Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB

Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/index.php)
-   Other Vehicles & General Automotive Discussions (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=6)
-   -   Hyundai Veloster (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=605)

thill 10-01-2013 11:52 AM

I drove both the turbo and non-turbo version and the Veloster is really not a drivers car at all. It is geared toward being a different looking car that has lots of tech features and gets good gas mileage for a good price.

It is not even close to being a drivers car. The electric power steering in the car is very poor IMHO, and this is a problem across all Hyundai cars that I have driven that use electric steering (the Gencoupe still uses hydraulic). The manual transmission is just okay. The driving dynamics are just not there compared to the FR-S/BRZ and it is not even close.

It is a good car for a hipster who cares more about tech features and MPG, and a different design than a driving enthusiast.

bedabi 10-01-2013 11:56 AM

I'd love to have the Veloster's trick 3rd door on my BRZ.

Burrcold 10-01-2013 12:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thill (Post 1243902)
The electric power steering in the car is very poor IMHO, and this is a problem across all Hyundai cars that I have driven that use electric steering (the Gencoupe still uses hydraulic).

The weighted hydraulic steering of my old gen coupe is one of the only things I miss about the car.

infinite012 10-01-2013 12:21 PM

I test drove both Veloster and Veloster Turbo before purchasing the BRZ.

Since the V and VT both share the same chassis and suspension, they both rode the same/had the same handling characteristics. There was a really unsettling wiggling in the rear of the cars (a product of the "V beam" rear axle design, probably) that swayed me away from buying it solely because it felt unsafe at anything >35 mph. Then there was the issue of MPG claim (40) vs real MPG (~33). Why have a car that felt unsafe at highway speeds and gets the same MPG as the BRZ?

Kelbyat07 10-01-2013 12:22 PM

My friends told me the turbo one drives like shit. If you are comparing our car to shit then you better go take a cold shower. The veloster did come out around the same time but its fwd, slow, its a hatch, not really nimble, and ugly looking.

thill 10-01-2013 12:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by infinite012 (Post 1243968)
I test drove both Veloster and Veloster Turbo before purchasing the BRZ.

Since the V and VT both share the same chassis and suspension, they both rode the same/had the same handling characteristics. There was a really unsettling wiggling in the rear of the cars (a product of the "V beam" rear axle design, probably) that swayed me away from buying it solely because it felt unsafe at anything >35 mph. Then there was the issue of MPG claim (40) vs real MPG (~33). Why have a car that felt unsafe at highway speeds and gets the same MPG as the BRZ?

Yes, the VT desperately screams for an LSD. And yes, Hyundai drastically overestimate's their MPG... They finally got caught...

infinite012 10-01-2013 12:57 PM

I should also note that the Hyundai dealership was going to give me over KBB on trade-in for my 08 STI plus they lowered the price of a Veloster Turbo Ultimate with the auto transmission to $25,xxx before TTL, so I would have made out crazy good on that deal.

But then I found a private buyer for my STI.

Entroper 10-01-2013 06:01 PM

We test drove a Veloster Turbo. It's a car that looks amazing on paper, and even pretty snazzy on the outside. Opinions will vary on that last part, but what they won't vary on is that once you get inside the car, it doesn't remotely live up to its promises. People have already listed its flaws, so I don't need to repeat them.

Hyundai is getting there. They've figured out the math, but they're a ways off from figuring out the X factor.

Diode Dynamics 10-01-2013 06:04 PM

They are very different cars IMO. I'm on forums for both, and they are too different to be compared

Nick C.

Gaiseric 10-01-2013 06:26 PM

I think I can sum up everyone's opinion in 3 simple words.

DON'T BUY IT!

:cheers:

Diode Dynamics 10-01-2013 06:44 PM

Well that's not necessarily true, it's still a nice car, just not anywhere near as fun as the Twins

Nick C.

Gaiseric 10-01-2013 06:55 PM

For the price point, there are better options. Like every car there is a market for it, someone will buy it no matter what. I thought it was pretty cool when it first came out but then I realized 3 doors is a stupid idea, and it doesn't drive good at all.

rskdsk 10-01-2013 08:25 PM

I bought a fully loaded veloster ... Had it for about 3 months ... until I hit a bump and my glass roof shattered.

That combined with the impossible "fishtank" rear visibility made my dump it asap


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:25 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.


Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.