| 2forme |
08-14-2012 12:52 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave-ROR
(Post 378686)
I just wrote the same reply I'd make to this in the other reply. The torque dip is KILLER on these cars. By feel I thought it would be as fast or faster until I ran both next to each other. The dip kills it and once the ITR is in the powerband it never drops back out. The weight makes a difference too.
Also, while the trans gearing itself is better in the BRZ, the final drive is taller. I'm too lazy to do the math, but I doubt the gearing is much, if any, better in the BRZ. Especially when you include the 1.2" larger diameter wheel and tire package.
I'm not slamming the BRZ or really defending the ITR, but since I own both and the guy wanted opinions from owners of both (past or present) these are my opinions. It in no way makes me regret purchasing my BRZ and I love the car. They are apples and oranges IMO. The BRZ is much more like a RWD GSR IMO than an RWD ITR.
|
The torque dip sucks no doubt, but the lowest part of the dip is essentially the highest part of the ITR. The difference is where the torque is made. More torque at higher RPM = more hp, seeing as HP is just a function of torque.
I wouldn't compare the BRZ to a GSR. The GSR is pretty slow for being 170hp and a bit more peaky than the ITR. My intent isn't to get into a pissing contest between the two, just bring down the inflated opinions about the ITR a bit. Reel in the kite a little so to speak.
I haven't owned both, but I've driven both (and more) quite extensively. The ITR reminds me of my GTS, so I'd compare the ITR more to the GTS than the BRZ to the GSR.
|