![]() |
Quote:
|
I can downshift in the manual or a manumatic, as you said. Can't do that in a CVT. I've tired shifting to L, but it doesn't accelerate any faster, and it doesn't raise the revs much.
|
How about dual CVT's beside each other with a clutch between them. When accelerating the other CVT is set to a taller ratio you could shift to just like a next gear. When decelerating the other CVT could be set to a lower ratio, just like shifting to a lower gear. There would only be a slight delay when switching from acceleration to deceleration. Because each CVT only needs to handle torque for the length of a gear change, they wouldn't have to be built as strong. The key would be that the CVT's wouldn't change ratios while they are being powered, but instead changing only when their clutch is disengaged between shifts. If only CVT's could be created which could lock into a particular ratio under power, but unlock as soon as it was unpowered. Control it all with a Android-based controller and voila! The perfect transmission.
|
Quote:
Normally the CVT responds to your foot, giving you the rpm the engine needs to produce however much power. This creates a little bit of lag since it needs to "shift" and rev the engine. The Sentra CVT I drove had a button on the shifter that disengaged "overdrive", which I am pretty sure just made it "shift down". You could easily design this so that the CVT operates the engine at a higher rpm at any given throttle input so that you have reserve power if you want to floor it. |
Quote:
It also had paddle shifters. :iono: You can "shift" and it feels sort of like a normal AT, but it is just a trick to make it feel more like a traditional trans. with a CVT, you can have a continuum of points of Engine-RPM vs CVT-ratio for any given wheel speed. So if the trans ECU jumps abruptly between two or more points it feels just like shifting an AT. For gas mileage you want the ratio so that the engine stays in the efficiency range of RPM/load but when you want acceleration it shifts the engine into the power band. The concept is sound and a really good CVT should actually be faster in a racecar. They just never caught on and got the high tech treatment that the other options have. |
Cvt is the future of all cars. Period.
The manual tranny has about 5 years left... At most. Say goodbye fanboys :) |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Anyways, back on topic. With Cvt, DSG and dual clutch autos in general becoming more efficient, reliable and cheap.... We may never have to shift our cars again! Thank god, I know we are all getting tired of the 1% (manual tranny owners) saying how they drive a Racecar because they have a third pedal :bellyroll::bellyroll:: LMFAOOOO!!! |
Quote:
|
Here a year and THAT was your third post? Are YOU real?
|
Quote:
actually no, I'm just an automated program that tracks very stupid replies... 3rd hit in a year, this is such a good forum! :D |
Quote:
I don't know, man. But it keeps me up at night. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
The benefit to a CVT is that it can keep the engine at the best RPM for the scenario (based on load and throttle input) instead of constantly revving up and down, and changing gears. Almost all CVT's have had a "manual" mode which lets you pick 5 or 6 pre-selected ratios and shift between them, it's nothing new at all. It's also worse on gas and much slower to use that compared to letting the CVT work as designed. |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:44 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.