![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
the engineering vocab you need to support your clam is “though 409SSS may have developed a surface oxide layer to protect the corrosion from farther penetrating the sub surface, the wielded area are subject to galvanic corrosion due the wield rod material and the heat effected zone during wielding have alter the materials chemical composition which resist further oxide development. When such material combinations is subject to an high salt environment, detrimental corrosion will occur. This theory can be verified through testing the 409SS wielded coupon material per mil-std-810 salt fog test.” |
Quote:
If I buy a home, I expect it not to collapse lol. If I buy a car, I expect it not to brake in 3 months. When Mazda had rust issues with their Mazda3, they had to do something, it was not normal and their customers had not to pay for that. If a company is using cheap material, it is not the consumer's fault. Especially if they sale their products the same price as others that use good material. I've bought an exhaust in the same price range than others that have no issues, I expect mine to be as good as the others. Problems can happen, I can understand. But as a good company, you should listen to your customers and find solutions. |
Unfortunately I don't think you will get anywhere with this.
Reading through the description they only identify the tips as 304 stainless, and the main piping as just stainless. This is a legal, but unethical technique for companies that use 4xx stainless in their products. It is common with manufacturers of domestic vehicle systems such as Dynomax, Flowmaster and Magnaflow to use inferior 4xx stainless. But out of these 3 companies, only Flowmaster is up front about using 409 stainless, the rest just use 'stainless steel', banking on the well known reputation of the better 304 stainless to lead customers to assume that is what they use. They don't. This looks to be the same situation, but adding to the (legal?) deception by naming the tip-only material as 304 to further encourage the customers' assumption. Pricing it on par with true 304 systems reinforces this even more as well as increases profits from using cheaper material. This is, in my opinion, 100% wrong and no different than outright lying about a product from an ethical point of view. However, I am not a lawyer and this may actually be 100% legally acceptable. And given how business law seems to be geared towards shafting the consumers, you are probably out the money. Advertising needs stronger transparency laws. But in the indefinite meantime consumers need to learn to ask relevant questions about what they are buying. |
Quote:
I'm always promoting Nameless products because they actually do live up to their standards. Just talk with Jason about your build on your car and you'll see why. It instills a lot of confidence in the product you're purchasing and they stand behind what they create. Not to mention they listen to their customers for ideas (i.e. Exhaust Diffuser being made for the Axleback by request) and go through some very interesting details of their builds. JDL did the same with their header and the collector testing they did on it. Two amazing companies. |
Quote:
In my opinion, these 3 companies are the absolute top tier of fabrication for the FR-S and BRZ. |
Quote:
I don't know if I'll get some help from them, but they should think about it. Seriously, I'm quit well known in Quebec for having my lil' Yaris before and now the FR-S. TWM is a great company that put a lot in my car to promote products. I work with a lot of track schools, I work for a well known non-profit organization, I have a LOT of friends in the DMCC (drift championship), I personnaly know, as a good friend, the owner of the DMCC. I'm not bragging about my "connexions", I'm not this type of person, I swear. I never had to do that before. But if I'm not satisfied about something, I will not stay silent. Takeda should understand that if they want their products to have nice publicity and not being put aside by the FR-S/BRZ owners or any other cars owners, they should work with their customers and help the find solutions about the issues they have with their products. I want to help Takeda to find a solutions to that. Because obviously, nobody will want to buy their products in countries where there is snow (which means Canada and part of United States) if it rusts that way after 3 months. Who would buy a $800 rusting exhaust when they can have something better, as the Nameless, for $500 or any other brand as Borla or HKS for the same price? I really like the AFE Intake, this is mainly why I wanted the Takeda exhaust and why my husband thought it should be nice. I really want this be settled......:brokenheart: |
To add to Dimman's list, my ARK DT-S exhaust is made with T-304/SUS-304 Stainless Steel and TIG Welded. I also paid a pretty penny for it but for good reason lol
|
These exhausts were originally made using 409 SS, but now AFE is making these with 304 SS instead as 409 can often accumulate surface rust due to salt/snow and other conditions. You wont see these problems with the new exhausts being shipped out.
|
Quote:
The biggest question is does this corrosion consider a quality problem? There question can be answer in two folds. 1. Does the corrosion prohibit the unit from functioning or compromise structural integrity? 2. Is the corrosion superficial, thus even though having rust spots are not aesthetically pleasing, it does have affect the performance of the exhaust in a negative manner? Iron base metal can developed 2 types of surface oxide. One is the traditional iron oxide or rust as an effect of corrosion; another is passivation which metal oxides are formed as a protective layer. According to material data, it suggests that 409 will corrode which forms iron oxide, but the iron oxide does not propagate. In this case, unlike traditional iron oxide development, 409SS iron oxide does not grow to significant size where it starts to flake off thus reducing the original material’s mass. This is type of corrosion are called superficial rust which exhibits light discoloring and pitting. To answer question 1, here is how you can approach the matter. Though the 409 SS surface rust does not appear to be growing, the rust developed from wield joint area does not follow the same corrosion pattern as iron oxide formulation on plane 409SS. As a result, the long term stability of this rust development in the wielded area is questionable. Further assurance is needed from manufactures to guarantee that there is not a deficiency in the design where corrosion in that area will not penetrate for the life of the unit. To answer question 2 here is how you can approach the matter. Though the 409 SS surface rust appears to be superficial, the manufacture has purposely omitted the discloser of this information from the advertising material. While only advertising the usage of 304 SS, the manufacture have mislead the consumer into believing the rest of the exhaust exhibit the same corrosion inhibiting properties as of 304SS. As a result, the manufacture may have violated the FTC regulation of truth in advertising and marketing. Quote:
|
All, I wanted to just clear a few things up. Trish07, I personally apologize for what you have gone through. I sent you a PM and hope you contact me. The exhaust is 409ss and it will have surface rust only. We did this to keep the exhaust system at a lower price. However, we hear all of you loud and clear. We will release a 304 SS version. We have now made all new exhaust systems in 304 to prevent these issues. We are constantly improving ourselves. We are new to the car exhaust market but do extremely well in the Diesel and Gas exhaust business. Trucks don't require 304 and we understand the car market does. I am thankful we got to hear all of these complaints because it will make us a better company. Trish07, you have every right to be upset and we are sorry you did not have anything less than a great experience. Thank you.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:33 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.