Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB

Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/index.php)
-   Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=59)
-   -   Rake (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=117838)

DaBoBo21 04-21-2017 11:32 AM

Rake
 
Hey guys. I was wondering if anyone is running with a "raked" setup. I'm curious to see how it looks. Wanting to put a pretty meaty tire in the back, but nothing obnoxious. Post some pictures if you have them!

Shady195 04-21-2017 11:43 AM

It will look silly.

Why are you only running a meaty tire in the rear? Are you drag racing? If so then what does it matter how it looks..

Also keep in mind that you change the weight distribution of the car doing something like this and it may not handle how you want.

I guess it all depends what the end goal here is.

Ryephile 04-21-2017 11:45 AM

Like this?

https://assets.hemmings.com/blog/wp-...6MM_Jungle.jpg


I kid, I kid!

Ok, seriously though, what're your goals here? Are you going for just a look, or is there some performance intent here?

DaBoBo21 04-21-2017 11:47 AM

I'll be honest, I'm not 100% certain what direction to take. I am aware it will handle differently, and no I'm not looking to drag. Like I said, I'm not going for anything obnoxious. A subtle rake.

DaBoBo21 04-21-2017 11:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ryephile (Post 2896208)
Like this?

https://assets.hemmings.com/blog/wp-...6MM_Jungle.jpg


I kid, I kid!

Ok, seriously though, what're your goals here? Are you going for just a look, or is there some performance intent here?

Lol, definitely not. I guess I'm going for more look, but nothing to the extent to take away the full nature of the car. I don't track it, nor do I plan to. It's my daily and I'm active at shows and meets.

Shady195 04-21-2017 11:56 AM

Leave the car alone then. Not sure why you'd want any sort of rake?

Ryephile 04-21-2017 12:05 PM

From a technical aspect, the last thing the car needs is proportionally more rear tire. It has a front weight bias, so it theoretically needs more front tire contact patch than rear.

If you were going for a bit of a California Rake aesthetic, perhaps a same width but taller aspect ratio might accomplish that without overly messing up the overall handling, but it certainly won't improve anything other than having that specific look.

What tires and wheels are you running now?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Same subject but a different take on it would be chassis rake, via changing the roll center axis. Lowering the front end or raising the rear would accomplish this, but whether it would help or hurt the handling is something I'd have to defer to the guys that have done the measurements and sorted it out on-track. Chassis rake is a useful and important handling tuning facet, I don't recommend changing it just for funsies.

DaBoBo21 04-21-2017 12:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shady195 (Post 2896219)
Leave the car alone then. Not sure why you'd want any sort of rake?

Just going for something different, man. Not everything has to make sense.

I'm not going for a drag look. Just trying to see if anyone has ran with a slight rake on this platform. I'm looking at running with the Ambit RT5s and I believe I could pull off a slight rake with them.

DaBoBo21 04-21-2017 12:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ryephile (Post 2896222)
From a technical aspect, the last thing the car needs is proportionally more rear tire. It has a front weight bias, so it theoretically needs more front tire contact patch than rear.

If you were going for a bit of a California Rake aesthetic, perhaps a same width but taller aspect ratio might accomplish that without overly messing up the overall handling, but it certainly won't improve anything other than having that specific look.

What tires and wheels are you running now?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Same subject but a different take on it would be chassis rake, via changing the roll center axis. Lowering the front end or raising the rear would accomplish this, but whether it would help or hurt the handling is something I'd have to defer to the guys that have done the measurements and sorted it out on-track. Chassis rake is a useful and important handling tuning facet, I don't recommend changing it just for funsies.

That all makes sense. Could you give me an example of "California Rake?"

smg1138 04-21-2017 12:24 PM

I think most people run a little bit of rake on this car. I personally set my ride hide at about 5" from the ground to the pinch welds front and back. That way as the fuel gets lower and/or I remove the trunk junk, I can get a little bit of positive rake. I'm not a fan of the dead body in the trunk look.

Ryephile 04-21-2017 12:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaBoBo21 (Post 2896227)
That all makes sense. Could you give me an example of "California Rake?"

That funny car picture I posted would be the most extreme example of California Rake. In traditional hot rodding it's simply running a taller rear tire to improve weight distribution during launch at the drag strip.

Gunman 04-21-2017 12:54 PM

Slight rake is good for aero, basically makes the entire under body a large diffuser.

8RZ 04-21-2017 12:55 PM

Do a reverse rake and have the front sit taller.

Icecreamtruk 04-21-2017 01:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 8RZ (Post 2896255)
Do a reverse rake and have the front sit taller.

You trying to take off or something? :iono:

8RZ 04-21-2017 01:56 PM

No, it's good for launching in reverse.

#fwdstatus

D18 04-21-2017 01:59 PM

I was running a slight chassis rake for a bit, mostly for the aero benefits listed above, and the slight aesthetic benefits 😉. Got rid of it though, cause it was causing the front of the car to be just low enough that I was scrapping more then I liked coming in and out of some driveways. Car isn't crazy lowered either, maybe a hair over 1" from stock.

Oh and I'm running a square tire setup.

Racecomp Engineering 04-21-2017 03:33 PM

Rake can also be used to alter suspension geometry in a way to reduce understeer. That can be a benefit if done right. It should still be kept fairly subtle though.

I don't recommend different size tires front vs rear for most people.

- Andrew

JazzleSAURUS 04-21-2017 03:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Racecomp Engineering (Post 2896341)
Rake can also be used to alter suspension geometry in a way to reduce understeer. That can be a benefit if done right. It should still be kept fairly subtle though.

I don't recommend different size tires front vs rear for most people.

- Andrew

As a follow up, if you were to prepare a car that had some rake, (say a spirited DD or something,) how much of a differential in height would you use? a couple mm at most I'd imagine, (3 or so?)

Ryephile 04-21-2017 03:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JazzleSAURUS (Post 2896350)
As a follow up, if you were to prepare a car that had some rake, (say a spirited DD or something,) how much of a differential in height would you use? a couple mm at most I'd imagine, (3 or so?)

If we're keeping it theoretical, the roll axes on the Lotus Elise were set up such that having a positive rake of 5mm [front 5mm lower than rear] gave the best overall balance; roll center axis and aerodynamic effect with its flat floor.

Tcoat 04-21-2017 04:10 PM

Looks like a little rake on these:


http://speed.academy/wp-content/uplo...S-TRACK-01.jpg
http://autoguide.com.vsassets.com/bl...-FRS-RS-03.jpg


As long as you don't go nuts it should look OK.
Mind you I come from a generation that did this to our street cars:
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-oWa_earKZ3...gg5o1_1280.jpg

JazzleSAURUS 04-21-2017 04:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ryephile (Post 2896357)
If we're keeping it theoretical, the roll axes on the Lotus Elise were set up such that having a positive rake of 5mm [front 5mm lower than rear] gave the best overall balance; roll center axis and aerodynamic effect with its flat floor.

That's about the difference I have on my Forester XT, it helped keep things from touching on launch at autox and kept the rear gripping and the COG down.

MuseChaser 04-21-2017 04:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by D18 (Post 2896294)
...
Oh and I'm running a square tire setup.

That sounds like it'd be REALLY bumpy...

Kodename47 04-21-2017 04:34 PM

Here's an old pic of mine:
http://res.cloudinary.com/lagbv048w/...w_Wheels_1.jpg

DaBoBo21 04-21-2017 05:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tcoat (Post 2896368)
Looks like a little rake on these:


http://speed.academy/wp-content/uplo...S-TRACK-01.jpg
http://autoguide.com.vsassets.com/bl...-FRS-RS-03.jpg


As long as you don't go nuts it should look OK.
Mind you I come from a generation that did this to our street cars:
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-oWa_earKZ3...gg5o1_1280.jpg


I think that top picture is along the lines I'm looking for, with the height of the release series below. Not looking to go much lower than stock.

DaBoBo21 04-21-2017 05:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kodename47 (Post 2896394)

This is almost exactly what I'm going for stance wise. It's subtle.

Gunman 04-21-2017 07:31 PM

Come on....go gasser style :)
https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com...1cc3ef16ab.jpg

Gent 04-21-2017 07:50 PM

1 Attachment(s)
I have a bit in mine. Not a tonne.

DaBoBo21 04-21-2017 08:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gent (Post 2896530)
I have a bit in mine. Not a tonne.

It looks good!

geezerbrzeezer 04-21-2017 08:45 PM

Keep that mofo perfectly level and be done with it. No stagger, don't jack it up.

Every mm of this thing looks best when appearing as glued to grade as possible.

shellslinger 04-21-2017 09:06 PM

This is an old pic with my old Tein Flex Z coilovers. It had a slight rake. I think the rear's were like 2-3mm higher than fronts.

http://s22.postimg.org/5f17yyhi9/IMG_1457.jpg

shellslinger 04-21-2017 10:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaBoBo21 (Post 2896202)
Hey guys. I was wondering if anyone is running with a "raked" setup. I'm curious to see how it looks. Wanting to put a pretty meaty tire in the back, but nothing obnoxious. Post some pictures if you have them!

Forgot to mention that I was running 245/40/17 Sport comp 2's. I'm not experienced enough to tell you how a rake effects this car. But all I know is that with the Flex Z's and the RSR Sports I, I had the same rake set up and the car feels very planted in the turns and stable. I'm running -1.5 degrees of camber in the front and -2.0 in the rears. Very confident inspiring around the canyons.

DaBoBo21 04-21-2017 11:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shellslinger (Post 2896619)
Forgot to mention that I was running 245/40/17 Sport comp 2's. I'm not experienced enough to tell you how a rake effects this car. But all I know is that with the Flex Z's and the RSR Sports I, I had the same rake set up and the car feels very planted in the turns and stable. I'm running -1.5 degrees of camber in the front and -2.0 in the rears. Very confident inspiring around the canyons.

That's awesome. Good to know! Thank you!

Kodename47 04-22-2017 05:12 AM

Mine is on lowering springs designed to give it a little rake for better handling.

DaBoBo21 04-23-2017 12:55 PM

1 Attachment(s)
Just to add, this is what I would be going for "rake" wise. I really like this stance.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:25 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.


Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.