![]() |
450 Whp possible with 12.5:1 compression
I am putting together all the parts for my engine, but the piston decision is complicated, my goal is 400+whp, my turbo is an EFR6258 and the E85 option does not work for me. I don't have e85 nearby and I don't want to rely on e85. I just wanted to know if it's not crazy or which one do you recommend for this goal.
|
Maybe?
I've yet to see anyone actually try High Comp boost with those numbers. Most are too afraid to try and find out, cause it it doesn't work it's wasted money or worse. I'd say get a stroker kit to help. |
to me that s not possible on 93oct and stock compression, even if you install a super huge turbo to keep charge temp down and it would anyway have an extreme lag
you'd want something like 10:1 with normal fuel to reach those hp, and a big turbo |
Too much for pump gas imho, you'd need E85, C16, or meth injection to reduce knock.
EFR6258 is going to produce a ton of heat making 400+ whp |
Get some meth
|
On a stock block or one of those HKS jobs?
Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Has anyone achieved something similar?
|
Possible yes, longevity no.
|
Quote:
According to https://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=38494 Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk |
Possible? Yes.
How deep are your pockets? You're gonna need race gas if you don't want to do e85. |
if he doesn t want to rely to e85 that he could get on the street, it seems to me useless to propose racegas.. and with 93 oct those hp and stock compression are not possible
|
I see, it seems that the most reliable and least complicated thing will be to buy the CP 10.5:1 pistons and not complicate my life, thanks anyway, I know that many easily reach that goal with E85. and for the guys above it will not be a stock block the question is for me to decide which piston was more suitable for my goal, I already have a lot of accessories to help keep everything good, oil cooler, a configuration of oil cans that have lowered the pressure in the crankcase, oil deflectors, oil pickup, ect. The last thing I need is to build the engine.
|
You could get an IAG short block instead of building it. They also machine it to help the oiling issues.
|
Quote:
|
Doesn’t seem like stock block lasts long over the 3-350whp range regardless of octane.
But is there even any documentation of anyone even hitting 400whp on pump regardless of built block or lower compression or not? |
The other thread claimed 693hp was the record on the stock block (probably not pump gas though). I'm sure that isn't a daily driver, lol.
Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk |
Quote:
300-320whp w/ sc or 330-350whp w/ turbo even on Ethanol seems the top end of reliable on stock block if you’re actually going to use the power. But reliability aside, I don’t think I’ve seen anyone hit 400whp+ on pump gas regardless of compression. |
Quote:
GTX2867R Gen 2. 18.5 Pounds. 420WHP On a Dynojet 93OCT. |
Quote:
|
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
Attachment 210102 |
Quote:
What was the change from red to blue? |
i haven t understood if that is with stock compression or lowered? i guess lowered?
|
Quote:
Map 1, Red Line is gate pressure at 17 PSI. 380WHP I think somewhere around 320 TQ. Blue is Map 2, 18.5PSI More timing. 420 WHP. 347 TQ. Both gets on boost 3-3.5K. Lots of response, very linear power. It’s my track car, so there was more power with more aggressive timing. But wanted to keep it more conservative. |
Quote:
|
My understanding is you start eating transmissions and axels at those levels. So you change one thing in a huge way, you need to reenforce everything else ancillary to it. I’m just puttering around at 252whp, but also research for the “one day” thoughts.
The gen 2 transmission is supposedly stronger, but I’m not sure if it is a direct bolt-up. |
Quote:
What head work was done? Larger valves? Cams? Port work? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
But 400 def possible on Pump. You just have to have the supporting mods. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I am currently at 400whp on map3 but Ususlly in map 1 & 2 for track which is 306 and 360 |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
On either a jacks or cd009 mazworx conversion |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:11 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.