Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB

Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/index.php)
-   Engine, Exhaust, Transmission (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=8)
-   -   Modifying the exhaust from an expert (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=39996)

HotLeopardMama 06-25-2013 01:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by qoncept (Post 1024119)
Basically either you're going to be happy with the power with very minor gains or you need to spend a lot of money either on FI or a build, like any other NA car.

I like the lil bump in power, but especially love its look, sound, and feel. :wub:

mad_sb 06-25-2013 01:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jpit (Post 1023828)
For those who have not had a chance to read this, you should take a look. Mike Kojima is one of the top modifiers in the US and he relates some of the problems in installing new exhaust parts on this engine. Seems that the ecu is the root of most of the problems.

http://www.motoiq.com/magazine_artic...strations.aspx

Mr Kojima has a lot to learn about 32 bit subaru ecu's. It's no mystery. It's fuel trims and learned knock correction. Simple as that. If he bothered to buy and Ecutek cable from JV and actually use it to datalog while they were doing all the parts swapping and dynoing, he would have very clearly seen what was going on.

Just sayin, dude ain't all that.

ML 06-25-2013 02:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jamesm (Post 1024068)
i disagree. a tune is good for 10-15whp. this thing needs more than 10-15whp to keep up with minivans, much less be 'fast' by any reasonable standard.

i can never figure out why people throw thousands of dollars at exhausts and tunes and intakes just chasing a few hp from an already fairly well optimized engine. by the time you have full exhaust, a tune, an intake and some pretty wheels you could have gone FI and actually be working with something substantial.

it's baffling to me, but it's not unique to the 86. miata guys will throw thousands into built 2.0 strokers to make less power than the most basic bolt on FM kit. just doesn't make much sense i guess.

but hey, the wheels are pretty :bonk:


Because I can afford to build my own turbo kit, but its the stuff you need to go with it that is the problem. (brakes, wider tires, injectors, gauges, tuning software, new clutch, etc.)

suaveflooder 06-25-2013 02:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Trashed675 (Post 1024037)
Just give it time boys. I remember when the GTR first came out, it was supposed to be "untuneable" and the ecu was supposed to be totally locked down. 3x the horsepower later, i think the tuners have cracked it.

Given the twins have only been available for about a year now, I'm sure things will get better.

Exactly my thoughts. I'm not planning on modding my car too much, but if I do it, will be in a couple years when the tuning is perfected. I have no doubt, it'll get better with time and experience.

l0aded 06-25-2013 02:36 PM

Sad time to live with California gas.. sigh. I'm assuming octane boosters don't really help either.

wootwoot 06-25-2013 03:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jamesm (Post 1024068)
i disagree. a tune is good for 10-15whp. this thing needs more than 10-15whp to keep up with minivans, much less be 'fast' by any reasonable standard.

i can never figure out why people throw thousands of dollars at exhausts and tunes and intakes just chasing a few hp from an already fairly well optimized engine. by the time you have full exhaust, a tune, an intake and some pretty wheels you could have gone FI and actually be working with something substantial.

it's baffling to me, but it's not unique to the 86. miata guys will throw thousands into built 2.0 strokers to make less power than the most basic bolt on FM kit. just doesn't make much sense i guess.

but hey, the wheels are pretty :bonk:

Reliability. We have no idea how the engine will hold up to boost. I would rather have less power and increased longevity and reliability than more power at the expense of either.

jamesm 06-25-2013 04:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wootwoot (Post 1024671)
Reliability. We have no idea how the engine will hold up to boost. I would rather have less power and increased longevity and reliability than more power at the expense of either.

yeah i see where some can feel that way. to me a blown engine is just an excuse to build a monster. if the car is broken, it's easier to justify fixing it to the wife :party0030:

sw20kosh 06-25-2013 04:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by l0aded (Post 1024514)
Sad time to live with California gas.. sigh. I'm assuming octane boosters don't really help either.

Torco Fuel Accelerator fuel additive works very well. It uses MMT as a detonation suppressant. My tuner said one bottle of Torco in a tank was able to produce the same power as running straight 104 octane gas on his dyno.

HotLeopardMama 06-25-2013 05:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wootwoot (Post 1024671)
Reliability. We have no idea how the engine will hold up to boost. I would rather have less power and increased longevity and reliability than more power at the expense of either.

^^THIS. That's the other reason why I'm okay with just the simple things like intake and exhaust. I'll eventually want a tune, too, but wheels and tires first. I don't know if I'll ever want to do FI, but maybe after a few years and 100,000+ miles proven, that $5000-ish price tag will be worth it.

But, I'll prolly have kids by then and $5k on my car as opposed to something on the kids isn't gonna be the most prudent expenditure. :(

Dynotronics1 06-25-2013 06:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mad_sb (Post 1024312)
Mr Kojima has a lot to learn about 32 bit subaru ecu's. It's no mystery. It's fuel trims and learned knock correction. Simple as that. If he bothered to buy and Ecutek cable from JV and actually use it to datalog while they were doing all the parts swapping and dynoing, he would have very clearly seen what was going on.

Just sayin, dude ain't all that.

DING DING DING!!! correct answer!

jpit 06-25-2013 06:33 PM

Don't you think John did that when he was there tuning it?

Dynotronics1 06-25-2013 06:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jpit (Post 1025256)
Don't you think John did that when he was there tuning it?

If JV spent several weeks doing the logging and adjustments, then yes. But I did not get that from this story.

FAER 06-25-2013 09:45 PM

I'd like to add that i don't think this car was designed "to be fast" in the street racer sense of the word.... more so "Fast" like the ae86 was...

Captain Insano 06-25-2013 11:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sw20kosh (Post 1024800)
Torco Fuel Accelerator fuel additive works very well. It uses MMT as a detonation suppressant. My tuner said one bottle of Torco in a tank was able to produce the same power as running straight 104 octane gas on his dyno.

Yep definitely it helps. Haven't seen it mentioned on this forum too much yet though. Surprised people without access to e85 aren't using it more.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:15 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.


Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.