Hmm that sucks. I was hoping it was at the end of the circuit :)

Under certain conditions the gauge bounces a bit so I was hoping that location wouldn't be ideal. I'll move it anyways, not going to hurt or take much time to do so. See what it reads just after the cooler. Could bypass the cooler too.

we will be logging pressures at the track this weekend with the stock system then put our overkill solution back on and relog to see how everything changes.

Dave, you are on the safe side

My observations:

I got my DEFI oil press\temp gauge installed recently

using stock fill 0W20

On a warmed engine (90С\190F oil) engine runs 1-0,9 bar \ 13-14 psi oil pressure

On the road the oil pressure seems to follow the tacho pretty fast and pretty straightforward in most cases - 2K rpm for 2bar \ 30psi , 3 for 3bar and so on till the bypass at 6 bar \ 87 psi sharp , no matter how you redline the engine

of course, when it's cold, the oil press could be higher


1 difference is I get steady 6bar under high load, no mater what

I will try these measures again when an oil cooler comes

I wish I had 87psi. A 26psi drop should not occur due to the cooler. Ugh. :(

correction - that's with Motul 300V 0W20

I recall stock fill didn't show that sharp 6bar performance when hot

which oil cooler do you use?

Mocal 19row 235 matrix with -10 AN lines.

On the race car it resulted in a net loss of about 2-3 PSI loss with at least twice the hose length, remote oil filter, 4 90 degree bends and 2 45s.

Current setup in the BRZ is that cooler, a total of ~4 feet of hose, 2 0 degree fittings (basically zero loss), 1 90 and 1 45.

Oh also.. I'm hoping to not take a nap after work tonight and hopefully will do the following testing:

Tonight: Install the gauge sender sandwich plate after the oil cooler sandwich plate, install oil pressure there (and temp, or I may just move temp over to the location the pressure is currently read from). If I don't put the temp in the current spot in the block I'll reinstall the OEM plug there.

Tomorrow night: Move the gauge sender sandwich plate between the spacer and oil cooler sandwich plate if possible (lines are exact length more or less but hopefully they'll move up 3/4"), otherwise, remove oil cooler sandwich plate and drain the cooler or loop the lines.

Possibly Friday/weekend, bypass cooler and test pressure sender in both locations again, although I suspect the tests above (plus original/current config) will show the same data as this test.

Does this car have one of those OEM oil to water cooler things? If so, getting rid of that would help- they have a pretty significant pressure drop.

And IMO you are measuring pressure in the right spot- right before the bearings.

I do not believe we have those.

No, OEM there is no oil cooler.

They do not have an oil to water cooler.

Have you taken measurements without the oil cooler in the loop? My search skills are failing me, but I can't find what pressures this vehicle should be running stock.

I haven't yet. I currently have the temp and pressure gauges in a second sandwich plate above the cooler sandwich plate. I didn't drive the car today but I'll probably drive it tomorrow and get some readings from that location, then I'll move it before the cooler which will show exactly what loss I'm getting from the cooler itself.

I can't wait to see Robi's testing... but here's some more data from this morning.


As noted above I switched both sensor locations and oil weight. Most of this increase is due to the oil weight I'm sure. However, the gauge is actually STABLE now instead of bouncing often in the original location.


It's still "cold" here (~60 degrees) but on the same route today I showed the following oil pressures at approx 75C oil temp (at the sandwich plate after the oil cooler):
3k: 650 kPa (94.3 PSI)
3.5k: 680 kPa (98.6 PSI)
4k: 715 kPa (103.7 PSI)
High RPM to redline: Rock solid at about 750 kPa (108.8 PSI)


That's a massive increase from before. Again I think the pressure increase is a combination of weather (colder temps and thus colder oil) and oil weight. The stability of the reading is, IMO, related to the location of the sensor but Robi will hopefully be able to provide his experiences this weekend.


Looking forward to tracking the car next weekend instead of worrying about oil pressure :)