| 86TOYO2k17 |
08-19-2020 06:08 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by PulsarBeeerz
(Post 3359962)
Sorry but in real world practice with a +2mm over-bored OEM TB or 72mm TB AND port matching IM I saw a 2-3% increase in MAFv usage. If there is a bottle neck the pressure will just be dropped at the next neck down in line. There's an entire flange after the TB which no one every takes into account. I should add I have an extrude honed IM that neckes down to ~70mm before the plenum. Grams TB uses a reducer plate to go from 72mm down to the OEM 66.5/67mm opening. Yeah it obviously wont make a different as the IM port size hasn't changed.
Your example isn't applicable to an engine for many reasons the main one being the lack of a pressure differential before and after the "funnel" and the manner in which air flows in an intake system.
|
Did you tune for the TB? and/or rescale the maf?
What was your before/after MAFv usage? And conditions of testing?
Did you test TB and IM porting separately?
Grams is at least 70mm exit side i had to port match my 67mm TB spacer making it much larger to match up, but yeah without porting the entire manifold at least to the plenum you’ll always have that bottleneck which most people don’t do yet claim a “butt dyno” difference. And you’d probably need an equally sized intake pipe going to the TB, and a filter with enough flow to match.
Edit: my TB was not grams. It was blox 70mm, 70mm straight through even on exit side.
|