Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB

Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/index.php)
-   Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Top Gear Calls Toyota GT 86 one of the best driving sports cars of the last decade (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=3465)

Sasquachulator 01-28-2012 05:18 AM

The stockers are going to be Michelin Pilot Premacy's.

Almost all Toyota's sport trims use this tire. (Sienna SE, Prius performance/sport package, Corolla XRS, etc)

the only reason they say its 'prius tires' is for shock value, just so you can go "WTF this is with PRIUS tires?? I can't imagine how it will stick with real tires...."

serialk11r 01-28-2012 06:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by switchlanez (Post 122710)
^Same tire manufacturer and dimensions as the Prius optional tires, yes, but different tire model and tread compound. Don't quote me on that; this is what I vaguely recall reading somewhere on this forum. Calling them "Prius tires" is a misconception.

Other way around, it's the same tire model as the Prius optionals, but wider.

Boil 01-28-2012 07:24 AM

I would swap the Prius tires for some Bridgestone Potenza RE-11s…

SUB-FT86 01-28-2012 07:30 AM

Everybody will swap the tires especially when they get new rims.

Argent6978 01-28-2012 09:19 AM

I'm probably going to tear up the stock tires on the autocross and use that as an excuse to get new tires later. :)

Giccin 01-28-2012 09:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SUB-FT86 (Post 122728)
Everybody will swap the tires especially when they get new rims.

+++++++++

Yep.

That is--after there is enough saved money for spankin' new Wheels.

OldSkoolToys 01-28-2012 01:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 4agze (Post 122592)
Last year they called the 2011 mini cooper s stale and needs to be redesign & golf gti needs to go back to its roots.


And not to forget they bashed the Jaguar XK-R for being too much of a 'track' car instead of it being more of a Super GT.

Yes children, Jeremy bashed a British car. It does happen.

Steve 01-28-2012 03:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jordo! (Post 122705)
Last I heard, the same ones that are on the Prius.

Are they offering something stickier now? If so, then I recant.

The AMG vid was pretty neat, but I still personally prefer grip over sliding around. And again, we're talking about on the road here...

Oh man stock tire debate brought back to life a little, and I'm probably repeating some points already brought up, but I want to rant.

For anyone who still thinks the stock tires do not suite this car, I think the ideas brought up in that video switchlanez posted show fairly well why the FR-S/BRZ has the stock tires it has. With all the engineering that went into this car, does anyone really think they put no thought, if not just as much into the stock tire selection???? The stock tires are skinny and do look skinny compared to other sports cars, but not without reason.

Look at it this way. The tires are balancing two main things. Performance numbers being a far behind number (3.)

1. Safety (its a globally marketed car, which is meant to double as a daily commuter)

2. Fun (and driving pleasure, the whole point of this car)

(1.)The tires should have grip to be SAFE on public roads even with spirited driving and safe enough on the track. So drivers with little experience aren't going to slide around too much and too easily causing accidents. MORE GRIP = GOOD

(2.)The tires should have little enough amount of grip to have FUN with the car and slide it around. Face it, in dryish conditions, the car will not have enough stock power to throw the back-end out and slide around on demand ONCE you throw tires on with significantly more grip. And in my opinion that can only lower fun and enjoyment. LESS GRIP = GOOD

MORE + LESS = AVERAGE (or something like that). A purpose built sports car with just average grip, skinny tires???? Mind = Blown. I know right. The car was built for affordable fun, not affordable performance and numbers. The stock tires help achieve this.

Now for performance. Many seem to be under the illusion that this car is going to get noticeably better laptimes/performance with just more tire grip. IT'S NOT, until you get significantly more power out of the engine (ie a lot more than just bolt ons, so pretty much FI.) In fact once the amount of grip and tire width become excessive, not only is the fun factor going to be ruined, but overall performance will noticeable decrease. I think its safe to say now, that it is well known fact that if you buy this car expecting impressive laptimes/0-60/quarter-mile and all that stuff, without A LOT of modification, then you just bought the wrong car.

I think Toyota/Subaru did a good job in picking a tire with enough grip to drive to work safely and have a blast on the weekend. For the reasons above ill probably be looking for less expensive, comparable tires to the stock ones. (since they will definitely need to be replaced fairly often compared to most average commuters)

Okay done ranting, and stating nothing new, with my first try-hard post.

ON-TOPIC, glad they finally got to drive the 86, and put the nail into the coffin of the "BRZ better than 86" crap started by the Top Gear magazine article.

suprachica79 01-28-2012 04:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steve (Post 122916)
Oh man stock tire debate brought back to life a little, and I'm probably repeating some points already brought up, but I want to rant.

For anyone who still thinks the stock tires do not suite this car, I think the ideas brought up in that video switchlanez posted show fairly well why the FR-S/BRZ has the stock tires it has. With all the engineering that went into this car, does anyone really think they put no thought, if not just as much into the stock tire selection???? The stock tires are skinny and do look skinny compared to other sports cars, but not without reason.

Look at it this way. The tires are balancing two main things. Performance numbers being a far behind number (3.)

1. Safety (its a globally marketed car, which is meant to double as a daily commuter)

2. Fun (and driving pleasure, the whole point of this car)

(1.)The tires should have grip to be SAFE on public roads even with spirited driving and safe enough on the track. So drivers with little experience aren't going to slide around too much and too easily causing accidents. MORE GRIP = GOOD

(2.)The tires should have little enough amount of grip to have FUN with the car and slide it around. Face it, in dryish conditions, the car will not have enough stock power to throw the back-end out and slide around on demand ONCE you throw tires on with significantly more grip. And in my opinion that can only lower fun and enjoyment. LESS GRIP = GOOD

MORE + LESS = AVERAGE (or something like that). A purpose built sports car with just average grip, skinny tires???? Mind = Blown. I know right. The car was built for affordable fun, not affordable performance and numbers. The stock tires help achieve this.

Now for performance. Many seem to be under the illusion that this car is going to get noticeably better laptimes/performance with just more tire grip. IT'S NOT, until you get significantly more power out of the engine (ie a lot more than just bolt ons, so pretty much FI.) In fact once the amount of grip and tire width become excessive, not only is the fun factor going to be ruined, but overall performance will noticeable decrease. I think its safe to say now, that it is well known fact that if you bought this car expecting impressive laptimes/0-60/quarter-mile and all that stuff, without A LOT of modification, then you just bought the wrong car.

I think Toyota/Subaru did a good job in picking a tire with enough grip to drive to work safely and have a blast on the weekend. For the reasons above ill probably be looking for less expensive, comparable tires to the stock ones. (since they will definitely need to be replaced fairly often compared to most average commuters)

Okay done ranting, and stating nothing new, with my first try-hard post.

ON-TOPIC, glad they finally got to drive the 86, and put the nail into the coffin of the "BRZ better than 86" crap started by the Top Gear magazine article.

Phenomenal post Steve, I learned a lot :thumbup:

Infernal 01-28-2012 07:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by suprachica79 (Post 122950)
Phenomenal post Steve, I learned a lot :thumbup:

+1 agree with steve

the tyres i imagine were also picked to increase the MPG figure quoted in the stats - us europeans ill get taxed less because of this

plus- these tyres are going to be cheap to replace in comparison to a 225/255 set up etc

I hope they do drive this car on the show though - looking forward to watching it tomorrow regardless :P

Subaruwrxfan 01-28-2012 09:29 PM

Great post steve, makes a lot of sense. I guess it will be a matter of personal preference in a way. People that want a more planted, harder handling car can always increase the tire width slightly to 225 or 235. I still haven't decided if I'm gonna want to get bigger tires or not. Your post is making me reconsider. Guess I'll have to judge it once I drive it.

switchlanez 01-28-2012 11:04 PM

Yeah great post Steve. Just want to rearrange your wording a bit: The average of MORE + LESS = OPTIMAL. We got what you were trying to say though. lol :D

70NYD 01-29-2012 12:41 AM

:) mm can't wait for a test drive

renyeo 01-29-2012 01:11 AM

Has Clarkson actually driven the GT86?


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:37 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.


Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.