![]() |
@Td-d, what's changes have you made? Also Can you check on idle stability ? Do you already have the x and y for logging?
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk |
Here's the link to notepad plus http://notepad-plus-plus.org/download/v6.6.9.html
My versions gonna get updated today, seem mine's quite outdated now at 6.1.3, May 28 2012 build LOL |
Do we have logging addresses for B01D? I've acquired an OP2 and would love to use it for logging :)
|
Back on 98 as E85 locations were getting too hard and the economy wasn't great.
First 2 logs: http://www.datazap.me/u/tech86/98-stage-1 3rd log split in 2 for size limit. http://www.datazap.me/u/tech86/98-stage-1-0 Any comments? |
Quote:
which 98 are you using BP seems worse than shell for knock on these cars. fuel trims afr look ok. |
Quote:
LOL BP stands out that much ;) but yeah, was the closest servo at the time. Yeah happy with the trims, still using stock A01G MAF scale so not sure I need to touch them just yet. |
Quote:
If I haven't posted yet, I'll put them up for you shortly phrosty, no problem. |
Quote:
However if you try Caltex or Shell fuel you probably wont need to remove that timing. |
Good point. Still got a near full tank so I'll back it off for now and reload the current map with different fuel. P100 would sort it out no doubt, but I heard they were discontinuing it?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Normally in Steve's main Tactrix thread - I haven't set up a Github directory for it yet. Probably should.
|
Quote:
I've tried to run the logcfg.exe for myself and it appears to be written for a very specific RomRaider configuration that I don't have. Otherwise I'd just create it myself. Going to have a look at the .xml files and see if I can just rewrite the program quickly. |
I'll get to it this weekend Phrosty - I looked, hadn't posted up yet.
Logcfg won't work because it relies on the master logger.xml that RR logger uses, with its standard notation for the parameters (E_XXX - e.g. E_AF_Correction_1_4byteExt_E81). We need to generate a whole new set of parameters in this syntax to work for Romraider - I just haven't had the time... |
Here the addresses dump for B01D:
Code:
RaM_Fuel_Type FFF8DC2A |
Quote:
What data are you generating these from? I can infer some of the info from what others have posted, but is there a document that shows the data types and units of measure of each address? |
Quote:
unfortunatly no doco, if you find some post it up :D |
Quote:
|
..
|
I have version 1.59 OTS maps for OFT with the latest rom file listed as B01C. That means that all files are B01C calID? Also has anyone tried to log a ECUTEK tune with OP2?
|
Quote:
NO !!! it does not you have to check with hex editor. or check table integrity. see first post. Also has anyone tried to log a ECUTEK tune with OP2? It should work if you match the RAM addresses with the tune calid, have not done it though. I believe they just change seed keys to prevent reading/writing of rom but RAM addresses for log parameters are likely the same. |
I am getting close to figuring out logging with the tactrix OP2 but I keep getting a logcfg.out file and red with flashing green lights. Any ideas?
|
Ha I got it. It was the Triggers. I remove the defrost trigger and it work. Steve99 also said he had a problem with the defrost trigger. Any one else have a trigger that works well I could use.
|
I couldn't get any triggers to work so I just plug mine in when I want to log and pull it out when I'm done (lol). Much easier with an obd2 extension cable.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
so let's say you have: ---------------------- paramname = Manifold_Relative_Pressure paramid = 0xFFF88F78 isfloat = 1 paramname = Direct_Ijector_PW paramid = 0xFFF887E8 isfloat = 1 paramname = Direct_Injector_PW_Ram paramid = 0xFFF887F0 isfloat = 1 The memory addresses above in bold are numbers, so sorted numerically in asc order would be: ----------------------- paramname = Direct_Ijector_PW paramid = 0xFFF887E8 isfloat = 1 paramname = Direct_Injector_PW_Ram paramid = 0xFFF887F0 isfloat = 1 paramname = Manifold_Relative_Pressure paramid = 0xFFF88F78 isfloat = 1 |
Did you mix the triggers in with the rest or leave them at the bottom?
|
Quote:
|
Is there a parameter for engine oil temp on the B01C? Thanks.
|
Aw man nothing?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
It's a float, in degrees C. FYI, B01C and B01D appear to have identical addresses. |
B01C and B01D will have most addresses identical - but not all. Any table that is specific to AT or MT will be different (since the At tables are not defined for the MT roms and vice versa). And yes, that's the correct address.
|
|
1 Attachment(s)
Sure thing, here you go for B01D. I believe this should work 100% for B01C as well.
|
After having a good look around the maps and definitions on the A01G ROM I discovered an update. The DI maximum definition is:
Code:
<table type="2D" name="Direct Injection Quantity Maximum" category="Alpha - BRZ" storagetype="float" endian="big" sizey="12" userlevel="4">I have also managed to do a complete ECUtek conversion def for those like me who use ECUtek most of the time ;) This has pressure in Bar, temps in C and tables (or most that I've used) in ratios rather than -/+ decimals. This is NOT an OFT definition! ZA1JA01G ECUtek Conversion Definition |
More ZA1JA01G ROM definition updates.
Just so you're aware, I use Celcius for temperatures. To convert into Fahrenheit you need to change to expression to the below: Code:
expression="(x*1.8)+32" to_byte="(x-32)/1.8"Code:
<table type="2D" name="A/F Learning #1 Airflow Ranges" category="Fueling - AF Correction / Learning" storagetype="float" endian="little" sizey="4" userlevel="4">Code:
<table name="Engine Load Limiter A" storageaddress="1047CC">Code:
<table name="CPC Duty Multiplier" storageaddress="C64C" />Code:
<table name="AVCS Base/Normal/Safe Hysteresis" storageaddress="120BE8" />Code:
<table name="CL to OL Transition with Delay (Injector Load Threshold)" storageaddress="10F2A8">Code:
<table name="Idle Speed Target G" storageaddress="118C34"> |
Quote:
|
Quote:
In what way? The learning ranges are done by MAF g/s and set the areas for the LTFT. |
Quote:
And with the addition of E, is the E range higher than the previous D, or did they just increase resolution? |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:47 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.