| Poodles |
08-27-2014 03:50 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Darnold
(Post 1917920)
I'd disagree with the cost aspect but I have a J's racing/ASM themed S2K project car right now. Also I'm glad someone else feels my pain of the s2k as an extremely boring daily driver with 0 luxuries. It's an amazing weekend warrior however lacks in the commuter car.
Overall you do not see any issues with snagging a 2013 over a new 2015/2014?
I've negotiated 25.6k on a new '14 BRZ limited however can get a '13 with <10k for 23K asking so I'll go ahead and assume <22K
Winter is coming after all ;)
|
Every year has seen improvements (if only minor). All of the improved parts are bolt on to the old cars though. I haven't seen used BRZ's going for that cheap around here at all, the FRS is depreciating faster though.
Quote:
Originally Posted by mokinbird87
(Post 1917926)
i never owned an S2000 but I would advise you to not to buy the BRZ for it's "features". Navigation sucks, heated seats sucks, it`s loud, etc... If I`m honest, the S2000 is a better driving experience. If I were you, I would keep the S2000 to do your fun stuff with, and get an another nice comfy car. I can only afford one car that is kind of a middle ground of everything, but if I already had an S2000, it`s a no brainer for me.
|
Nav is nice to have so you don't drain your phone battery or if the screen is too bright, or you don't have a mount, etc. Heated seats I can't really comment on as I haven't had mine into the winter yet, but my gf did turn mine on to mess with me and it got very warm (I had to watch Top Gear with her...). I wouldn't call the car loud at all unless you're used to a new Camry or something as it's much quieter than a convertible...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Darnold
(Post 1917932)
Mokinbird, the problem is one S2K is built beyond my personal driving ability. As well the AP1 has 130k miles on it at this point and is reaching it's endings, anything I do replace the AP1 with will need to be a RWD sports car as well and I'd honestly prefer a new car. That leaves me with only a few options and all of the alternatives besides the BRZ are blagh.
Genesis feels sloppy in comparison
Mustang GT is all power no finesse
Miata is less power + better handling but I'd like to avoid another soft top. And this puts me in the same dilemma I'm in now
The navigation doesn't bother me 100% as much because I know with cars like this selling the navigation to FRS owners who didn't pick one up won't be all that bad (so I'd imagine).
I'm one of those twisted individuals that took a RWD sports car out in the middle of New Hampshire's worst snow storms... And loved it
|
Definitely don't agree on the Miata being the better handling car. Stock for stock the Miata rolls through corners and needs a ton of work to get to the level the twins are out of the box in handling and ride quality. Tires would be the only place the Miata might win stock for stock, but all bets are off once you put good tires on the twins (plus the ability to fit some serious rubber under these cars)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Darnold
(Post 1917965)
I HATE HATE HATE the wrx/sti platform... (I know I'm weird). Also I've driven a evo X and it simply has too much road presence to be considered a driver's car, albeit an unbelievable performer.
|
Even the new one? Heard a lot of good things, but ultimately chose the BRZ because of the superior gas mileage and it's much sexier looking. I wouldn't touch a Mitsu as their dealer network, parts, and service are terrible.
Quote:
Originally Posted by pantdino
(Post 1918197)
This is the smart way to buy a car. Period.
|
Not when it comes to performance cars, especially inexpensive ones. Could have been beat on by some kid since day one. Unless you're the original owner, you'll never know how the car was treated and maintained before you.
Quote:
Originally Posted by _______
(Post 1918582)
I've logged a good amount of miles in the S2000 and it's by far the more exciting car and superior in performance. But a twin definitely is the more versatile car in that it mixes in everyday practicality (sans rear seat comfort) and fun into one package. And thats something that it beats over the S2000. I love the S2000, I almost bought one but I could definitely not live with it as a daily. Its a superior car over the twin in performance and fun but when you can have fun and have the comfort that the twin offers it the way to go if thats what your looking for. If you have another car that can handle the everyday aspects and that you are satisfied with it i'd say don't trade the S2000.
|
There's some good threads comparing the twins to the S2000. Namely this one: http://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=18696
The aero on the BRZ is superior to the S2000, but the S2000 has the better engine (nothing a little boost won't fix)
|