Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB

Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/index.php)
-   Forced Induction (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=78)
-   -   450 Whp possible with 12.5:1 compression (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=148999)

Garvin29 03-03-2022 12:54 AM

450 Whp possible with 12.5:1 compression
 
I am putting together all the parts for my engine, but the piston decision is complicated, my goal is 400+whp, my turbo is an EFR6258 and the E85 option does not work for me. I don't have e85 nearby and I don't want to rely on e85. I just wanted to know if it's not crazy or which one do you recommend for this goal.

x808drifter 03-03-2022 05:41 AM

Maybe?
I've yet to see anyone actually try High Comp boost with those numbers.
Most are too afraid to try and find out, cause it it doesn't work it's wasted money or worse.

I'd say get a stroker kit to help.

tomm.brz 03-03-2022 07:20 AM

to me that s not possible on 93oct and stock compression, even if you install a super huge turbo to keep charge temp down and it would anyway have an extreme lag

you'd want something like 10:1 with normal fuel to reach those hp, and a big turbo

cpierr03 03-03-2022 09:24 AM

Too much for pump gas imho, you'd need E85, C16, or meth injection to reduce knock.

EFR6258 is going to produce a ton of heat making 400+ whp

86TOYO2k17 03-03-2022 09:42 AM

Get some meth

p1l0t 03-03-2022 01:00 PM

On a stock block or one of those HKS jobs?

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk

Garvin29 03-03-2022 03:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by p1l0t (Post 3508460)
On a stock block or one of those HKS jobs?

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk

it is a stock block, I was thinking that maybe with an increase in displacement it could be possible

Garvin29 03-03-2022 03:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tomm.brz (Post 3508402)
to me that s not possible on 93oct and stock compression, even if you install a super huge turbo to keep charge temp down and it would anyway have an extreme lag

you'd want something like 10:1 with normal fuel to reach those hp, and a big turbo

I could actually play it safe and go down to 10.5:1 but I really like the efficiency and the lag can't be giant

Garvin29 03-03-2022 03:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 86TOYO2k17 (Post 3508423)
Get some meth

Now that I think about it, meth can be more easily adapted to what I'm looking for, I'll put it among the options, the problem is that with strong movements it may fail.

Garvin29 03-03-2022 03:26 PM

Has anyone achieved something similar?

Grady 03-03-2022 03:38 PM

Possible yes, longevity no.

p1l0t 03-03-2022 04:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Garvin29 (Post 3508489)
it is a stock block, I was thinking that maybe with an increase in displacement it could be possible

Sounds like about 400hp is the most you want to do on a stock block. (If you want to drive it more than once or twice)

According to https://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=38494

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk

CSG Mike 03-03-2022 04:55 PM

Possible? Yes.

How deep are your pockets?

You're gonna need race gas if you don't want to do e85.

tomm.brz 03-03-2022 08:29 PM

if he doesn t want to rely to e85 that he could get on the street, it seems to me useless to propose racegas.. and with 93 oct those hp and stock compression are not possible

Garvin29 03-03-2022 09:52 PM

I see, it seems that the most reliable and least complicated thing will be to buy the CP 10.5:1 pistons and not complicate my life, thanks anyway, I know that many easily reach that goal with E85. and for the guys above it will not be a stock block the question is for me to decide which piston was more suitable for my goal, I already have a lot of accessories to help keep everything good, oil cooler, a configuration of oil cans that have lowered the pressure in the crankcase, oil deflectors, oil pickup, ect. The last thing I need is to build the engine.

Poogchomp 03-03-2022 10:33 PM

You could get an IAG short block instead of building it. They also machine it to help the oiling issues.

Irace86.2.0 03-04-2022 01:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Garvin29 (Post 3508544)
I see, it seems that the most reliable and least complicated thing will be to buy the CP 10.5:1 pistons and not complicate my life, thanks anyway, I know that many easily reach that goal with E85. and for the guys above it will not be a stock block the question is for me to decide which piston was more suitable for my goal, I already have a lot of accessories to help keep everything good, oil cooler, a configuration of oil cans that have lowered the pressure in the crankcase, oil deflectors, oil pickup, ect. The last thing I need is to build the engine.

I think the FA20F in the WRX is 10.6:1. People seem to be knock limited on the stock block sub 325whp with pump gas. I don't know if aftermarket rods and pistons can take a beating surviving 400whp with knock or worse. Direct injection helps, but lower compression ratio is a good idea. I don't know how much direct injection improves knock resistance. Older EVOs and STIs were maxing out pump gas around 400-425whp and that was with a 8-9:1 compression ratio.

86TOYO2k17 03-04-2022 06:08 PM

Doesn’t seem like stock block lasts long over the 3-350whp range regardless of octane.

But is there even any documentation of anyone even hitting 400whp on pump regardless of built block or lower compression or not?

p1l0t 03-04-2022 06:12 PM

The other thread claimed 693hp was the record on the stock block (probably not pump gas though). I'm sure that isn't a daily driver, lol.

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk

86TOYO2k17 03-04-2022 06:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by p1l0t (Post 3508696)
The other thread claimed 693hp was the record on the stock block (probably not pump gas though). I'm sure that isn't a daily driver, lol.

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk

Yeah not on pump gas. And making 693whp once on a dyno to never go over 10% throttle again and never actually use the power isn’t really the same thing.

300-320whp w/ sc or 330-350whp w/ turbo even on Ethanol seems the top end of reliable on stock block if you’re actually going to use the power.

But reliability aside, I don’t think I’ve seen anyone hit 400whp+ on pump gas regardless of compression.

JOSEC 03-05-2022 12:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 86TOYO2k17 (Post 3508694)
Doesn’t seem like stock block lasts long over the 3-350whp range regardless of octane.

But is there even any documentation of anyone even hitting 400whp on pump regardless of built block or lower compression or not?

I got it. Built Block. Head work. +1 Intake and Exhaust.
GTX2867R Gen 2. 18.5 Pounds. 420WHP On a Dynojet 93OCT.

86TOYO2k17 03-05-2022 01:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JOSEC (Post 3508810)
I got it. Built Block. Head work. +1 Intake and Exhaust.
GTX2867R Gen 2. 18.5 Pounds. 420WHP On a Dynojet 93OCT.

Have a dyno? Build thread?

JOSEC 03-05-2022 05:22 PM

1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by 86TOYO2k17 (Post 3508816)
Have a dyno? Build thread?

No build thread. But here it is.
Attachment 210102

86TOYO2k17 03-05-2022 10:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JOSEC (Post 3508842)
No build thread. But here it is.
Attachment 210102

Nice power.

What was the change from red to blue?

tomm.brz 03-06-2022 04:27 AM

i haven t understood if that is with stock compression or lowered? i guess lowered?

JOSEC 03-06-2022 07:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 86TOYO2k17 (Post 3508887)
Nice power.

What was the change from red to blue?

2 different Maps.
Map 1, Red Line is gate pressure at 17 PSI. 380WHP I think somewhere around 320 TQ.

Blue is Map 2, 18.5PSI More timing. 420 WHP. 347 TQ.

Both gets on boost 3-3.5K. Lots of response, very linear power.

It’s my track car, so there was more power with more aggressive timing. But wanted to keep it more conservative.

JOSEC 03-06-2022 07:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tomm.brz (Post 3508909)
i haven t understood if that is with stock compression or lowered? i guess lowered?

Lowered compression. 10.5:1

BrahmaBull1990 03-06-2022 10:51 AM

My understanding is you start eating transmissions and axels at those levels. So you change one thing in a huge way, you need to reenforce everything else ancillary to it. I’m just puttering around at 252whp, but also research for the “one day” thoughts.

The gen 2 transmission is supposedly stronger, but I’m not sure if it is a direct bolt-up.

86TOYO2k17 03-06-2022 11:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JOSEC (Post 3508914)
2 different Maps.
Map 1, Red Line is gate pressure at 17 PSI. 380WHP I think somewhere around 320 TQ.

Blue is Map 2, 18.5PSI More timing. 420 WHP. 347 TQ.

Both gets on boost 3-3.5K. Lots of response, very linear power.

It’s my track car, so there was more power with more aggressive timing. But wanted to keep it more conservative.

That’s awesome. Most power I’ve seen on pump gas.

What head work was done?
Larger valves?
Cams?
Port work?

dragoontwo 03-06-2022 11:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BrahmaBull1990 (Post 3508928)
My understanding is you start eating transmissions and axels at those levels. So you change one thing in a huge way, you need to reenforce everything else ancillary to it. I’m just puttering around at 252whp, but also research for the “one day” thoughts.

The gen 2 transmission is supposedly stronger, but I’m not sure if it is a direct bolt-up.

It's a slightly uprated version of the same transmission. It will be a direct swap.

JOSEC 03-06-2022 02:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 86TOYO2k17 (Post 3508932)
That’s awesome. Most power I’ve seen on pump gas.

What head work was done?
Larger valves?
Cams?
Port work?

Larger valves both intake and exhaust. Very slight port work just to clean everything up leading up to the larger valves (Bowl blend, 5 angle valve work, etc). And of course springs and new retainers to able to support increased redline.

But 400 def possible on Pump. You just have to have the supporting mods.

JOSEC 03-06-2022 02:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BrahmaBull1990 (Post 3508928)
My understanding is you start eating transmissions and axels at those levels. So you change one thing in a huge way, you need to reenforce everything else ancillary to it. I’m just puttering around at 252whp, but also research for the “one day” thoughts.

The gen 2 transmission is supposedly stronger, but I’m not sure if it is a direct bolt-up.

4th gear has reliability issues on the current (1st gen) AZ6. I've personally seen it on friends cars who range from 400WHP-600WHP. They always seem to rip up 4th gear. But I got that all fixed up by the guys at Jacks Transmission.

jrhudson 03-06-2022 11:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dragoontwo (Post 3508933)
It's a slightly uprated version of the same transmission. It will be a direct swap.

=D:w00t:

Evil Rocky 03-11-2022 12:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JOSEC (Post 3508961)
4th gear has reliability issues on the current (1st gen) AZ6. I've personally seen it on friends cars who range from 400WHP-600WHP. They always seem to rip up 4th gear. But I got that all fixed up by the guys at Jacks Transmission.

How is the transmission holding up? There was a guy on Facebook who said the second day of regular driving transmission went out and just got jacks stuff. Was debating on getting jacks or saving up more for cd009

I am currently at 400whp on map3 but Ususlly in map 1 & 2 for track which is 306 and 360

JOSEC 03-11-2022 04:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Evil Rocky (Post 3509995)
How is the transmission holding up? There was a guy on Facebook who said the second day of regular driving transmission went out and just got jacks stuff. Was debating on getting jacks or saving up more for cd009

I am currently at 400whp on map3 but Ususlly in map 1 & 2 for track which is 306 and 360

2 years now with the built transmission with no issues. I personally didn't want to mess with cutting and welding brackets so I went with Jacks. WPC will cut down on stress risers on stock gears in addition on what Jack's does to the stocks transmission to make it a little bit more reliable. No problems so far.

jrhudson 03-11-2022 09:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Evil Rocky (Post 3509995)
How is the transmission holding up? There was a guy on Facebook who said the second day of regular driving transmission went out and just got jacks stuff. Was debating on getting jacks or saving up more for cd009

I am currently at 400whp on map3 but Ususlly in map 1 & 2 for track which is 306 and 360

wow, really? maybe a bad trans? but CD009 are known for their strength. its what 2jz peeps that make 1000 hp use for their builds.

Evil Rocky 03-17-2022 11:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jrhudson (Post 3510205)
wow, really? maybe a bad trans? but CD009 are known for their strength. its what 2jz peeps that make 1000 hp use for their builds.

I wanted the jacks stuff since easier to swap in. I have carbon synchros in mine and been okay. I only used the 400whp map twice since don’t need it and don’t want transmission to go right away. It hoping get a good deal
On either a jacks or cd009 mazworx conversion


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:11 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.


Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.