Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB

Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/index.php)
-   Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Premium vs regular fuels (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=102811)

emishor86 03-13-2016 07:55 AM

Premium vs regular fuels
 
Hey all,

Wondering if the ZN6 or ZC6 engine performs better with a more expensive fuel like "BP Ultimate" or "Shell V-Power". From research I've done, only sport cars seem to gain a few HP however normal family vehicles gain no benefits.

So is it worth it in a FRS or BRZ?

:thumbsup:

OUGrad05 03-13-2016 11:28 AM

What typically matters from tank to tank is the octane rating of the fuel. Some of the higher end brands have more or better cleaners/detergents in them but most of your mainstream gasolines are of good quality today.

If you're hearing knock/pinging definitely step up a grade, if you're driving hard, step up a grade. I run premium in all my cars, they all require it, when they didn't I still usually ran up a grade. Modern knock sensors will cut in if knock is detected, an easy /cheap way to prevent that is to run good fuel.

If you're not loading up the engine much it likely wont matter.

gravitylover 03-13-2016 12:14 PM

These are high compression motors and they really should only be run with 91 or higher octane. You may not notice a big performance difference using lower but it's there. You also most likely will not hear the knocking because the computer takes care of it pretty well but it is there and can do damage if low octane gas is used too often. I can prove the performance difference by looking at a chart of my car on fuelly and see a nearly 5mpg drop when I ran a tank of 87 because it was all that was available when I needed gas once last year. All other parameters were the same other than that one tank. In hindsight I should have just put in a gallon or two but was so used to filling the tank I just did it.

Tcoat 03-13-2016 12:50 PM

How is this even a question? read the manual. It will tell you what you should and must use.
The octane levels are for reducing knock ONLY! Higher octane fuel does not give you more power really. What it does is allows the engines with learning ECUs to adjust the timing higher. This is where the "more power" is created.
As a society that identifies higher numbers as being stronger or better I think many people totally misunderstand octane rating. High octane fuel is intended to reduce preignition in high compression engines it is not stronger or better than low octane fuel in any other way. To grossly over simplify what is happening the higher the octane fuel the harder it is to ignite not the other way around. Sure you can run high octane in a regular engine but it is not doing a single thing for you. You should not run lower octane in a high compression engine though since you run the risk of damage. New engines with self adjusting timing this risk is not huge but run too low in an older engine and you better be good at fixing it.

menikmati 03-13-2016 12:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tcoat (Post 2579416)
How is this even a question? read the manual. It will tell you what you should and must use.
The octane levels are for reducing knock ONLY! Higher octane fuel does not give you more power really. What it does is allows the engines with learning ECUs to adjust the timing higher. This is where the "more power" is created.
As a society that identifies higher numbers as being stronger or better I think many people totally misunderstand octane rating. High octane fuel is intended to reduce preignition in high compression engines it is not stronger or better than low octane fuel in any other way. To grossly over simplify what is happening the higher the octane fuel the harder it is to ignite not the other way around. Sure you can run high octane in a regular engine but it is not doing a single thing for you. You should not run lower octane in a high compression engine though since you run the risk of damage. New engines with self adjusting timing this risk is not huge but run too low in an older engine and you better be good at fixing it.

In the words of Tai Lopez, "Knawledge."

mdm 03-13-2016 01:04 PM

And cleaners/detergents are a separate issue, they are about preventing/removing carbon buildup in the intake system, especially on intake valves (unless the engine uses direct injection, then of course fuel detergents can't clean the intake valves because the valves do not come into contact with fuel).

Cleaning capability is per se indepent of octane rating, though some brands put more cleaners in their premium (high octane) fuels.

Cleaners/detergents also have no effect on HP, at least not directly. I mean, if there were no or insufficient cleaners, gradually carbon buildup would interfere with engine operation and reduce HP, but that's not the effect the OP has in mind, I suppose.

All gasoline is supposed to contain cleaners, there are standards for that. But - at least in the US - some gas brands set their own higher standards: "Top Tier" gas.

Tcoat 03-13-2016 01:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by menikmati (Post 2579420)
In the words of Tai Lopez, "Knawledge."

http://img.picturequotes.com/2/453/4...ge-quote-1.jpg

Tcoat 03-13-2016 01:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mdm (Post 2579427)
And cleaners/detergents are a separate issue, they are about preventing/removing carbon buildup in the intake system, especially on intake valves (unless the engine uses direct injection, then of course fuel detergents can't clean the intake valves because the valves do not come into contact with fuel).

Cleaning capability is per se indepent of octane rating, though some brands put more cleaners in their premium (high octane) fuels.

Cleaners/detergents also have no effect on HP, at least not directly. I mean, if there were no or insufficient cleaners, gradually carbon buildup would interfere with engine operation and reduce HP, but that's not the effect the OP has in mind, I suppose.

All gasoline is supposed to contain cleaners, there are standards for that. But - at least in the US - some gas brands set their own higher standards: "Top Tier" gas.


The use of the words "regular" and "premium" don't help the misconceptions either! Premium implies that it is somehow better overall which is not the case.

daiheadjai 03-13-2016 01:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tcoat (Post 2579435)
The use of the words "regular" and "premium" don't help the misconceptions either! Premium implies that it is somehow better overall which is not the case.

You bet that's an example in a marketing text book somewhere...

Sent from my SGH-I747M using Tapatalk

Tcoat 03-13-2016 02:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by daiheadjai (Post 2579441)
You bet that's an example in a marketing text book somewhere...

Sent from my SGH-I747M using Tapatalk

Strangely enough that price difference is yet another thing that makes people think the higher octane is "better" fuel. We are conditioned to believe that if we pay more for what we think of as the same thing then it must be a higher quality. There is much more to the price difference in fuels than quality. Although "premium" does have a few additives that cost a bit more to produce these are not really what drives the price up. The regular is made, stored and transported in massive volumes and this keeps costs down. Since premium is made in substantially smaller volumes then those costs get driven up.
If you pay $10 to make, store and transport 100 gallons of regular fuel and sell it for $1 a gallon you make $90 for your $10 investment.
If you spend $10 to make, store and transport 40 gallons of premium and sell it for $1 then you only make $30 for that same $10. In order to show a better profit you need to charge more and this is why they do. The oil companies make way more money on regular fuel sales then they do with premium so trying to upsell you really makes no sense.
(To all you economists out there I know my comments are way oversimplified but was going for brevity not 100% accuracy)

VTEC 03-13-2016 03:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by emishor86 (Post 2579312)
Hey all,

Wondering if the ZN6 or ZC6 engine performs better with a more expensive fuel like "BP Ultimate" or "Shell V-Power". From research I've done, only sport cars seem to gain a few HP however normal family vehicles gain no benefits.

So is it worth it in a FRS or BRZ?

:thumbsup:

It all depends on the OEM tune. The FR-S and BRZ were tuned by factory to use 93 octane under North American rating. I think for you in Australia your system rates that as 98 or 100?

Anytime you use something below factory settings, the computer will detect that because the fuel will start to detonate when it's not supposed to. The computer will detect the explosions and compensate by lowering the compression and horsepower to prevent more premature detonations. So it's not so much that you gain power by using the factory recommended fuel, you lose power by using the cheaper fuel.

If you put something with higher octane and more expensive than the recommended fuel, the computer has no way of knowing that. You will still get the same 200 horsepower on 100 octane that you get with 93 octane. You would just be wasting your money on more expensive fuel with no added performance.

The reason why family cars get no benefit from premium fuel is because they are usually tuned to 87 octane. And if you decide to put 91 octane in your Corolla, there is no way for the Corolla's ECU to detect that. And you would be wasting your money again.

You gotta check the factory specs for each car though. Some sports cars like ours and I think the STI are tuned for 93 octane. Most are probably tuned for 91. An accord coupe V6 6MT is only tuned for 87 octane.

humfrz 03-13-2016 03:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by emishor86 (Post 2579312)
Hey all,

..........................performs better with a more expensive fuel So is it worth it in a FRS or BRZ?

Yes ............ :)


humfrz

FR-Sky 03-13-2016 04:31 PM

well...around my area there is only 91,,and i use 91 shell V power...

I hope thats fine =[

Tcoat 03-13-2016 04:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FR-Sky (Post 2579516)
well...around my area there is only 91,,and i use 91 shell V power...

I hope thats fine =[

Manual says: Recommended 93 Required minimum 91. All is good in the world.

Packofcrows 03-13-2016 04:44 PM

93 you'll notice bit more response and better mpg. Thats it. 91 it feels the same as 93 but with about 3-5mpg less. IMO

I only use Shell 91 or Chevron 91. No 93 in central CA

itsAlex 03-13-2016 05:27 PM

I also use Shell 91, there's Esso 94 around here but as the manual says, 91 is minimum. It's not recommended, but it gets the job done safely. Besides, I rarely ever go above 3500 rpm, if it matters.

FR-Sky 03-13-2016 07:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tcoat (Post 2579520)
Manual says: Recommended 93 Required minimum 91. All is good in the world.

Well,,they do have 100 near my area,,but its 10$ a gallon lol

softgrip 03-13-2016 07:48 PM

I'm all about BP Ultimate. Every fillup for my WRX, and now the BRZ is getting the same loving.

PureShield 03-13-2016 08:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by itsAlex (Post 2579548)
I also use Shell 91, there's Esso 94 around here but as the manual says, 91 is minimum. It's not recommended, but it gets the job done safely. Besides, I rarely ever go above 3500 rpm, if it matters.

Except that's based off of American 91 octane not Canadian 91. Canadian 91 is more like 87-89 American.

retoocs 03-13-2016 09:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mdm (Post 2579427)
And cleaners/detergents are a separate issue, they are about preventing/removing carbon buildup in the intake system, especially on intake valves (unless the engine uses direct injection, then of course fuel detergents can't clean the intake valves because the valves do not come into contact with fuel).

Cleaning capability is per se indepent of octane rating, though some brands put more cleaners in their premium (high octane) fuels.

Cleaners/detergents also have no effect on HP, at least not directly. I mean, if there were no or insufficient cleaners, gradually carbon buildup would interfere with engine operation and reduce HP, but that's not the effect the OP has in mind, I suppose.

All gasoline is supposed to contain cleaners, there are standards for that. But - at least in the US - some gas brands set their own higher standards: "Top Tier" gas.

Not all direct injection have the injectors only in the combustion chamber. The D-4S system in the 86's have a port injector too. [ame="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zc8aUxBZlsU"]2013 Scion FR-S | D-4S Technology Explained - YouTube[/ame]

Cleaners/detergents and other additives do affect hp. The additives doesn't contribute to producing power. Most gasoline around the country is about 97% so you are losing about 6 hp over getting 100% gasoline.

mdm 03-13-2016 09:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by retoocs (Post 2579673)
Not all direct injection have the injectors only in the combustion chamber. The D-4S system in the 86's have a port injector too.


Sure, I should have said "unless the engine uses only direct injection"

Tcoat 03-13-2016 09:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PureShield (Post 2579666)
Except that's based off of American 91 octane not Canadian 91. Canadian 91 is more like 87-89 American.

No. Canadian octane is measured in AKI exactly the same as the US. So 91 here is exactly the same as 91 there. Don't know where you heard different.

VTEC 03-13-2016 09:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FR-Sky (Post 2579609)
Well,,they do have 100 near my area,,but its 10$ a gallon lol

Well you don't have to fill the whole tank with 100, that would expensive and overkill. But you can mix 100 with 91 to get 93 octane. There's a chart posted somewhere on here by one of the California members that shows you how many gallons of each to mix in order to get whatever octane you are looking for.

But an easier way might be just to order a case of octane booster and add some to each fill up

PureShield 03-13-2016 09:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tcoat (Post 2579692)
No. Canadian octane is measured in AKI exactly the same as the US. So 91 here is exactly the same as 91 there. Don't know where you heard different.

My local clubs tuner at Drift Office has tuned and modified over 180 FR-S/BRZ's and has done extensive testing using Canadian 91/94 vs American 92 vs E85 and has shown that are gas is far inferior especially when dealing with a force-fed motor.

Tcoat 03-13-2016 10:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PureShield (Post 2579718)
My local clubs tuner at Drift Office has tuned and modified over 180 FR-S/BRZ's and has done extensive testing using Canadian 91/94 vs American 92 vs E85 and has shown that are gas is far inferior especially when dealing with a force-fed motor.

Then they better get that info to the government. They can blow the whole highly regulated and monitored fuel industry away.

Tcoat 03-13-2016 10:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VTEC (Post 2579710)
Well you don't have to fill the whole tank with 100, that would expensive and overkill. But you can mix 100 with 91 to get 93 octane. There's a chart posted somewhere on here by one of the California members that shows you how many gallons of each to mix in order to get whatever octane you are looking for.

But an easier way might be just to order a case of octane booster and add some to each fill up

Why? Unless you are going to tune for it higher octane than 93 does nothing at all for you.

PureShield 03-13-2016 10:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tcoat (Post 2579730)
Then they better get that info to the government. They can blow the whole highly regulated and monitored fuel industry away.

Haha I don't personally know @Tcoat I'm just relaying the info. I've read different things all over the internet and heard different things in person. I've also read that American gas stations can put lower rated numbers on the pump than what the fuel may actually be :iono: and that the sign on the pump is just the lowest of what you may get???? Who knows.

Hotrodheart 03-13-2016 10:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tcoat (Post 2579416)
How is this even a question? read the manual. It will tell you what you should and must use.
The octane levels are for reducing knock ONLY! Higher octane fuel does not give you more power really. What it does is allows the engines with learning ECUs to adjust the timing higher. This is where the "more power" is created.
As a society that identifies higher numbers as being stronger or better I think many people totally misunderstand octane rating. High octane fuel is intended to reduce preignition in high compression engines it is not stronger or better than low octane fuel in any other way. To grossly over simplify what is happening the higher the octane fuel the harder it is to ignite not the other way around. Sure you can run high octane in a regular engine but it is not doing a single thing for you. You should not run lower octane in a high compression engine though since you run the risk of damage. New engines with self adjusting timing this risk is not huge but run too low in an older engine and you better be good at fixing it.

@tcoat how does it run on maple syrup?

Tcoat 03-13-2016 10:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PureShield (Post 2579736)
Haha I don't personally know @Tcoat I'm just relaying the info. I've read different things all over the internet and heard different things in person. I've also read that American gas stations can put lower rated numbers on the pump than what the fuel may actually be :iono: and that the sign on the pump is just the lowest of what you may get???? Who knows.

We are the same way. If you read the pump labels they say minimum XX. If it was really that much lower then any cars with non ECU controlled timing would be grenading all the time. We do have some things that are lower for environmental reasons (i.e. benzene and sulphur) but those do not impact the octane rating. They may be picking up on something else but it is not likely octane levels.


As far as "who knows" goes there will be thousands of people since these things are very closely monitored. Nobody would get away with selling sub rated gas for long.

PureShield 03-13-2016 10:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hotrodheart (Post 2579743)
@tcoat how does it run on maple syrup?

As being from Canada as well I can tell you it runs great but can be a bit sticky.

Tcoat 03-13-2016 10:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hotrodheart (Post 2579743)
@tcoat how does it run on maple syrup?

Quote:

Originally Posted by PureShield (Post 2579751)
As being from Canada as well I can tell you it runs great but can be a bit sticky.

I prefer running moose piss. Mileage isn't as good but easier on the injectors.

VTEC 03-13-2016 11:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tcoat (Post 2579732)
Why? Unless you are going to tune for it higher octane than 93 does nothing at all for you.

I know that. I said some people in California use a chart that shows them how much of 100 and 91 octane to mix together to get 93 octane. I didn't say anything about going over 93.

Hotrodheart 03-13-2016 11:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tcoat (Post 2579753)
I prefer running moose piss. Mileage isn't as good but easier on the injectors.

If I was behind a car, I'd rather it was running on maple syrup. Jes sayin...

CatScan 03-13-2016 11:46 PM

Run on alcohol, that's "Supreme"!

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikiped...g_McKenzie.jpg

itsAlex 03-14-2016 10:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PureShield (Post 2579666)
Except that's based off of American 91 octane not Canadian 91. Canadian 91 is more like 87-89 American.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tcoat (Post 2579692)
No. Canadian octane is measured in AKI exactly the same as the US. So 91 here is exactly the same as 91 there. Don't know where you heard different.

As Tcoat said, both Canada and the US measure their octane ratings using AKI ((R+M) /2). Other countries use methods like RON and MON.

V_86 03-14-2016 10:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Packofcrows (Post 2579527)
93 you'll notice bit more response and better mpg. Thats it. 91 it feels the same as 93 but with about 3-5mpg less. IMO

I only use Shell 91 or Chevron 91. No 93 in central CA

There's no 93 really in any of CA, I've never seen it in Socal. It sucks because I would like the mpg gain and fewer lost ponies to 91.

PureShield 03-14-2016 11:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tcoat (Post 2579692)
No. Canadian octane is measured in AKI exactly the same as the US. So 91 here is exactly the same as 91 there. Don't know where you heard different.

Quote:

Originally Posted by itsAlex (Post 2581375)
As Tcoat said, both Canada and the US measure their octane ratings using AKI ((R+M) /2). Other countries use methods like RON and MON.

I'm just relaying the info I've been getting. Like I said the guys at Drift Office have done extensive testing using Canadian fuel vs American fuel and they find it inferior. For example this one guy in my local club has an FR-S with an Edelbrock supercharger kit and his car tuned and then dynoed at 225whp on Chevron 94 from B.C and around 250whp on Chevron 92 from Washington. These are also a couple of similar topics I've found.

http://www.revscene.net/forums/68154...dien-fuel.html

http://www.e90post.com/forums/showthread.php?t=860059

mav1178 03-14-2016 11:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PureShield (Post 2581428)
I'm just relaying the info I've been getting. Like I said the guys at Drift Office have done extensive testing using Canadian fuel vs American fuel and they find it inferior. For example this one guy in my local club has an FR-S with an Edelbrock supercharger kit and his car tuned and then dynoed at 225whp on Chevron 94 from B.C and around 250whp on Chevron 92 from Washington. These are also a couple of similar topics I've found.

http://www.revscene.net/forums/68154...dien-fuel.html

http://www.e90post.com/forums/showthread.php?t=860059

I never trust a tune.

If someone wants to claim gas is better or worse in an area, please have the gasoline lab results published.

Everything else is indirect and cannot be taken at face value without a large bag of salt.

-alex

PureShield 03-14-2016 11:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mav1178 (Post 2581475)
I never trust a tune.

If someone wants to claim gas is better or worse in an area, please have the gasoline lab results published.

Everything else is indirect and cannot be taken at face value without a large bag of salt.

-alex

Hard to not trust tuning your ECU nowadays since it's the best way to get performance gains out of your mods.

CatScan 03-15-2016 12:00 AM

Or you could just put whatever the station has in the car. The thing will run, and you won't kill your car.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:32 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.


Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.