Originally Posted by SUB-FT86 (Post 27521)

You obviously have no clue about really good daily drivability(passing punch,going up hills, and when you have more than one passenger). I drive a torqueless wonder so I know what's a dissapointing daily driver.

Originally Posted by MatadorRacing_F1 (Post 27537)

Just wondering if I was the only one seeing the irony in you bitching.

Anyway, I love responsive cars with a broad powerband. However, there is a solution to your problem. It's called a gearbox. ever heard of one?

This car was never meant to be a muscle car.

Just saying....

Originally Posted by nate89 (Post 27535)

I actually think the tail lights are awesome! I also like the head lights, the aggressive front fender arch, the...WHOLE FREAKIN CAR! If it looks like this I will totally buy it!

Originally Posted by SUB-FT86 (Post 27521)

You obviously have no clue about really good daily drivability(passing punch,going up hills, and when you have more than one passenger). I drive a torqueless wonder so I know what's a dissapointing daily driver.

Originally Posted by SUB-FT86 (Post 27542)

You are ignorant if you think that good power generally means muscle car. By your logic a lot of sports cars is "muscle cars". And yes you are right I drive a torqueless wonder and trust me my engine is the worst part of my car next to my brakes. If I'm upgrading then a N/A 2.0l boxer isn't going to make me feel any better about my commute. I had a feeling I would get under your skin you're so predictable.

Originally Posted by FT-86GOD (Post 27519)

How much better does it look when its going sideways.... (^,^)

I didnt think i liked it much up until i seen that clip... I reckon this thing will

look much better when a company puts together a widening kit for this and u

can set it up with good offset... Will clean up some of the strong lines in the

arch flares atleast.. They have certainly killed the awesome looking tail lights & rear end..

I was sold on getting this in black but seeing it in white.... Well now im not so sure..

White with a carbon firbe bonnet and difusers, dumped, 25mm widening kit, and some Black 18inch Volks would be pure sex.....


Hachiroku get ready for this forum to EXPLODE in the coming months...

Well done bro.........

Originally Posted by SUB-FT86 (Post 27521)

You obviously have no clue about really good daily drivability(passing punch,going up hills, and when you have more than one passenger). I drive a torqueless wonder so I know what's a dissapointing daily driver.

Originally Posted by tripjammer (Post 27523)

like it...We need to see it on more colors and we need to see the interior...Why come we don't engine specs yet?

This thing will need a turbo.

If it only has 200 HP NA...then it can't sell higher than a base genesis coupe.

Originally Posted by NESW20 (Post 27546)

now it all makes sense. you're a fanboy.

Originally Posted by FT-86GOD (Post 27548)

Hahaha ur a turd.......:popcorn:

Originally Posted by NESW20 (Post 27554)

umadtho? :iono:

Originally Posted by Tugboat (Post 27551)

Torqueless monsters make for a great drivers car. They make you work for performance and reward better than a car that has the power to overcome anything. I drive a high reving (9500 rpm) torqueless (1.6L) monster everyday. And I love it. As for highway speeds, the only major down side on the highway is running at higher rpms than most others. As long as you got a good exhuast note for those higher rev starts, its not that bad and a whole lot of fun.

Originally Posted by SUB-FT86 (Post 27562)

This is my point about these engines. This is all fun and good on a track where you can rev to your hearts desire but on regular roads where we all drive around 2500rpms to 4500 rpms these engines suck ass IMO and they feel like you're beating the crap out of them just to go somewhere. Most people will never get to rev to those high numbers unless they hit a track or else on the streets it'll sound like your racing from one stop light to the next. The only upside from these 2.0 liters in my experience is MPG.