![]() |
What am I missing about getting a flush look
I've been on the wheel directory for idk how many hours looking at different setups. At first I was set on getting work kiwami wheels 18x9.5 +38 and st coilovers to drop the car about an inch but now I'm worried about there bring too much poke and i dont want the wheels all cambered out and looking broken. I pick 18x9.5 because I like the deep concave look. I would want to do 18x8.5 in the front but I feel semi concave wheels up front and deep concave wheels in back may look funny.
My question is what else am i missing in getting the stance you want for your car because some of the other wheels running the same specs look perfect to me and then the wheels I'm looking at are poking too much on the directory. I don't know much about camber bolts and stuff either so I don't know if that plays a part or is completely irrelevant. Any suggestions, help, or 18x9.5 pictures to show me I'm wrong and it won't poke appreciated. As of now I'm tempted to just make the purchase of 18x9.5 all around and hope for the best or get 18x8.5 up front and hope for the best. I figured I'd ask the much more knowledgeable people on the forum first though. |
Whenever someone asks for advice about stancing their car, my answer is always this:
Don't do it. |
Are you going for just stance or do you want good performance?
|
Quote:
|
Seeing this thread I'm about to say fuck it and order the 18x9.5 all around. I don't even want to drop mine as much as he did
http://www.ft86club.com/forums/showt...t=20907&page=5 |
If going just for looks, might as well go staggered. The 18x9.5 is really too wide up front.
For a more performance oriented option, 18x8 +35 square setup would sit pretty flush. |
18x10 all around
|
Jesus, this forum.
1. don't go staggered. 2. with 18x9.5, +38 and a 255/35 tire... you'll need something like 1.5 to 2 degrees of camber in front to avoid rubbing the fender. that's hardly "stanced." Go read the meaty tire thread and see what's been done. Stop posting junk threads. And the rest of you, stop giving bad advice and being "performance" snobs. |
@sdemo is totally correct. The amount of perceived "poke" is going to be determined by how much negative camber you're running as well as wheel offset and width.
In the front, with a 1.5" drop, you might need 1.0 - 2.0 degrees of negative camber to "tuck" the top of the wheel and prevent it from looking like it's poking (even though, technically, the bottom of the wheel will be). Don't worry about that, in the end it works and looks good. Most achieve this with either camber bolts or adjustable top hats. In the rear, if you drop the car 1.5" you'll get roughly -1.2 degrees of natural negative camber. That should be enough because the rear fender clearance is better. In general I avoid buying staggered setups if that's not what came from the factory. The last thing you want to have to deal with is a RWD car that understeers like a FWD car because the balance of front and rear grip has been thrown for a loop just to get a look. |
Quote:
Personally I think it's retarded to use an 18x9.5 wheel on an 86 with stockish power levels. A light 18x8 with a low offset would be a good compromise. |
I care about understeer? When did I say anything about that? OP just wants some wheels that look nice and are semi-flush with the fender... not hellaflush, not stanced, not any of that other nonsense.
To turn this into a stance v. performance thread is ridiculous and likely confusing for the OP. EDIT: @DAEMANO we must be brothers from another mother... both with RSR Sports-I and SA10rs heh |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Second don't call my thread "junk" when I in fact got the exact answer I was looking for from @DAEMANO. I was looking for an explanation as to why some cars looked different with the same wheel spec and @DAEMANO provided that for me. Im new to modding cars as I didn't care to mod my auto frs I initially had. Id like to have a full understanding of what I'm getting myself into before I spend a few thousand dollars and end up upset so I figured I'd ask the forum seeing as I thought that's what the forum was for. I spent plenty of time on other threads including the meaty tire one before making this one. Thank you as well for telling me the amount of camber I'd expect with those wheels |
Op from what you've posted I really think you will be unhappy with 9.5
Look how many wider wheels are for sale in classifieds. IMO you sound like you want a 8.5 with a higher offset. 38-45 is good. I have staggered 8.5/9.5 +45 I regret. Then 9.5 +45 even pokes in the rear imagine up front. |
To turn this into a stance v. performance thread is ridiculous and likely confusing for the OP.
I know what stance v is and hate it. Looks broken to me and would never do it |
Quote:
|
Quote:
18x9.5 +45 surely only pokes in the rear on a stock suspension car with little to no camber. What exactly are the supporting specs for this claim? (tire size, suspension, camber, ride height...) EDIT: and up front, I have the same spec wheel on my moderately lowered car (with 255/35s) and I want to space them OUT, if anything. I rub the inner fender liner at full lock... and a lower offset (closer to +40) would be better |
Quote:
Really though, the coils were a godsend. Had them on the car for about 2 years and 20k miles now. They really do everything @Moto-P set them up to do. For the price, the comfort and performance have been a total win. My only issue with the wheels has been that curb rash is hard to mend due to the gorgeous two-tone finish. Eventually I'll probably end up fixing the rash on mine and then powdering them bronze like the new factory bronze version. My car is black so it'll end up looking something like the FT86SF car here:http://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=109671 As-Is http://i.imgur.com/V3GVXfn.jpg?1 To-Be http://www.ft86speedfactory.com/imag...onze_brz_1.jpg http://www.ft86speedfactory.com/imag...onze_brz_3.jpg |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
For reference, I am at 18x8.5 et 45 up front and run a 15mm spacer for an effective offset of et30. I still have about 10mm of room to come outward (poke more) in the front that would still tuck. I run a 225 section tire that gives some space, but could easily go 245 in the same brand (BFG Geforce Sport Comp2s) which run very wide. I am lowered 1.6" in the front with 2.0 degrees of negative camber. Here's a close up. http://i.imgur.com/qw30bbG.jpg?1 |
Quote:
The following is needed to have an accurate comparison if you are only looking at pictures: change in static ride height vs stock camber tire size tire type wheel width wheel offset wheel maker of the above items I listed, 5 out of 7 are not consistent measurements across the industry. 18x9.5" +38 can vary by as much as 5mm in each direction on the front face, depending on who makes the wheel. In practice, you should lay out goals you want and then go from there. If you are set on wheels then you can remove three of the 7 things I listed above. -alex |
Quote:
I understand what your saying about the many things that vary. I feel like it'd be a safer bet for me to go 18x8.5 +38. Especially after the pictures provided. |
Quote:
|
If you want a really agressive fitment and don't care much for square setup and don't mind stagger you could do 18x8.5 +35 front and 18x9.5 +40 rear it'll pretty much line up flat with car body but leave enough room to not scrape ender wall. If you do go 18x9.5 all around front wheel will stick out more than rear. After that you'll probably want coilovers if you don't already have it, find one that'll give about 3 in drop adjustable, than get some LCA to adjust camber in rear , optional to have camber bolt in front to adjust camber. -1 ish camber won't be noticeable which will give you some room for tinker with.
http://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/2016...03e9486d2c.jpg |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:48 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.