Originally Posted by charged86 (Post 976463)

Because Jon@visconti knows his tuning. I said believe I don't have raw data of my own vehicle yet

Originally Posted by s2d4 (Post 978938)

Originally Posted by ft_sjo (Post 979947)

There's nothing wrong with the seals. The issue is with the calibration which has since been fixed. No aftermarket tuner is going to know more than the OEM or have the same testing capabilities.

Originally Posted by 2forme (Post 979957)

Once the seal is blown, it's blown. No amount of tuning will fix a seal that broke.

In all honesty, this should have never been an issue. Are they saying that Subaru never tested high temp combustion environments when designing this motor?

Originally Posted by ft_sjo (Post 980580)

You fix it by increasing the remit of the transient spark control tables from 5200rpm to something higher and populate the aforementioned table with appropriate data.

The actual changes from Subaru have been posted else where on this forum. You don't need no vendors to repeat what's already out there.

Originally Posted by charged86 (Post 979932)

I that suppose to be a burn. I don't have a turbo. Jv worked directly with vortech for the file I have

Originally Posted by Dezoris (Post 980584)

And how exactly do the masses get this done?

Originally Posted by ft_sjo (Post 980144)

Engine dyno testing would have been unlikely to exhibit this behaviour due to it's high-speed transient nature. It's unfortunate that the road testing before release didn't seem to highlight it either. It is what it is.

This is not about 'high temp combustion environments'. It's about transient detonation. A problem you want to solve (via a new calibration), not try and cover up with an aftermarket 'fix'.

Originally Posted by charged86 (Post 976281)

The frs/brz/gt86 needs your help!!!. we need and adequate fuel solution to the following: (anyone please help me add or delete these requests)

1. Direct injector O-ring solution.
(higher temp rated Teflon or billet aluminum or ceramic


2. Fuel return system (we need one)
@Visconti @Don@Accelerated


3. Fuel canister rubber ring (whole canister revision?)
(oem Subaru part # 42025CA000. beginning to believe this should
replaced and included in aftermarket pump sales)
*also we need a better diy*

4. root cause of the reason for failure. ECU tuning, fuel type, etc

Since all of us forced induction guy have no warranty left and these issues are a major part of any FI system we need to have something fool proof and reliable. Please help. GOD Speed. :w00t:


@Visconti @Don@Accelerated

@FT-86 speedfactory FT-86 SpeedFactory

@FullBlown

@Jesse@JDLAuotdesign JDLAutoDesign

@AVOturboworld

@Abel_PTUNING

@FA20Club.com

@Brian@Vortech

@Evasive Motorsports

@Titanmotorsports

@PERRIN_Jeff

@RallySport Direct

@MAPerfomance MAPerformance


found this on direct injection o rings
http://www.pspglobal.com/oscillating.html


found this on mk6 Volkswagen forums
http://www.golfmk6.com/forums/showthread.php?t=37349

Originally Posted by killerkid08 (Post 984509)

just to speak toward number 3:

why do we need this ? proper installation won't damage it. It's not thin rubber, you just have to be careful with it.

Originally Posted by charged86 (Post 984633)

i was wondering about a whole revision of the fuel canister