Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB

Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/index.php)
-   FR-S / BRZ vs.... (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=25)
-   -   ..... vs. DC2 Integra Type R (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=2153)

TouchMyHonda 08-14-2012 12:34 PM

The frs is basically a rwd itr. I love the people talking about understeer like they have any experience in one of these cars. My civic gets more tail happy than most rwd cars.

Dave-ROR 08-14-2012 12:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 2forme (Post 378562)
Didn't notice this for the first post. I had to reply.

B18C5 stock dyno:
http://www.carbide-red.com/car/stock_b18c5_dyno.gif

86 stock dyno:
http://www.tune86.com/sites/default/...n-frs-dyno.jpg

Explain to me how 2200 RPM of torque above 110 ft-lbs (300 rpm above 120) is considered to be more usable power than 4750 RPM's of torque above 120 ft-lbs and 3000 of that around 140 ft-lbs given similar weight that it needs to haul....

I understand you probably love the ITR. It's a fantastic car, but let's be realistic here. 90% of the time I'm not "using" 6000-8000 RPM...The ITR is 10 years old, has a great motor, TONS of aftermarket, and a large red target on it. Given your signature, I'd assume you have a large bias towards them. Sorry if my bland comment offended, but that's my opinion.

I just wrote the same reply I'd make to this in the other reply. The torque dip is KILLER on these cars. By feel I thought it would be as fast or faster until I ran both next to each other. The dip kills it and once the ITR is in the powerband it never drops back out. The weight makes a difference too.

Also, while the trans gearing itself is better in the BRZ, the final drive is taller. I'm too lazy to do the math, but I doubt the gearing is much, if any, better in the BRZ. Especially when you include the 1.2" larger diameter wheel and tire package.

I'm not slamming the BRZ or really defending the ITR, but since I own both and the guy wanted opinions from owners of both (past or present) these are my opinions. It in no way makes me regret purchasing my BRZ and I love the car. They are apples and oranges IMO. The BRZ is much more like a RWD GSR IMO than an RWD ITR.

2forme 08-14-2012 12:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave-ROR (Post 378667)
Launch. Look at the 5-60 times for the BRZ, they are pitiful because of the dip. The BRZ was dead even with my stock *GSR* from a 20MPH roll until I had to shift in the BRZ, then the GS-R pulled a bit.

Are those numbers from the same dyno on the same day? If not, they don't mean much. I could go make a dyno show my BRZ at 150hp, and then change some settings to make it match a 170whp dyno.

Some stock ITRs (ie good driver at sea level strips) have also posted 13.8-13.9 in the quarter, has a BRZ touched that yet?

I gain nothing by stating the ITR is faster, but I doubt my BRZ is that much slower than the norm or that my ITR is that much faster than the norm.

I even stated from a launch, the two should be more or less equal.

I'm sorry, but there's no way on God's green earth, that a 195 hp, 2639 lb ITR with complete interior and 195/55/15 tires is touching anywhere near 13.9...even at E-Town. If that's the case, then a 180 hp, 2500 lb GTS with BETTER gearing should be 13.7 bone stock.

Come on man, you're a mod. You should know that not everything posted on a forum is absolute truth. Especially for honda boys.

Dave-ROR 08-14-2012 12:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DarkSunrise (Post 378654)
I haven't run the numbers so you might be right, but you'd need to factor in curb weight (ITR is 2639, BRZ is 2776) and gearing to make an accurate comparison.

And stock ITRs more often than not with full tanks are 25xx.. Mine which has AC and stereo equipment is less than the curb weight with a full tank...

trifenix 08-14-2012 12:47 PM

Man memories of vtec singing to 8500.....(and lack of torque)

Jayde 08-14-2012 12:48 PM

Someone say RWD Integra?!?!

http://www.team-integra.net/forum/19...onversion.html

Dave-ROR 08-14-2012 12:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 2forme (Post 378696)
I'm sorry, but there's no way on God's green earth, that a 195 hp, 2639 lb ITR with complete interior and 195/55/15 tires is touching anywhere near 13.9...even at E-Town. If that's the case, then a 180 hp, 2500 lb GTS with BETTER gearing should be 13.7 bone stock.

Come on man, you're a mod. You should know that not everything posted on a forum is absolute truth. Especially for honda boys.

Except that I know the guy who did it multiple times (Not on slicks, but sticky street tires (not stock tires)), not basing my information on forum reading. Hell if you knew me at all you'd know that I wouldn't actually click on a "Look what my (insert car here) did in the 1320!!!" thread.

14.1-3s are easy on a stock ITR for those few who care enough to drag race them. I don't even know what the BRZ does in the qtr, I couldn't really care less about it.

Honestly, believe whatever you want. I'm the one who has run them against each other. Go find a stock ITR owner willing to do the same with you and post your results. :thumbup:

2forme 08-14-2012 12:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave-ROR (Post 378686)
I just wrote the same reply I'd make to this in the other reply. The torque dip is KILLER on these cars. By feel I thought it would be as fast or faster until I ran both next to each other. The dip kills it and once the ITR is in the powerband it never drops back out. The weight makes a difference too.

Also, while the trans gearing itself is better in the BRZ, the final drive is taller. I'm too lazy to do the math, but I doubt the gearing is much, if any, better in the BRZ. Especially when you include the 1.2" larger diameter wheel and tire package.

I'm not slamming the BRZ or really defending the ITR, but since I own both and the guy wanted opinions from owners of both (past or present) these are my opinions. It in no way makes me regret purchasing my BRZ and I love the car. They are apples and oranges IMO. The BRZ is much more like a RWD GSR IMO than an RWD ITR.

The torque dip sucks no doubt, but the lowest part of the dip is essentially the highest part of the ITR. The difference is where the torque is made. More torque at higher RPM = more hp, seeing as HP is just a function of torque.

I wouldn't compare the BRZ to a GSR. The GSR is pretty slow for being 170hp and a bit more peaky than the ITR. My intent isn't to get into a pissing contest between the two, just bring down the inflated opinions about the ITR a bit. Reel in the kite a little so to speak.

I haven't owned both, but I've driven both (and more) quite extensively. The ITR reminds me of my GTS, so I'd compare the ITR more to the GTS than the BRZ to the GSR.

Dave-ROR 08-14-2012 12:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jayde (Post 378709)

Yeah there's a mid engine ITR with a prelude engine in it as well.

There's also Blake's old ITR (no idea what happened to it) which he used for Pikes Peak and then drifting. IIRC B20VTEC with a CRV (or AWD Integra, forgot which but pretty sure CRV) trans, AWD Integra rear end.. was AWD for Pikes Peak and then modified for FR for drifting.

Dave-ROR 08-14-2012 12:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 2forme (Post 378718)
The torque dip sucks no doubt, but the lowest part of the dip is essentially the highest part of the ITR. The difference is where the torque is made. More torque at higher RPM = more hp, seeing as HP is just a function of torque.

I wouldn't compare the BRZ to a GSR. The GSR is pretty slow for being 170hp and a bit more peaky than the ITR. My intent isn't to get into a pissing contest between the two, just bring down the inflated opinions about the ITR a bit. Reel in the kite a little so to speak.

I haven't owned both, but I've driven both (and more) quite extensively. The ITR reminds me of my GTS, so I'd compare the ITR more to the GTS than the BRZ to the GSR.

I can't reply to this without offending Celica GTS owners ;)

Jayde 08-14-2012 12:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave-ROR (Post 378719)
Yeah there's a mid engine ITR with a prelude engine in it as well.

There's also Blake's old ITR (no idea what happened to it) which he used for Pikes Peak and then drifting. IIRC B20VTEC with a CRV (or AWD Integra, forgot which but pretty sure CRV) trans, AWD Integra rear end.. was AWD for Pikes Peak and then modified for FR for drifting.

Mmm, AWD Integra. I wish they made it over here to the states. That'd be my winter DD! Aren't they quite rare, even in Japan?

Dave-ROR 08-14-2012 12:56 PM

Oh and I'll try to find a stock-ish ITR next week at Mid Ohio. If so I'll post datalogging info of my BRZ and the ITR. Not too many stock ITRs at ITR Expo though :(

Dave-ROR 08-14-2012 12:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jayde (Post 378723)
Mmm, AWD Integra. I wish they made it over here to the states. That'd be my winter DD! Aren't they quite rare, even in Japan?

Yeah.. powered by a D series IIRC. I haven't looked into them since Blake first mentioned the project probably 9 or 10 years ago.

2forme 08-14-2012 01:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave-ROR (Post 378722)
I can't reply to this without offending Celica GTS owners ;)

Can't say anything that we probably haven't already heard. Biggest problem with the GTS is it actually needs someone who knows how to drive it. My average at the track in my stock GTS was 14.85, not the best out there, but whatever. I haven't taken the BRZ up. Probably won't either, there have been tales of dealerships checking the track for people who race. My friend has long since sold his ITR. He averaged 14.7 with 2.0 60's. He drove the BRZ and loved it. Said it was nice to not have to downshift to get up hills. LOL


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:20 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.


Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.