Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB

Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/index.php)
-   Forced Induction (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=78)
-   -   Phil's Accelerated Performance Turbo Auto FRS Thread (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=14063)

Philly 08-08-2012 12:02 PM

Phil's Accelerated Performance Turbo Auto FRS Thread
 
We decided to make a separate thread for those interested.

First of all, BIG thanks to Don and his team @ Accelerated, and John @ Visconti Tuning for all their hard work. These guys really know their stuff, and their attention to detail is impressive to say the least.

The car is currently running 8 psi and dynoed 255 WHP.

Pics and vids to follow (sorry haven't had time yet). Any questions I'm sure Don and John will chime in.

Memphis 08-08-2012 12:03 PM

What are they limiting your boost to right now? 4?

Visconti 08-08-2012 12:04 PM

Gotta walk before you run...

Philly 08-08-2012 12:05 PM

3 Attachment(s)
Before:
Attachment 12281

After:
Attachment 12282
Attachment 12283

Memphis 08-08-2012 12:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Visconti (Post 366727)
Gotta walk before you run...

I know :) I was just wondering to see where you guys decided to start it at. :)

Looks great BTW. :party0030:

Philly 08-08-2012 12:07 PM

3 Attachment(s)
First run on Dynojet @ 4
Attachment 12284
Attachment 12285

John working away... (Don in background)
Attachment 12286

Jordo! 08-08-2012 12:08 PM

Nice numbers.

Philly 08-08-2012 12:10 PM

Apologies for the crappy pictures, I'm using an iPad camera

mastertech86 08-08-2012 12:12 PM

Can't wait to see driving impressions with the auto!

Memphis 08-08-2012 12:12 PM

Im guessing with those numbers it is 3-4 psi like Dons was at first? :) Impressive :) Let us know how it runs buddy.

Visconti 08-08-2012 12:24 PM

1 Attachment(s)
Attachment 12287

Second run.. Sorting the fuel

deucethemoose 08-08-2012 12:26 PM

All of that sits above the crossmember, right? I'd hate to see the oil return get ripped off by a speedbump or something...

Don@Accelerated 08-08-2012 12:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by deucethemoose (Post 366779)
All of that sits above the crossmember, right? I'd hate to see the oil return get ripped off by a speedbump or something...

For the 2000th time. It sits above the crossmember :)

Reason 08-08-2012 12:35 PM

Jebus!

Assuming that car did a baseline of 160ish that am I really seeing nearly 70whp gained on 4 psi? that is nuts!

fuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu I was going to keep my warranty... I told myself I was going to be a good boy....


That lean spike in the fuel near redline on the first dyno sheet, is that something you've seen before or was that just a one time thing?

JoeBoxer 08-08-2012 12:42 PM

Nice numbers especially for an auto which i figure doesn't get as much to the wheels as a standard.

FrX 08-08-2012 12:51 PM

230whp at 4psi? Niiiiceee.

Visconti 08-08-2012 01:07 PM

Adding boost.. Taking things slow.. Phil has a long ride home!

blackfireball5 08-08-2012 01:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Don@Accelerated (Post 366787)
For the 2000th time. It sits above the crossmember :)

hahaha

blackfireball5 08-08-2012 01:29 PM

Will be watching this post like a dog watches a steak.

Visconti 08-08-2012 01:33 PM

F5

djdnz 08-08-2012 02:43 PM

Not that I'm interested in auto numbers specifically, just love following posts like this :)

Keep up the updates John!

Gooooo Canada!

Don@Accelerated 08-08-2012 02:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reason (Post 366796)
Jebus!

Assuming that car did a baseline of 160ish that am I really seeing nearly 70whp gained on 4 psi? that is nuts!

fuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu I was going to keep my warranty... I told myself I was going to be a good boy....


That lean spike in the fuel near redline on the first dyno sheet, is that something you've seen before or was that just a one time thing?


Dynojet wideband has issues with picking up air. Its just how they are. We disregard some data.

Reason 08-08-2012 03:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Don@Accelerated (Post 367126)
Dynojet wideband has issues with picking up air. Its just how they are. We disregard some data.


Yeah on second glance it looked more like a gap in data logging than legitimate fuel issues...

Thanks

Visconti 08-08-2012 03:24 PM

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rz9FbGC_Aik&feature=youtube_gdata_player"]Accelerated Performance FRS-300A Turbo Kit @ 10PSI - YouTube[/ame]

SkullWorks 08-08-2012 03:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Don@Accelerated (Post 367126)
Dynojet wideband has issues with picking up air. Its just how they are. We disregard some data.



so you are running a tail pipe sensor and not running an in pipe sensor before the Cats?

I have never seen our sensor (even in tail pipe mount) pickup near that much air after the motor is moving enough Exhaust to get a reading...

FrX 08-08-2012 03:32 PM

Do you guys plan to add any additional cooling for the transmission?

ed209 08-08-2012 03:35 PM

kudos to you guys for doing your due diligence and making a kit with the right materials that works. I know who to talk to when I pick up my fr-s...

fenton 08-08-2012 03:37 PM

These things sound terrifying!

fenton 08-08-2012 03:40 PM

230hp at 4psi and 260 at 10psi..... assuming your still working on it? :)

Sounds like alot more risk for only 30 hp more

ed209 08-08-2012 03:43 PM

you do realize that no two cars are alike right?

Draco-REX 08-08-2012 03:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fenton (Post 367258)
230hp at 4psi and 260 at 10psi..... assuming your still working on it? :)

Sounds like alot more risk for only 30 hp more

It's probably at 260 instead of 280 in order to minimize the risk.

Visconti 08-08-2012 03:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fenton (Post 367258)
230hp at 4psi and 260 at 10psi..... assuming your still working on it? :)

Sounds like alot more risk for only 30 hp more

I'm not just turning the boost up and down, timing and fueling is being adjusted and tweaked as we go.

As I turned up the boost I've taken a bunch of timing out of this.

Car made as much as 264 on 9 psi but I think it's at a good spot @ 255whp.

As time goes on and I have more data I will consider turning it up but for now this is a leap in the right direction.

John

fenton 08-08-2012 03:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Visconti (Post 367281)
I'm not just turning the boost up and down, timing and fueling is being adjusted and tweaked as we go.

As I turned up the boost I've taken a bunch of timing out of this.

Car made as much as 264 on 9 psi but I think it's at a good spot @ 255whp.

As time goes on and I have more data I will consider turning it up but for now this is a leap in the right direction.

John

That's what I figured thanks for the detailed answer!

Boosted2.0 08-08-2012 04:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Don@Accelerated (Post 367126)
Dynojet wideband has issues with picking up air. Its just how they are.

You may want to look at the hose to your air pump and the CFM your air pump is pulling.

Had mine act up on me, took the air pump apart and found a bunch of muffler packing in there gumming up the works. Had a cuatomer with a loose baffle in his muffler that was apparently shedding packing.

Visconti 08-08-2012 09:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Boosted2.0 (Post 367344)
You may want to look at the hose to your air pump and the CFM your air pump is pulling.

Had mine act up on me, took the air pump apart and found a bunch of muffler packing in there gumming up the works. Had a cuatomer with a loose baffle in his muffler that was apparently shedding packing.

It's not that cool dynojet one...
But car was actually on 8 psi :)

Just landed bit do I hate flying

TSLRich 08-09-2012 08:07 AM

any update from Phil? is he driving home? how does it feel on the street?

SUB-FT86 08-09-2012 08:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FrX (Post 367237)
Do you guys plan to add any additional cooling for the transmission?

I don't think 180 wtq is going to hurt the tranny. This tranny came out of a Lexus IS250 which makes about 170 wtq stock.

Visconti 08-09-2012 08:27 AM

Phil is home and so am I.
Now I'm trying to respond to the 200 emails and 50 PMs I have! fml

Matador 08-09-2012 08:46 AM

Wild guess here. The auto is going to be the way to go for big power.

Chewie4299 08-09-2012 08:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SUB-FT86 (Post 368768)
I don't think 180 wtq is going to hurt the tranny. This tranny came out of a Lexus IS250 which makes about 170 wtq stock.

I was going to point put that you are wrong and add some supporting documentation until I remembered that we are talking about the auto here. You are correct. I felt I should still post since the information is useful.

As for the 6MT I believe it should be treated as a new tranny.

http://kaizenfactor.wordpress.com/20...n-or-is-scion/

Quote:

Were we (and Aisin) wrong about the BRZ / FR-S / GT 86 manual transmission? Or is Scion?

Almost 2½ months ago, Kaizen Factor indulged in some of our much-loved Informed Speculation and attempted to delve into the specifics of The BRZ / FR-S / GT 86 transmissions and driveline. No sooner had we posted it, however, that Paul Williamsen, National Manager of Lexus College (this being the brand’s product training division, and an integral part of new model long lead press previews) made the following observations:

…we’re still getting contradictory info out of TMC (Toyota Motor Corporation) on which 6-spd Aisin tranny we’ll have in the FT86, FR-S, & BRZ.

One of the obvious differences between the old IS 200/Altezza box (TMC type J160) and the current IS 250/Cadillac/Porsche box (TMC type RA6X) is that the former has gear reduction on the input side, while the latter has its reduction at the output end. We’ve seen references to both types.

Perhaps, then, things weren’t as clear-cut as they first appeared.

Flash-forward to Wednesday 25 April and the end of the press embargo on the Scion FR-S long lead preview. Although we at Kaizen Factor were not blessed with an invitation, FT-86Club.com‘s stellar coverage was the next best thing to being there. Their correspondent Ichitaka went as far as scanning and posting the Long Lead Press Presentation Outline, in a format familiar to this author from multiple Lexus press previews. Curious over the transmission information contained therein, we were gratified that our prediction of the Lexus IS 250-sourced A960E 6-speed automatic with upgrades such as earlier torque converter lockup, faster upshift and downshift times and throttle blips accompanying downshifts was spot-on. This author did a stunned double-take, however, to see the 6-speed manual identified as an RA62 – just like the less-than-stellar Lexus IS 250 Manual’s transmission – in both the Page 2 index and Page 26, as shown below.

A quick primer on Toyota’s 6-speed manual RWD transmissions
Although our earlier article covered this ground in far greater detail, a recap on Toyota’s 6-speed manual rear-wheel-drive-centric transmissions is in order. In essence, there are only three of them: The Getrag 233 / Toyota V160/V161 used in the legendary Supra Mark IV Twin Turbo; the Aisin AY6 / Toyota/Lexus RA60 series and the Aisin AZ6 / Toyota/Lexus J160. The AY6/RA60 series is, essentially, a beefy truck transmission whose vague shift feel is decidedly subpar for a rear-wheel-drive transmission. Except for RA62 (Lexus IS 250 and, allegedly, Scion FR-S and its derivatives) and RA63 (Europe’s Lexus IS 200d and IS 220d diesels), its other Toyota applications are in Tacoma and FJ Cruiser. The AZ6/J160, on the other hand, is a far more logical basis for the so-called Toyobaru coupe’s manual, having graced not only Toyota Altezza and 1st-generation Lexus IS 200 manual models, but such legendary sports cars as the Honda S2000, Mazda RX-8, 2nd-gen (NB) Mazda MX-5 Miata and the final S15 Nissan Silvia Spec-R. Frankly, we thought that the picture below (from the 2011 Tokyo Motor Show), as featured in our prior article, had settled the issue.



Were we (and Aisin) wrong, then? This skeptical author investigates
Although we’ve never seen such an egregious error in any Toyota/Lexus/Scion press preview printout, this author remained deeply skeptical. Another of the Scion FR-S long lead press materials, the “86″ Development Story brochure delves into the transmission issue on page 14, as shown below. This starts out with by noting that “…transmission development began with an effort to shorten the stroke of the 6-speed manual transmission used in the Altezza…” – an implicit admission that they started out with the Aisin AZ6/Toyota J160 transmission. Beyond that, the story twists and turns, and informs us how engineers from Toyota, Subaru and Aisin AI engineers came together and brought in Takeshi Kaino, a researcher specializing in shift feel to help implement the ideal 6-speed manual transmission. They go on to say that

After creating five different prototypes and executing a final, daring overall design change, the team finally succeeded in creating the ideal 6-speed manual transmission for a sports car…

(Tomohiro) Ishikawa (6-speed manual transmission development director): “Perhaps 80% of the design had changed. More than that, if you look at blueprints for individual parts. Most of the parts were changed I bet.”

No word one way or the other, however, on whether or not at some point they changed from the J160 to the RA62 as a basis for the FR-S / BRZ / GT 86 manual transmission.



Mild skepticism morphed into full-on raging doubt, however, when comparing the Scion FR-S “RA62″ individual gear ratios as shown in the second illustration above to those of the undoubtedly RA62 Lexus IS 250 Manual (as shown in a PDF document linked to the Lexus USA Newsroom’s 2012 Lexus IS 250/350 Product Information page). Except for a direct 1.000 5th-gear ratio, none of the individual gear ratios (not even reverse!) are shared by the two so-called RA62 iterations! And, given past Toyota history, when the slightest changes to an individual gear ratio or two warranted a new transmission denomination (see the RA60, RA60F, RA61, RA62 and RA63 family, or, going further back, the W55, W56, W57, W58, and W59 family of RWD 5-speed manual transmissions, which are externally and internally very similar aside from the gear ratios), we doubt that 2 transmissions that share but one of 7 gear ratios would carry the same code.

Paul Williamsen sets the record straight
Beyond his impressive talents that include Product Engineering, Design, & Development and Curriculum Design & Development, Mr. Williamsen is a walking encyclopedia when it comes to all things Toyota. Thus, he seemed to be a natural source to shed some light on the murky subject of the Scion FR-S / Subaru BRZ / Toyota (GT) 86 manual transmission. And his reply certainly did just that:

Preliminary info from TMC Engineering Div. did not allow us to make a positive identification of origins of the 6-speed manual transmission used in the the FT-86/FR-S/BRZ.

Newer, more thorough, information from TMC identifies the FR-S/BRZ transmission as an all-new type, the TL70.

A technical drawing of the TL70 shows that the order of the gears on the shafts (below) DOES NOT MATCH the RA60: the TL70 does match the sequence of the Aisin AZ6 (TMC type J160) 6-spd manual gearbox fitted to the original Toyota Altezza 2.0 (in Japan) and IS 200 (for Europe).

Similarly, illustrations of the TL70 internal shift linkage indicate that it is more like the J160 than the RA60 series. The ratios are unique to the TL70, with a closer overall spread of ratios than the RA62 of the current IS 250.

I have not been able to personally inspect any of these parts out of the new car and compare them to the earlier models.



There you have it, then. In summary, Toyota, Subaru and Aisin engineers started with the AZ6/J160 manual from the Toyota Altezza/Lexus IS 200, changed at least 80% of it in the quest for improved shift quality and came up with the AZ6-derived TL70 manual that graces the Subaru BRZ and its Toyota-badged stablemates. The only connection to the AY6/RA62 was the one erroneously made by whoever put together the Scion FR-S Long Lead Press Presentation Outline. Thus, we can accurately state that we and Aisin were closest to the truth.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:28 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.


Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.