Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB

Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/index.php)
-   Engine, Exhaust, Transmission (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=8)
-   -   Piper Camshafts (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=91080)

Captain Snooze 09-28-2017 06:52 AM

1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by nav (Post 2984609)
@CSG Mike Of the NA engines CSG has delivered, have any been focused on an NA build with more aggressive camshafts? If so, how did they change the torque characteristics after 7,000rpm and do you see any bottlenecks?

Probably.

Attachment 158717

nav 09-28-2017 08:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Captain Snooze (Post 2984719)

:lol:

CSG Mike 09-28-2017 09:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nav (Post 2984609)
@CSG Mike Of the NA engines CSG has delivered, have any been focused on an NA build with more aggressive camshafts? If so, how did they change the torque characteristics after 7,000rpm and do you see any bottlenecks?

All FI.

The ROI just isn't there for a NA engine, unless you absolutely want to have a monster NA engine that's gotta be FA based. Do you want to be the firsT?

sw20kosh 09-29-2017 04:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bach415 (Post 2984185)
If it was tuned on lower CR but still gave similar results to stock power levels, wouldn't the stock CR w/ the cams provide better results (or poorer) then?

Well my motor fully tuned on 91 vs stock FA20 tuned on 91 would have been roughly similar. Slightly lower for my motor.

This is all moot as the cam control was not working so power was not optimized.

sw20kosh 09-29-2017 04:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detroiter (Post 2984279)
I would assume it would give better results. Compression makes more power so I would assume a stock compression motor with the stg3 cams would make more power than a low CR one. I could be wrong but assuming the low CR was around a 9.5:1 or 10:1 it would take quite a bit of power out of the FA20 with keeping it NA so having it make close to stock levels with the cam control malfunctioning sounds promising for the cams as a power adder for a NA build.

CR is around 11.8 and hitting MBT on 91 octane.

nav 10-01-2017 08:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CSG Mike (Post 2985104)
All FI.

The ROI just isn't there for a NA engine, unless you absolutely want to have a monster NA engine that's gotta be FA based. Do you want to be the firsT?

Hi Mike, due to the legislation in my forced induction is illegal. Most modified cars here which are not boosted from the factory tend to be highly built NA cars. Totally understand that the $/hp is not in favour of an NA build.

In my case I'm not really looking at the quantitative gains, rather trying to change the nature of the torque curve, to make the car subjectively more fun to drive. I did an analysis of several driver's cars studying their torque curves, as I was surprised at how some relatively lower powered cars I have driven felt a lot more fun. Once I equalised for the weight, I realised that the nature of torque delivery matters to the sensation while driving.

https://i.imgur.com/5BGZ72n.png

I then pulled some dynojet reports of stock cars such as the S2000, E46 M3, Ferrari 458 and others... the purpose was to better understand the shape of the curves, the actual torque was not important to me and probably inaccurate when compared.

I extracted the main graph from the study and attached it for you to have a look. Anyway, the need for a 'top end rush' is my own interpretation of the engine character that gives pleasure to me. Anyway, I have to thank you Mike, for all the invaluable advice so far.

CSG Mike 10-02-2017 02:35 AM

@nav which cars did you find the most enjoyable in terms of power delivery?

nav 10-02-2017 10:14 AM

im looking to shift the torque curve 1000 rpm to the right, and limit rpm to around 8,000 where I hear the oiling system can't keep up. So the idea for me is to move peak torque, sacrificing some low end along the way.

CSG Mike 10-02-2017 10:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nav (Post 2986340)
im looking to shift the torque curve 1000 rpm to the right, and limit rpm to around 8,000 where I hear the oiling system can't keep up. So the idea for me is to move peak torque, sacrificing some low end along the way.

Well, you do hit a hard limitation on flow at the higher RPMs, so cams will help, but you'll also want to do some head work to achieve that.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:11 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.


Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.