![]() |
Very excited and looking forward to B8 shock dynos. I am really curious to what the ideal/max spring rate is they can handle (via GC sleeves with custom rates) for autox/track (I don't mind giving up a bit of DD comfort).
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
DougW |
Wow... That is all. It a shame the system will not be legal in some racing classes.. :(
|
Quote:
DougW |
Quote:
|
Want to see the MonoFlex and T2 dynos
|
I posted the T2 dynos in the tag team thread...on my phone now or I'd copy pasta.
- Andy |
Mmmm pasta :9
|
Quote:
I haven't seen anyone do the standard KW V3 shock dynos yet, but would be very interested to see how it compares to the KW CS and where the overlap lies. |
Yes and that's what we were going for with our T2s. A large range of adjustment with a lot of room on the top end for serious track cars. :)
- Andy |
Milliken's has a full chapter on where these "ideal" values come from. Keep in mind though it's all anaylitical and not necessarily truly ideal. There also isn't really a hard cut off where you want to be ~65% critical or 25% critical either.
~65% provides the best body control over smooth surfaces. ~25% provides the best tire control over bumpy surfaces. Luckily, the frequency where these two different conditions exist is decently far apart. Those Penske's are crazy in what kind of response they can get, but I think that valving is more designed for jumping corner curbs than anything else? |
Quote:
Andy this helps w/re to the GC thread. And another vote for a damper sticky thread :D |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:24 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.