|
Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing Relating to suspension, chassis, and brakes. Sponsored by 949 Racing. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
06-19-2019, 01:27 PM | #15 | ||||
Join Date: Sep 2012
Drives: Subaru BRZ / Toyota 86 Experts
Location: Santa Fe Springs, CA
Posts: 1,028
Thanks: 359
Thanked 914 Times in 399 Posts
Mentioned: 154 Post(s)
Tagged: 3 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by CounterSpace Garage; 06-19-2019 at 01:44 PM. |
||||
06-19-2019, 03:02 PM | #16 | ||
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: S2000 CR
Location: Orange County
Posts: 14,530
Thanks: 8,920
Thanked 14,176 Times in 6,835 Posts
Mentioned: 966 Post(s)
Tagged: 14 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Quote:
That said, the DTC you're using have a very high initial ramp; I'd have modulation and more importantly, release issues with them on stock and SX2 as well! I get that Hawks are super popular due to their low price via contingency, but there are many, many superior options out there. The Hawks bear little merit beyond being the low price leader. When I come out to RM, I'll bring some pads with me that we can throw on a car for the weekend, so you can experience the difference yourself with zero financial commitment! |
||
06-19-2019, 09:03 PM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: FR-S Turbo
Location: Grand Bend
Posts: 310
Thanks: 337
Thanked 84 Times in 60 Posts
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
|
06-20-2019, 04:04 PM | #18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Drives: 2023 BRZ
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 1,810
Thanks: 1,483
Thanked 1,250 Times in 676 Posts
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
|
Honestly, I love it. I have no complaints. That said, I haven't tried many of the higher-priced alternatives, so there may be something I'm missing. Many of us around here run them and I don't really hear any complaints about it. It is considered a go-to pad for many NASA guys in this region. Keep in mind many NASA guys here get them for free or at a huge discount, so that is also a factor. But like I said, I have used them for years and have zero complaints.
DTC-60s would certainly be a nice step up from the HP+, which in my opinion have no right being driven hard on a road course. I think they often work well for autocross, though. What tires would you use with them?
__________________
Director of Rocky Mountain 86CUP
|
06-21-2019, 12:46 AM | #19 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: FR-S Turbo
Location: Grand Bend
Posts: 310
Thanks: 337
Thanked 84 Times in 60 Posts
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
I have Hankook RS4's for track days and Nankang AR-1's for competition. |
|
06-21-2019, 01:06 PM | #20 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Drives: 2023 BRZ
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 1,810
Thanks: 1,483
Thanked 1,250 Times in 676 Posts
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
|
Yes I am thinking of the old compound. Thank you.
__________________
Director of Rocky Mountain 86CUP
|
06-21-2019, 02:36 PM | #21 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Drives: 2013 WRB BRZ 6MT
Location: Ontario Canada
Posts: 1,020
Thanks: 917
Thanked 604 Times in 387 Posts
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
|
How is daily driving noise on the new HP+ compound? Also, is fade resistance better than the originals? Any comments on durability?
|
07-04-2019, 07:59 AM | #22 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2019
Drives: 2013 BRZ Sport-Tech
Location: Toronto
Posts: 354
Thanks: 184
Thanked 179 Times in 121 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
I'm new to these boards and as such have no reputation behind my statements but if you're only doing a couple of track days a year rather than outright competition then slap some HP+ pads on and go have fun!
Back when I started doing lapping I had a 2003 Golf (same weight, less power and grip than an FT86) and ran HPS pads. With good fluid I never had an issue. When I moved to my E46 BMW I went with the same pads. It was only when I got into time attack and started competing for the lead in my class that I started to overwhelm the HPS's; even in a car 500 lbs heavier than the FT86, with more power (especially more torque). Just before switching cars I switched to DTC-60's with the plans to daily drive on those pads all track season and go back to HPS's for the winter (too lazy to switch every track day and had been told by several people that they had no issues dailying on them). Well the daily portion never came about but I did run them for 1 day on the track and the initial bite was a phenomenal difference to the HPS's. My braking points moved 10-15ft later but I didn't feel like I had the same ability to modulate the brakes. There's most of my experience with brake pads. |
07-04-2019, 03:27 PM | #23 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Drives: 2013 WRB BRZ 6MT
Location: Ontario Canada
Posts: 1,020
Thanks: 917
Thanked 604 Times in 387 Posts
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Quote:
I ran HP+ about 4 years ago (It was my first year performance driving) and the problems weren't acceptable to me. The good parts were the bite and durability. After 4 track days, 10 autocross events and around 5000kms of daily driving, they still had around 70% pad material remaining. That said, the bad parts were show stoppers. In particular, they were way too noisy for street driving. They would be quiet for 2-3 days following a bedding cycle but then go back to sounding like a bus again. The fade resistance wasn't really up to scratch either, I was noticing a bit of pad fade at the end of 20 minute sessions at the end of my first season. For comparison, I've used EBC Yellowstuff before and they have good street manners and fade resistance but they lack bite and I've gone through a set in a single season. I'm considering trying the Bluestuff NDX which I understand have better bite and wear (friend of mine has them on his RX8 and he likes them for dual-duty) but I'm open to considering other products that may also fit my needs. |
||
07-06-2019, 11:39 AM | #24 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: FR-S Turbo
Location: Grand Bend
Posts: 310
Thanks: 337
Thanked 84 Times in 60 Posts
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
As for noise -well- I don't daily this thing very much so I don't know if it they would get better with more miles, but yeah they frequently squeal like race brakes. I actually kinda like that since I know what it is I've also now driven the old HP+ compound on the same setup, on track. It was dead silent on street, but definitely a drop off in braking performance. Significantly less initial bite, less overall braking ability and not as good "feel" or release. The new compound is a huge step forward on track - the fact it's 100% streetable is a massive bonus. Now - the biggest plus of the new HP+ compound? I pulled the first set off after I inspected them and found the driver side front pads were down to 2mm material. What did I find? Zero wear on the rotors. I don't mean minimal - I mean ZERO. Not even the slightest ridge you could feel with your fingernail. That's a huge cost savings if you're running larger rotors than stock. Also interesting was that -even though they ended up at 2mm- I still had no noticeable fade last time I was on track back in October in 5 degree C weather. No doubt that temp played a factor, but still..... Last edited by Turbo; 07-06-2019 at 11:50 AM. |
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Turbo For This Useful Post: | Lynxis (07-07-2019) |
07-08-2019, 12:52 AM | #25 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: FR-S Turbo
Location: Grand Bend
Posts: 310
Thanks: 337
Thanked 84 Times in 60 Posts
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Here's an idea - get some cheapie aftermarket pads for the street from a decent aftermarket company like Wagner - probably $100 total. And HP+ front and rear for the track. In fact - you could even try running HP+ in the rear always and just change the fronts to cheapies for the street. Rears don't do much braking anyways, so maybe they won't squeal much either? Just a thought...... |
|
07-08-2019, 10:04 AM | #26 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Drives: 2014 GT86
Location: Latvia, Riga
Posts: 4,333
Thanks: 696
Thanked 2,085 Times in 1,436 Posts
Mentioned: 53 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
Well, actually exactly because rears don't do much for braking, there is higher chance for them to squeal imho (my thought of line goes - less braking, lower temps, even more chance for bedded layer to be worn from rotors during daily driving light-braking, and not bedded back due said too light braking and too low temps. Though then again rears are also smaller and brake bias should even then out. But then again from real life observed wear rear pads usually last 2-3x times as long as front pads, so even with that bias they probably still brake/heat less. And then there is bit that it's non optimal to use staggered pad setup to not change brake bias for brakes to perform right. Summarizing that all .. i'd probably still change both front & rear pads pre/post trackday).
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Anyone used the Hawk "street race" (DTC30) compound on the rear? | Turbo | Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing | 9 | 10-01-2018 07:36 PM |
Compound boost. | Jaden | Forced Induction | 218 | 09-26-2016 09:36 PM |
New Hawk HP + compound | Hyper4mance2k | Tracking / Autocross / HPDE / Drifting | 24 | 11-11-2014 11:05 AM |
help im really dumb i think!!! compound issue.. | nickmerronesucks | Cosmetic Maintenance (Wash, Wax, Detailing, Body Repairs) | 11 | 05-02-2014 03:53 PM |
new R compound from Maxxis | Matt Andrews | Wheels | Tires | Spacers | Hub -- Sponsored by The Tire Rack | 4 | 06-08-2012 02:27 PM |