Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB

Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/index.php)
-   Engine, Exhaust, Transmission (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=8)
-   -   STI engine (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1984)

Aldo the Apache 10-14-2011 11:13 PM

STI engine
 
What's going on guys? New to the site here. I'm very excited for the ft86 it looks amazing! I'm VERY concerned that they will manage to **** it up before the production car but let's keep our fingers crossed.

So who here thinks it will be relatively easy to drop an sti motor in here? I thought this car was going to be turbocharged stock. Hell when I drive one I might very well find they picked the right motor from the start. But just for S&G who thinks it will bolt up or do you reckon itll need some fabrication?

old greg 10-15-2011 12:50 AM

It will need fabrication.

At the very least you'll need modified wiring harness, custom headers, oil pan, downpipe, IC piping, IC mounting (and/or bumper beam if you want anything of worthwhile size). On the plus side, the EJ257 longblock should bolt right up to the stock motor mounts and bellhousing.

But, there won't be enough room between the engine and the firewall to plumb the exhaust in the same way as it has always been done on the Impreza. The turbo will need to be mounted out front like on a 2010+ Legacy GT. The problem is that the EJ will be ~1" longer than the stock engine (EJ = Timing Belt, FA = Timing Chain), and there might not be enough room left to stick a turbo between the accessory belt and the radiator.

quik1987 10-15-2011 07:30 PM

I wonder if any parts will be sharable between the 2 engines. EJ207 and FA20
EJ207
http://image.motortrend.com/f/920979...STI+engine.jpg
FB20
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-LlaWhnukxt...5BC+FB20+4.jpg
FA20
http://www.ft86club.com/forums/attac...3&d=1315924693
Where the engine sits
http://www.ft86club.com/forums/attac...1&d=1316117092

CyberFormula 10-16-2011 04:02 AM

just put a porsche engine in ...and make a custom exhaust to come out from the front fenders.

ryun84 10-16-2011 04:58 AM

And light pedestrians on the sidewalks ablaze.

S13Kuro 10-16-2011 07:39 AM

Just as long as I can spray close spectators with my nitrous as Luda admires my timely arrival I'll be happy.

Okay no but seriously fairly sure there'll be turby ones later down the track anyway. Haven't they already released that there's a possibility of a 1.6T a year after initial release?

Aurex 10-18-2011 05:29 PM

What the hell? Does anyone else think that the oil filter that is mounted on the FB20 and concept car looks like a disaster waiting to happen? That looks like it will make a mess of the engine bay. I notice that there is a lip there, but it can't possibly hold all the oil that will come out of that filter?

That was the best thing about the EJ series motors, the oil filter was mounted on the bottom of the motor pointing straight down...

ichitaka05 10-18-2011 06:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aurex (Post 64789)
What the hell? Does anyone else think that the oil filter that is mounted on the FB20 and concept car looks like a disaster waiting to happen? That looks like it will make a mess of the engine bay. I notice that there is a lip there, but it can't possibly hold all the oil that will come out of that filter?

That was the best thing about the EJ series motors, the oil filter was mounted on the bottom of the motor pointing straight down...

Never seen recent V engine trucks? they have filter like that & it's working perfectly

Aurex 10-18-2011 06:44 PM

I haven't. I don't really pay any attention to trucks at all. I'm also not 100% up to date with current\future Subaru tech.

My concern when I saw the above picture(s) was that the filter would still be full of oil and when you take it off it would drain out of the filter, fill that recessed area and spill down the block.

When you shut the motor off the oil must drain out of the filter then?

ichitaka05 10-18-2011 07:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aurex (Post 64822)
I haven't. I don't really pay any attention to trucks at all. I'm also not 100% up to date with current\future Subaru tech.

My concern when I saw the above picture(s) was that the filter would still be full of oil and when you take it off it would drain out of the filter, fill that recessed area and spill down the block.

When you shut the motor off the oil must drain out of the filter then?

Under the oil filter mount, there is a small nipple which you can pull off to drain that catch area. Some put a small disposable bottle or cup directly under it to catch the oil that drips out. Some others have even gone as far as to run a hose all the way down by the oil pan.

Aurex 10-18-2011 07:23 PM

Perfect! Thank you sir, for taking the time to explain how it works.

ichitaka05 10-18-2011 07:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aurex (Post 64834)
Perfect! Thank you sir, for taking the time to explain how it works.

No problem :happy0180:

Marrk 10-18-2011 07:33 PM

Slightly OT: Anybody have a guess as to whether the cams on the FT-86 will be chain driven or belt driven? What does Subaru usually use?

ichitaka05 10-18-2011 07:39 PM

^Expect to have it chain. Older model was belt, but recently been chain

quik1987 10-18-2011 11:12 PM

Some detail about the FB20 that might apply to the FA20:
Quote:

Subaru FB engine

(Japanese: Subaru FB engine) New generation boxer engine announced on 23 September 2010.[6] The Subaru FB engine is entirely new as of 2010. Subaru aims to reduce emission and improve fuel economy. The key is to increase and broaden torque output. Subaru increases the stroke but decreased the bore.
The FB has an all new block and head. It now has DOHC, with intake and exhaust variable valve timing (AVCS - Active Valve Control System), and timing chain that replaced the timing belt. Moving to chain-driven cams is said to allow the valves to be placed at a narrower angle to each other and shrink the bore of cylinder from 99.5 mm to 94. It results in less unburned fuel during cold starts, thereby reducing emission. Subaru is able to maintain the exterior dimension substantially unchanged by asymmetrical connecting rods like those in EZ36. The FB is only marginally heavier. Car and Driver is told direct injection will be added soon. Subaru claims a 28-percent reduction in friction losses, mainly due to lighter pistons and connecting rods.[7][8] The FB has a 10% increase in gas mileage with the power coming on sooner and the torque band being broader.
  • FB20: 1,995 cc, DOHC, 84mm bore x 90mm stroke, 10.5:1 Compression Ratio,
Rated at: 109 kW (148PS) @6,000 rpm, 196 Nm (20 kgm) @4,200 rpm in (2011+ JDM Subaru Forester)[9],Rated at: 145 hp, 145 ft-lb (2012+ Subaru Impreza)

RRnold 10-18-2011 11:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ichitaka05 (Post 64827)
Under the oil filter mount, there is a small nipple which you can pull off to drain that catch area. Some put a small disposable bottle or cup directly under it to catch the oil that drips out. Some others have even gone as far as to run a hose all the way down by the oil pan.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aurex (Post 64834)
Perfect! Thank you sir, for taking the time to explain how it works.


To add, the current Tacoma has it in that similar position and it's makes it so much easier to change and is a lot cleaner. I'm glad they've decided to place it in the same position.

http://0.tqn.com/d/trucks/1/0/_/M/1/...oma_engine.jpg

KaliKev 10-19-2011 01:47 AM

Same engine as my FJ. Changing oil is a breeze!

suprachica79 10-19-2011 09:35 AM

Hearing that it should have a timing chain is really exciting to me. Changing timing belts is such an expensive part of maintanence!

ichitaka05 10-19-2011 12:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by suprachica79 (Post 64957)
Hearing that it should have a timing chain is really exciting to me. Changing timing belts is such an expensive part of maintanence!

WHAT? I replaced my Impreza's Timing belt lil while ago and only cost me $50. Chain would of cost me double or triple of the cost

MannyO 10-19-2011 12:35 PM

I remember when I almost bought a B5 Audi S4 a few years ago. The thing that stopped me from buying it was the timing belt replacement cost. It was somewhere around $1,500. $350 for parts: Belt, Actuator, Cam Idler, Cam Tensioner and the rest in labor.

suprachica79 10-19-2011 12:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ichitaka05 (Post 64975)
WHAT? I replaced my Impreza's Timing belt lil while ago and only cost me $50. Chain would of cost me double or triple of the cost

You replaced it yourself then. I'm talking for the average person who doesn't know how to replace one themselves, bringing it to a shop can cost over $1000. Chain's last alot longer.

ichitaka05 10-19-2011 12:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by suprachica79 (Post 64980)
You replaced it yourself then. I'm talking for the average person who doesn't know how to replace one themselves, bringing it to a shop can cost over $1000. Chain's last alot longer.

technically, you should change belt or chain around same time anyways. Maybe 30~60k difference

suprachica79 10-19-2011 01:00 PM

I was under the impression you could wait alot longer with a chain

ichitaka05 10-19-2011 01:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by suprachica79 (Post 64989)
I was under the impression you could wait alot longer with a chain

Commonly chain replacement said to be every 100k vs belt is every 60k... but official Subaru maintenance schedule inspected every 30k, but don't need to replace til 100k.

edit. BUT some chain said no need to change it 200k... so it's all up to how the company makes it

suprachica79 10-19-2011 01:10 PM

I thought belts are 80-100k, chains can double that or even stand the whole life of the engine

ichitaka05 10-19-2011 01:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by suprachica79 (Post 64995)
I thought belts are 80-100k, chains can double that or even stand the whole life of the engine

Again, it's all up to the car maker. Chain still stretch resulting loosen the tension equal to misfire & other engine damaging stuff.

I have only worked w timing chain twice, so I'm no expert in that field. IMO I prefer belt over chain do to light weight & easier to install... but that's just me.

Marrk 10-19-2011 01:37 PM

re Timing Chains:

I am not an expert, but my understanding has always been that timing chains rarely need to be replaced. They are tensioned by a tensioner. They perform better than belts, though perhaps not as well as gear-driven cams.

Again, I am not an expert. But I was happy to be rid of my Tercel and the headache of belt replacements because belts were something that I could not do myself. (The Tercel was a great car, by the way. Mine was, anyway.)


:happy0180:

ichitaka05 10-19-2011 01:39 PM

^Belt have tensioner too

Marrk 10-19-2011 01:46 PM

^^ Yes.

suprachica79 10-19-2011 02:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marrk (Post 64998)
re Timing Chains:

I am not an expert, but my understanding has always been that timing chains rarely need to be replaced. They are tensioned by a tensioner. They perform better than belts, though perhaps not as well as gear-driven cams.

:happy0180:

That's what I knew chains to be as well. Rarely ever do they need replacing, if properly maintained. Again, I'm no expert either, but that's what I understand about timing chains.

ichitaka05 10-19-2011 03:02 PM

Hm... It's debate kinda thing for me.

You wanna tune your engine, I'm not sure chain is good or not. I don't see much chain tuned engine (other than truck engines). BUT for DD cars, maybe chain is better? IDK

Dimman 10-19-2011 03:05 PM

I think it depends on the chain design. I think Suzuki uses them on one of their motors and it's supposed to be good for the life of the vehicle. But it is running in an oil bath on the bottom or something so it is perpetually lubricated.

Metal will still fatigue and fail over time. So how hot the chain gets, how big/strong the links are, etc... will be factors.

I wouldn't assume all chains are good for the life of the car just because some are.

quik1987 10-19-2011 05:00 PM

I'm kind of concerned about the plastic intake manifold on the FB20. It leads me to believe the FA20 will have it as well.
http://response.jp/imgs/zoom/249397.jpg

I suppose it leaves another product for aftermarket to make.

I wonder if we will see red STi manifolds.

ichitaka05 10-19-2011 05:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by quik1987 (Post 65046)
I'm kind of concerned about the plastic intake manifold on the FB20. It leads me to believe the FA20 will have it as well.
http://response.jp/imgs/zoom/249397.jpg

I suppose it leaves another product for aftermarket to make.

I wonder if we will see red STi manifolds.

That's the outside shell. Inside have a metal. iirc they did that on newer EJ enignes

Dimman 10-19-2011 05:27 PM

^ Kind of hard to tell on the BRZ concept since the whole motor's blinged out in chrome. Turbo EJ's had aluminum, but I don't think the non-boosted FA will.

suprachica79 10-19-2011 06:16 PM

Doesn't the plastic seem a little cheap to you guys?

chulooz 10-19-2011 06:27 PM

The plastic manifold is better for weight, heat, and price... I heard they have great flow too. While I am instinctively against plastic engine components this is not groundbreaking tech for subaru, so I am more excited than worried about it.

Levi 10-20-2011 05:31 AM

What about CF?

Infernal 10-20-2011 07:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Levi (Post 65149)
What about CF?

do you want this under $25k (£20k) ??

Levi 10-20-2011 08:14 AM

No, but for 30.000 €, yes!


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:57 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.


Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.