![]() |
Quote:
Quote:
|
It's all good. :happy0180: It will (hopefully) be a much better car. It's good news for the FWD pocket rocket fanatics out there. Currently the CR-Z falls short of what it was supposed to be imo.
Also found this article just now. "Honda CR-Z Convertible in the Works?" http://www.thetorquereport.com/2010/...le_in_the.html |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
No bueno on the targa! That failed with the Del Sol! :thumbdown: Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
My only concern with the convertible is the added weight that will come with it. I mean, the CR-Z is already kinda heavy for what it is, and the added weight to make the body more rigid won't be a good thing towards performance.
Anyways, (not directly related to the topic) I just stumbled on to this photoshopped CR-Z and wanted to share. Click the image for source. I kinda like the Scirocco-ish widened rear end. http://i53.tinypic.com/21eapi0.jpg |
That does look sweet but pointless on the staggered wheels!?!
Look at the camber on that black hatch tho!! :eyebulge: |
I do agree the turbo is a much better idea than the hybrid. There's nothing wrong with the Lea engine, it was the powertrain that was the problem. As it is a FWD Honda, I'd never buy it either way. But hopefully it works out better for Honda.
|
Honda NSX or bust...
|
NSX :bow:
|
http://www.autoblog.com/2010/12/13/v...ave/#continued
this is what the CR-Z should have been...Id even be trmepted into buying it if it was a factory option. K20 CR-Z |
NSX FTW, this should have been the new NSX, come on Honda this would have sold like hot cakeshttp://i819.photobucket.com/albums/z...s/IMG_5972.jpg
|
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:46 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.