Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB

Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/index.php)
-   Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Premium vs regular fuels (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=102811)

fumanchu1 03-17-2016 06:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hotrodheart (Post 2583169)
@Tcoat does sugar free maple syrup have less octane than the regular kind?


http://www.canadiangifts.com/maple/images/mpg08.jpg

Sugar free maple syrup?!? that's like saying gum free gum!!!

Capt Spaulding 03-17-2016 08:01 PM

Or non-alcoholic gin. What's the point? :iono:

Tcoat 03-17-2016 08:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fumanchu1 (Post 2586366)
Sugar free maple syrup?!? that's like saying gum free gum!!!

sugar free sugar!

joe strummer 03-27-2016 04:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VTEC (Post 2579472)
The FR-S and BRZ were tuned by factory to use 93 octane under North American rating.

Anytime you use something below factory settings, the computer will detect that because the fuel will start to detonate when it's not supposed to. The computer will detect the explosions and compensate by lowering the compression and horsepower to prevent more premature detonations.

The reason why family cars get no benefit from premium fuel is because they are usually tuned to 87 octane. And if you decide to put 91 octane in your Corolla, there is no way for the Corolla's ECU to detect that. And you would be wasting your money again.

Actually, our cars are not "tuned" for 93 octane, or any other octane. Octane requirements are dependent on the engine's compression. Octane in effect raises the temperature at which the fuel mixture will ignite.

We need fuel with a higher octane because our engines are high compression. Higher compression=higher temperature.

Also, the engine's computers don't lower compression when knock sensors detect knock. How could they? Compression is fixed. The ECU changes the engine timing to compensate, based on signals from knock sensors. You'll get less horsepower, but that's just a by-product of the less-than-optimum timing.

Lastly, it doesn't matter if the ECU could detect what octane fuel is put in the tank. What would it do with the information?

Packofcrows 03-27-2016 05:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by joe strummer (Post 2598829)

Also, the engine's computers don't lower compression when knock sensors detect knock. How could they? The ECU changes the engine timing to compensate, based on signals from knock sensors.


Indeed!

I notice this when using super cheap $2.60 91 Oct vs Chevron $3.09 or Shell 91 Oct $3.15.

I spoke with Gas Station owner and he said it's due to the ethanol and lack of additives. I noticed the spark plugs wearing out quicker with 87 oct on friends IS300 when manual said to us 91. Gas station owner said ethanol content was about 20-26% (?).

I always thought ethanol tops in gas was about 10%???

billwot 03-27-2016 10:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by joe strummer (Post 2598829)
Actually, our cars are not "tuned" for 93 octane, or any other octane. Octane requirements are dependent on the engine's compression. Octane in effect raises the temperature at which the fuel mixture will ignite.

We need fuel with a higher octane because our engines are high compression. Higher compression=higher temperature.

Also, the engine's computers don't lower compression when knock sensors detect knock. How could they? Compression is fixed. The ECU changes the engine timing to compensate, based on signals from knock sensors. You'll get less horsepower, but that's just a by-product of the less-than-optimum timing.

Lastly, it doesn't matter if the ECU could detect what octane fuel is put in the tank. What would it do with the information?

:thumbsup::thumbsup::thumbsup:

mdm 03-27-2016 12:35 PM

And high compression ratiio helps achieving better thermal efficiency of the engine.

[ame="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t4yh5Pt8was"]Compression Ratio and Thermal Efficiency - YouTube[/ame]

In other words, the high CR and the need for high octane are some of the costs of squeezing 200 HP form 2 liters.

VTEC 03-27-2016 02:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by joe strummer (Post 2598829)
Actually, our cars are not "tuned" for 93 octane, or any other octane. Octane requirements are dependent on the engine's compression. Octane in effect raises the temperature at which the fuel mixture will ignite.

We need fuel with a higher octane because our engines are high compression. Higher compression=higher temperature.

Also, the engine's computers don't lower compression when knock sensors detect knock. How could they? Compression is fixed. The ECU changes the engine timing to compensate, based on signals from knock sensors. You'll get less horsepower, but that's just a by-product of the less-than-optimum timing.

Lastly, it doesn't matter if the ECU could detect what octane fuel is put in the tank. What would it do with the information?

You're right it reduces timing, not compression, my bad, and that in effect reduces the horsepower.

But what I mean is your ECU can detect fuel octane below factory specifications (or factory "tune") and compensate by reducing timing/power. But putting higher octane than factory specs, will not have the opposite effect. The ECU will not detect higher octane or do anything to take advantage of it.

joe strummer 03-27-2016 03:04 PM

The ECU doesn't detect octane. It gets a signal from the knock sensor and retards timing. There are a number of causes of knocking. Low octane is one of them.

billwot 03-27-2016 03:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by joe strummer (Post 2599024)
The ECU doesn't detect octane. It gets a signal from the knock sensor and retards timing. There are a number of causes of knocking. Low octane is one of them.

:thumbsup::thumbsup:

Luftwaffel 03-27-2016 04:10 PM

I had to retard my brain timing to read this thread.

Fuel quality is easy to measure. You guys are overthinking shit. It's called a data log.

For the Californians... mixing 91 and 100 is silly. You literally have E85 stations everywhere. Get a flex fuel kit.

stevesnj 03-27-2016 07:16 PM

I think fuel issues should be a sticky and anyone making a new thread should be deleted IMHO. I'd say this goes for oil and tire threads. :P Happy Bunny Day!

Zhangy 03-27-2016 10:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tcoat (Post 2579520)
Manual says: Recommended 93 Required minimum 91. All is good in the world.

all engines must be designed to run on 87 octane, 2L boxer engine is no different. using 87 octane will do no harm, because it's the rule. The manual says a lot of things to lower the liability of the manufacturer such as touchless wash only, wash after driven on salty road every time, don't mod your car... you get the point

Legionsk88 04-03-2016 04:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Luftwaffel (Post 2599065)
I had to retard my brain timing to read this thread.

Fuel quality is easy to measure. You guys are overthinking shit. It's called a data log.

For the Californians... mixing 91 and 100 is silly. You literally have E85 stations everywhere. Get a flex fuel kit.

i will have to disagree with you on the E85 stations being everywhere, the nearest one from me is a good 20 miles from me, so a 40 mile trip for it, would not be very economical for me.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:47 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.


Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.