Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB

Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/index.php)
-   BRZ First-Gen (2012+) — General Topics (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=23)
-   -   STi owner (now BRZ) jumping in late (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=36175)

Bristecom 05-11-2013 09:59 PM

That model/style/color STI is my favorite! But I liked the way the Evo VIII/IX felt inside and drove better (other than the engine maybe).

wheelhaus 05-11-2013 10:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Whitigir (Post 926878)
How exactly does a 130 torque at 3300 RPM make it more enjoyable for you vs a car which make 250 at 1500 ? I still don't get it

It's difficult to describe if you just "don't get it", because that means you probably never will, and that is unfortunate. The replies above have pretty much hit it. The 86 is a lightweight driver's car, which means it's designed for someone who enjoys the act of performance driving and the connection with the machine. The subtle differences in characteristics of the steering feel, how it transitions it's weight, the seating position, pedal position, chassis balance, shifter feel, etc. all add up to make a car that is so much fun to drive as-is that it doesn't NEED 300+hp to be exciting. A HUGE part of driving excitement is pushing a machine to it's limits, and the 86 has accessible limits without being extremely dangerous, so you can have more fun with it more often. It would certainly still be exciting with 300+hp, but it just wouldn't be the same; it wouldn't have the same spirit.
Quote:

Originally Posted by Brzetto (Post 927807)
I wouldn't call that boring, I would have got the same color but then again I have this thing for blue.

I was in the same boat and nearly ordered a BRZ in World Rally Blue, especially because the last two STi's I had were that color, it's sentimental and I liked sporting the WRC colors. However, the BRZ in Dark Grey just struck me, and I decidedly wanted something a bit more understated.

Brzetto 05-11-2013 10:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wheelhaus (Post 927871)
It's difficult to describe if you just "don't get it", because that means you probably never will, and that is unfortunate. The replies above have pretty much hit it. The 86 is a lightweight driver's car, which means it's designed for someone who enjoys the act of performance driving and the connection with the machine. The subtle differences in characteristics of the steering feel, how it transitions it's weight, the seating position, pedal position, chassis balance, shifter feel, etc. all add up to make a car that is so much fun to drive as-is that it doesn't NEED 300+hp to be exciting. A HUGE part of driving excitement is pushing a machine to it's limits, and the 86 has accessible limits without being extremely dangerous, so you can have more fun with it more often. It would certainly still be exciting with 300+hp, but it just wouldn't be the same; it wouldn't have the same spirit.

I was in the same boat and nearly ordered a BRZ in World Rally Blue, especially because the last two STi's I had were that color, it's sentimental and I liked sporting the WRC colors. However, the BRZ in Dark Grey just struck me, and I decidedly wanted something a bit more understated.

Fair enough :thumbup: My BRZ is my first Subaru, naturally I had to jump in with what I feel is the best color for the car.

zc06_kisstherain 05-13-2013 12:25 AM

congrat on BRZ and wow 2 toy cars! i wish i can do that

mav1178 05-13-2013 02:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Whitigir (Post 926878)
How exactly does a 130 torque at 3300 RPM make it more enjoyable for you vs a car which make 250 at 1500 ? I still don't get it

Gearing.

-alex

LeeMaster 05-13-2013 03:28 AM

Congratulations on the purchase, I've always wanted an 06 STi.

WolfpackS2k 05-13-2013 11:17 AM

Some of you guys are being ridiculous. The BRZ is not fast. Just admit it. The car's glaring pitfall and main source of criticism is it's engine. And you cannot deny that it would be more enjoyable to drive with an extra 50-75 hp (hell, probably 30 could do it). Adding that horsepower will do nothing to diminish the driving enjoyment you already have.

The BRZ/s handling prowess already allows it to take twisty turns are more than double the speed limit. I know all the cloverleaf exit/entrance ramps around me can be taken at 65 mph+ and people are probably surprised to see a car being flung onto the interstate already exceeding the posted limit. I'm not sure how that can be called "low limit" fun. And adding more horsepower won't get you through the turn faster. It just might get you there faster, as well as require the use of your brakes a bit more.

There's nothing great about this engine, though I will admit I thought it sounded pretty good the other day at 6000 rpm in 4th gear when I was passing someone on a 2 lane section of Hwy 49 driving to Charlotte.

BTW speaking from personal experience you picked great color :thumbup:

zc06_kisstherain 05-13-2013 11:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WolfpackS2k (Post 930699)
Some of you guys are being ridiculous. The BRZ is not fast. Just admit it. The car's glaring pitfall and main source of criticism is it's engine. And you cannot deny that it would be more enjoyable to drive with an extra 50-75 hp (hell, probably 30 could do it). Adding that horsepower will do nothing to diminish the driving enjoyment you already have.

The BRZ/s handling prowess already allows it to take twisty turns are more than double the speed limit. I know all the cloverleaf exit/entrance ramps around me can be taken at 65 mph+ and people are probably surprised to see a car being flung onto the interstate already exceeding the posted limit. I'm not sure how that can be called "low limit" fun. And adding more horsepower won't get you through the turn faster. It just might get you there faster, as well as require the use of your brakes a bit more.

There's nothing great about this engine, though I will admit I thought it sounded pretty good the other day at 6000 rpm in 4th gear when I was passing someone on a 2 lane section of Hwy 49 driving to Charlotte.

BTW speaking from personal experience you picked great color :thumbup:

Well said. I didnt look for power when i bought this car. But everyone is wishing little more power

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

dsgerbc 05-13-2013 01:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by zc06_kisstherain (Post 930712)
But everyone is wishing little more power

I'm not. It's fine as is. If it had more power, it would need better tires, or people would be crashing it in the rain left and right. It's already very tail-happy in the wet as is. And if it had better tires it would be even less fun on the street.

mav1178 05-13-2013 03:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dsgerbc (Post 931139)
I'm not. It's fine as is. If it had more power, it would need better tires, or people would be crashing it in the rain left and right. It's already very tail-happy in the wet as is. And if it had better tires it would be even less fun on the street.

I drove a stock KA S13 for a long, long time. With the proper gearing and a few more HP, it was underpowered but super fun...

The BRZ/FRS is about 30+more RWHP, and about the same weight.

Anyone complaining about power needs to just buy another car.

-alex

WolfpackS2k 05-13-2013 03:37 PM

Quote:

If it had more power, it would need better tires, or people would be crashing it in the rain left and right.
That's just a ridiculous thing to say. First, it has traction control. Second, even with more power the tire size is just fine. We're talking about a 2700 lb car here, with less than half the weight on the rear tires. It's not like those 215 section width tires are overtaxed.

The Mercedes Benz C63 AMG has 451-481hp (depending on options) and it's rear tires are only 30 mm wider than the FRS/BRZ/s. You don't hear about them "crashing in the rain" all the time. I only mention this car because when "under tired" comes to mind this is the car that always pops into my head.

dsgerbc 05-13-2013 04:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WolfpackS2k (Post 931473)
That's just a ridiculous thing to say. First, it has traction control. Second, even with more power the tire size is just fine. We're talking about a 2700 lb car here, with less than half the weight on the rear tires. It's not like those 215 section width tires are overtaxed.

The Mercedes Benz C63 AMG has 451-481hp (depending on options) and it's rear tires are only 30 mm wider than the FRS/BRZ/s. You don't hear about them "crashing in the rain" all the time. I only mention this car because when "under tired" comes to mind this is the car that always pops into my head.

And how often crazy kids are buying AMG mercs and installing some automatic VSC/TC defeat relays?

In general the longer the wheel base the harder it is to spin a car into a pole.

Who said anything about tire size? It's the particular make/model of the tire that is quite slippery in the wet.

OrbitalEllipses 05-13-2013 04:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dsgerbc (Post 931554)
Who said anything about tire size? It's the particular make/model of the tire that is quite slippery in the wet.

Horrible compound. Great for highway mileage though.

WolfpackS2k 05-13-2013 04:15 PM

^^I'm not sure what you're complaining about then? Seems to me it would be quite easy to mount a different tire.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:25 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.


Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.