Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB

Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/index.php)
-   Forced Induction (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=78)
-   -   Forced Induction Buyer's Guide | $5,000 +/- (otd) | Daily Driver Spec (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=56783)

CxG 05-15-2016 06:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coheed (Post 2652499)
There are only 3-4 kits that are favorable to me from the budget and engineering point. As each kit has been released, I've looked for engineering weak points and potential problem areas. If you want this kit to be reliable for years to come, this is something worth considering and factoring into the cost of the system.

HKS V3 kit looks great. It doesn't require a specialized belt, and the pipe routing seems slightly more ideal than the JR kit. Aesthetically, the intercooler layout isn't quite conventional, and this asymmetrical style may turn off some. Though some reliability issues have cropped up with the blower assembly, I would hope these are a small percentage of total units sold.

Cosworth SC is great. It should be super reliable, but their kits are sold in stages that don't seem to be cost-conscious. Engineering is top notch, though I don't like the rearward relocation of the TB.

My favorite kit is the Edelbrock kit. Though weight is the biggest drawback imho. This unit is big and heavy. But the setup seems to have the best engineering, doesn't need expensive traction fluid, has little maintenance, provides higher power gains than the Cosworth and Sprintex (from what little I've seen), and should be easily 100k miles reliable. You can retain the factory exhaust manifold for emissions purposes, but make even more power should you decide on aftermarket parts.

Overall, the Edelbrock kit seems to realistically be within most people's budgets, while giving solid gains and low maintenance. Turbo kits will make more power, but as people push these cars more and more, those transmissions will start showing their weaknesses, and that's something to factor into consideration as well. Just my .02.

How can mention the edelbrock but not the harrop?


Sent from my D5803 using Tapatalk

Coheed 05-15-2016 09:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CxG (Post 2653281)
How can mention the edelbrock but not the harrop?


Sent from my D5803 using Tapatalk

Has it been released? I haven't seen any kits or threads here about it. Just a sneak peak.

CxG 05-16-2016 02:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coheed (Post 2653397)
Has it been released? I haven't seen any kits or threads here about it. Just a sneak peak.

Yup it has. For sale on moto east. Don't personally know anyone that has it though.

Sent from my D5803 using Tapatalk

camelflage 07-22-2016 11:34 PM

I installed the innovate/sprintex kit recently. $4500 out the door for kit, labor, and dyno tune. 210 non-intercooled. made 200 hp to the wheels with the 80mm pulley it comes with now. I daily mine and love it.

Wise 01-29-2017 10:23 PM

Noob turbo question.

I've noticed quite a few people who are running 300whp turbo kits, with no engine work done.

Previously I'd been looking at supercharger kits where I've heard that anything over 260whp is risking the engine internals.

Are turbo kits different because the setup reaches peak efficiency later in the rpm range, or are the people I'm seeing with turbo kits generally throwing caution to the wind?

CxG 01-30-2017 07:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wise (Post 2841782)
Noob turbo question.

I've noticed quite a few people who are running 300whp turbo kits, with no engine work done.

Previously I'd been looking at supercharger kits where I've heard that anything over 260whp is risking the engine internals.

Are turbo kits different because the setup reaches peak efficiency later in the rpm range, or are the people I'm seeing with turbo kits generally throwing caution to the wind?

1) Dynos read differently
2) SC have parasitic loss and make less power with the same amount of "boost"
3) a centrifugal SC will reach peak efficiency late so that's not necessarily the case
4) it all comes down to fuel and and tuning. 300whp on 91 is completely different than 300whp on E85
5) boosting a non turbo car without engine work is always a risk.

86 South Africa 08-06-2017 11:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CxG (Post 2841886)
1) Dynos read differently
2) SC have parasitic loss and make less power with the same amount of "boost"
3) a centrifugal SC will reach peak efficiency late so that's not necessarily the case
4) it all comes down to fuel and and tuning. 300whp on 91 is completely different than 300whp on E85
5) boosting a non turbo car without engine work is always a risk.


Agree with all these points but would also add that it's likely a turbo is riskier because they can "add boost" low down and fairly sharply.

IMO the 1 really great thing with any SC is the relatively simple installation and setup vs turbo options too.

Ryan GT86 07-10-2018 05:36 AM

So for turbos that aren't CARB compliant. How do you guys get around emissions testing?

teetsdownlow 07-10-2018 07:38 AM

Pay someone to oversee it or sell the car before 5 years. I suppose if you have a friend/family at a prior residence you could keep it registered in a non emission regulated state


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:59 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.


Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.