Of Curb Weights and why this car will not weigh under 2600lbs
 

We've seen a wide range in curb weights lately from both magazine articles and leaked information.

My goal with this thread is discuss why we are seeing such a wide range in weights this close to the actual debut of the car and why we are seeing the numbers we are seeing.

One important thing to realize about this car is that its a Subaru drivetrain chassis for the most part. The suspension bits are almost straight out of the current Impreza's, and the drivetrain minus the front differential and axles is going to be close to the same weight of a Subaru drivetrain.

Why does this matter? Because it gives us a good indicator of how much this car will actually weight.

Curb weights and Subaru's:

I know a few folks here know me from other Subaru forums, but one of things I've done over the years was compile a list of Subaru curb weights for EVERY model sold in the U.S. These numbers were taken from actual service manuals so they were about as accurate as they can get.

The lightest AWD Impreza ever sold in the U.S. was the 1993 base model L and that came in at 2500lbs. This was a car that had 14" wheels, NO abs, NO passenger airbag, NO power anything, TINY brakes with drum rear brakes, possibly NO A/C (not sure) and NO options at all possibly not even a stereo (I don't have the exact model details, I need a brochure for that).

The lightest model gained weight in 95 up to 2555lbs and in 1996 several reinforcments were added to the chassis along with other component improvements that upped the weight to 2715lbs!

Now I also have some European weights, but since they measure curb weights different it is impossible to know if these compare correctly. But in 1993, the lightest AWD model in Europe was 2460lbs but had a smaller motor and probably even less options, and I'm not sure where that number came from, possibly not even service manuals.

Important things to note:

The EJ engines form this period were SOHC 1.8 or 2.2 motors with MUCH smaller heads (Phase I) and the engine was lighter than later 2.5 SOHC and DOHC motors.

PLUS, the rear subframe on these cars was VERY light compared to the Multi-link subframe in the current cars. How do I know this? Well I worked in a Subaru parts department for awhile and had to carry these things around! The multilink subframe is VERY heavy, not including the actual multilink components. Probably 50-75% heavier than the non-multilink subframes. The strut assembly is heavier on the non-multilink rears, but not nearly enough to compensate for the subframe and component weight difference.

Comparing to the FT86 chassis:

Now I know you might be saying to yourself, "Why are we comparing an AWD car to a RWD car in terms of weight?". Well the important thing to know is that Subaru's AWD is simple and mechanical. If you remove the front axles and front differential, you have a RWD drivetrain. That accounts for ONLY 50lbs or so no more. Yes, there is a center differential but Subaru 5-speed manuals are NOT complicated and not heavy and compared to the 6-speed in the FT86 it will be very comparable on weight probably including the middle AND front differential!

Now, how does this matter with the FT86 chassis? Well, we know several things about the FT86 chassis now and what the car will have that will give us an indication of the weight of the vehicle.

First, the rear subframe is the same as the current Imprezas. This means the rear suspension is heavier than earlier Imprezas. The front suspension and subframe is an unknown, possibly lighter but supposedly the same engine mount style so probably close to the same.

Second, the FT86 engine is heavier. The FB motors gained a little weight over the SOHC EJ25 normally asperated motors due to the use of the timing chain, DOHC and aluminum timing chain cover. Even with the plastic manifold, they are heavier. And the SOHC EJ25's were heavier than earlier Impreza Phase I motors.

Thirdly, the FT86 has much larger brakes and wheels than early Imprezas. This will add to the weight even more.

Fourthly, the FT86 WILL have between 4 and 7 airbags possibly more. Thats extra weight right there. Even if the radio is optional, the bits and pieces from the FT86 WILL weight more than early Imprezas.

Finally, the Chassis... First generation Imprezas were small, very small. The chassis were also developed 20 years ago so they don't have the safety considerations in mind as a current car would have and also don't have the structural rigidity either. Even if they managed to save weight on the FT86, its still going to have as heavy or heavier chassis than a first generation Impreza.

Doing the Math:

For the purposes of this segment, I'm going to use my 1995 Impreza because its a known quantity (I know what came with the car and what didn't) and I know the curb weight... 1995 L Coupe AWD - 2605lbs (has A/C, small 14" wheels, no ABS or power anything)

Here are a list of the things I discussed and how they compare between the older Impreza and the new FT86-

Engine - FT86 heavier by ~10-25lbs
Transmission - AWD probably heavier, but not much, subtract 50lbs (+10 for 6-speed vs. 5-speed)
Front Suspension and Subframe - Probably a wash
Rear suspension - FT86 ~25lbs heavier
Wheels and tires- FT86 10-20lbs more per wheel, ~40-80lbs
Brakes - FT86 5-10lbs heavier each corner, ~20-40lbs
ABS - FT86 has it, add ~20-30lbs
Airbags - Impreza has 2 vs. 4+ for FT86, add 10-30lbs
Interior - Probably a wash (the rear seat only weighs 30lbs on the Impreza and the front seats are not that heavy, the rest of the interior is spartan including bits in the trunk)
Chassis - Unknown, close to wash. Impreza has almost zero extra reinforcements

Total: FT86 heavier by between ~50 and 230lbs

So the FT86 might weight between 2650lbs and 2800lbs+

The bad news:

This does line up almost exactly with what we saw from the Toyota leaked brochure weight numbers with the higher weights being determined by content, and the VERY low weight being a base model with steel wheels and unpainted bumpers (and no radio).

I highly suspect the final weight is going to be OVER 2700lbs possibly even higher.

The ONLY way this won't happen is if the chassis is insanely light, which there is almost zero chance of it weighing less than a 20 year old tiny chassis with no modern structural improvements.

The GOOD news!:

The good news about this is that weight reduction is EASY for early Imprezas. This will also apply to the FT86 chassis.

There are other threads about this, but the easy weight reductions are these:

Delete the back seat (~30lbs)
Dump the junk in the trunk (~30lbs)
Lightweight battery (~15lbs)
Lightweight bumper beams (~30lbs)

Those are all things I've done with my Impreza for racedays (the bumper beams stay put though) and all things that can easily get the car down to the 2600lbs range or possibly lower if it does turn out that the base models are in the 2600lbs range.

Final thoughts:

There a lot of people who are going to be upset about the production weight of this car. Its not going to be as light as some of the ridiculously light FWD cars on the market right now (Mazda 2 comes to mind).

But this is a RWD car thats not made of exotic lightweight materials and not made 20+ years ago when crash tests and safety standards barely existed.

WE SHOULD BE HAPPY that this car will weigh 2800lbs or less and realize that our expectations of a near 2500lbs car are unwarranted and unrealistic.

You make some pretty compelling points, the majority of which aren't going to be answered until we get actual specs from Toyota or Subaru, or until someone gets their car on a scale. However, I will say that your assumtion that just because the crash standards have become more stringent compared to 20 years ago, that the chassis will have to be heavier, isn't necessarily true. Design and engineering have also come a long way in 20 years and costs for lighter materials have also been reduced as well.

So, this car has a Impreza rear subframe with double wishbone suspension? Weird.

Nice post, well thought out.

FWIW, the magazine "specs" are simply guesses that haven't been directly refuted by Toyota or Subaru.

The leaked datasheet reads 1190Kg [2618 Lb] for the stripped out model, 1210Kg [2662 Lb] for the low-spec, and 1230Kg [2706 Lb] for the high-spec. Who knows if this is dry, wet, "unladen", or something else entirely. I wouldn't be surprised if the cars were slightly more than these quoted weights by the time they hit showroom floors.

Quite a few flaws with your arguing.

You forget technological advancements in the past decade have given auto producers the ability to make better parts (lighter) for less.

Also the '93 Impreza was designed as a cheap(heavy) econo car, the brz has had lightweight principles in its development since its conception.

Final thoughts: You will be wrong, nice try though. :)

Yes the OP may have glossed over a few points [that I assumed would be obvious, but apparently not]. The '93 Impreza may have been a heavy car for its size in 1993, but it's light in 2013. You're forgetting the cost of technology and significant monetary inflation in the past 10 years that negates the ability to implement new technology in an affordable car. You're also forgetting economies of scale; mass produced vs. small batch production.

Lightweight principles are nice in a boardroom meeting, but when the cash is laid down, parts bit bits get put on and the weight ideals are cast aside.

just for kickers lets look at the basics:
battery
backseat
spare tire if there is one
that is at least 50lbs right there between 2600-2700 is fine with me. I guess extrem guys will get down to 2400ish but then all the comforts are gone and the car is just a shell.

Well it is called Fuji Heavy Industries for a reason! I wonder if it was a Toyota chassis and Toyota engine, how much different would it weigh?

Although Insideline's weight checked in at 2822 on the pre-production, we'll have to see what the final production will tip the scales at. The US versions will more than likely be heavier too.

http://media.il.edmunds-media.com/sc...110111_815.jpg

If a usdm Elise with fiberglass body, bonded aluminum chassis, vacuum formed plastic cockpit, no carpet, go kart size, next to useless A/C, basic 2 airbags, no power steering, no sound deadening, 2 buckets without any real padding weights 2000 lbs. And the universal acclaimed Cayman at 2950 lbs. Then, a 2700-2800 lbs ft86 with a 25k price tag looks like a great engineering feat.

For people who complain or nit pick about the weight issue, go try a Elise and see how much you will hate it, unless driving a go kart daily is your thing.

Kostamojen is right, asking toyota to build the ft86 in the 2500 lbs range is unrealistic given the car needs to be both practical and affordable.

:( I wish what you said is wrong.... I really hope it comes at 2700 or less. Please God :bow:

I agree with Kostamojen's assessment. The different curbweights systems alone will make the US version appear 50lbs heavier.

Automatics typically add 50lbs over their manual versions. So 2800lbs isn't unrealistic once you add full tank of fuel and options. :iono:

Here is the article
http://www.ft86club.com/forums/showt...ght=insideline

The weight will more than likely vary from country with the US having the heaviest due to the mandatory safety and emissions equipment. Then for CA, the engine may be even more restricted. On new vehicles, you're not due for a smog test for 5 yrs so that gives you plenty of time to mod it.

As mentioned, the weight can be reduced and the engine can be opened up so starting with roughly 190hp/2800 lbs, it's a nice canvas to work with.

So if it comes at 2800 lbs, how much possible weight reduction We/I can make if the purpose is to have a light weight dd car (I only track day my car 2 or 3 times a year) so most of the time it will be a dd fun car

If you are only going to the track 2-3 times/year, what's your defnition of a light weight dd car? To put things in perspective, the ITR is 195hp/2639 lbs.

There is a lot you can do to shave the weight down but essentially dd and weight reduction rarely go hand in hand. It all depends on what you want to do.

Well not a heavy diet, but at least lighter than stock without removing anything from interior except rear seats. Say, cf hood, light weight bumper beam, light weight 17 rims, single exhaust...ect

My plan is not to fully strip the car, but at least remove some weight while keeping it as oem as possible for the interior

Haven't Subaru and Toyota both cut weight on the current Impreza and Camry over previous models? That's got to count for something.

If this is a 'world' car, doesn't the Euro test for CO2 favour lighter vehicles as well?

There's still hope!

You can save a 20-30 lbs by swapping out the headers and full exhaust and achieve both.

I wish the low-spec was available in the US.

One thing that makes the Impreza chassis seem heavy for the time was the AWD. I did kind of gloss over that point, so here is a little more info...

The lightest Impreza EVER sold was the FWD model.

In Europe, the Curb weight for the 1.6 FWD was 2215lbs.
In the U.S., the Curb weight for the 1.8 FWD was 2325lbs.

Those numbers seem quite in line with the FWD compact Japanese cars from that period, and especially if you realize how simular/standardized manufacturing techniques are for the Japanese makes at any one point in time.

The chassis was not heavy on that car, and won't be heavy on the FT86 either. But it won't be Lotus Elise light, or even first-gen Miata light.

It WILL be significantly lighter than other RWD coupes on the market and thats the important thing.
Here are some more weight saving routes to take:

Coilovers - lighter than stock strut assemblies
Exhaust - Stock mufflers are HEAVY!!!
Wheels - Lighter wheels, even lighter tires are available.

Next to gutting the interior, removing sound deadening, and other things more drastic... Those 3 things along with the other items listed before can shave quite a bit of weight from a stock car without going completely racecar.

Remove the spare/jack/etc, wiper fluid tank/motor titanium exhaust, good lightweight wheels/lugs, lightweight mirrors, dry CF hood/Trunk (and doors if you want to go all out), dry carbon driveshaft, lightweight bucket seats, lightweight battery, coilovers, replace all the OEM nuts/bolts with titanium ones....most of this is not cheap but you'll lose a decent amount of weight on the car without gutting the car or sacrificing anything except your wallet.

Holy crap the AWD system is heavy! :confused0068:

Rear differential, rear differential carrier, rear axles, prop shaft, center differential, beefier rear subframe and suspension. I think the FWD cars didn't have a rear swaybar either but I'm not sure on that. Actually most of the weights I listed for the light models probably didn't have rear swaybars...

After the catalytic converter can't you switch to (anodized?) aluminum tube? (same with muffler). That would save a crapton of weight over steel (45 pounds says this site http://www.yellowbullet.com/forum/sh...=170195&page=2, although those mufflers might not pass noise regulations lol), and while aluminum is weaker it's cheap as dirt, corrosion resistant, and structural properties don't matter as much for that section of piping.

Getting a little finicky here trying to save ounces... But the big weight savings with the exhaust will be the HEAVY stock muffler. You can see it in this photo:

http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a3...ojen/wide1.jpg

It looks to be simular to the 2008+ WRX/STI muffler of which I actually had one for kicks and it is HEAVY!!!

Just switching to a smaller can might save 15lbs+ and won't cost much at all.

Titanium ;) and not just after the cat...

side exhaust would be cool
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KUFFudEJnjk

this reminds me....when i bought my rx7 in 04, i never understood why my curb weight was 3000lbs, but when i put my car on a truck stop scale it was 2740lbs

Curb weights are rarely the "actual" weight of the vehicle, but they do have a specific means of measurement (x amount of fluids, etc.) so they CAN be compared against other curb weight numbers.

Engine - FT86 heavier by ~10-25lbs
Transmission - AWD probably heavier, but not much, subtract 50lbs (+10 for 6-speed vs. 5-speed) ( considering dry weight of ups confirmed 2005 6speed tranny is 135 lbs)
Front Suspension and Subframe - Probably a wash
Rear suspension - FT86 ~25lbs heavier (prob more)
Wheels and tires- FT86 10-20lbs more per wheel, ~40-80lbs (15 lbs pre wheel and tires so 60lbs at max)
Brakes - FT86 5-10lbs heavier each corner, ~20-40lbs (considering you're only adding 2 disk brakes cause the 1993 had 2 disks in the front only 15 lbs max)
ABS - FT86 has it, add ~20-30lbs (maybe 10 lbs more... if that)
Airbags - Impreza has 2 vs. 4+ for FT86, add 10-30lbs (airbags weigh less today side airbags added 6 lbs to my celica...)
Interior - Probably a wash (the rear seat only weighs 30lbs on the Impreza and the front seats are not that heavy, the rest of the interior is spartan including bits in the trunk)
Chassis - Unknown, close to wash. Impreza has almost zero extra reinforcements
BOLD is what the real numbers sould be any why

$$$
Aluminum tube is easy to work with, and good for places where you don't see as high temperature. Aluminum headers might be an issue because exhaust temps are well into the zone where it weakens considerably.

Weighs more in U.S because of Safety features no?

I'd rather be alive than dead in a head on collision by some kid speed racing down the road.

Put my remarks in red :)
This will supposedly be a "world car" so I don't think we will see many if any changes for the U.S. market.

I hope so. Most of the cars that are from other parts of the world that come to the U.S normally weigh more, but it could be a different case for this car.

Who knows. Lol Seriously though. Who knows.

Celica T-Sport (GTS in USA?) weight was about 1200 kg. And it was a expensive car. FT86 can hit almost same weight and still remain as a affordable car. That is impressive, at least in modern day. That celica was light car back then, now it is superlight..

BTW, last generation of Celica's was blast to drive. 2zz is very very nice engine, steering feel is superb and chassis is lively and gooooood. It's a shame that it did cost 45.000 euros in finland, so it is very rare in here. I almost get one of those from used car dealer, but someone was faster than me... Never owned but always liked them. :wub:

Edit: First post, but long time lurker. Like a over a year lurker.

Ive looked into getting an aluminum exhaust. Fancy stuff, it's as light as titanium for a whole system, but can bend out of shape easily.

11.x" rotors will be multiple pounds heavier than small 93 impress rotors. Probably 4-5 more not including the larger calipers and rear brakes. And early 90s abs pumps were heavy. The one from the 96 integer rcecar was 20-25lbs by itself. Extra lines were light but then add bs computer sensors and wiring...

They can call it a "world car" all they want, but there is tons of evidence to show that the U.S. version of cars always have differences from the international versions. Different regulations and crash test requirements make companies redesign certain aspects and in some cases exclude cars from being imported here. There's a reason that the highly efficient cars in Europe are only slowly starting to make their way to this side of the pond, and it's not because people hate getting good gas mileage.

Whole lot of structural issues when it gets hot/cold, expands/contracts, and starts vibrating, especially at the welds. Plus galvanic corrosion issues wherever it meets steel.

There are aluminum race mufflers available rather cheap, though.

Dave, how much did/do your tegs weigh? We have a 97 JDM DC1 in the family. I'm contemplating Acquiring, fixing it up, doing a few hill sprints and sell at a profit.

Weighed it a few weeks ago, it is 2395lbs bone stock with 3/4 tank of gad and a small floor jack in the back.

Sorry for the thread jack.

PM'd.

Wow thanks for the post I learned a lot from it. But can we actually compare two cars that is more than a decade apart? They might have found new ways to make some parts stronger without adding weight and they could have found ways to lighten some of the electricals. I know this might bot relate directly to cars but look at how much laptops have changed in the past decades they have gotten more powerful but at the same time lighter and more compact. I haven't followed Toyota or Subaru's advancement over the years in depth but they should have made some advancement right?

But that being said, it's safe to assume that most of us weighs around 140lb right? So having all these new feature is almost like having another passenger in the car. In other words tell all your friends to take the bus XD