sharp jerk as the momentum of the engine transmits through the drivetrain. Reducing the engines' inertia with a lightweight pulley kit allows faster and smoother shifting.

When looking at high performance engines such as those found in Honda VTEC equipped cars and the S2000, it is obvious that manufacturers do understand the benefits of reducing engine inertia, and have utilized lightweight pulleys to help the power output and responsiveness without the use of a harmonic balancer.

However, this is not the case for all engines, many of them do require the use of the harmonic balancer to prevent failure. Skylines with the RB20, 25 and 26 are a good example of this, which is why we don't make a pulley kit for them. The pulley kits we do make are for engines that do not rely on the balancer to any significant degree.


That's a good theory. Nice. The CEL engine everyone is talking about is about the pulley being so light that the crank sensor would read twice and thus throw a check engine light.

Touge Factory 12-17-2012 04:16 PM

Good news guys,

GFB will allow customers to purchase the two accessory pulleys for anyone that already has the crank pulley.
MSRP: $190.00 for the two pulleys.

:thumbup:

Touge Factory 01-11-2013 08:13 PM

The 3 piece pulley sets are BACK IN STOCK!


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:31 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.


Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.