follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Delicious Tuning
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > 1st Gens: Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 / Subaru BRZ > BRZ First-Gen (2012+) -- General Topics

BRZ First-Gen (2012+) -- General Topics All discussions about the first-gen Subaru BRZ coupe


User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-06-2012, 11:51 PM   #1
ashtray
As Seen On The Internet
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Drives: 2003 WRX, 2013 BRZ, 442
Location: SoCal
Posts: 852
Thanks: 23
Thanked 251 Times in 159 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
93 Octane?

In the marketing materials, it says fuel requirement is 93 octane. Does this mean it will make less hp on 91 octane?
ashtray is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2012, 11:54 PM   #2
ayau
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Drives: Some rust bucket
Location: Polar ice cap
Posts: 3,058
Thanks: 312
Thanked 1,045 Times in 556 Posts
Mentioned: 37 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ashtray View Post
In the marketing materials, it says fuel requirement is 93 octane. Does this mean it will make less hp on 91 octane?
91 would be the lowest i'd go. i believe 91 is the lowest 'premium' in the US.

you could fill it with 87 and the car would still drive. you just risk the engine detonating.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Engine_knocking
ayau is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2012, 11:56 PM   #3
ashtray
As Seen On The Internet
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Drives: 2003 WRX, 2013 BRZ, 442
Location: SoCal
Posts: 852
Thanks: 23
Thanked 251 Times in 159 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Yeah, California only gets 91 octane as the highest available at the pumps. Sucks.
ashtray is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2012, 12:03 AM   #4
devinclfalcons
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Drives: Evo X MR
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 183
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ayau View Post
91 would be the lowest i'd go. i believe 91 is the lowest 'premium' in the US.

you could fill it with 87 and the car would still drive. you just risk the engine detonating.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Engine_knocking
What about 89 octane?
devinclfalcons is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2012, 12:12 AM   #5
ayau
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Drives: Some rust bucket
Location: Polar ice cap
Posts: 3,058
Thanks: 312
Thanked 1,045 Times in 556 Posts
Mentioned: 37 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by devinclfalcons View Post
What about 89 octane?
use what the manufacturer recommends, which is 91 or above.

i don't know what the long term effects are if you use anything below, but the engine was tuned with a specific octane rating.
ayau is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2012, 12:15 AM   #6
Dave-ROR
Site Moderator
 
Dave-ROR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Drives: Stuff
Location: Florida
Posts: 10,317
Thanks: 955
Thanked 5,965 Times in 2,689 Posts
Mentioned: 262 Post(s)
Tagged: 8 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ashtray View Post
In the marketing materials, it says fuel requirement is 93 octane. Does this mean it will make less hp on 91 octane?
They are all california spec, so 91 is the actual requirement. The marketing materials also say it has a 15" rear rotor.. it doesn't.. unless you live in Japan and use their weird method of measuring rotors..
__________________
-Dave
Track cars: 2013 Scion FRS, 1998 Acura Integra Type-R, 1993 Honda Civic Hatchback
DD: 2005 Acura TSX
Tow: 2022 F-450
Toys: 2001 Chevrolet Corvette Z06, 1993 Toyota MR2 Turbo, 1994 Toyota MR2 Turbo, 1991 Mitsubishi Galant VR-4
Parts: 2015 Subaru BRZ Limited, 2005 Acura TSX
Projects: 2013 Subaru BRZ Limited track car build
FS: 2004 GMC Sierra 2500 LT CCSB 8.1/Allison with 99k miles
Dave-ROR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2012, 12:17 AM   #7
M-17
Ninja Cat Mod
 
M-17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Drives: BRZ
Location: MASSACHUSETTS
Posts: 5,529
Thanks: 11,956
Thanked 6,254 Times in 2,673 Posts
Mentioned: 149 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave-ROR View Post
They are all california spec, so 91 is the actual requirement. The marketing materials also say it has a 15" rear rotor.. it doesn't.. unless you live in Japan and use their weird method of measuring rotors..
Curious... what weird method of measuring of rotors?
__________________


Education is Important, but Race Cars are more Importanter
M-17 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2012, 12:17 AM   #8
Dave-ROR
Site Moderator
 
Dave-ROR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Drives: Stuff
Location: Florida
Posts: 10,317
Thanks: 955
Thanked 5,965 Times in 2,689 Posts
Mentioned: 262 Post(s)
Tagged: 8 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by M-17 View Post
Curious... what weird method of measuring of rotors?
The smallest wheel size that fits the rotor and caliper assembly = the brake size. So any rotor and caliper that won't fit under a 14" wheel but will fit under a 15" wheel is a 15" rotor..
__________________
-Dave
Track cars: 2013 Scion FRS, 1998 Acura Integra Type-R, 1993 Honda Civic Hatchback
DD: 2005 Acura TSX
Tow: 2022 F-450
Toys: 2001 Chevrolet Corvette Z06, 1993 Toyota MR2 Turbo, 1994 Toyota MR2 Turbo, 1991 Mitsubishi Galant VR-4
Parts: 2015 Subaru BRZ Limited, 2005 Acura TSX
Projects: 2013 Subaru BRZ Limited track car build
FS: 2004 GMC Sierra 2500 LT CCSB 8.1/Allison with 99k miles
Dave-ROR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2012, 12:19 AM   #9
M-17
Ninja Cat Mod
 
M-17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Drives: BRZ
Location: MASSACHUSETTS
Posts: 5,529
Thanks: 11,956
Thanked 6,254 Times in 2,673 Posts
Mentioned: 149 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave-ROR View Post
The smallest wheel size that fits the rotor and caliper assembly = the brake size. So any rotor and caliper that won't fit under a 14" wheel but will fit under a 15" wheel is a 15" rotor..
Weird but interesting, thanks.
__________________


Education is Important, but Race Cars are more Importanter
M-17 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2012, 12:19 AM   #10
tranzformer
Delights in pure handling
 
tranzformer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Drives: Zoom Zoom
Location: KS
Posts: 4,854
Thanks: 0
Thanked 15 Times in 14 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ashtray View Post
In the marketing materials, it says fuel requirement is 93 octane. Does this mean it will make less hp on 91 octane?

Isn't there a difference in octane rating; RON vs. AKI?
tranzformer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2012, 12:20 AM   #11
Dave-ROR
Site Moderator
 
Dave-ROR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Drives: Stuff
Location: Florida
Posts: 10,317
Thanks: 955
Thanked 5,965 Times in 2,689 Posts
Mentioned: 262 Post(s)
Tagged: 8 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by tranzformer View Post
Isn't there a difference in octane rating; RON vs. AKI?
Yes but one would assume any US materials would be AKI
__________________
-Dave
Track cars: 2013 Scion FRS, 1998 Acura Integra Type-R, 1993 Honda Civic Hatchback
DD: 2005 Acura TSX
Tow: 2022 F-450
Toys: 2001 Chevrolet Corvette Z06, 1993 Toyota MR2 Turbo, 1994 Toyota MR2 Turbo, 1991 Mitsubishi Galant VR-4
Parts: 2015 Subaru BRZ Limited, 2005 Acura TSX
Projects: 2013 Subaru BRZ Limited track car build
FS: 2004 GMC Sierra 2500 LT CCSB 8.1/Allison with 99k miles
Dave-ROR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2012, 12:21 AM   #12
tranzformer
Delights in pure handling
 
tranzformer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Drives: Zoom Zoom
Location: KS
Posts: 4,854
Thanks: 0
Thanked 15 Times in 14 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave-ROR View Post
Yes but one would assume any US materials would be AKI
I was thinking if they forgot to convert it over to the US system of AKI and left it in RON measurements. You know, kinda like the rear brake size?
tranzformer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2012, 12:24 AM   #13
Dave-ROR
Site Moderator
 
Dave-ROR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Drives: Stuff
Location: Florida
Posts: 10,317
Thanks: 955
Thanked 5,965 Times in 2,689 Posts
Mentioned: 262 Post(s)
Tagged: 8 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by tranzformer View Post
I was thinking if they forgot to convert it over to the US system of AKI and left it in RON measurements. You know, kinda like the rear brake size?
I'd guess the college intern in the marketing department saw the world "premium fuel required" and converted that to "93 octane required"

91 AKI is 95 RON anyways I think, so the 93 doesn't make sense for that mistake.
__________________
-Dave
Track cars: 2013 Scion FRS, 1998 Acura Integra Type-R, 1993 Honda Civic Hatchback
DD: 2005 Acura TSX
Tow: 2022 F-450
Toys: 2001 Chevrolet Corvette Z06, 1993 Toyota MR2 Turbo, 1994 Toyota MR2 Turbo, 1991 Mitsubishi Galant VR-4
Parts: 2015 Subaru BRZ Limited, 2005 Acura TSX
Projects: 2013 Subaru BRZ Limited track car build
FS: 2004 GMC Sierra 2500 LT CCSB 8.1/Allison with 99k miles
Dave-ROR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2012, 12:35 AM   #14
Nate219BRZ
Senior Member
 
Nate219BRZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Drives: Rip 04 golf gti rip 05 scion TC
Location: NWI
Posts: 230
Thanks: 68
Thanked 65 Times in 25 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
i take it its okay to run racing fuel in these...110 octane?
Nate219BRZ is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:07 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.