Future of FRS/BRZ
 

As owners what do you think the future of the FRS/BRZ will be? Faster, bigger engine, or will it just die? I keep reading that sales have took a nose dive which is certain death for most cars.

I don't think they will capture more sales by releasing cars with body kits and TRD parts. I think it will take more. I think they should market raw performance and stop trying to up the game with accesories
I hate to see this car die, because its exactly what the car world needs

I do keep reading about the STI version of this car in other forums and readit.

:search:
:scared0016:

http://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=99175
:sigh:

:popcorn:

Since goaway1 isnt here, I shall be his placeholder.

Scrap heap

:popcorn:

Wow this forum has little cliques of bulldogs that just grab on and don't let go!

Oh and never mind!

I can see them upping to a 2.5 by 2018 or 2019

Richard, it's just that this has been discussed very thoroughly for several years on here. Almost every other thread is about it.

For real though, it has been discussed several times on the forum.

If you want my guess, it will use a new 3JZ-GTS inline 6 codeveloped with BMW running on unicorn farts. It will also have a hybrid system plus ATTESA-ETS (yes, Nissan's joining in on this one too).

I'm just making stupid shit up at this point, but it's still more believable than moroning.com.au.

Anyway, back to popcorn. :popcorn:

You seem to have a knack for creating erroneous and useless threads

:popcorn::popcorn::popcorn::popcorn::popcorn:
entertainment at it's best! :lol:

Regardless, you can take the accessories and body kit parts of this topic and transfer it to another car. Like......wanting to sell accessories to try to keep this car alive? That's a sign that it's already dead. And then talk about THAT aspect of cars.

In fairness to Rich I think he was asking about the more long term viability of the car than yet another "the next model year will have xxxx" rumour.


The "drop: in sales is exactly what I would expect to see in a new model car. The first year would be huge with everybody that followed development. The following year would still be strong as the cars get out on the street and are seen and then you will see a drop off as the market for them stabilizes. After 3 or 4 years (now) used ones will start to come up in numbers and that will impact the sales numbers even higher. It is important to note that they are still selling what they makes since they anticipate this and planned the builds around it. It would be a much bigger concern if there were fields of tem parked in storage since they were not moving but from what I can find that is not the case.


Whatever changes are planned were planned back in 2009 or earlier. People don't understand how long something as simple as a different antenna or dash trim take to put into place. The manufacturers don't look at each years sales and decide what they are going to do for the next model year this all happens at least 3 years in advance. It is not as simple as saying "oh we only sold 100 this year we better make 80 next and let's throw some new knobs on it to try to juice it up". Someplace there is a massive chart planning out every single change from concept to end of model that will include refreshes and numbers built. They will not deviate from that plan unless something drastic happens. Look at the Aztek for example. They knew it was a turd on wheels and had to sell it below cost just to get rid of it yet they continued to make it for 5 years since the contracts were all in place and it would have cost them more to drop it than to make it and immediately scrap tem all. This is how much the pre planning effects the auto industry.


As far as what changes they will make go that could be a bad news story for many of the people here but great news for the public in general. This is a very specialized vehicle and was originally designed for a very specific type of driver. There are only so many of type of driver around so they need to expand the market. Since the "more power" crowd is a sub group of the existing market that is not the direction they are likely to go in. They are much more likely to head more to the "average Joe". This means more features, less raw, and lowering overall performance. I believe we have already seen this beginning to happen with the suspension changes (not saying they are "worse" just tamed a bit) over the 15 and 16 models. The supposedly "luxury" features of the RS2 are very telling as to what direction I think we will see the cargo. Eventually the car will get bigger and heavier to accommodate the comfort features as we saw with many of the sports models to proceeded it.


I do think a version of the STi and maybe a TRD will show up at some point. However these will be limited numbers and will not actually be built to satisfy the performance crowd but to sell more base models. Mustang GTs are about10% of the Mustang production with the rest made up by the lower level performers. They are made so that Mrs Retired School Teacher can have a Mustang that meets her low level performance needs but still looks like a race car. There is no money to be made in the performance level cars for most of the manufacturers (Porsche, Ferrari, etc don't count since that is all they make) and their bread and butter is making higher volumes of the cars that look like their performers. This is what the STi will be meant to do. It will bring average people in the door and when they gasp in shock at the price the sales guy will say " ahhh but over here is the BRZ limited. It is the same thing only a little less power and is half the price".


In summary; will the car survive? Probably. Will it survive as it is? Probably not.

That's the intelligent answer I was looking for. Just discussion. I guess we as owners are hoping for to much to fast, and the manufacturers work on a more slow pace. I'm just used to working on tight quick deadlines I think everyone else should be too lol

Good point about the antenna. Something as small as an antenna could take years . But I think I read the designer built the car so the driver can build the car, which is why this car has so many aftermarket offerings I guess

I missed out on all the discussion about this and most discussions of any importance about this car. I just bought mine two months ago and its all brand new to me

Thanks Tcoat!

I do don't I! Everyone has a hidden talent!:cheers:

Ya people seem to think that the parts on their cars magically appear at the assembly plant. There is just as much that goes into each individual part as there is the whole car. I cringe every time I hear somebody say "that looks cheap why don't they change it" or "X part would be better than Y part" they should use that. The manufacturers have to pay for those things and it is expensive.
We have a large customer that wants to change the rotor coating coverage by 2 millimeters. It is going to cost them so much they have been debating it for 3 years now.
That simple antenna change if not handled properly could cost them millions. This is why the updates and refreshes have to be planned out so well and way in advance of the change.

Thanks @Tcoat great read and answer to good question. It was not about more power or hearsay or I would like. The Mazda MX-5 Miata is now in its 17th year and I hope our car can stand the test of time. One thing to consider is that toyota is all about reducing emissions.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Just don't, for any reason, no matter how cool you think it is, even if your last dying wish, ever, post up an article for some clickbait (especially motoring.au) and say "look at this guys". That would not go well at all.

I'm going to state a less optimistic view. I think the twins will slowly die a death precisely because they are twins. I don't think there will be any significant new investment in these models. They'll likely keep making them for a bunch more years, with some trim-only special editions to spice things up, but there won't be a "new" twin. They are not core product for either Toyota or Subaru. Subaru isn't likely to want to fund development of new major hardware, especially not RWD only, and Toyota has moved on to other things.

I think it is more likely that Subaru and Toyota will each try in their own way to fill the holes in their model lineups that would be left by the eventual death of the twins. For example, Toyota could try to "Si" the Corolla or maybe make a new, more sporting hybrid CRZ. Subaru could make another non-turbo Impreza RS stripper, with a focus on handling. (These are just illustrations of what is possible. I'm not suggesting they will happen).

Part of the reason that the MX-5 has been around so long is that it is a Mazda-only development and a core part of their business and their identity. Even they were able to defray the costs a bit by "selling" the platform to FCA (it wasn't a co-development, as the twins were).

It's possible that Toyota is strategically keeping the 86 at its current power levels to not interfere with the launch of the new Supra. Toyota would love to see the 86 fan base graduate to the next Supra level.

Good points and I can see it not getting much love in the future. Subaru has its WRX but Toyota has nothing appealing in this category. I hope the Supra comes back like its glory days. I thought MRS had potential but it just went away. Here's to the Supra to carry the torch.

@Talus1 yeah good point and do agree with parts, I think the auto motive industry is changing and collaboration is key to success. Mazda and Fiat is jumping on the band wagon http://www.drive.com.au/motor-news/f...17-gl1bke.html


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

This platform has no future. Journalists cry for more power, the internet cries for more power and the people who buy them generally (I know it's not the rule) don't buy a second one. There's no real incentive to get a newer one, simply because no major change has been made. No power bump, no (major) cosmetic changes, just some interior stuff and a shark fin antenna. The FRS was released under the wrong marque. Dealers have little to no knowledge of the cars quirks. It's a lot working against them, and I can't see Toyobaru continuing to develop the platform further, without caving to the masses and turning it from a small sports car to a GT car

:popcorn: Thanks guys I took the weekend off

I hope you didn't think I was being optimistic.
Will the car carry on for a while? Yes I think it will but I envision a much different vehicle down the road.
Much like this:
http://carphotos.cardomain.com/ride_...0001_large.jpg


Turned into this:


http://imganuncios.mitula.net/2012_m...4500656129.jpg

For intelligent answers Tcoat is your guy.

If I were to speculate on what will happen long-term, this is what I would expect as well. At some point, the 86 will either die in its current configuration, or it will be a new version in name only, perhaps retaining some of its "core values" of front engine - rear wheel drive two door coupe.

if you want to see what will happen look at the MR2s history. Gen II is nothing like Gen I except the nameplate and mid-engine. Don't even get me started on the Gen III (MRS).

As much as I love the 86, it is very unlikely I would buy a second one. I'm not very brand or model loyal, and I only buy new cars about once every decade or so (with some used ones thrown in between). Basically for me to purchase a second, it would have to be a very compelling reason, and it would have to be 8 years from now. Just don't see those two things converging.

SHHHHH don't ruin my rep.

Ugh. Hasnt subaru already come out saying they will not make a turbocharged version of the BRZ because it would hurt their WRX/STI sales.

But I want more power so that I can look like less of a fuckboy when I'm bench racing on the internet.

Should I dig up that STI concept "I want to believe" picture again?

Not officially, no. There isn't a company that would make such a statement publicly because they want people to forget that they are there to make a profit and the business strategies are kept low key.
They have however officially given many other indications that this is the case. Just compare the level of marketing committed towards the WRX compared to the BRZ as an example. Even the web sites sort of scream "look at this WRX" and "oh by the way we have this BRZ thing as well".

Isn't there a 300hp turbo coming next year?

Anybody look recently at the good car / bad car sales numbers for FRS/BRZ in North America? From watching TV and media coverage I would have expected the MX-5 sales to be huge and dwarf the twins - but for 2015 year end if you add FRS+BRZ US sales the number is almost double the MX-5 number (15,803 vs. 8,591). This is the moldy, old twin model vs the brand-new shiny MX-5 (which almost doubled its sales vs 2014). Prior to the new MX-5 model, the twins were selling at more than 3 twins to 1 Miata.

From a manufacturing standpoint, if the Miata is a success the twins are a huge success - even with reduced sales numbers.

This whole thread is just too much for me...

:suicide:

I don't want a fat supra, I like my supercharged go kart

For a sec there I thought you were going to post something like this as a second picture: http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/...tS._SX522_.jpg

But dude it is a Supra! Made famous by movie, video game and anime alike. I bet 98% of the guys looking for a new one to come out have never even sat in the old version much less drove it.