follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Speed By Design
Register Garage Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Technical Topics > Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing

Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing Relating to suspension, chassis, and brakes. Sponsored by 949 Racing.


User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-31-2017, 10:54 PM   #1
ApexEight
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Drives: 2014 Subaru BRZ Limited 6MT SSM
Location: Atlanta, GA, USA
Posts: 293
Thanks: 195
Thanked 68 Times in 54 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Long-term adverse effects of Whiteline chassis inserts?

My question pertains to the Whiteline polyurethane transmission mount insert, differential mount inserts, and subframe mount inserts.

I believe these products would increase the life of the stock bushings in their respective locations since they would ensure that the stock units are deflecting less, thus greatly reducing the chance of them tearing. On older cars, torn bushings in these locations can be common and are always a major pain when it comes to replacing them, especially the diff and subframe bushings. With these inserts theoretically increasing the longevity of the stock, rubber bushings, they seem to be a no-brainer for any twin.

What I'm wondering is whether they could introduce problems elsewhere.

Since the stock bushings are no longer absorbing the energy through deflection, the energy has to be transmitted elsewhere, right? Areas off the top of my head that could see increased abuse due to these inserts include the internals of the diff itself, the axles, suspension bushings and ball joints, etc.

Aside from potentially increasing wear on other components, are there any other possible negative effects from running these inserts from a suspension and handling perspective? Like, for a street car, is this too much chassis stiffening, or is it only helping the stock suspension work even better? Since the stock suspension bushings are still there, wouldn't they just absorb more energy and result in greater alignment changes during a corner and thus negatively impacting the handling of the car? I don't know, just thinking out loud here.

Any experience and/or insight regarding this matter is greatly appreciated. They seem to be great mods, but I want to be able to discuss possible negative effects and just gain a better understanding of them overall.
ApexEight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2017, 11:00 PM   #2
Mr.ac
[insert cool phrase here]
 
Mr.ac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Drives: BRZ Premium
Location: Central Coast CA
Posts: 2,369
Thanks: 709
Thanked 1,558 Times in 930 Posts
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
The only 2 problems I seen in my MR2 days with poly bushings is it caused a few motor mounts to wiggle loose. Since the transfer of vibrations was not absorbed by the traditional bushings. Other than that, a bit of locktight should fix it.

The other was daily confort. Many people and even me went back to oem bushings just for the better ride quality. It was fun when your a boy ricer but once you grow out of it. It's not.
__________________
New daily driver - Subaru BRZ Premium
Weekend fun/track car - '91 MR2 Turbo Gen3
Old daily driver - '88 MR2 Supercharged
Mr.ac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2017, 11:01 PM   #3
ApexEight
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Drives: 2014 Subaru BRZ Limited 6MT SSM
Location: Atlanta, GA, USA
Posts: 293
Thanks: 195
Thanked 68 Times in 54 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Just found this highly relevant post by @NRXRaptor:
http://www.ft86club.com/forums/showp...85&postcount=4

Like he says, the diff seems to move the most; those rear carrier bushings move around like crazy. I've ran the Whiteline inserts before. The NVH didn't bother me that much, but I didn't like the clunk I got between shifts unless I was being careful. I've read that if you use just the rear bushing inserts on the diff and not the ones on the front (toward the front of the car), it greatly reduces all these negative effects. Thinking about just doing that.

As for the subframe, it definitely moves around under heavy load. This can't be good... But that car handles well from the factory and the rear end is predictable. I think these are what I'm questioning the most...
ApexEight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2017, 11:03 PM   #4
ApexEight
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Drives: 2014 Subaru BRZ Limited 6MT SSM
Location: Atlanta, GA, USA
Posts: 293
Thanks: 195
Thanked 68 Times in 54 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.ac View Post
The only 2 problems I seen in my MR2 days with poly bushings is it caused a few motor mounts to wiggle loose. Since the transfer of vibrations was not absorbed by the traditional bushings. Other than that, a bit of locktight should fix it.

The other was daily confort. Many people and even me went back to oem bushings just for the better ride quality. It was fun when your a boy ricer but once you grow out of it. It's not.
I know what you mean. I filled my 240SX's motor mounts with window weld back in the day. Iy was cool at the time, but I've definitely grown out of that. To me, it's about balancing comfort with performance now.

What I like about Whiteline's products is that it still retains the factory rubber bushings, just with polyurethane reinforcement, instead of a full poly replacement.
ApexEight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2017, 04:57 AM   #5
mav1178
Senior Member
 
mav1178's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Drives: 2005 Toyota Camry
Location: 91745
Posts: 6,562
Thanks: 493
Thanked 6,093 Times in 3,029 Posts
Mentioned: 95 Post(s)
Tagged: 3 Thread(s)
Honestly, not many people outside of chassis engineers would know.

When you make something solid or resonate at a different natural frequency than stock, you start opening up a can of worms... there's a reason why OEMs test so much and their stuff is so.... "conservative", because they use the easiest part to cover the widest range of use.

-alex
mav1178 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to mav1178 For This Useful Post:
Captain Snooze (09-01-2017), Spuds (09-04-2017), strat61caster (09-01-2017)
Old 09-01-2017, 06:51 AM   #6
churchx
Senior Member
 
churchx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Drives: 2014 GT86
Location: Latvia, Riga
Posts: 4,333
Thanks: 696
Thanked 2,085 Times in 1,436 Posts
Mentioned: 53 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
But some of NVH increases subjectively are minor enough to make it worth doing some of stiffening mods anyway with pros outweighting cons. So imho "it depends" on case per case basis.
Though there is also bit, that some may play reasonably well if used alone, but making overall NVH increase untolerable if used with set of other parts.
churchx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2017, 08:00 AM   #7
Lunatic
Senior Member
 
Lunatic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Drives: 2015 Raven FRS
Location: Indio, CA. Just an Old Fart in a Automatic!.
Posts: 1,614
Thanks: 7
Thanked 1,056 Times in 488 Posts
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
I just installed Whiteline Diff and Sub Frame inserts. Car feels much better, more solid, but way noisier. Can really hear the rear end gears whine now. I could never live with this if this was my only daily driver but as a 2nd car I'll live with the noise.
Lunatic is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Lunatic For This Useful Post:
Spuds (09-04-2017)
Old 09-01-2017, 12:03 PM   #8
PuslarBrrrz
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Drives: 2013 BRZ
Location: Dayton, OH
Posts: 103
Thanks: 37
Thanked 61 Times in 33 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
The front outrigger bushings of the differential made the most noise for myself. So much that I took them out and left the two rear bushings in instead. Even with the trans bushing, rear subframe and rear diff bushings in the NVH is very livable.
PuslarBrrrz is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to PuslarBrrrz For This Useful Post:
ApexEight (09-01-2017), DocWalt (01-31-2022), Spuds (09-04-2017), strat61caster (09-04-2017)
Old 09-01-2017, 12:57 PM   #9
ApexEight
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Drives: 2014 Subaru BRZ Limited 6MT SSM
Location: Atlanta, GA, USA
Posts: 293
Thanks: 195
Thanked 68 Times in 54 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by PuslarBrrrz View Post
The front outrigger bushings of the differential made the most noise for myself. So much that I took them out and left the two rear bushings in instead. Even with the trans bushing, rear subframe and rear diff bushings in the NVH is very livable.
I think this is what I'll ene up doing. Did you feel a noticeable improvement in handling amd overall grip?

Would be good to hear from others who have ran these parts long-term to see if they resulted in other parts wearing faster.
ApexEight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2017, 11:00 AM   #10
PuslarBrrrz
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Drives: 2013 BRZ
Location: Dayton, OH
Posts: 103
Thanks: 37
Thanked 61 Times in 33 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ApexEight View Post
I think this is what I'll ene up doing. Did you feel a noticeable improvement in handling amd overall grip?

Would be good to hear from others who have ran these parts long-term to see if they resulted in other parts wearing faster.

The rear end is noticeably more planted in spirited driving for sure. You wouldn't think there is a slight lag in the OEM bushing settling but you will notice how more instant the weight transfer is.

As for the diff bushings, well its nice to know it isn't bouncing around anymore but you still get wheel hop at times since the OEM engine mounts are still there. However shifting is a slight bit better.
PuslarBrrrz is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to PuslarBrrrz For This Useful Post:
ApexEight (09-04-2017), strat61caster (09-04-2017)
Old 09-04-2017, 04:21 PM   #11
bhmax
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2015
Drives: 13 BRZ, 16 FiST, 05 WRX
Location: AL
Posts: 291
Thanks: 377
Thanked 96 Times in 68 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
I can concur that removing the outrigger bushings, for me just the lower ones while keeping the upper ones, removed a lot of the NVH I got after installing them.
bhmax is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2017, 06:26 PM   #12
ApexEight
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Drives: 2014 Subaru BRZ Limited 6MT SSM
Location: Atlanta, GA, USA
Posts: 293
Thanks: 195
Thanked 68 Times in 54 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by bhmax View Post
I can concur that removing the outrigger bushings, for me just the lower ones while keeping the upper ones, removed a lot of the NVH I got after installing them.
Wait so you're saying to remove the upper inserts on the front diff mounts and leave the plastic kinda ridged ones on the bottom?

This is interesting. Seems like the front bushing upper inserts could be the real source of the NVH.
ApexEight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2017, 10:28 PM   #13
bhmax
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2015
Drives: 13 BRZ, 16 FiST, 05 WRX
Location: AL
Posts: 291
Thanks: 377
Thanked 96 Times in 68 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ApexEight View Post
Wait so you're saying to remove the upper inserts on the front diff mounts and leave the plastic kinda ridged ones on the bottom?

This is interesting. Seems like the front bushing upper inserts could be the real source of the NVH.
I did the opposite of what you just said. I kept the upper and removed the lower. I'd start there and see what that does for you.

Another thing I just thought about though is that for me, having a trans mount insert caused more NVH than I liked, and moving to an STI mount seemed to lessen it.
bhmax is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to bhmax For This Useful Post:
ApexEight (09-04-2017)
Old 09-04-2017, 11:00 PM   #14
Qc86
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Drives: 2017 Toyota 86 M6
Location: Rouyn-Noranda, Quebec, Canada
Posts: 103
Thanks: 21
Thanked 20 Times in 16 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
i have a all the bushing you mentioned on my 2017 86. i have them for 8000km now,i drive the car hard and daily drive it. the noise is not too bad imo its just at high speed that its more noisy, but for how much better the car feels i dont care bout NVH. i dont see any problem with running those bushing.
Qc86 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Qc86 For This Useful Post:
ApexEight (09-06-2017)
 
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Long Term FR-S regal Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum 83 04-01-2016 06:40 AM
long term and short term brichard0625 Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 7 08-26-2013 08:56 AM
Long term Bt216 Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum 3 06-06-2013 11:58 PM
Fuel Trims - Long term and short term victorb Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 6 03-27-2013 02:18 PM
Short Term and Long Term Fuel Trims naikaidriver Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 3 03-18-2013 09:55 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:58 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.