Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB

Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/index.php)
-   Engine, Exhaust, Transmission (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=8)
-   -   Want to start an exhaust system theory discussion (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=128316)

Joesurf79 06-14-2018 10:05 AM

Want to start an exhaust system theory discussion
 
I have some questions for which I seem to get conflicting answers, and I'm wondering where I can find a good book on exhaust system design theory / tuning.


I have lived under the impression that on small displacement 4 cyl N/A motors, once you get past the headers / cats / front pipe - the section of the exhaust generally refered to as the "cat-back" had little to no effect on power production or delivery. Thus headers that were properly designed to scavenge / use exhaust pulses were the most important piece of the puzzle, followed by reducing catalytic converter restrictions - the catback was just for gas routing and sound managment purposes. By the time the gasses got that far down the pipe, there was no "gain" to be had - the velocity had dropped off too far.


Are the assumptions correct? I ask because I recently installed an Ace header and catless front pipe + tune (on a track only, NOT road use BRZ), and planned to fab my own 2.5" stainless, minimal weight dump pipe with a small resonator and 6" magnaflow canister muffler to cut the noise a little.


As I poked around with some guys that are familiar with spec miata racing whom I respect, they say they have seen quite an effect (10+ hp gains / losses) on the dyno when testing different diameters and tubing lengths of the exhaust system AFTER the headers... In the low HP NA car world, 10 hp is a huge difference!


This gives me pause - I don't want to fab up a short section of exhaust after the front pipe and end up losing 20+ pounds of exhaust weight...but also losing 10 hp as well!


Thoughts? Resources? Experiences? Any good books that anyone can recommend?

nikitopo 06-14-2018 10:58 AM

Other vendors say that you have gains with a catback and others say no. Personally, I believe that there are some gains, but in low gears (2nd, 3rd gear) where your engine revs faster and there are more exhaust gases on same period of time. With a better catback you might have a bit better engine response and a bit better acceleration on low speed corner exits.

NoHaveMSG 06-14-2018 11:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joesurf79 (Post 3098839)

As I poked around with some guys that are familiar with spec miata racing whom I respect, they say they have seen quite an effect (10+ hp gains / losses) on the dyno when testing different diameters and tubing lengths of the exhaust system AFTER the headers... In the low HP NA car world, 10 hp is a huge difference!

I think there is a bigger difference in the miata since the stock cat back on one of those is sub 2 inch. Stock for us is like 2.25ish.

Turbo 06-14-2018 11:08 AM

Somewhere I have a book on the subject. I'm going to try and dig it out as much for you as my own personal use re-designing the exhaust for my car.

If you're looking for the technical side of things, this is a good starting point:

http://www.enginelabs.com/engine-tec...gn-and-theory/

churchx 06-14-2018 01:20 PM

I'd say, that there are gains to be had .. BUT! Only if catback is only thing upgraded.
If you had got most (and more then from catback) gains from upgrading header & ecu tune, better flowing catback will net way less on top of those two.

Doozer 06-14-2018 09:06 PM

Flow is everything.

The "axle-back" section of these cars does have some significance but not as much as a Miata I believe.

You do need something there to help direct exhaust flow. Otherwise every racecar would just run an open header.

If your track doesn't have a sound limit requirement, just a 2.5" pipe out to the bumper is fine. We used the Nameless 2.5' resonated muffler delete for years to keep sound under 110db.

Once we got into aero stuff, the center exit was born.

We dynoed lots of variables of axle-back systems. Nothing ever showed anything more then a 2/3HP change.



Don't think about it too much. If you think your set-up is fast, it's fast!

NRXRaptor 06-14-2018 09:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Doozer (Post 3099065)
Flow is everything.

The "axle-back" section of these cars does have some significance but not as much as a Miata I believe.

You do need something there to help direct exhaust flow. Otherwise every racecar would just run an open header.

If your track doesn't have a sound limit requirement, just a 2.5" pipe out to the bumper is fine. We used the Nameless 2.5' resonated muffler delete for years to keep sound under 110db.

Once we got into aero stuff, the center exit was born.

We dynoed lots of variables of axle-back systems. Nothing ever showed anything more then a 2/3HP change.



Don't think about it too much. If you think your set-up is fast, it's fast!

peak numbers don't tell the whole tale

Joesurf79 06-14-2018 09:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Doozer (Post 3099065)
Flow is everything.

The "axle-back" section of these cars does have some significance but not as much as a Miata I believe.

You do need something there to help direct exhaust flow. Otherwise every racecar would just run an open header.

If your track doesn't have a sound limit requirement, just a 2.5" pipe out to the bumper is fine. We used the Nameless 2.5' resonated muffler delete for years to keep sound under 110db.

Once we got into aero stuff, the center exit was born.

We dynoed lots of variables of axle-back systems. Nothing ever showed anything more then a 2/3HP change.



Don't think about it too much. If you think your set-up is fast, it's fast!

So I run HPDEs at 5 different tracks and so far, I haven't run into any DB limits. However I also don't want to be lumped in with the guy with the Ear drum shattering, shrieking straight piped ls swapped 240sx with a pickachu hanging off the bumper either...thus my plan to use a resonator and the canister magnaflow.

Doozer, if you don't mind, could you explain how you routed the center exit? Did it pass under the rear subframe in the factory location? Running the exhaust out to the bumper wasn't part of my plan - it was a turndown in front off the diff. But I'd hate to screw up aero balance royally by doing so.

Thoughts? Do you have a full flat under car pan? If so, care to share the plans :)?

Joesurf79 06-14-2018 09:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NRXRaptor (Post 3099071)
peak numbers don't tell the whole tale

Is the implication that the catback portion of the exhaust does significantly impact the area under the curve?

Doozer 06-15-2018 01:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joesurf79 (Post 3099073)
So I run HPDEs at 5 different tracks and so far, I haven't run into any DB limits. However I also don't want to be lumped in with the guy with the Ear drum shattering, shrieking straight piped ls swapped 240sx with a pickachu hanging off the bumper either...thus my plan to use a resonator and the canister magnaflow.

Doozer, if you don't mind, could you explain how you routed the center exit? Did it pass under the rear subframe in the factory location? Running the exhaust out to the bumper wasn't part of my plan - it was a turndown in front off the diff. But I'd hate to screw up aero balance royally by doing so.

Thoughts? Do you have a full flat under car pan? If so, care to share the plans :)?

Don't worry about the aero stuff. A center exit exhaust in regards to the total aero package is minimal. There are much bigger gains in other areas worth your time and energy.

I would recommend just a standard 2.5" single exit muffler delete exiting driver's side. Any form of resonator in this axle back section should help your ears.

You have to think:
Japan engineers spent a lot of hours routing of the original exhaust system.
Ace also spent lots of hours engineering the header.

The only thing both Toyota and Ace engineers did the same was to measure everything with the total length of the exhaust in place, engine-to-bumper.

Hope this helps

Jasonb 06-15-2018 04:29 PM

This is the reason I did a header and just an axleback. Did the header for the power gain, and an axleback for the extra volume and weight savings. Using stock front pipe and mid pipe to keep the volume reasonable, I'm sure there is a couple HP to be freed up by changing the front pipe, but not for the added volume. Paid $224 for the axleback vs potentially up to about a grand on a good catback. Even if the entire catback can give me 2 or 3 hp, that wasn't worth it for the price.

SuperTom 06-15-2018 04:48 PM

I still believe there has to be gains coming off an Ace header with aftermarket front pipe, catback. I know there dyno results were with stock fp ect but the diameter is so damn tiny. I believed I measured around 52mm inside diameter for the FP.


Ace headers end in a 2.5/63mm outside diameter which is probably around 60mm inside. I find it hard to believe that with all the velocity and scavenging coming off the Ace headers hitting a 52mm restriction along with a cat doesn't hurt performance.


All I know is when I upgrade to Ace header I will be upgrading the rest of exhaust piping to 2.5" as well (High FLow Cat FP, 2.5") catback to keep the velocity constant.


I currently have Gruppe-S UEL 60mm, INvidia Catted FP 60mm, HKS legamax catback 60mm. All piping is consistent 60mm OD all the way through and I feel the great response this setup give.

PuslarBrrrz 06-15-2018 05:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SuperTom (Post 3099373)
I still believe there has to be gains coming off an Ace header with aftermarket front pipe, catback. I know there dyno results were with stock fp ect but the diameter is so damn tiny. I believed I measured around 52mm inside diameter for the FP.


Ace headers end in a 2.5/63mm outside diameter which is probably around 60mm inside. I find it hard to believe that with all the velocity and scavenging coming off the Ace headers hitting a 52mm restriction along with a cat doesn't hurt performance.


All I know is when I upgrade to Ace header I will be upgrading the rest of exhaust piping to 2.5" as well (High FLow Cat FP, 2.5") catback to keep the velocity constant.


I'd imagine you are correct. Heck Ace even offers a 3" front pipe to compliment their headers. I'm running a resonated 2.75" front/over combo from Ultimate Racing and the throttle response and drivability of the car certainly improved over oem. Less rasp too.



There is a dyno floating around somewhere that backs up my own claims. I've ran it with the Gruppe-S header, oem and now HKS. Couldn't imagine replacing it unless going for a full Ace setup.

Ernest72 06-15-2018 06:11 PM

I can tell you that my hooker catted front pipe with helmholz resonator did eliminate some drone compared to stock and no extra volume. I have JDL UEL catless headers and Q300.

Teseo 06-15-2018 06:41 PM

Weight reduction is the best mod for going faster, dyno is for tuning and brag out

SuperTom 06-15-2018 08:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Teseo (Post 3099426)
Weight reduction is the best mod for going faster, dyno is for tuning and brag out

Then you might like my build thread :)

Down to ~2536lbs will be <2500lbs by the end of this summer

NRXRaptor 06-15-2018 09:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joesurf79 (Post 3099074)
Is the implication that the catback portion of the exhaust does significantly impact the area under the curve?

no, its simply that peak numbers don't tell the whole tale of power delivery. for instance, stock evos had ridiculous power numbers, but those numbers didn't tell you that you'd have to slog through the entire tachometer before getting to the power

hell, a user on here posted his dyno chart for his (works?) carb legal turbo kit. most people simply went "hurr u spent $6600 for that little power gain durr" while munching on crayons and completely missing the immense boost in torque and power at 3000rpm. if you only look at peak numbers you're doing it wrong

I think we can all agree that a catback is only ever going to do a little bit compared to things like headers, boost, and tunes

Joesurf79 06-15-2018 09:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NRXRaptor (Post 3099461)
no, its simply that peak numbers don't tell the whole tale of power delivery. for instance, stock evos had ridiculous power numbers, but those numbers didn't tell you that you'd have to slog through the entire tachometer before getting to the power

hell, a user on here posted his dyno chart for his (works?) carb legal turbo kit. most people simply went "hurr u spent $6600 for that little power gain durr" while munching on crayons and completely missing the immense boost in torque and power at 3000rpm. if you only look at peak numbers you're doing it wrong

I think we can all agree that a catback is only ever going to do a little bit compared to things like headers, boost, and tunes

I gotcha, yeah - more area under the torque curve everywhere is more fun than a high peak by itself.

My car is right at 2500 lbs now, with 1/2 tank of 93 oct.
I've got plans to shave another 50 lbs by the end of summer from the car...and 10 lbs from my chubby self;)
With the 4.56 final drive and the headers / tune - it's peppy! Can t wait to get it on track next weekend!

Simplify and add lightness works if you carry it far and commit !

Joesurf79 06-15-2018 09:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Doozer (Post 3099130)
Don't worry about the aero stuff. A center exit exhaust in regards to the total aero package is minimal. There are much bigger gains in other areas worth your time and energy.

I would recommend just a standard 2.5" single exit muffler delete exiting driver's side. Any form of resonator in this axle back section should help your ears.

You have to think:
Japan engineers spent a lot of hours routing of the original exhaust system.
Ace also spent lots of hours engineering the header.

The only thing both Toyota and Ace engineers did the same was to measure everything with the total length of the exhaust in place, engine-to-bumper.

Hope this helps

It does. A solid, straight as possible 2.5" with straight through resonator / muffler out to the factory driver exhaust opening shouldn't significantly hurt power production or delivery is what you're saying.

Ultramaroon 06-15-2018 09:54 PM

I've been considering the concept of anti-reversion to improve scavenging.

Joesurf79 06-15-2018 10:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ultramaroon (Post 3099473)
I've been considering the concept of anti-reversion to improve scavenging.

Adding anti reversion chambers to an existing system? Where in the system? At the header in individual primaries? After the collectors? Or further back?

Teseo 06-15-2018 10:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SuperTom (Post 3099453)
Then you might like my build thread :)

Down to ~2536lbs will be <2500lbs by the end of this summer

Fuck yeah! Power/weight ratio is everything.

How much you weight, after lunch and some beers

Ultramaroon 06-15-2018 11:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joesurf79 (Post 3099474)
Adding anti reversion chambers to an existing system? Where in the system? At the header in individual primaries? After the collectors? Or further back?

I didn't plan out my follow-up. I figured the older crew would pick up on it first. :(


http://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=77762

Spuds 06-16-2018 12:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ultramaroon (Post 3099486)
I didn't plan out my follow-up. I figured the older crew would pick up on it first. :(


http://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=77762

TLDR for the new folks? I'm lazy.

Ultramaroon 06-16-2018 01:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spuds (Post 3099503)
TLDR for the new folks? I'm lazy.

It's worth reading. OP is a delusional computer repair guy that happens to live right in my town. He spent a lot of money on a whim with zero understanding. Results were as expected. A real cringefest.

NoHaveMSG 06-16-2018 03:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ultramaroon (Post 3099511)
It's worth reading. OP is a delusional computer repair guy that happens to live right in my town. He spent a lot of money on a whim with zero understanding. Results were as expected. A real cringefest.

That was more entertaining then the last Star Wars movie.

I was working in the motorcycle industry in the early 2000's. I remember a lot of weird stuff coming out. The only thing that really stuck around was hemholtz resonators, and those pretty much just to meet sound restrictions.

Joesurf79 06-16-2018 10:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ultramaroon (Post 3099486)
I didn't plan out my follow-up. I figured the older crew would pick up on it first. :(


http://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=77762

I see what you did there :) that right there is internet gold :):popcorn:

SuperTom 06-16-2018 01:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NRXRaptor (Post 3099461)
no, its simply that peak numbers don't tell the whole tale of power delivery. for instance, stock evos had ridiculous power numbers, but those numbers didn't tell you that you'd have to slog through the entire tachometer before getting to the power

hell, a user on here posted his dyno chart for his (works?) carb legal turbo kit. most people simply went "hurr u spent $6600 for that little power gain durr" while munching on crayons and completely missing the immense boost in torque and power at 3000rpm. if you only look at peak numbers you're doing it wrong

I think we can all agree that a catback is only ever going to do a little bit compared to things like headers, boost, and tunes


That's why I like the dyno #s on the Ace 350 header. Doesn't gain much up top compared to whats out there but the mid range torque dip turns into a torque surplus

SuperTom 07-18-2018 10:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ernest72 (Post 3099416)
I can tell you that my hooker catted front pipe with helmholz resonator did eliminate some drone compared to stock and no extra volume. I have JDL UEL catless headers and Q300.

Just bought the Hooker catted front pipe and Agency power Catback. I'm taking a big sound risk with Agency catback so I'm hoping the Hooker with the Jpipe resonator will balance out the potential drone of the AP CB. Was drew to the AP CB because of the 25lb weight. This will be all going on my new aCe 350 headers.

Worst case I can keep my Invidia Catted FP and HKS legamax catback because It sounds good with this. Just wanted to go with full 2.5" piping to mate up with ace headers and lose some weight.

Joesurf79 08-09-2018 09:47 AM

5 Attachment(s)
So this is what I ended up with Exhaust Wise. Ace CS400 headers, ceramic coated yellow, Ace Front pipe (no resonator, ceramic coated as well) into a 2.5" stainless system with a Vibrant straight through "super Quiet" resonator, and a magnaflow 6" diameter straight through muffler. Shaved 20 or so lbs, and got the super sweet pie cut turn-down tip I always wanted :thumbup:


Sounds fantastic at full tilt, and my totally biased, cash-hemmorage-influenced opinion is that it is best haha!

Shark_Bait88 08-09-2018 10:07 AM

I'm really digging that setup!

My next exhaust will either be a similar custom setup or the CLEiB single exit catback. I'd imagine the custom route would actually be cheaper. haha


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:05 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.


Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.