Originally Posted by switchlanez (Post 827374)

I said trolls were noted in the sig. Maybe there are. Maybe one of them is me. That's up to your interpretation. Trolling is not necessarily found in the discussions linked. Those members may have trolled elsewhere in the thread or elsewhere in the forum. And my kill just happens to be in a non-trolling argument. I said I have "trolls noted in my sig" not "troll posts noted in my sig."

The list is simply a mirror of the discussion that goes on in this forum. "Kill" is exactly that. Squashing by fact. Nothing more. Whatever extraneous negative connotations it may imply is all your interpretation. Your problem (only if you let it be); not mine.

Originally Posted by Dave-ROR (Post 827301)

So did that refer to the "kill list", Moto-P, or yourself/your car? I assumed "kill list" but perhaps I guessed wrong.

So anytime we post a fact that counters another opinion or fact (and btw at least half of your "kills" were based on opinion not facts) we should all consider that a "kill"? The way your "kill list" comes off is as an attempt to further belittle those who you have included in your list by directing people to your "kill" posts. It appears to be an attempt to show how smart you are, and how dumb the person you are replying to is. That may not have been your intention, but that's how it appears from the outside. I think your sig is a clear reminder on how to conduct, or how not to conduct, yourself.