Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB

Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/index.php)
-   Issues | Warranty | Recalls / TSB (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=72)
-   -   FR-S Rod knock (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=31093)

mad_sb 03-22-2013 02:44 PM

LOL,

I still don't understand what the OP mentioned about the piston hitting one of the injectors.....

The DI injectors are located between the intake valves in a recess of the head... I don't see how it could get hit unless there was debris inside the chamber.. then again, i don't think we have a cross section view anywhere that shows if the tip of the injectors protrudes into the cylinder...

I understand if the bearing is worn enough for rod knock that there is extra slop in the travel.. but there should be enough squish area that nothing would hit the injector...

pozer 03-22-2013 06:18 PM

http://image.modified.com/f/roadtest...+injectors.jpg
To me it looks like the DI might have a few mm overhang but I did not see it myself so I can only guess.

andrew20195 03-22-2013 07:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pozer (Post 811989)
http://image.modified.com/f/roadtest...+injectors.jpg
To me it looks like the DI might have a few mm overhang but I did not see it myself so I can only guess.

Yeah, I was thinking that with a bad rod bearing, there may have been enough slack for the piston to kiss the injector tip.

Marrk 03-22-2013 07:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pozer (Post 811989)
http://image.modified.com/f/roadtest...+injectors.jpg
To me it looks like the DI might have a few mm overhang but I did not see it myself so I can only guess.



Great graphic. Many thanks for that. :thumbsup:

mad_sb 03-22-2013 07:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marrk (Post 812194)
Great graphic. Many thanks for that. :thumbsup:

I found that image while i was thinking about it... if you look close it should not protrude past the top of the deck and if you look at the images

here:
http://www.ft86club.com/forums/showp...4&postcount=34
and here
http://www.ft86club.com/forums/showp...7&postcount=35

you can see the recess in the head and the piston...

Ohh well,
If it happened it must be possible i just hope they don't miss anything while doing the rebuild. I would be worried about the oiling system being contaminated etc.

BlaineWasHere 03-22-2013 08:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marrk (Post 811112)
@Blaine&Andrew:

I am not an expert on this. However, my understanding is that a Congressman in Massachusetts and the ACLU are upset about EDRs, and they want to make sure there is legislation to protect the consumer because, as pointed out above, you own the data. Also, because of First Amendment rights.

My understanding is also that the EDR is like a "black box" recorder on an aircraft. It is logging data of a kind above and beyond error codes, including what's going on in the cabin (e.g., whether or not there is a passenger sitting on the passenger seat).

Could they tell there was a snowplow on the road at the time of the incident? I don't know. Can some cars tell where the curb is and park themselves? Yes.

It only knows what the car knows. Does your car know what types of vehicles you're following and what the weather is?

FirestormFRS 03-25-2013 11:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by naikaidriver (Post 810989)
If I may add one more tidbit to this side-conversation...

A few years back I was taking my BMW in to be serviced and I made a comment about how much technology had advanced when the "technician" took my key, stuck it in a reader box and was able to get all kinds of data off of it including ECU logs!

He told me about a warrantee claim that was made a few months earlier over a brand new 7-series that a dad bought for his son. It was returned a few months earlier with a blown transmission. The "technician" said when he inserted the key from the car, he was able to tell that the car was moving at 70mph at full throttle when the car was shifted into reverse. He was quite proud of himself for being able to deny the warrantee claim due to abuse.

Anyway, just thought that I would share.

Scott

That whole myth about jamming a car into reverse was busted by the Mythbusters long ago:

Turns out, you can put a moving car's automatic shifter into reverse, but the transmission will actually go into neutral.

http://dsc.discovery.com/tv-shows/my...to-reverse.htm

Dude was flat out lying to ya.

As to the piston hitting the injector. If they car actually spun the bearing that means one half of the bearing came out of the large end hole of the rod. That's would allow the additional piston travel.

mad_sb 03-26-2013 09:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FirestormFRS (Post 818239)
....

As to the piston hitting the injector. If they car actually spun the bearing that means one half of the bearing came out of the large end hole of the rod. That's would allow the additional piston travel.


For sure, but my skepticism is based on thinking they would not design it so the tip of the injector protrudes past the roof of the chamber. Anyway, i guess we will eventually find out for sure.

naikaidriver 03-26-2013 10:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FirestormFRS (Post 818239)
That whole myth about jamming a car into reverse was busted by the Mythbusters long ago:

Turns out, you can put a moving car's automatic shifter into reverse, but the transmission will actually go into neutral.

http://dsc.discovery.com/tv-shows/my...to-reverse.htm

Dude was flat out lying to ya.

As to the piston hitting the injector. If they car actually spun the bearing that means one half of the bearing came out of the large end hole of the rod. That's would allow the additional piston travel.

This is taken directly from the article that you sent the link to;

"Turns out, you can put a moving car's automatic shifter into reverse, but the transmission will actually go into neutral. Most modern vehicles have safeguards to prevent engine damage, which is what would happen if you flipped directly from "D" to "R."

Based on this statement, it is not enough "evidence" to conclude that the "technician" was lying since the exact word that the Mythbusters used was "most modern vehicles". Also, they acknowledged that damage would occur if the transmission were to go directly from D to R. The BMW in the story had significant transmission damage from what I was told. Also, he said that the car's ECU recorded that the vehicle was at WOT when the shifter was moved from D to R at over 70mph which would also indicate abuse.

It is also true that these idiots who pass themselves off as "technicians", in their khaki pants and spotless white polo shirts don't know the first thing about cars and its common knowledge that these "technicians" routinely lie through their teeth to not pay a claim. That was not the issue that I brought up. The issue at hand is the data logging features of new cars. Whether or not the "technician" was telling the truth about that particular case is irrelevant and hair-splitting for the purpose of forum drama.

My point that I was making concerning the data logging features of modern cars is still applicable and surprising considering that BMW was able to read that data from the key alone.

Scott

FirestormFRS 03-26-2013 07:19 PM

I was just pointing out that in today's electronic controlled transimissions it is not possible for the transmission to go into reverse while the car is moving forward.

You perk up little camper, didn't mean to pee in your cheerios.

*KID* 09-01-2014 12:06 PM

Never thought I'd post something like this but mine started knocking the same. :( bummer. I have 35k miles and I won't lie I do spirit drive but I have never had any issue like this on any of my cars till now. I'm bummed.

vien 11-01-2015 05:32 PM

Mine is doing the same now :(

Lonewolf 11-02-2015 12:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vien (Post 2438632)
Mine is doing the same now :(

Details? Mileage, model year, etc?

vien 11-02-2015 01:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lonewolf (Post 2438929)
Details? Mileage, model year, etc?

its a 12 brz first gen. car has 58,600 miles car started knocking really bad the other yesterday still runs but knocks bad again. lucky for me its still under power train warranty and mastro Subaru in fl is taking care of it. they said there has been 3 cases so far but the first one where you hear it while revving or driving but not much at idle.

Lonewolf 11-02-2015 10:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vien (Post 2439357)
its a 12 brz first gen. car has 58,600 miles car started knocking really bad the other yesterday still runs but knocks bad again. lucky for me its still under power train warranty and mastro Subaru in fl is taking care of it. they said there has been 3 cases so far but the first one where you hear it while revving or driving but not much at idle.

I suspected it was a first year motor...despite what others in denial might say...those motors have issues. I'm glad to hear the dealer is taking care of you.

vien 11-03-2015 10:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lonewolf (Post 2439991)
I suspected it was a first year motor...despite what others in denial might say...those motors have issues. I'm glad to hear the dealer is taking care of you.

yeah im glad they are covering it plus helps that my buddy is the service writer there.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:24 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.


Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.