There's an actual button that you press, which enables "sport" mode. If you didn't test drive it with that option on, it's understandable why you came away a little "underwhelmed".

See the buttons below the shifter?
http://media.caranddriver.com/images...-s-520x318.jpg

Did you not read his review?

He had nothing bad to say about the power, just the fact that it had a TQ converter?

I didn't get the feeling he was underwhelmed by anything but the sounds coming from the motor. And potentially the fit/finish and interior

Read the above quote from the OP - he just insinuated that manual and "sport mode" were analogous. Not true at all.

I heard it was to get better gas mileage. I believe something about the hydraulic systems put more stress on the engine and by switching to electric, they can achieve slightly better MPG. That's what i heard.

The steering is a little hard to judge on the street where it just feels light. It's quality is more apparent on a track/etc where you can feel the oversteer or understeer coming on and make correction more easily. In my IS, it was like a video came controller and you couldn't feel the wheels, but this is good. I've not driven a cayman, but it's better than the boxsters I've driven.

I can see on the street the porsche's being judged better. I've driven an Elise, but not in anger, so I can't compare it to that, or the Exige.

The salesman messed with the switches before I set off. I think he did mention a sport button. I'm sure he activated it, if not, I don't care because I never felt any lack of power or torque. If you are trying to make a case for the auto better than the manual, sorry, you are entitled to your opinion but I will always buy a clutch and stick manual.

Skullworks is totally right. I was thoroughly impressed with this car, not 'underwhelmed'. No idea how you got that impression, but oh well.

This is Rosso_Corsa's friend. I was at the passenger side during the test drive, and trust me: HE WAS ON SPORT MODE. The light was on.

I made damn sure he was on it, so that he can provide me with the most accurate information.

Yes, manufacturers are adopting electrically assisted steering partly to improve mileage. In most cars, hydraulic steering pumps are a load on the engine, which hurts efficiency. In a handful, like some Mazdas, the hydraulic pumps are electrically powered, which is in theory the "best of both worlds," but those systems still have the additional components and fluid of a hydraulic system. This adds manufacturing cost, weight and, according to some, makes for a less reliable system. Expect electric assist to be the norm in very short order. It already seems to be the norm for newly introduced models, even performance cars like Porsches and the Mustang GT.

Lack of feedback (or "road feel") seems to be the biggest problem with these systems, along with vague on-center feel. I've driven several cars with electrically assisted steering, and the FR-S had the most feedback, while the Ford Focus probably had the strongest on-center feel. The steering in my 2010 Acura TSX and the 2012 BMW 328i Sport Line are similar IMO: they provide impressive accuracy and a perfectly linear response, but virtually no information from the road surface, and only adequate on-center feel. Neither provides the "locked in" sensation I've had in other performance cars. (Yes, I did try Sport Mode with the BMW.) Of course, different tires would change the steering feel in any case, and I'd wager the BMW's in particular could be improved with different tires. (Interestingly, BMW's M models -- new M5 for sure and probably upcoming M3 -- are retaining hydraulic assist, which seems like a tacit admission they can't make a true "Ultimate Driving Machine" with their electric assist. I bet they will eventually though.)

It is for MPG. But i think ive read that electric systems only really nets 1mpg gain over hydraulic.

In other words, there needs to be alot of other things in place to increase mpg as a whole, and not just the electronic steering itself.

Hm, so maybe the electric system, in conjunction with a direct-injection system, variable valve timing, and lighter weight cars-- all add up to a better MPG rating?

I was just reminded of that Lonely Island song...

http://iruntheinternet.com/lulzdump/...2882911430.png

I just wanted to comment on the engine noise remark: I drove the FR-S with a TRD exhaust and rode in a BRZ Limited the next day. The difference was huge! Whereas the stock BRZ sounded boring and a little rough, the FR-S with the cat-back sounded very nice and sports-car-like. I'm sure with a good cat-back and removal of the sound tube into the cabin, the car will sound much more pleasing. And you liked the 370Z sound better? That thing has all the melodious sound of a school bus! Anything over 4500rpm and you can't hear a damn thing in the cabin! It's like they sacrificed all refinement and NVH control in the name of outright horsepower.

Great review!

I owned a 2007 Cayman S and now have a Subaru BRZ. IMHO the BRZ has better steering then the Cayman S. Get a manual, delete the engine resonator, put something other than Prius tires on it, drive it without 3 other people in the car and get back to us. Also, I agree on the FR-S interior...take a look at the Subaru Limited for something a little more upmarket.

BTW, congrats on getting 4 people in the car, that's a heck of a feat!

I honestly don't understand what the complaints are about in regards to the rear seats.

On this test drive, we fitted 2 guys about 5'7 and 5'9 at the back. Previously, I fitted 2 girls about 5'5 back there with no complaints. Sure, their legs don't have much room to move around for long rides, but I can see it working in a city type situation. Back seats are definitely usable. For your reference, I'm 6'2 and was in my ideal driving position which sits 2 clicks closer than most people my size.