follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Speed By Design
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Technical Topics > Engine, Exhaust, Transmission

Engine, Exhaust, Transmission Discuss the FR-S | 86 | BRZ engine, exhaust and drivetrain.


User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-08-2015, 02:46 PM   #15
steve99
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Drives: FT86
Location: Australia
Posts: 7,998
Thanks: 1,035
Thanked 4,987 Times in 2,981 Posts
Mentioned: 598 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by kch View Post
Thanks; I edited my response. Didn't know about the CEL with a catted header. Kinda defeats the purpose, doesn't it?

Edit: looks like a lot of the people getting CELs with a catted header were running the OFT OTS stage 2 tunes, which are designed for catless headers. Wonder if that was the problem...?
Could contribute, but may not be total cause.

ECU compares reading from the two 02 sensors pre/post cat and runs some weird algorithm/test/calculation to see if cat stock working efficiently. Since any aftermarket cat may result in different readings it possible it may cause the cel code. Any additional mods you do may also effect this.

If the guys have OFT or any other tuning device they could easily disable the P0420 code in their tune.
steve99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2015, 03:11 PM   #16
akahenry
Senior Member
 
akahenry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Drives: '18 STi
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 837
Thanks: 1,315
Thanked 201 Times in 155 Posts
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
You can do what I plan on doing. Catless Header with stock everything else (along with a tune--duh!) When time comes to get emissions testing, just swap everything back to stock exhaust parts, along with the tune, and enjoy your car.
Your best bet would be to get a front pipe with a high flow cat and a resonator to pretty much eliminate any type of rasp or unwanted attention. A catless front pipe vs a front pipe with a high flow cat will yield negligible gains, especially in NA Engines (generally speaking). In my honest opinion, if you're going to get a catted header--you're just wasting your money. Why get a catted header that will most likely than not cost more and reduce the amount of gains that you're able to maximize from swapping headers? If it's from a noise stand point, I can understand, but nonetheless I still think it's pretty redundant. Also considering that owners have reported getting CELs' thrown at them while running a catted header makes it even more unappeaing...
akahenry is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to akahenry For This Useful Post:
Chad86 (10-13-2015), steveholt (04-08-2015)
Old 04-08-2015, 06:37 PM   #17
steveholt
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Drives: 2015 BRZ Limited 6MT
Location: Illinois
Posts: 147
Thanks: 31
Thanked 30 Times in 23 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Haven't owners of the ft86speedfactory uel catted header been having good fortune with no cel?
steveholt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2015, 08:15 PM   #18
Turdinator
Seņor Member
 
Turdinator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Drives: 86 GT/'74 TA22 Celica/Kangaroo
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,706
Thanks: 1,104
Thanked 764 Times in 478 Posts
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
@steveholt what are you trying to achieve with a header? If it is power then you really should consider a tune first and then get a catless header. If it is more for sound then get a catted header and a mid pipe with a HF cat. That way you have your best chance at passing emissions.
__________________
1974 TA22 Celica
2013 86 GT
Turdinator is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Turdinator For This Useful Post:
steveholt (04-08-2015)
Old 04-08-2015, 09:45 PM   #19
steveholt
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Drives: 2015 BRZ Limited 6MT
Location: Illinois
Posts: 147
Thanks: 31
Thanked 30 Times in 23 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Turdinator View Post
@steveholt what are you trying to achieve with a header? If it is power then you really should consider a tune first and then get a catless header. If it is more for sound then get a catted header and a mid pipe with a HF cat. That way you have your best chance at passing emissions.
At the moment, it is more for sound than anything, performance gains would definitely be secondary to sound right now.

i really want that wrx sti boxer rumble...

i think i want to upgrade the header last because i want to diy everything, i have a shop that rents out tools and lifts at $15/hr and want to get to know my car from the back to front for the exhaust. I am a bit of a novice with cars but have custom built computers my whole life and also am a bit of an amateur freelance gunsmith. I am a tinkerer and I think I should be able to manage with my car, I feel most confident working from the rear of the exhaust to the front where the headers right now

i am currently only running a berk dual tip muffler delete but plan on changing to the following:
Invidia N1 catback -> berk high flow catted front pipe or invidia catless front pipe or invidia catless resonated front pipe -> stock overpipe -> stock header

based on the replies in this thread, i think the resonated catless front pipe would give me the best sound without the raspiness of a true straight pipe?
steveholt is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to steveholt For This Useful Post:
Turdinator (04-08-2015)
Old 04-08-2015, 10:29 PM   #20
Turdinator
Seņor Member
 
Turdinator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Drives: 86 GT/'74 TA22 Celica/Kangaroo
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,706
Thanks: 1,104
Thanked 764 Times in 478 Posts
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by steveholt View Post
At the moment, it is more for sound than anything, performance gains would definitely be secondary to sound right now.

i really want that wrx sti boxer rumble...

i think i want to upgrade the header last because i want to diy everything, i have a shop that rents out tools and lifts at $15/hr and want to get to know my car from the back to front for the exhaust. I am a bit of a novice with cars but have custom built computers my whole life and also am a bit of an amateur freelance gunsmith. I am a tinkerer and I think I should be able to manage with my car, I feel most confident working from the rear of the exhaust to the front where the headers right now

i am currently only running a berk dual tip muffler delete but plan on changing to the following:
Invidia N1 catback -> berk high flow catted front pipe or invidia catless front pipe or invidia catless resonated front pipe -> stock overpipe -> stock header

based on the replies in this thread, i think the resonated catless front pipe would give me the best sound without the raspiness of a true straight pipe?
If you want the STi rumble stay away from EL headers, UEL will give you the sound you want. Also keep in mind adding a header makes the car seriously louder than stock so if your ultimate goal is to have a header choose a quieter cat back than you would normally choose..

If you are mechanically minded installing your own exhaust will be a piece of cake
__________________
1974 TA22 Celica
2013 86 GT
Turdinator is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Turdinator For This Useful Post:
Chad86 (10-13-2015)
Old 04-08-2015, 10:41 PM   #21
steveholt
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Drives: 2015 BRZ Limited 6MT
Location: Illinois
Posts: 147
Thanks: 31
Thanked 30 Times in 23 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Turdinator View Post
If you want the STi rumble stay away from EL headers, UEL will give you the sound you want. Also keep in mind adding a header makes the car seriously louder than stock so if your ultimate goal is to have a header choose a quieter cat back than you would normally choose..

If you are mechanically minded installing your own exhaust will be a piece of cake
I get a little obsessive about everything having to be perfect with minimal compromise, i anticipate wnating to tear my hair out when the time comes to DIY all this.

i won't be getting a header for a long while, so i want the next best thing to it with the setup i typed up, thoughts?
steveholt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2015, 10:59 PM   #22
Turdinator
Seņor Member
 
Turdinator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Drives: 86 GT/'74 TA22 Celica/Kangaroo
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,706
Thanks: 1,104
Thanked 764 Times in 478 Posts
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by steveholt View Post
I get a little obsessive about everything having to be perfect with minimal compromise, i anticipate wnating to tear my hair out when the time comes to DIY all this.

i won't be getting a header for a long while, so i want the next best thing to it with the setup i typed up, thoughts?
I haven't heard any invidia setups in person so I can't really comment. I personally would go a HF cat in the front pipe as you won't lose much by having it there but it means down the track you can have a catless header if you want.
__________________
1974 TA22 Celica
2013 86 GT
Turdinator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2016, 01:55 PM   #23
CoreVD
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Drives: BRZ
Location: Italy
Posts: 6
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Hello everyone, I renew this topic.
I would like to get your advice on which solution makes the most sense:
a) cattless manifold with front-pipe stock catted
b) catted manifold with front-pipe cattless


The smoke control do not care for me.
I'm interested more performance solution and less unpleasant odor (roadside checks...).I read that the best strength gains are obtained by removing the catalyst collector, ok.
I prefer A because the solution is not very expensive.

But I did this thought (perhaps stupid ):
The two series of catalysts (if I understand correctly) have 400 cells.
The solution a) would then 400 cells (Tomei 4-1 + stock front-pipe).
The solution b) would have 100 cells (HKS GT Spec + HKS duble resonated).

What do you recommend?
CoreVD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2016, 02:14 PM   #24
Icecreamtruk
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Drives: Track preped NA FRS
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 987
Thanks: 1,056
Thanked 680 Times in 405 Posts
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by CoreVD View Post
Hello everyone, I renew this topic.
I would like to get your advice on which solution makes the most sense:
a) cattless manifold with front-pipe stock catted
b) catted manifold with front-pipe cattless


The smoke control do not care for me.
I'm interested more performance solution and less unpleasant odor (roadside checks...).I read that the best strength gains are obtained by removing the catalyst collector, ok.
I prefer A because the solution is not very expensive.

But I did this thought (perhaps stupid ):
The two series of catalysts (if I understand correctly) have 400 cells.
The solution a) would then 400 cells (Tomei 4-1 + stock front-pipe).
The solution b) would have 100 cells (HKS GT Spec + HKS duble resonated).

What do you recommend?
Catless header and catted front-pipe with a hi-flow cat. Both stock header and stock front-pipe hurt the performance of the car greatly.
Icecreamtruk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2016, 02:22 PM   #25
aznatama
Senior Member
 
aznatama's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Drives: 2014 BRZ MT (Sold); 2006 V70R
Location: Fairfax
Posts: 873
Thanks: 10
Thanked 186 Times in 150 Posts
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Hi flow catted header and catless fp may be your best bet. Not much difference between hi flow and catless, and the hotter the gasses, the faster it'll flow through the cat. Also, no cel and no smell.

Sent from my D6503 using Tapatalk
__________________
'14 BRZ LTD MT DGM
aznatama is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2016, 08:26 AM   #26
CoreVD
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Drives: BRZ
Location: Italy
Posts: 6
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by aznatama View Post
Hi flow catted header and catless fp may be your best bet. Not much difference between hi flow and catless, and the hotter the gasses, the faster it'll flow through the cat. Also, no cel and no smell.

Sent from my D6503 using Tapatalk

Hello,
thanks for your answers.


unfortunately a friend that has the solution b) him came the CEL (header catted HKS GT Spec).
But I do not know if it was unpleasant odor. You're sure it does not?


With the solution b), which costs less than half of a), I could tune ekutec.
I would have more powerful and less odor.
My doubt is that I have never seen a chart with the solution b), I think the small diameter of stock front-pipe creates problems.
CoreVD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2016, 10:51 AM   #27
Mr.Impreza
Mr.Fujitsubo
 
Mr.Impreza's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Drives: 2018 STI
Location: Woodbridge
Posts: 1,719
Thanks: 4,055
Thanked 1,552 Times in 784 Posts
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by CoreVD View Post
Hello everyone, I renew this topic.
I would like to get your advice on which solution makes the most sense:
a) cattless manifold with front-pipe stock catted
b) catted manifold with front-pipe cattless


The smoke control do not care for me.
I'm interested more performance solution and less unpleasant odor (roadside checks...).I read that the best strength gains are obtained by removing the catalyst collector, ok.
I prefer A because the solution is not very expensive.

But I did this thought (perhaps stupid ):
The two series of catalysts (if I understand correctly) have 400 cells.
The solution a) would then 400 cells (Tomei 4-1 + stock front-pipe).
The solution b) would have 100 cells (HKS GT Spec + HKS duble resonated).

What do you recommend?
dgsghh
__________________
2018 Subaru WRX STI ~ The Weekend Car ~
2015 Toyota 86 ~ The Sold Car ~ Build Journal
OFT Stage 1 Tune Review


Last edited by Mr.Impreza; 12-05-2016 at 01:23 PM.
Mr.Impreza is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2016, 02:11 PM   #28
aznatama
Senior Member
 
aznatama's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Drives: 2014 BRZ MT (Sold); 2006 V70R
Location: Fairfax
Posts: 873
Thanks: 10
Thanked 186 Times in 150 Posts
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Catted headers cost under 1,000 new, and I just sold my p&l catted and ceramic coated header for about half that. They're not expensive. I had no cel either.

Sent from my D6503 using Tapatalk
__________________
'14 BRZ LTD MT DGM
aznatama is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Frontpipe catless/hfc and emissions, sound level... steveholt Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 20 04-05-2015 12:11 AM
WTB Catless Invidia Frontpipe tinma Canada Classifieds 2 03-03-2015 02:54 PM
WTB: Invidia Catless/Resonatorless Frontpipe Sterz Engine, Exhaust, Bolt-Ons 0 07-16-2014 05:49 PM
FS: Used T1R 70R Single exit cat-back and catless frontpipe FT-86 SpeedFactory Engine, Exhaust, Bolt-Ons 7 07-31-2013 03:49 PM
Catless Frontpipe w/resonated Perrin Catback ShoNUFF Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 3 03-29-2013 02:21 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:27 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.