![]() |
CR is only good for when you have no reading material and are taking a huge poo.
|
All you need to read to know CR is full of crap is what they say about the Jeep Wrangler and the shady business with the Suzuki Samurai.
|
Haven't read the the Consumer Reports review but, in my opinion:
Wrangler or Wrangler Limited: 1. Very low gas mileage 2. Overpriced 3. Poor ride quality relative to other SUV's in its class 4. The design is getting old but is sold because it is unique, has a popular trade name (Jeep) and has a cult following. They may have great off-road qualities but most buyers, I suspect, don't take them off-road much. Consumer Reports has only had a preliminary review of the 2014 Jeep Cherokee but I expect their 'full' review will be very complimentary. The Cherokee replaces the 'Liberty' which was a big loser. Quote:
|
".....and are taking a huge poo...." Another opinionated poster that includes human or animal excrement in his/her limited vocabulary. Another monthly visitor to their proctologist.
Quote:
|
Quote:
After all, buy what you need, want, like the most, it is your money, your ride, your to look at, and your to care for. You don't get married to a women because she has good rating from friends and family. To male enthusiasts like us, cars are like our second wife. Probably similar to female enthusiasts with cars as their second husband |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Hahaha... so much hate on this forum when anything negative gets said about the 86... People on this forum remind of "Apple people". Too blinded by "perfection" to admit flaws, and this car (and the iPhone btw) has its share of flaws.
Consumer Reports is spot on. I would not recommend this car to the average consumer. I love it but I love it because I am willing to deal with its flaws as a compromise to everything else it gives me. The average consumer (i.e. people reading consumer reports) shouldn't buy this car. I say good job to Consumer Reports for not getting too caught up in the 86-Fad and giving an honest review. Consumer reports relies on feedback from consumers. So when they send out surveys and 75% of the people that have this car have taken it in for warranty work 3-4 times over the last year, it becomes an unreliable car. P.S. Consumer reports are not allowed to accept money or products from the companies that they are reviewing. When they review 10 different dishwashers, they buy all 10 dishwashers at full price so that their reviews are only biased by the people reviewing them. How many other journalist outlets can claim that? |
The amount of cognitive dissonance in this forum is astounding.
CR says that the twins have a lot of issues. Instead of saying "yup, they sure do!", the entire forum decides to dump on CR. Ridiculous. Maybe they're not a magazine for enthusiasts, but they're not wrong either. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I really don't care what they say I've had this car since the end of June I've been to the shop 0 times. I'm aware of the chirping and the condensation in the tail lights also hearing people who have been over correcting the steering and not trusting the cars ability to do itself. This weekend will be it's first time in the shop for maintenance. But what I don't want is 10 years from now these CR reviews causing my car a bad resale value just because of some bad reviews. If I wanted a car that does the driving and the thinking for me I'd get a Mercedes.
|
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:03 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.