Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB

Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/index.php)
-   Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Feedback to TMS/SOA Management (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=12830)

Napoleon 07-31-2012 10:00 PM

I own a BRZ.

EXTERIOR
I enjoy the subtle design of the front end bumper. The trapezoid shape opening is beautiful, but the plastic (crash beam?) bar running across looks out of place. There must be some other solution that could make it look less like a focal point. It does not need to look like the FRS but, if the metal edge (near the Subaru badge) hovered over the plastic bar just a little bit it would look nice.

ngabdala 07-31-2012 10:02 PM

1 Attachment(s)
Seat belt issue? I bought these. They also have them TRD branded and Toyota too. Seatbelt neck cushion. Now I just need a BRZ to put them on :lol:




Quote:

Originally Posted by FR-S/GT-86 (Post 350440)
When the seat is all the way down (how it should be) the seatbelt rubs my neck raw, even with it in the silly snap holders. I am sure this was a design compromise, but it deserves attention.


pastuch 07-31-2012 10:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Napoleon (Post 351017)
I own a BRZ.

EXTERIOR
I enjoy the subtle design of the front end bumper. The trapezoid shape opening is beautiful, but the plastic (crash beam?) bar running across looks out of place. There must be some other solution that could make it look less like a focal point. It does not need to look like the FRS but, if the metal edge (near the Subaru badge) hovered over the plastic bar just a little bit it would look nice.

I agree for the most part I prefer the FRS/FT86 bumper but how to mount the LED DRLs on the FRS bumper...

ParangWala 07-31-2012 11:37 PM

I drive a Raven 6MT FR-S @ 3000kms, there have already been comments of what I have issues with but I might as well re-iterate for the sake of having it on record.

FIRST AND FOREMOST, the annoying chirping noise from the engine bay! Also I feel that the clutch is slightly numbing, I would prefer a little bit more feedback from the clutch although I've learned to adapt.

That's it for now....

CircuitJerk 07-31-2012 11:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FLIPs_FR-S (Post 350746)
I have the AT and I really enjoy using the tip-tronic shift paddles. BUT, they should have been put in a stationary location on the steering column. When I drive out to the twisty country roads we have here it is very aggravating to have to make sure I'm about to shift properly entering or existing the turns. Taking my eyes off the road to do so is not safe.

I agree, but when I'm driving like that I switch over to manual so I can use the stick. It's the most natural thing for me anyway as that's where your hand would be in a manual. I just gotta stop going for the clutch pedal that doesn't exist. Sounds crazy, I know...

Saber_TRD 08-01-2012 01:26 AM

Sell it as/Release the Toyota 86 with all the trims/options available in Japan, in North America. Especially the GT 86 Limited; List of options/features seen here: http://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=8954 I don't care if they keep the Scion as the low spec version, I refuse to buy the Scion and will only purchase the Toyota, preferably the GT 86 Limited.

EDIT: At the very least allow dealerships to order in the parts listed above, in my link. My dealership has refused to order the parts claiming they are not able to or are not allowed to, even though they are parts for a Toyota vehicle. If I have to I can tolerate registering it as a Scion but it better be equipped with all features/options from the GT 86 Limited and Toyota and 86 badging with no sign of Scion anywhere on it other than that registration.

Seven years without a Toyota sports car, then having the President and CEO of Toyota give his word a Toyota sports car will be sold, then not following through is a major piss off.

Grateful Dave 08-01-2012 02:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Moshpit37 (Post 350780)
But that will shift gears. Unless I'm missing something I'm pretty sure you get a gear shift every time you touch the paddles.

I'm pretty sure while in D you click paddle once an it shows the gear you are in then you click again to change gears. After a few seconds it goes back to D. I could be wrong. I'll try it again. The last few days I've been driving my Tacoma 4x4. I've been neglecting her since I bought the my FRS. That has been strange sitting so high and it handles way different.

Moshpit37 08-01-2012 02:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Grateful Dave (Post 351554)
I'm pretty sure while in D you click paddle once an it shows the gear you are in then you click again to change gears. After a few seconds it goes back to D. I could be wrong. I'll try it again. The last few days I've been driving my Tacoma 4x4. I've been neglecting her since I bought the my FRS. That has been strange sitting so high and it handles way different.

Nope. I checked on the way back to work and it definitely shifted as soon as I touched the downshift paddle.

Edit: Sorry for the thread jack. Let's get back on topic and if need be bring this to the discussion thread.

Style 08-01-2012 04:08 AM

The plastic in the inside gets scratched too easily, especially the door panels. Everyone knows what I'm talking about.

kndonlee 08-01-2012 08:30 AM

I just posted my impressions. You should have a mod just delete any irrelevant posts, and edit the existing posts for continuity.

The only thing that should be in there are "Thanks" for the posts rather than the general, "please listen to my 2 cents dribble"

WRJad 08-01-2012 09:06 AM

Subaru needs to improve their paint quality and painting process. My BRZ has numerous paint defects its not even funny (not sure how it made it past QC). Since the defects are at the rear of the car I try to not look at them, but they are there. I should raise a big stink over the defects but I don't want half the car repainted and have it not match.

Memphis 08-01-2012 09:33 AM

2013 Scion FR-S Auto Owner-

Transmission (Auto):

The only complaint I have, as most people know, is that I wish that the auto had a launch feature or was able to get off the line faster.

For those that seem to think the auto launches fine, Id suggest finding a friend with a manual to compare it against. You will see what I am talking about. It is the one thing that is causing the auto to be so slow compared to the manual.

I cant describe it and I wish that I had taken video of my track time when my friend and I went to the drag strip to see just how much of a difference there was between auto and manual.

After the initial launch and when the car got past the RPM where it lugged it seemed to keep up very well even though the manual was still pulling ever so slightly ahead.

This was run after run after run.

I feel adamant that if the auto was able to launch without having to lug up to speed that it would be the best damn auto on the market that is not a DSG. Other than that major flaw (in my opinion) the auto is amazing. Drool worthy.

I mean the launch of the auto is going to hurt a LOT of auto x times which is what I am planning on doing.

I dont care that the manual is faster. I expect it to be.

What I did not expect was my friend being able to run a 15.5 with a huge speaker box in the back along with all of the spare tire components while I was able to manage only a 16.4 at best with everything known to man stripped out of the back of the car.

I dont like comparing cars, I hate it. But I feel this example would best explain how disappointed I was with the times.

When you used to drive a 2008 Pontiac G5GT with 171 HP and 167 TQ and stock it ran a 16 flat with a slush box auto and weighed in at 2991 lbs with everything in it, its a little disheartening when your 2013 Scion FR-S runs a mediocre 16.5-16.7 with everything in it at 200 HP and 151 TQ and weighs in at 2800 lbs.

Again this is not because I care about the 1/4 mile times but because I was expecting no more than a 5 tenth of a second difference from auto to manual.

Yes, I am well aware that gearing as well as when that peak power is made makes a difference. But people with an auto can not launch at the right RPM range to allow the car to snap up and go like the manual. Instead we just chug along until we get to the right point.

Stu baru 08-01-2012 09:36 AM

BRZ Limited MT:

-Engine Performance (Feel, noises, etc)

Lacking low-RPM torque, really needs to be turbo-charged. DI chirp is just unacceptable.

-Exhaust Sound Performance (Sound Quality)

My preference would be to NOT pipe sound into the cabin, but I understand that some like to hear their cars more than I do

-Transmission (Performance, Quality)

Clutch engagement point should be moved inward toward the floor

-Tire Performance (Wear, Noise, Handling)

A car designed for superior handling should come with higher performance tires

-Interior Parts/Panels (Fitment, gap, deformation, etc)

The side extensions around the center control cluster were designed solely to torment people of height...if I had a dollar for every time I've drilled my knee hopping into the car without being careful, I'd be a wealthy man. Note that I'm 6'4".

-Unusual Interior Noise (Squeaking, rattling, etc and location)

There was a rhythmic whining coming from the right-front that I attributed to tire noise that seems to have subsided some. There is an intermittent soft thumping/rubbing sound that seems to come from the trunk at highway speeds for which I have yet to pin down a source.

-Front Seat Functionality

The seats are too firm to provide good comfort to a large range of passenger sizes and shapes. While the seats hold one in place nicely, they are a bit hard and cause me some sciatic nerve issues on longer drives. The passenger seat does this to my wife within minutes of getting in the car, hence she never rides with me. A slightly softer seating material would probably mitigate some of this, as would adding more seating adjustments. For me, as a taller driver, raising the seat front to provide thigh support would be wonderful. Providing some lumbar adjustment would be great for shorter drivers like my wife.

-Rear Seat Function (... troll question? haha)

Oxymoron?

-Exterior Parts/Panels (Fitment, Gap, Wheel/Tire Size, Design of Wheels, etc)

I hate the little Toyota dimpling of the hood around the front logo, it really detracts from the elegant lines of the car.

-Interior Function (Visor, Mirrors, etc)

Visors need a stiffer spring-rate, I can no longer tuck my wallet there without running the risk of it flying out.

-Audio Equipment Performance

Lack of a high-fidelity option is a minus, but then this has been a Subaru weakness for decades.

-Center Cluster Switch usability

Functional, but the layout doesn't imply significant amounts of development thought. Could use some cleaning up.

Style 08-01-2012 11:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Memphis (Post 351927)
2013 Scion FR-S Auto Owner-

Transmission (Auto):

The only complaint I have, as most people know, is that I wish that the auto had a launch feature or was able to get off the line faster.

For those that seem to think the auto launches fine, Id suggest finding a friend with a manual to compare it against. You will see what I am talking about. It is the one thing that is causing the auto to be so slow compared to the manual.

I cant describe it and I wish that I had taken video of my track time when my friend and I went to the drag strip to see just how much of a difference there was between auto and manual.

After the initial launch and when the car got past the RPM where it lugged it seemed to keep up very well even though the manual was still pulling ever so slightly ahead.

This was run after run after run.

I feel adamant that if the auto was able to launch without having to lug up to speed that it would be the best damn auto on the market that is not a DSG. Other than that major flaw (in my opinion) the auto is amazing. Drool worthy.

I mean the launch of the auto is going to hurt a LOT of auto x times which is what I am planning on doing.

I dont care that the manual is faster. I expect it to be.

What I did not expect was my friend being able to run a 15.5 with a huge speaker box in the back along with all of the spare tire components while I was able to manage only a 16.4 at best with everything known to man stripped out of the back of the car.

I dont like comparing cars, I hate it. But I feel this example would best explain how disappointed I was with the times.

When you used to drive a 2008 Pontiac G5GT with 171 HP and 167 TQ and stock it ran a 16 flat with a slush box auto and weighed in at 2991 lbs with everything in it, its a little disheartening when your 2013 Scion FR-S runs a mediocre 16.5-16.7 with everything in it at 200 HP and 151 TQ and weighs in at 2800 lbs.

Again this is not because I care about the 1/4 mile times but because I was expecting no more than a 5 tenth of a second difference from auto to manual.

Yes, I am well aware that gearing as well as when that peak power is made makes a difference. But people with an auto can not launch at the right RPM range to allow the car to snap up and go like the manual. Instead we just chug along until we get to the right point.

Doing a neutral drop would destroy the engine right? Just want to make sure lol

7thgear 08-01-2012 03:08 PM

FRS owner here

"I" feel that the door position locks could be spaced a bit better

i'm talking about those little grooves in the door hinge that lock the door in 3 seperate locations (barely open, middle, and fully open) I feel that the middle position in it's current state is too wide, ina lmost any normal parking situation it requires that no other car's are present if you park in the center of a standard parking space

and if there is a car, the other car has to be perfectly parked as well, if it is even an inch closer to your car, i am forced to be mindful of how far i open the door. I don't mind being cautious, but it is a pain because i never know if the "spring" force of the door might accidentally force it open and touch the other car or a wall

i know it may sound silly, but even like 2-3 degrees less of swing at the medium setting is all that i'm suggesting.

xravexboix 08-01-2012 07:36 PM

Done. I'll post up discussion topics once we're set.

http://instagram.com/p/NzcqIvtcQO/

mojojojo 08-01-2012 09:15 PM

Scion FR-S and I know this is beating a dead horse, but the engine with the DI fuel system or whatever is making the cricket noise.

|-Goku-| 08-01-2012 10:06 PM

-Other Electronic Switch function/usability

Can they adjust the sensitivity of the Passenger seat belt sensor? Just putting my phone on the seat causes the alarm to beep.

xravexboix 08-01-2012 10:37 PM

BTW, please keep posting on any other things you may have. TMS/SOA/FHI are monitoring this thread.

I'll update the original post shortly with some feedback.

Subie 08-01-2012 10:49 PM

There ought to be an option to automatically lock the doors at a certain speed for manual drivers, or when shifting from Park to Drive for automatic drivers. Conversely, the doors should unlock when the car is turned off for manual drivers, or when the shifter is moved from Drive to Park for automatic drivers. Some variant of this would be OK too.

Subie 08-01-2012 10:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ruskymx (Post 343623)
Not sure if it's wind noise or a wheel bearing but there is a noise that sounds like a "tuning fork" at around 60mph and can be hear whether in 4th, 5th or 6th

I don't know if it's the same issue or not, but I'm getting some sort of harmonic at 70 MPH and a similar noise (although more cyclical sounding as opposed to constant) at 35 MPH. It really detracts from the car on highway trips and must be addressed for me to consider myself satisfied with the car.

ruskymx 08-01-2012 10:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Subie (Post 353837)
I don't know if it's the same issue or not, but I'm getting some sort of harmonic at 70 MPH and a similar noise (although more cyclical sounding as opposed to constant) at 35 MPH. It really detracts from the car on highway trips and must be addressed for me to consider myself satisfied with the car.

I had a tech at my dealership check mine out and he can hear the noise but cannot determine what it is. He had me keep track of when I heard it,speed, gear, clutch position, etc.

I noticed that the turn signals are not solidly mounted and move a little if you push on them. I wonder if when I get up to speed that the force of the air is pushing them in a little and creating the noise.

People that have been in the car with me don't notice it until I point it out. Once I do, they notice it right away. :sigh:

Ruskymx

poormans_LFA 08-03-2012 04:34 PM

Please please give the steering wheel more telescope adjustment for taller drivers like myself with long legs. That's the one thing that keeps me from buying an FR-S AND i'd really like to have one. Thank you.

http://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=10623

Rejor11 08-04-2012 10:33 PM

-Tire Performance (Wear, Noise, Handling)

In my opinion, the tires are excellent for a stock car. I say this as having had raced the car on the track at an HPDE event. Sure, putting stickier tires would enhance the trackability of the car, but the car is tons of fun on the track with the current stock rubbers on her.

Rejor11 08-04-2012 10:34 PM

-Other Noise/Vibration

I am getting what sounds like wind whistling through the window right behind my head in the driver's door. Also hear harmonic sounds from the front left while driving at highway speeds and it's utterly annoying.

Rejor11 08-04-2012 10:36 PM

-Rear Seat Function (... troll question? haha)

Useless. Build a rear bin like the FD Mazda RX-7s had, and offer it as an option for future FRS/BRZs and put it up in the parts bin for us to buy.

Rejor11 08-04-2012 10:37 PM

-Vibration (Steering Wheel, Pedals, Floor, Seat, etc)

Strangely enough, and this happens along with the harmonic noise I hear from the front left... I can feel the vibration in my gas pedal while the noise is present. Tire or wheel issue perhaps?

Rejor11 08-04-2012 10:42 PM

-Vehicle Handling (Alignment, Road-Handling, Stability)


Handling is amazing for a stock car, and this is coming from a track perspective. Easy to control, easy to keep at its limits, and from an instructor's perspective, has a lot of rear grip available. And a GT-R driver even tossed her around and gave it a thumbs up ^.^

Off the track, traction control is great... I've had it save my ass on freshly rained-upon roads a couple of times. The car can swing around on you if you're not careful, but that's what this car is made for.

VSC Sport mode for traction control is also great. Amazing training tool for the track, since it does not kick in too soon and allows you to toss the car around. It, too, has saved me from going into the wall when I pushed the limit too far and the car started to swing towards the wall. VSC kicked in at the right moment and helped me realign the car down the track.

Keep doin what you're doin for the traction control. Good safety tool and good training tool.

Rejor11 08-04-2012 10:44 PM

-Engine Performance (Feel, noises, etc)

Chirping noise. Some have said this may be the fuel pump. Personally I do not know. Also, I had an ignition coil throw a code while on the highway. Had it checked by toyota, who called a service rep from Headquarters and they were told to clear the code and test drive the car. The code did not come back so everything was good. Still, it's something to keep an eye on.

Rejor11 08-04-2012 10:47 PM

-Brakes (Noise, Performance, Pedal Feel)

Brakes do not provide any "bite." In other words, no matter how hard I press on the brakes, ABS will not engage.

russv 08-05-2012 12:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Subie (Post 353837)
I don't know if it's the same issue or not, but I'm getting some sort of harmonic at 70 MPH and a similar noise (although more cyclical sounding as opposed to constant) at 35 MPH. It really detracts from the car on highway trips and must be addressed for me to consider myself satisfied with the car.

I'm hearing that harmonic at 70 MPH as well. Seems to come from the back.

digital_assassin 08-05-2012 01:01 AM

-Exterior Parts/Panels (Fitment, Gap, Wheel/Tire Size, Design of Wheels, etc)
 
The front bumper on mine as well as a few other members isn't seating properly at the headlights. Needs more of a positive attachment to hold it in.

This
Attachment 11138

Should be this
Attachment 11139

It seems like the forward most tab doesn't sit down far enough.

Tanuki 08-05-2012 01:17 AM

I think this is IMPORTANT.

I bought my car, and after paperwork was finished, we found that a portion of the frame in the trunk was damaged. The only fix offered by the dealership and TOYOTA, is to cut the section out of the car and have it replaced. My car had 10 miles on it when the damage was found, Cutting the car up to fix this doesn't seem like the best idea to me. I would honestly rather leave the damage then let a "Dealer Preferred" body shop touch the car. I don't even get to choose my own body shop for this? Really?

Can you tell me exactly what part of the QA process this was overlooked in? Should I be looking for other items like this on the car?

http://i813.photobucket.com/albums/z...a/EN2C2444.jpg

VS

http://i813.photobucket.com/albums/z...a/EN2C2441.jpg

Rejor11 08-05-2012 04:49 PM

wow.

Lonewolf 08-05-2012 05:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tanuki (Post 360117)
I think this is IMPORTANT.

I bought my car, and after paperwork was finished, we found that a portion of the frame in the trunk was damaged. The only fix offered by the dealership and TOYOTA, is to cut the section out of the car and have it replaced. My car had 10 miles on it when the damage was found, Cutting the car up to fix this doesn't seem like the best idea to me. I would honestly rather leave the damage then let a "Dealer Preferred" body shop touch the car. I don't even get to choose my own body shop for this? Really?

Can you tell me exactly what part of the QA process this was overlooked in? Should I be looking for other items like this on the car?

http://i813.photobucket.com/albums/z...a/EN2C2444.jpg

VS

http://i813.photobucket.com/albums/z...a/EN2C2441.jpg

What the hell Subaru? At first I was kidding when I said their assembly workers were drunk and blind, but now I think there may be some truth to it...:thumbdown:

rhl4688 08-05-2012 09:14 PM

Scion FR-S MT. I am waiting for the TRD Supercharger to come out. I know I am not alone.

cmss2000 08-06-2012 09:58 AM

Homelink mirror doesn't work properly. I pull in the garage and the first thing you want to do is turn the engine off so you don't get smogged, but then go to put the garage door down and it doesn't work. Same with opening the garage door, you have to start the engine (or at least turn the key on) before being able to open the garage door.
My BMW had the same problem. Acura gets it right as they are active as soon as you get in the car and even after you shut the engine off. Very annoying! And a waste of $200+ for the homelink mirror.

swansons 08-07-2012 09:33 PM

BRZ MT Limited owner here

Love the car - thank you Subaru and Toyota - I am very impressed.

Most of my comments and concerns have been posted by others already. Here are some additional thoughts:

- I hate the red stitching
- Sun visors are a little too short
- Some toe room under the front seats would make the rear seat useable
- 12V sockets do not work with car off
- Provide a wood-grain option for the Limited trim instead of the silver plastic

Work off the issues in this thread and I'll buy another one!

Memphis 08-08-2012 12:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by swansons (Post 365546)
BRZ MT Limited owner here

Love the car - thank you Subaru and Toyota - I am very impressed.

Most of my comments and concerns have been posted by others already. Here are some additional thoughts:

- I hate the red stitching
- Sun visors are a little too short
- Some toe room under the front seats would make the rear seat useable
- 12V sockets do not work with car off
- Provide a wood-grain option for the Limited trim instead of the silver plastic

Work off the issues in this thread and I'll buy another one!

I had to double check to see if I read that correctly...

Wood-grain, in a twin? I bet you want shag carpeting and gold plated curb feelers too.

FR-S/GT-86 08-08-2012 03:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tanuki (Post 360117)
I think this is IMPORTANT.

I bought my car, and after paperwork was finished, we found that a portion of the frame in the trunk was damaged. The only fix offered by the dealership and TOYOTA, is to cut the section out of the car and have it replaced. My car had 10 miles on it when the damage was found, Cutting the car up to fix this doesn't seem like the best idea to me. I would honestly rather leave the damage then let a "Dealer Preferred" body shop touch the car. I don't even get to choose my own body shop for this? Really?

Can you tell me exactly what part of the QA process this was overlooked in? Should I be looking for other items like this on the car?

http://i813.photobucket.com/albums/z...a/EN2C2444.jpg

VS

http://i813.photobucket.com/albums/z...a/EN2C2441.jpg

If I had not seen these pics myself, I'd never have believed it. Umm, that is a serious QC issue. They really should be offering you a new car, not one that was incorrectly sent out of the factory and then repaired at a body shop. If ever there was a case for a lemon law, this is it.

Are you driving it or is it in the possession of Toyota?


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:57 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.


Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.