Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB

Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/index.php)
-   BRZ First-Gen (2012+) — General Topics (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=23)
-   -   First Production Subaru BRZ Teaser Images! (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=2180)

NorCalRider 11-07-2011 08:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dark (Post 73126)
Not gonna happen with not-so-friendly CR ratio of the engine.

It's not the CR ratio that is a limiting factor, 12.5 is doable in a turbo application. The limiting factor will be the availability of a good tuning solution for the D4-S fuel system and how the engine is designed, along with how the internals are made.

ruskymx 11-07-2011 08:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RRnold (Post 73119)
Yeah, same dimensions but are both manufactures going to use the same exact tire brand? That might be the difference even though both are 45 series, on might have a deeper thead depth adding that extra .6".

I know for sure that this is not the case because most tires will have anywhere from 8-12/32nd's of tread depth and that equals 6.35mm to 9.525mm of tread depth on brand new tires. The only time the tread depth gets greater for cars would be for snow tires. My brand new BFG Mud Terrain KM2's have 20/32's of depth new and that equals 15.88mm.

The difference in height would either be tire size, 215/45/17 (24.7" diameter) compared to 225/45/17 (25" diameter) would be .3" or 7.5mm or the ride height of the two cars could be different due to springs etc. I highly doubt that they are going to use two different shells/unibodies for the different versions. It would drive up cost of production too much for a relatively lower volume car (in comparison to Corolla/Impreza, etc)

Until I see official releases from Toyota/Subaru for the USDM, I'm not counting on anything that comes out through these leaks etc. It's not that I don't love all the info coming out recently, but I don't want to get disappointed when something doesn't make it across the pond.

The counter on the top is this page is moving too darn slow! :sigh:

Caliban 11-07-2011 08:31 PM

awesome news! thanks for the update

jadamian75 11-07-2011 08:36 PM

Wow it looks great. I really like the light around the head light. I'm glad I did not buy that miata I test drove this weekend.
Joe

tripjammer 11-07-2011 08:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AIRMAX (Post 73123)
I'm not sure what Toyota was thinking....

Now...
The Subaru version is not only... a little bit better performance wise, it is also smaller and BETTER looking front and rear.


Toyota just lost about 25% potential sales, who will no doubt fork the extra $4000-$5000 to get a more "mature" and "prestige" looking version.


Unless the Toyota comes out with a turbo, many people who waited and current owners of 350z/370z/Genesis etc who are looking for a newer car will opt for the Subaru version.... Looks Audi-ish with Mazda touch.... which is GOOD.

The delinquent looking rear tail lights of the Toyota only really appeals to the really young, like 18-21 year olds.... they need to offer a "red" cover tail lights off the factory.... many people do not want to mod their rear lamps within the first year or 2 due to warranty purposes.....


I still like the Toyota version better! I don't like the BRZ front grille. But the rest of the car is tight! I need to see the whole car like the FR-S.

Just because the Japanese version of the FT-86 has the clear taillights does not mean the US version will have them...

tripjammer 11-07-2011 08:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ydooby (Post 73146)
For the record I still prefer the Toyota's front end, and depending whether the BRZ will go with the test mule's rear (which looks identical to the FT-86's) or the BRZ STi Concept's rear (which I prefer), I think the FT-86 may still be the better looking of the two to me. And the BRZ is not any smaller than the FT-86; they're identical. The smaller dimensions quoted in the first post of the thread are of the BRZ Prologue Concept.

I agree with you. I like the Toyota version better. The front grill is keeping going to the scion dealer...but I need to see the BRZ production rear end.

tripjammer 11-07-2011 08:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Crashoverride (Post 73158)
Agree'ed your truck is awesome, I for one will go the TRD route, I like the toyota version better or I just have never been a Subi fan, I think the TRD version\upgrades make the car look clean.:bow:

I agree. I don't care if it's a scion. I actually like that this car is going to put scion on a better higher level!

I also think this is going to be Subaru's best looking car. Let's face it Subaru does not know how to make a beautiful car. The wrx and Sti are alright but they ain't pretty. The BRZ is. This car is gonna get people into the Subaru showrooms!

tripjammer 11-07-2011 08:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AIRMAX (Post 73176)
Well turbo or not, the point is...

the Subaru version is BETTER looking, BETTER performance for more cost.

A lot of people who were planning to buy the Toyota version can simply add an extra $4000-$5000 to get a much better looking Front Bumper, Tail lights and Off the factory tuning that increases the performance.

I think there's a big enough market for those people.


Let's face it, out of all the AERO and TRD kits... which would cost $2000-$3000 anyways, the Subaru Front Bumper and Rear lamps are "hot" enough to upgrade from Toyota version to Subaru.

You can't say that...you don't know what the production BRZ lights look like.

Also some of us like the scion front end more than the BRZ front end!
Remember the high resolution pics of the FRS are of the low spec version since it has not fog lights and no LEDs in the headlights like the high spec version.

We have to see both cars side by side and in both trims...

Dark 11-07-2011 09:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NorCalRider (Post 73183)
It's not the CR ratio that is a limiting factor, 12.5 is doable in a turbo application. The limiting factor will be the availability of a good tuning solution for the D4-S fuel system and how the engine is designed, along with how the internals are made.

I agree. 12.5:1 ratio is doable, but 10:1 is whole lot better. I agree that it need tuning supports for D4S, so let's hope there will be a ton.

Dark 11-07-2011 09:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AIRMAX (Post 73176)
Well turbo or not, the point is...

the Subaru version is BETTER looking, BETTER performance for more cost.

A lot of people who were planning to buy the Toyota version can simply add an extra $4000-$5000 to get a much better looking Front Bumper, Tail lights and Off the factory tuning that increases the performance.

I think there's a big enough market for those people.


Let's face it, out of all the AERO and TRD kits... which would cost $2000-$3000 anyways, the Subaru Front Bumper and Rear lamps are "hot" enough to upgrade from Toyota version to Subaru.

I wouldn't say BRZ is better than FRS or vice versa. Like RRnold said before, Subie version can turn off completely in real life. We need to wait and see first. Though, if all things equal, I take Subie over Scion any day.

Zaku 11-07-2011 09:53 PM

I just hope they don't do a Porsche Philosophy and don't get me wrong I love Porsche I want to own one one day. But I hope it's not one of those We give you less and charge you more IE Boxster Spyder; Because with the way Scion is trying to win people over. It's going to be at least antiquate.

Dave-ROR 11-08-2011 12:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RRnold (Post 73179)
The 2) Subaru's in the mag test both had different suspension as well as different tires. It is possible that both manufactures can use shocks as well as different tires which will change the specs. They'll be identical with the same but there will be a slight variation.

That's testing. In production they will all come with tire x.

Basic car struts won't change ride height.

My opinion is still that one or both of the measurements is simply wrong though.

ashtray 11-08-2011 01:14 AM

Two things:

First, can we add the "T" word to banned words here, so it just comes out as "*****"?

Second, maybe the extra 15mm in height is due to a huge rear spoiler. :D

tripjammer 11-08-2011 02:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ashtray (Post 73277)
Two things:

First, can we add the "T" word to banned words here, so it just comes out as "*****"?

Second, maybe the extra 15mm in height is due to a huge rear spoiler. :D

Oh yeah I forgot the spoiler! Hehe!

Krampus 11-18-2011 02:32 AM

http://www.subaru-global.com/11la/

Racelex 11-18-2011 02:51 AM

The difference in ride height will most likely be the different spring rate used for the Subaru.

Levi 11-18-2011 06:01 AM

From what I see no I think I'll like the Subaru alot better than the Toyota. IMO headlights, front bumper are better than Toyota's from what I see. I also like the STI Concept taillights better, but now we have to see if they make it to production. But the rear bumper is better on the Toyota.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:55 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.


Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.