|
Engine, Exhaust, Transmission Discuss the FR-S | 86 | BRZ engine, exhaust and drivetrain. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
06-22-2016, 04:51 PM | #29 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Drives: FR-S
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 2,605
Thanks: 733
Thanked 2,361 Times in 1,031 Posts
Mentioned: 345 Post(s)
Tagged: 3 Thread(s)
|
So here is an idea.... How about you un-screw the MAF at idle. Lift it up while logging and see if the load value changes... If you lift the MAF out of the intake pipe your IAT temp may change which would possibly alter a speed density volumetric efficiency value slightly... but not crazy significantly... However removing the MAF from the intake pipe on a MAF tuned car will make a significant change and the car will struggle quite a bit.
Upping the fuel pressure is going to be a massive waste. There is a very high likeliness that less than 20% of your fueling after 3,200RPM is from the port injectors. So if you are running 13.5AFR and trying to get to 12.5 which is 8% more fueling and you are running 20% fueling from port with 4 bar fuel pressure you are going to need something closer to 7-8 bar of fueling to hit that target. And thats if it is actually 20% fueling... The factory tune in the low end actually uses pure DI until iirc 5000RPM or 1.5 load value. If the motec tune has anything similar to the OEM setup it will be the same. And I'm going to guess that since they were caring more about performance than economy they were not going to use the port injection very much. As you don't have enough engine load to justify a port injection to shorten the direct injection time to improve quality of fuel mixture. You are realistically probably 5-10% port injection after 4,500RPM or so. And since the DI system has its own pressure sensor it can compensate. The DI pump is simply going to stop increasing the fuel pressure once it hits a certain point and nothing will happen. More importantly where is the o2 sensor that you used to determine 13.5:1? If it was in the tail pipe and you had an exhaust leak and a large exhaust tip it is easily acceptable to consider the 13.5:1 being an inaccurate reading. You should place the o2 closer to the engine to verify you have a good reading. Or maybe try reading with the motec unit.
__________________
When I grow up, I wanna be God. My flickr - Canibeat Local magazine scout Old Setup: Vortech Supercharged 360WHP/262WTQ @ 11.5psi My build thread - WTF happened to nelsmar's car thread |
06-22-2016, 05:25 PM | #30 | |
Member
Join Date: May 2016
Drives: Toyota 86
Location: Australia
Posts: 39
Thanks: 8
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
they didnt care so much about performance as opposed to longevity (toyota didnt want any cars blowing up on tv.. bad press) you are right in assuming it was in the tailpipe, I will be doing it from the o2 sensor next session. though i do not think it was far off the mark as many others have tested with similar results. |
|
06-22-2016, 05:36 PM | #31 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Drives: FR-S
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 2,605
Thanks: 733
Thanked 2,361 Times in 1,031 Posts
Mentioned: 345 Post(s)
Tagged: 3 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
As for the PI, it is mostly used to clean the top of the valves and improve longevity of the engine. Although it is used to help under heavy load to give a better burn quality when the DI injection time is too long and doesn't give an even distribution of fuel. So for your case I would start with finding out if it is speed density or if it is a mass air flow based tune. This is simple to test and can be done without breaking any laws in your region since you can do it by simply idling the car and removing the sensor (leave it plugged in at first, and maybe even unplug it while logging to see what happens). My wideband can swing 0.5-1.5 AFR on massive tipped exhausts with low volume of air flowing through. The dyno I used to use would be consistently 0.5-1AFR leaner than actual when using the tail pipe. But that unit was having a slight calibration issue and no one ever cared to fix it. You should have a rear o2 sensor bung on your manifold that you could use for testing the actual AFR. It is however best to test this pre-cat. So it might be worth doing a pull with the primary o2 removed, or simply moved post cat if you still have a cat in the header. I don't know a ton about your scenario and just took a few moments to search around on other posts... Is there a certain baseline you should be expecting? If you were to put the factory computer in and do a pull without any learning the car will likely show more power due to the car running extra lean, or overly advanced due to no learning. It takes a bit of driving for the learning to kick in. Comparing your power to another dyno using the same ecu would not be very rational. You would need another car on that same dyno to get an "idea" of what to expect. But I am going to guess that moving the o2 sensor you may see a good 0.5 AFR richer (though this might not happen) and get you closer to what you should be seeing.
__________________
When I grow up, I wanna be God. My flickr - Canibeat Local magazine scout Old Setup: Vortech Supercharged 360WHP/262WTQ @ 11.5psi My build thread - WTF happened to nelsmar's car thread |
|
The Following User Says Thank You to nelsmar For This Useful Post: | justatroll (06-22-2016) |
06-22-2016, 05:48 PM | #32 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Drives: Full race 4cyl boxer
Location: CO, USA
Posts: 587
Thanks: 310
Thanked 510 Times in 269 Posts
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
The Following User Says Thank You to justatroll For This Useful Post: | nelsmar (06-22-2016) |
06-22-2016, 06:17 PM | #33 | |
Member
Join Date: May 2016
Drives: Toyota 86
Location: Australia
Posts: 39
Thanks: 8
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
I know there wont be much effect on afr by raising the fuel pump pressure due to running di. But i have had mixed reports on it doing nothing at all or something. i will prove it on the dyno next time with a temporary bosch pump and fpr. Will be testing from the o2 sensor hole this time. doing a bunch of other things and back to back testing as well. It's difficult to prove whether one car is making more than the others due to the distance between me and the majority of the other cars, plus I am fairly sure the cars at the front of the field wouldnt be putting their hands up for testing against the slow cars! What i can say is that I am not the only one who feels disadvantaged by lack of power, and there appears to be a BIG difference between the cars at the back of the pack and the front runners. Like someone said to me once, if you dont cheat ur an idiot. If you get caught cheating you're a bigger idiot. I must be an idiot. lol |
|
06-22-2016, 06:30 PM | #34 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Drives: FR-S
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 2,605
Thanks: 733
Thanked 2,361 Times in 1,031 Posts
Mentioned: 345 Post(s)
Tagged: 3 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
I have tuned cars with aftermarket regulators and return lines and there is no difference in the output of the AFR with altered fuel pressure. The only difference i the duty cycle will change slightly on the pump. And it has been tested before in attempt to raise that pressure even higher by phil @ evasive. You can only request the pump to go so high and it wont go any higher... I don't recall what pressure he managed to get it to but he did this by commanding a higher duty cycle... Considering it is in a closed loop function and you cannot modify this (closed loop meaning the ecu reads the current pressure... and when it changes it modifies the rate on its own) you will have poor luck modifying it. I would love for me to be wrong... I can also tell you I have tried commanding 22MPa with the factory ecu and it doesn't go up any more than the standard 20MPa but this could also be related to OEM ecu logic having a maximum pressure allowance of 20MPa. Since I haven't disassembled the rom my self I cannot say for sure but considering how well it lines up the results im going to say its the ecu stopping it.
__________________
When I grow up, I wanna be God. My flickr - Canibeat Local magazine scout Old Setup: Vortech Supercharged 360WHP/262WTQ @ 11.5psi My build thread - WTF happened to nelsmar's car thread |
|
The Following User Says Thank You to nelsmar For This Useful Post: | Crunk81us (06-22-2016) |
06-22-2016, 06:30 PM | #35 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Drives: FR-S
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 2,605
Thanks: 733
Thanked 2,361 Times in 1,031 Posts
Mentioned: 345 Post(s)
Tagged: 3 Thread(s)
|
Hah! I didn't even see your post. Your spot on =P
__________________
When I grow up, I wanna be God. My flickr - Canibeat Local magazine scout Old Setup: Vortech Supercharged 360WHP/262WTQ @ 11.5psi My build thread - WTF happened to nelsmar's car thread |
06-22-2016, 06:50 PM | #36 | |
Member
Join Date: May 2016
Drives: Toyota 86
Location: Australia
Posts: 39
Thanks: 8
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
|
|
06-23-2016, 12:08 AM | #37 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2013
Drives: FT86
Location: Australia
Posts: 7,998
Thanks: 1,035
Thanked 4,987 Times in 2,981 Posts
Mentioned: 598 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
|
If the motec ECU is locked and it is using speed density then to "adjust" you could offset either the IAT sensor (integrated in MAF i believe) or the MAP sensor readings to alter the "tune". This may be as simple as a series or parallel resistor but the adjustment would be fairly crude.
but you will need to research the charastics of the IAT and/or MAP sensors so your offsets work correctly diagrams for illustration only or Last edited by steve99; 06-23-2016 at 12:30 AM. |
06-26-2016, 05:03 AM | #38 | |
Member
Join Date: May 2016
Drives: Toyota 86
Location: Australia
Posts: 39
Thanks: 8
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Crunk81us For This Useful Post: | steve99 (06-26-2016) |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Delicious Tuning Flex Fuel Kit Mark 1+ Fuel Pressure Safety System | DeliciousTuning | Software Tuning | 20 | 06-09-2016 06:21 AM |
Fuel system questions. Boost-A-pump/stock fuel lines for engine swap | Toxicmilk45 | Engine, Exhaust, Transmission | 4 | 12-14-2015 03:52 PM |
High Pressure Fuel Pump Thread | crazyfrenchbiker | Engine, Exhaust, Transmission | 10 | 09-09-2015 01:32 AM |
High Pressure Fuel Pump Difference? Toyota vs. Subaru | 86_ZN6 | Engine, Exhaust, Transmission | 18 | 06-03-2013 06:48 AM |
Dynosty FR-S/BRZ Fuel System Upgrades! Deatschwerks DW65C Fuel Pump | Dustin@Dynosty | Engine, Exhaust, Bolt-Ons | 3 | 08-21-2012 04:53 PM |