| Mandy |
04-12-2013 12:51 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by fatoni
(Post 859585)
pretty close. i just dont understand how someone can say that the miata doesnt offer enough for its price and then go spend 25k on the frs.
|
It's just preference. There's plenty of Mustang/Camaro owners calling us buffoons for getting an FR-S/BRZ.
I don't care for a convertible, so there's one strike. It's lighter and less powerful, but still gets excellent fuel economy, the cabin is nice on the NC. I don't really like the fascia, they've looked like they have a smiley face since the NA. Year ago I wanted to buy an NB, and I still consider them the most attractive Miata.
When it came to the 3K difference, I thought it was worth it for a slightly more powerful car, a hard top (sure I could get the hard-top convertable, but that starts at $28k). The back seats, while arguably useless, have already been used a handful of times for me. The trunk space is gigantic in comparison, no 'girl car' stigma, and a first-year car, unlike the Miata which is one of the best selling sports cars of all time, meaning they're infinitely more common, for now.
It was a contender when I was looking for a new car, but I just felt the FR-S/BRZ had much more to offer at the same price point. The Gen Coupe was another one I was looking at, but it was just too hideous on the outside to stomach.
Not saying the Miata is a 'bad' car, or that it "doesn't offer enough for its price", but I thought the FR-S was a better all-around value. If the Miata was in the 18-20k range, I would have given it more consideration; it was one of the few cars where I felt like the Cabin was designed specifically for me (FR-S gave me these feels too).
|